UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

Altaba Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

(4)

Date Filed:


LOGO

ALTABA INC. (NASDAQ: AABA)

140 East 45th45th Street, 15th15th Floor

New York, New York 10017

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSMay 17, 2019

To be held on October 24, 2017Dear Altaba Inc. Stockholder:

Notice is hereby givenYou are cordially invited to the holdersattend a special meeting of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Shares”stockholders (the “Special Meeting”), of Altaba Inc. (the “Fund”) that the annual meeting of stockholders of the Fund (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held at 50 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017, on Tuesday, October 24, 2017,Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:0011:30 a.m. (Eastern time). The Annual

At the Special Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal (the “Dissolution Proposal”) to approve the voluntary dissolution and liquidation of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution attached as Appendix A to the accompanying proxy statement (the “Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution”). If the Dissolution Proposal is beingapproved by our stockholders, we expect to:

sell or otherwise dispose of all of the remaining ordinary shares, par value $0.000025 per share, and American Depositary Shares (“Alibaba ADSs”) of Alibaba Group Holding Limited (collectively, “Alibaba Shares”) held by the Fund (other than Alibaba ADSs, if any, to be distributed in kind) and our equity interests in Excalibur IP, LLC, to the extent any such assets have not been sold or disposed of by the Fund before the Special Meeting;

make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution to stockholders (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof), which we currently estimate, based on the assumptions and subject to the qualifications set forth in the proxy statement, will be made in the third or fourth quarter of 2019 and will be in an amount between $52.12 and $59.63 per Share in cash and/or Alibaba Shares, which estimates assume, among other things, an Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, an Alibaba Share value at the time of distribution, of $177.00 per Alibaba Share (the actual closing prices of the Alibaba Shares on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and May 15, 2019);

file a Certificate of Dissolution with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware Secretary of State”), which the Fund currently expects to occur promptly following the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution (although such filing may be delayed by the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) in its sole discretion), at which time we will close our stock transfer books and our common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), will cease to be traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market;

after the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State (such time, the “Effective Time”), limit our operations and activities to those required to wind up our business affairs as required by law;

follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) to obtain an order from the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court”) establishing the amount and form of security for contested known, contingent and potential future claims that are likely to arise or become known within five years of the Effective Time (or such longer period of time as the Court may determine not to exceed ten years after the Effective Time) (the “Court Order”);

as soon as practicable after the issuance of the Court Order, pay or make reasonable provision for the following purposes:Fund’s uncontested known claims and expenses and establish reserves as required by the Court Order;

 

1.

To elect the Director nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement (Tor R. Braham, Eric K. Brandt, Catherine J. Friedman, Richard L. Kauffman, and Thomas J. McInerney) to serve until their respective successors shall have been elected and qualified.

thereafter, to the extent that the Fund’s actual liabilities and expenses are less than the amounts required to be held as security for its outstanding claims and expenses, distribute all of our remaining assets in one or more liquidating distributions on a pro rata basis to or for the benefit of our stockholders, including an initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution that the Fund plans to make as soon as practicable following entry of the Court Order; and

 

2.

To approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Fund and BlackRock Advisors, LLC.

deregister as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which the Fund currently expects to occur following the issuance of the Court Order, and after the Fund has reduced its remaining assets to cash and distributed substantially all of its assets.

3.

To approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Fund and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC.


We currently estimate that, based on the assumptions and subject to the qualifications set forth in the proxy statement, that we could make aggregate liquidating distributions to stockholders, including thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution referred to above, ranging between approximately $39.9 billion and $41.2 billion (approximately $76.76 and $79.35 per Share, respectively). Such estimates assume, among other things, an Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, an Alibaba Share value at the time of distribution, of $177.00 per Alibaba Share (the actual closing prices of the Alibaba Shares on the NYSE ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and May 15, 2019).

4.

To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

Pursuant to Delaware law, our corporate existence will continue for a period of at least three years following the Effective Time for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, winding up the Fund and making distributions to stockholders, but not for the purpose of continuing to engage in any business. The three-year statutory winding-up period can be extended by the Court and is automatically extended for any proceeding commenced but not completed prior to the end of this three-year period. As a result, the winding-up process could extend beyond three years after dissolution, and it is difficult to estimate when it will be completed.

5.

To approve a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan for the Fund’s management and Directors.

The accompanying proxy statement contains important information regarding the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including, among other things, the assumptions and qualifications applicable to our estimates of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, the aggregate liquidating distributions we expect to make and the amounts of our assets we expect to withhold from such liquidating distributions. You are urged to read the accompanying proxy statement, including the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution attached as Appendix A thereto, carefully in its entirety.

6.

To vote upon a proposal submitted by a stockholder, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

7.

To vote upon a proposal submitted by a stockholder, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

8.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof.

After carefully considering the risks, timing, viability and potential impact on our stockholders of the alternatives potentially available to the Fund, the Board unanimously determined that the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (THE “BOARD”) UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACHAPPROVAL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4 AND 5 AND “AGAINST” PROPOSALS 6 AND 7.DISSOLUTION PROPOSAL.

At the Special Meeting, stockholders will also be asked to approve a proposal (the “Adjournment Proposal”) to grant discretionary authority to the Board to adjourn the Special Meeting, even if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.The Board has fixedunanimously recommends that you vote “for” approval of the closeAdjournment Proposal.

Your vote is important, regardless of business on September 6, 2017, as the record date fornumber of Shares you own. We cannot proceed with the determinationliquidation and dissolution of stockholdersthe Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution unless the Dissolution Proposal is approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof.

It is important that your Shares be represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy.thereon.Whether or not you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting, we urge you to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided or vote via telephone or the Internet pursuant to the instructions on the enclosed proxy card or on the Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materialsvoting instruction form for the Altaba Inc. AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders to be Heldheld on October 24, 2017June 27, 2019, so you will be represented at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. If you attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be able to do so, and your vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting will revoke any proxy you may have submitted. Merely attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting, however, will not revoke any previously submitted proxy.

Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Thomas J. McInerney

Chief Executive Officer of the Fund

The attached proxy statement is dated as of May 17, 2019 and is first being sent to stockholders on or about May 17 2019.


LOGO

ALTABA INC. (NASDAQ: AABA)

140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor

New York, New York 10017

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be held on June 27, 2019

Notice is hereby given to the holders of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Altaba Inc. (the “Fund”) that a special meeting of stockholders of the Fund (the “Special Meeting”) will be held at 50 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017, on Thursday, June 27, 2019, at 11:30 a.m. (Eastern time). The Special Meeting is being held for the following purposes:

1.

To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the voluntary liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution attached to the accompanying proxy statement as Appendix A (such plan, the “Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution,” and such proposal, the “Dissolution Proposal”).

2.

To grant discretionary authority to the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) to adjourn the Special Meeting, even if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (such proposal, the “Adjournment Proposal”).

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE DISSOLUTION PROPOSAL AND THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.

The Board has fixed the close of business on May 16, 2019, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting and any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof.

Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of Shares you own. We cannot proceed with the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution unless the Dissolution Proposal is approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to vote thereon. Whether or not you plan to attend the Special Meeting, we urge you to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided or vote via telephone or the Internet pursuant to the instructions on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form for the Altaba Inc. Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 27, 2019 so you will be represented at the Special Meeting. If you attend the Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be able to do so and your vote at the Special Meeting will revoke any proxy you may have submitted. Merely attending the Special Meeting, however, will not revoke any previously submitted proxy.

By order of the Board:

LOGO

Thomas J. McInerney

Chief Executive Officer of the Fund

New York, New York

September 11, 2017May 17, 2019


YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED OR VOTE VIA TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET PURSUANT TO THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD OR ON THE IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ALTABA INC. ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 24, 2017.VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM. IN ORDER TO SAVE THE FUND ANY ADDITIONAL EXPENSE OF FURTHER SOLICITATION, PLEASE MAIL YOUR PROXY CARD OR VOTE VIA TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET PROMPTLY.

IF YOU WISH TO ATTEND THE ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON, YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DO SO. IF YOU INTEND TO ATTEND THE ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON AND YOU ARE A RECORD HOLDER OF THE FUND’S SHARES, IN ORDER TO GAIN ADMISSION, YOU MUST SHOW PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION, SUCH AS YOUR DRIVER’S LICENSE. IF YOU INTEND TO ATTEND THE ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON AND YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES THROUGH A BANK, BROKER OR OTHER CUSTODIAN, IN ORDER TO GAIN ADMISSION, YOU MUST SHOW PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION, SUCH AS YOUR DRIVER’S LICENSE, AND SATISFACTORY PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF SHARES OF THE FUND, SUCH AS YOUR VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM (OR A COPY THEREOF) OR BROKER’S STATEMENT INDICATING OWNERSHIP AS OF A RECENT DATE. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES IN A BROKERAGE ACCOUNT OR THROUGH A BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO VOTE IN PERSON AT THE ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING UNLESS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED AND OBTAINED A “LEGAL PROXY” FROM YOUR BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE AND PRESENT IT AT THE ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING.





LOGO

ALTABA INC. (NASDAQ: AABA)

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 24, 2017JUNE 27, 2019

This proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”) is furnished to the holders of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Shares”), of Altaba Inc. (the “Fund”) in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Fund (the “Board”) of proxies to be voted at the annuala special meeting of stockholders of the Fund to be held on Tuesday, October 24, 2017,(the “Special Meeting”), and any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).thereof. The AnnualSpecial Meeting will be held at 50 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017, on Tuesday, October 24, 2017,Thursday, June 27, 2019, at 8:0011:30 a.m. (Eastern time).

This Proxy Statement will give you the information you need to vote on the matters listed on the accompanying Notice of AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders (“Notice(the “Notice of AnnualSpecial Meeting”). Much of the information in this Proxy Statement is required under rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”(the “SEC”).

The Fund will furnish to any stockholder, without charge, a copy of the Fund’s most recent annual report and/or semi-annual report to stockholders upon request. Requests should be directed to the Fund’s Secretary at 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017 or to Georgeson LLC toll free at1-866-219-9786.

The Notice of AnnualSpecial Meeting, this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card and the Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materialsor voting instruction form for the Altaba Inc. AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on October 24, 2017 (the “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials”) are first being sent to the Fund’s stockholders on or about September 12, 2017.May 17, 2019.

Background



Summary

This summary highlights selected information included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement and may not contain all of the information that is important to Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”) (the “Sale Transaction”). Followingyou. To fully understand the Sale Transaction, Yahoo changed its nameproposed voluntary liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to Altaba Inc.the Plan of Liquidation and was requiredDissolution, you should carefully read this entire Proxy Statement and the documents delivered in connection with this Proxy Statement. As used in this Proxy Statement, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to register asthe Fund.

About the Fund

The Fund is an independent, publicly traded,non-diversified,closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). We referThe Fund is organized as a Delaware corporation. The Shares are currently listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) and its ticker symbol is “AABA.” The Fund’s principal executive offices are located at 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017 and its telephone number is646-679-2000.

Prior to registering as an investment company on June 16, 2017, the Fund priorwas an operating company named Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”). Yahoo sold its operating business to Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”) on June 13, 2017 (such sale, the “Sale Transaction”) pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement entered into by Yahoo and Verizon on July 23, 2016, as amended as of February 20, 2017 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). On June 16, 2017, Yahoo changed its name to “Altaba Inc.” and changed its Nasdaq ticker symbol to “AABA.” As a result of the Sale Transaction, as “Yahoo” for purposesthe Fund’s remaining assets consisted primarily of this Proxy Statement.its equity investments, short- and long-term debt investments and cash. For a description of the Fund’s operations following the Sale Transaction, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Background of the Proposed Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

TheAs of the close of business on May 15, 2019, the Fund’s consolidated investment assets currently consistconsisted of:

 

an approximately 15% equity stake in196,066,905 ordinary shares, par value $0.000025 per share (“Alibaba Ordinary Shares”), and 87,248,511 American Depositary Shares (“Alibaba ADSs” and, together with Alibaba Ordinary Shares (all of which are expected to be converted into Alibaba ADSs), “Alibaba Shares”), of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, a Cayman Islands company (“Alibaba”);, which had an aggregate market value of approximately $50 billion based on the closing market price of Alibaba ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and represented approximately 96.0% of the Fund’s total assets;

 

an approximately 36% equity stakeshort- and long-term investments that primarily consist of investments in commercial paper, short- and long-term corporate debt, certificates of deposit, shares of common stock of Yahoo Japan Corporation (“Yahoo Japan”);

cash, cash equivalents,money market investment vehicles, U.S. agency bonds, other U.S. treasuries and high-quality, short-termforeign sovereign debt securities (the “Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio”);

investments in certain additional companies;, which together with cash had an aggregate market value of approximately $1.8 billion and represented approximately 3.3% of the Fund’s total assets; and

 

all of the equity interests in Excalibur IP, LLC (“Excalibur”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Fund that owns certaina portfolio of patent assets that were not core to Yahoo’s operating business.(the “Excalibur IP Assets”), which had an approximate fair value of $250 million, which together with other assets represented approximately 0.7% of the Fund’s total assets.

TheAs disclosed in the Fund’s public filings with the SEC, the Fund’s investment objective is to seekincrease the price per Share at which it trades relative to track the combinedthen-current value of the Fund’s principal underlying assets. The Fund seeks to do this by reducing the discountat which it trades relative to the underlying value of its net assets (before giving effect to deferred taxes on unrealized appreciation) while simplifying its net asset base and returning capital to its stockholders in ways that are accretive and increase stockholder value.

The Special Meeting (page 33)

At the Special Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon proposals (each, a “Proposal”) to:

approve the voluntary liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A (such Proposal, the “Dissolution Proposal”); and


grant discretionary authority to the Board to adjourn the Special Meeting, even if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (such Proposal, the “Adjournment Proposal”).

Reasons for the Liquidation and Dissolution (page 39)

The Fund has pursued a number of strategies with the goal of reducing the discount at which its Shares trade relative to their net asset value, including by repurchasing the Shares, both in the open market and through an exchange offer of the Fund’s Alibaba Shares and cash for Shares and the sale of certain other assets (which concentrated the Fund’s assets in Alibaba Shares), and through other means. However, the Shares have continued to trade at a substantial discount to net asset value. See “Additional Information—Market Price of Shares.” After carefully considering the risks, timing, viability and potential impact on our stockholders of the alternatives potentially available to the Fund to achieve this goal, as well as the recommendation of management, and in consultation with the Fund’s legal, financial and tax advisors, the Board determined that the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders.

Dissolution Generally Under Delaware Law (page 42); Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (page 43)

Delaware law requires that the dissolution of a corporation be authorized upon (i) the determination by its board of directors that such dissolution is advisable and in the best interests of the corporation and its stockholders and (ii) the subsequent approval of the dissolution by a majority of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Dissolution Generally Under Delaware Law.” The Board unanimously approved the voluntary liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution on April 2, 2019.

If the Dissolution Proposal is approved by our stockholders, we expect to:

sell or otherwise dispose of all remaining Alibaba Shares (other than Alibaba ADSs, if any, to be distributed in kind) and Excalibur, to the extent any such assets have not been sold or disposed of by the Fund before the Special Meeting;

make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution to stockholders (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof), which we currently estimate, based on the assumptions and subject to the qualifications set forth in this Proxy Statement, will be made in the third or fourth quarter of 2019;

file a Certificate of Dissolution with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware Secretary of State”), which the Fund currently expects to occur promptly following the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution, at which time the Fund will close its stock transfer books and the Shares will cease to be traded on Nasdaq;

after the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State (such time, the “Effective Time”), limit our operations and activities to those required to wind up our business affairs as required by law;

follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) to obtain an order from the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court”) establishing the amount and form of security for contested known, contingent and potential future claims that are likely to arise or become known within five years of the Effective Time (or such longer period of time as the Court may determine not to exceed ten years after the Effective Time) (the “Court Order”);

as soon as practicable after the issuance of the Court Order, pay or make reasonable provision for the Fund’s uncontested known claims and expenses and establish reserves for other claims as required by the Court Order;

thereafter, to the extent that the Fund’s actual liabilities and expenses are less than the amounts required to be held as security for its outstanding claims and expenses, distribute all of our remaining assets in one or more liquidating distributions on a pro rata basis to or for the benefit of our stockholders. including an initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution that the fund plans to make as soon as practicable following entry of the Court Order; and


deregister as an investment returncompany under the 1940 Act, which the Fund currently expects to occur following the issuance of the Court Order, and after the Fund has reduced its remaining assets to cash and distributed substantially all of its assets.

The Board may modify or amend the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution at any time, notwithstanding stockholder approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, if the Board determines that such action would be in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders. The Board will have authority under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to make any such modification or amendment to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution without further stockholder approval. Moreover, prior to the Effective Time, the Board may abandon the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution altogether without further stockholder approval.

The Fund currently expects the Certificate of Dissolution to be filed during the third or fourth quarter of 2019 promptly following the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution, although such filing may be delayed by the Board in its sole discretion. The Fund will issue a press release not less than five days before filing the Certificate of Dissolution to announce (i) that the Board has determined to proceed with the dissolution and (ii) the anticipated filing date of the Certificate of Dissolution.

The dissolution of the Fund would become effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State, unless we provide for a later effective time that is not more than 90 days after the filing date. However, the Fund’s existence would continue for a period of three years from the Effective Time for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, winding up the Fund and making distributions to stockholders, but not for the purpose of continuing to engage in any business. The three-year statutorywinding-up period can be extended by the Court and is automatically extended for any proceeding commenced but not completed prior to the end of this three-year period.

After the Effective Time, the Fund may revoke the dissolution only if (i) the Board adopts a resolution recommending that the dissolution be revoked, (ii) the holders of a majority of the Shares outstanding and entitled to vote upon the dissolution on the Effective Time vote to revoke the dissolution and (iii) the Fund files a Certificate of Revocation with the Delaware Secretary of State and takes certain other actions specified by the DGCL.

If stockholders do not approve the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Fund will continue its corporate existence and the Board will continue to explore alternatives for returning capital to stockholders in a manner intended to maximize value. Such alternatives may include, among other things, (i) resubmitting the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to stockholders for reconsideration in the future, (ii) selling all or substantially all of the Fund’s Alibaba Shares for cash and returning the proceeds from such sales to the Fund’s stockholders by way of share repurchase programs or a tender offer or (iii) making an exchange offer of the Fund’s Alibaba Shares for Shares, together with cash, and selling Alibaba Shares to fund the cash portion of such exchange offer and taxes that would be incurred in such transaction.

Pre-Dissolution Liquidating Distribution (page 41)

The Fund intends to make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof) contingent on and as soon as reasonably practicable following stockholder approval of the Dissolution Proposal and before the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State. The Fund currently estimates that the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be between $52.12 and $59.63 per Share in cash and/or Alibaba Shares. However, this estimate is subject to a number of assumptions and qualifications that could vary, as described in greater detail below. The Fund currently expects to make suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution during the third or fourth quarter of 2019, although such timing may be extended by the Board in its sole discretion. However, there is no assurance regarding whether or when suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be made.

The Fund’s estimate of the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution is based on:

the assumption that the Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, the Alibaba Share value at the time of distribution is $177.00 per Alibaba Share (the actual closing prices of the Alibaba sharesShares on the NYSE ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and Yahoo Japan sharesMay 15, 2019);


the assumption that it owns. Allthe Fund’s written warrant transactions would be settled in cash with each of the Fund’s bank counterparties prior to the payment of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution; and

the Board’s estimate of thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount (as such term is defined below) based on, among other things, the foregoing assumptions.

The amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution would be dependent on the Fund’s surplus and net assets before and after making such distribution, in accordance with Delaware law. Thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution would also be conditioned on the prior sale by the Fund for cash of not less than a sufficient number of Alibaba Shares to ensure that the Fund has sufficient liquid assets to cover thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount and to fund the cash portion of such distribution. The Fund is not eligible to be treated as a “regulated investment company” (a “RIC”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as a result of the Fund’s concentrated ownership of Alibaba Shares. Instead, the Fund is treated as a regular corporation, or a “C” corporation, for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as a result, will be subject to corporate income tax to the extent the Fund recognizes taxable income and taxable gains. Accordingly, the sale or other disposition of the Fund’s remaining non-cash assets, including the remaining Alibaba Shares, will generally be taxable to the Fund for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Fund will also generally recognize gain or loss upon any liquidating distribution (including the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution) of Alibaba Shares or other non-cash property to stockholders or to a liquidating trust as if such property were sold at its fair market value at the time of the distribution.

In addition, in light of the fact that the Board has adopted the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and anticipates entering into a dissolution andwinding-up process, in determining the amount of the Fund’s assets that would be available for apre-dissolution liquidating distribution, the Fund intends to retain sufficient assets to ensure the Fund’s ability to satisfy or make adequate provision for all of its liabilities, including the expansive array of potential, contingent and future liabilities the Fund would be required to provide for in the context of a dissolution and winding up in accordance with the exception“safe harbor” provisions under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL (see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Dissolution Generally Under Delaware Law”). Given the uncertainties with respect to certain of the Fund’s contingent and future liabilities, including potential liabilities for taxes payable to taxing authorities in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), in order to provide the maximum protection for our stockholders and directors under these “safe harbor” dissolution provisions, the Board has determined that it would be prudent to wait until the issuance of the Court Order before distributing assets that the Court might determine are needed to cover such contingent and future liabilities.Accordingly, before making apre-dissolution liquidating distribution, the Fund intends to hold back an amount of assets that the Board estimates will be sufficient to cover the maximum potential reserves that might be required by the Court to satisfy the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, which amount, due to the uncertainties described under “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters,” will include the maximum amount of potential PRC taxes on all of the Alibaba Share Transfers (as such term is defined below) without any offset or reduction for any foreign tax credits allowable under U.S. tax law (such amount of assets to be held back, the“Pre-Dissolution Holdback Amount”).

The actual amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution could be higher or lower than the Fund’s current estimated range of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution depending on, among other things, how much of the Fund’s assets, at such time, are in the form of Alibaba Shares, the actual market prices of the Alibaba Shares on and prior to the payment date of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution (which may be higher or lower than the assumed Alibaba Share price provided above), the Fund’s anticipated ability to monetize such remaining Alibaba Shares on favorable terms, and the extent that existing and potential liabilities are resolved, new liabilities arise or facts and circumstances otherwise change or develop. It is not possible to predict with certainty what thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount or the amount available for thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution ultimately will be. The amount set forth above should be considered strictly as an estimate subject to the specified assumptions and qualifications. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution.”

For additional information on the Fund’s plan to sell Alibaba Shares, in order to, among other purposes, fund the cash portion of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation andDissolution—Pre-Dissolution Liquidating Distribution.”


Winding-Up Process (page 44)

After the Effective Time, the Fund would exist solely for purposes of prosecuting and defending suits and winding up its affairs. The Fund expects to follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL because following such procedures would afford greater protection to our directors and stockholders than the “default” provisions of Section 281(b) of the DGCL. The provisions of Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL would protect the Fund’s directors from liability to claimants for failing to make adequate provision for the Fund’s actual and potential liabilities by providing for judicial determination of the amount and form of reserves to be set aside for pending, contingent or potential future claims and by providing that, in the absence of fraud, the judgment of the directors of the Fund is conclusive as to the provision made for payment of all other claims that are mature, known and uncontested or that have been finally determined to be owing by the Fund. With respect to stockholders, while the liability of a stockholder of the Fund for any claim against the Fund is generally limited to such stockholder’s pro rata share of such claim or the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution, whichever is less, and is limited in the aggregate to the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution, the procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL further limit stockholder liability by providing that stockholders have no liability for any claim commenced after the expiration of thewinding-up period.

For a detailed description of the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, including the adjudication process before the Court and the Court Order, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process.”

The Fund intends to proceed expeditiously after the Certificate of Dissolution is filed to wind up its affairs, settle its liabilities and obtain the Court Order, after which it intends to distribute any available assets to stockholders. The Fund expects the Court Order to be issued within one year following the Effective Time, although there can be no assurance regarding the timing of the Court Order. In order to ensure the maximum protection of the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, the Fund does not intend to make any liquidating distributions between the Effective Time and the date when the Court Order is issued, although the Fund reserves the right to do so. There can be no assurance as to the amount that the Court will ultimately determine is required to be held back by the Fund. In its petition to the Court, the Fund will provide its view as to the amount of claims and liabilities that is reasonably likely to be payable by the Fund with respect to disputed, contingent and potential future claims and liabilities. The Court will then make its own determination as to the amount and form of security reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for disputed, contingent and potential future claims and liabilities. As a result, the Fund may be required to withhold up to the maximum potential amount of each potential claim and liability. Such reserves may exceed the amounts ultimately payable with respect to such contingent liabilities and stockholders may not receive distributions of these excess amounts for a substantial period of time.

After receiving the Court Order, the Fund will take various actions, including posting security ordered by the Court for claims and making payments for claims that are mature, known and uncontested, as required by the Court and Section 281(a) of the DGCL. For additional information, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process.” Thereafter, to the extent that the Fund’s actual liabilities and expenses are less than the amounts required to be held as security pursuant to the Court Order, the excess will be available to be distributed to the Fund’s stockholders in one or more post-dissolution liquidating distributions. Subject to the Fund’s compliance with the Court Order, all determinations as to the timing, amount and kind of distributions will be made by the Board in its absolute discretion and in accordance with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. However, no assurances can be given either as to the ultimate amounts available for distribution to our stockholders or as to the timing of any distributions.

Any amounts proposed or determined to be set aside as security for the claims in the Fund’s petition or in the Court Order or actually held back by the Fund will not be calculated in accordance with, or by reference to, U.S. GAAP and will not reflect any change in the Fund’s position with respect to its liabilities and reserves from an accounting perspective. Rather, such amounts will be calculated solely to ensure that the Fund has sufficient assets to comply with its obligations to provide adequate security under the dissolution procedures under the DGCL, which is generally a more conservative standard than the determination required by U.S. GAAP.


Sale or Other Disposition of Our Remaining Assets (page 46)

The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution gives the Board the power to sell, distribute or otherwise dispose of our remainingnon-cash assets in order to maximize value for the Fund’s stockholders and creditors. The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution does not specify the manner or timing in which we may sell, distribute or otherwise dispose of ournon-cash assets and any such sales or dispositions will be made on such terms and at such times as the Fund may determine in its discretion. Approval of the Dissolution Proposal at the Special Meeting will constitute stockholder approval of any such sales or dispositions. We will not be required to obtain any further stockholder approval with respect to specific terms of any particular sales or dispositions of assets approved by the Board. We do not anticipate amending or supplementing this Proxy Statement to reflect any such terms, unless required by law.

Prior to making anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution, we plan to sell not less than a sufficient number of Alibaba Shares to ensure that the Fund has sufficient liquid assets to cover thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount and fund the cash portion of such distribution. We intend to sell no more than approximately 50% of the Alibaba Shares we held at the time the Board approved the liquidation and dissolution pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution prior to receiving stockholder approval of the Dissolution Proposal and to sell our remaining Alibaba Shares after stockholder approval, except that any Alibaba Shares we do not need to sell to cover thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount may instead be distributed in kind. The Fund, which continues to be a party to that certain Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2012, as amended on January 24, 2018, by and among Alibaba, the Fund, SoftBank Group Corp. and the other shareholders of Alibaba listed therein (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), which provides certain limitations and restrictions on the Fund’s share sale activities, intends to sell our Alibaba Shares through open market transactions and/or through private dispositions not executed or recorded on a public exchange or quotation service. Regardless of the method we choose, we currently intend to provide additional information upfront regarding the manner and timing that we expect to use to sell our Alibaba Shares. On May 15, 2019, we announced that, in connection with the Plan, we intend to commence selling our Alibaba Shares on May 20, 2019, and that we currently intend to update stockholders weekly on the actual amount of Alibaba Shares sold on the Fund’s website at https://www.altaba.com, in the section titled “Holdings”. The actual commencement of selling, the timing and method of sales, and other related transaction considerations will be determined at the Fund’s discretion, and the plans are subject to change based on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The Fund intends to sell its Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio are


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS


managed bywhen the Fund’s officers and employees. The Board has determineddetermines that itdoing so is in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders. The Fund also intends to sell Excalibur, sell certain of the Excalibur IP Assets or license the Excalibur IP Assets when the Board determines that doing so is in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders.

Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves (page 47)

Among other liabilities, the Fund’s major known, contingent and potential future liabilities include (i) potential U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax claims (including potential PRC tax claims), which constitute a significant majority of the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, (ii) potential liabilities arising out of certain data security incidents and other data breaches incurred by Yahoo (collectively, the “Data Breaches”) and certain other legal contingencies, and (iii) continuing obligations to indemnify former Yahoo executives.

With respect to PRC tax claims, the Fund potentially could be liable for PRC tax with respect to the following dispositions of Alibaba Shares:

the repurchase from the Fund by Alibaba of 523,000,000 Alibaba Shares for approximately $7.1 billion on September 18, 2012 (the “2012 Alibaba Share Transfer”);

the sale by the Fund’s subsidiary, Altaba Holdings Hong Kong Limited (“Altaba Hong Kong”) of 140,000,000 Alibaba Shares in Alibaba’s initial public offering for approximately $9.4 billion (net of underwriting discounts, commissions and fees) on September 24, 2014 (the “2014 Alibaba Share Transfer”);

the transfers of Alibaba Shares in the 2018 Exchange Offer and the Alibaba Resale (as each such term is defined in “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Background of the Proposed Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution”), including internal transfers of Alibaba Shares from Altaba Hong Kong to the Fund (the “2018 Alibaba Share Transfers”); and


the disposition or other transfer of the Fund’s remaining Alibaba Shares as described in this Proxy Statement, which are expected to be completed in 2019 (the “2019 Alibaba Share Transfers” and, collectively with the 2012 Alibaba Share Transfer, the 2014 Alibaba Share Transfer and the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers, the “Alibaba Share Transfers”).

Because Alibaba, which is a Cayman Islands company, holds PRC taxable property, including equity interests in PRC resident enterprises, each of the Alibaba Share Transfers would be an indirect transfer of such property and potentially subject to PRC tax under Bulletin Regarding Certain Enterprise Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Property byNon-Resident Enterprises, SAT Bulletin [2015] No. 7 (“Bulletin 7”), other than the 2012 Alibaba Share Transfer which is covered by the predecessor PRC tax regulation with respect to indirect share transfers. If an Alibaba Share Transfer were subject to PRC tax under Bulletin 7, the tax would be 10% of the gain that the PRC taxing authorities deemed the Fund or its applicable subsidiary to have derived from such transfer. The statute of limitations period applicable to Bulletin 7 cases is ten years. The PRC taxing authorities, in particular the State Taxation Administration (the “STA”), which is the highest level taxing authority in the PRC, have wide discretion to interpret Bulletin 7 and to apply the indirect transfer rules to specific circumstances.

As described in more detail under “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters,” based on the advice of the Fund’s tax counsel and advisors and other relevant information, we believe it is more likely than not that the Alibaba Share Transfers are not, and in the case of the 2019 Alibaba Share Transfers will not be, subject to PRC tax. There can be no assurance that the PRC taxing authorities will agree with such positions. Even if the PRC taxing authorities have confirmed (which would likely be orally and not in writing) that their review of any Alibaba Share Transfer is closed and that such transaction is not taxable, the PRC taxing authorities are not foreclosed from subsequentlyre-examining and potentially assessing PRC tax on such transactions at any time prior to the expiration of theten-year statute of limitations period; however, we believe based on the advice of our PRC tax advisors that it is highly unlikely they will do so where they have given oral confirmation that a transaction will not be taxed.

The Fund is a party to written warrant transactions with bank counterparties, which give each of the counterparties the right to purchase Shares from the Fund. However, the written warrant transactions began to expire on March 1, 2019 and are expected to expire and be settled in cash prior to the payment date of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution.

In addition, the Fund would incur operating expenses through completion of the dissolution andwinding-up process, including severance costs, compensation to employees who would implement the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, compensation to our independent directors, directors’ and officers’ insurance and other insurance premiums, income, payroll and other taxes (including any taxes that may be imposed on the sale, distribution or other disposition of our remainingnon-cash assets), legal, accounting, financial advisory and consulting fees and general and administrative expenses (including the fees of the external investment advisers of our Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio).

Liquidating Distributions; Amount; Timing (page 53)

The Fund currently estimates that, assuming an Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, an Alibaba Share value at the time of distribution of $177.00 (the actual closing prices of the Alibaba Shares on the NYSE ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and May 15, 2019), it could make aggregate liquidating distributions to stockholders, including thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, ranging between approximately $39.9 billion and $41.2 billion (approximately $76.76 and $79.35 per Share, respectively), based on the number of Shares outstanding following completion of the repurchase of $5.75 billion of the Fund’s Shares under Rule 10b5-1, authorized by the Board on September 6, 2018 (the “September 2018 Repurchase Program”). Such estimates assume that the funds held back for certain of our potential tax liabilities (including potential PRC tax liabilities) eventually would be released and available for distribution, based on the assumednon-taxability of the Alibaba Share Transfers under Bulletin 7 or, if the Alibaba Share Transfers were taxable under Bulletin 7, the assumed utilization of related foreign tax credits for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The aggregate amount of liquidating distributions would depend on a number of factors, including the amount of proceeds received from the sales of our Alibaba Shares and/or the value of any Alibaba Shares distributed to our stockholders, the amount of proceeds received from the sales or other dispositions of our othernon-cash assets, the potential tax consequences


of such sales and/or distributions of our Alibaba Shares, the resolution of outstanding known claims against the Fund (such claims, “Known Claims”), the incurrence of unexpected or greater-than-expected liabilities and expenses with respect to Litigation Claims and the assertion of Uncertain Claims (as such terms are defined in “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process”) (including potential U.S. federal, state and local tax claims and potential foreign tax claims, such as potential PRC tax claims), and costs incurred to wind up our business.

We plan to make an initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution to our stockholders on our transfer books as of the Effective Time as soon as practicable following entry of the Court Order. Under Section 281(a) of the DGCL, the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution may not be made before the expiration of a period of 150 days from the date of the last notice of rejection given by the Fund with respect to Known Claims. We currently expect the Court Order to be issued within one year following the Effective Time, although there can be no assurance regarding the timing of the Court Order.

In the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution, we intend to distribute all of the Fund’s remaining assets in excess of the amount to be used by the Fund to pay claims and fund the reserves required by the Court Order and pay the Fund’s operating expenses through the completion of the dissolution andwinding-up process. The amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution would depend on, among other things, the amount that was paid in thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution and the actual amount of the reserves that we are required to establish pursuant to the Court Order. The Court Order will reflect the Court’s own determination as to the amount and form of security reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for all known, contingent and potential future claims against the Fund. There can be no assurances that the Court will not require the Fund to withhold from the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution amounts in excess of the amounts that we believe are sufficient to satisfy the Fund’s potential claims and liabilities. For example, based on our current views as to the applicability of PRC tax to the Alibaba Share Transfers, we currently expect to request in our petition to the Court that the Fund not be required in the Court Order to hold back any reserves in respect of potential PRC tax liabilities with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, and we believe that, if we receive confirmation (which would likely be oral and not written) from the PRC taxing authorities that they have closed their review of an Alibaba Share Transfer and that PRC taxes will not be assessed on that transaction, the Court would likely grant our request. Nevertheless, the Court may require the Fund to reserve an amount for some or all of such potential PRC tax liabilities. For more information regarding the Fund’s potential PRC tax liabilities, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters.”

For more detail on the various factors that could affect the ultimate amount of liquidating distributions, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution following entry of the Court Order.”

To the extent that claims for which the Fund has set aside reserves are resolved or satisfied at amounts less than such reserves, and assuming no need has arisen to establish additional reserves, the Fund would make additional distributions to stockholders of any portion of the reserves established pursuant to the Court Order that the Board determines is no longer required because the relevant claim has been resolved or satisfied. However, if the Court requires us to reserve an amount for some or all of our potential PRC tax liabilities (which are subject to aten-year statute of limitations period) or any other potential liabilities that are not resolved prior to the issuance of the Court Order, stockholders may not receive distributions of any excess reserve amounts for a substantial period of time. If such a reserve were required for potential PRC taxes with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, then we would seek to include a provision in the Court Order that would permit the Fund to return to the Court to petition for a reduction in the Fund’s reserves if we receive oral confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities after the issuance of the Court Order, or otherwise believe there is a reasonable basis for concluding, that the PRC taxing authorities do not intend to assess PRC tax with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers. There is no assurance, however, that the Court would agree to consider such a request or, if it does, that it would modify the Court Order in such a scenario. For more detail on the various factors that could affect the amount and timing of any additional liquidating distributions, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of any additional post-dissolution liquidating distributions to stockholders under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

Pursuant to Delaware law, our corporate existence will continue for a period of at least three years following the Effective Time for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, winding up the Fund and making distributions to stockholders,


but not for the purpose of continuing to engage in any business. The three-year statutory winding-up period can be extended by the Court and is automatically extended for any proceeding commenced but not completed prior to the end of this three-year period. As a result, the winding-up process could extend beyond three years after dissolution, and it is difficult to estimate when it will be completed.

The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of any liquidating distributions to stockholders under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. It is not possible to predict with certainty what the amount required to be reserved by the Fund in the Court Order or the amount available for the liquidating distributions ultimately will be. The amounts set forth above should be considered strictly as estimates subject to the specified assumptions and qualifications. The aggregate amount that would be distributed to stockholders could be higher or lower than the Fund’s current estimated range of the aggregate liquidating distributions depending on, among other things, the resolution of outstanding Known Claims, the incurrence of unexpected or greater-than-expected liabilities and expenses with respect to Litigation Claims and the assertion of Uncertain Claims (as such terms are defined in “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process”) (including potential U.S. federal, state and local tax claims and potential foreign tax claims, such as potential PRC tax claims), the ability to receive the estimated proceeds from, and the timing and tax impact of, sales or other dispositions of ournon-cash assets, and costs incurred to wind up our business. Further, if additional amounts ultimately are determined to be necessary to satisfy or make provision for any of these obligations, stockholders may receive substantially less than the current estimates. It is possible that the aggregate liquidating distributions that would be paid to a stockholder under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution would not exceed the amount that the stockholder could have received upon sales of its Shares in the open market.

Under Delaware law, in the event the Fund fails to retain sufficient funds to pay the expenses and liabilities actually owed to the Fund’s creditors, each stockholder could be held liable for the repayment to those creditors who file claims before the end of thewinding-up period, out of the amounts previously received by such stockholder from us or from any liquidating trust or trusts, of such stockholder’s pro rata share of such excess liability (up to the full amount actually received by such stockholder). However, under the “safe harbor” provisions of Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, the liability of a stockholder of the Fund for any claim against the Fund is generally limited to such stockholder’spro rata share of such claim or the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution, whichever is less, and is limited in the aggregate to the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution. The procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL further limit stockholder liability by providing that stockholders have no liability for any claim commenced after the expiration of thewinding-up period.See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process.”

Reporting Requirements (page 58)

As an investment company registered under the 1940 Act, the Fund will be required to continue filing periodic reports required by the 1940 Act until the SEC issues an order declaring that the Fund is no longer an investment company and its registration under the 1940 Act is no longer in effect or the SEC issues an order excepting the Fund from all or a portion of its reporting requirements. We currently intend to maintain our investment company status under the 1940 Act following the Effective Time and currently expect to deregister as an investment company under the 1940 Act following the issuance of the Court Order, and after the Fund has reduced its remaining assets to cash and distributed substantially all of its assets.

Delisting and Lack of Market for Trading of the Shares (page 58)

We anticipate that, upon the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution, trading in our Shares will be suspended on Nasdaq, and our Shares will thereafter be delisted. However, under the Nasdaq rules, Nasdaq has discretionary authority to suspend or terminate the listing of a company that has announced that liquidation has been authorized by its board of directors and that it is committed to proceed, even if the Shares otherwise meet all enumerated criteria for continued listing on Nasdaq.

In addition, we will close our stock transfer books and discontinue recording transfers at the Effective Time. Thereafter, record holders of the Shares generally will be prohibited from transferring record ownership of their Shares following the Effective


Time (except by will, intestate succession or operation of law). The Fund will, however, request that, following the Effective Time, The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) maintain records representing the right to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions, including any transfers of such rights. Consequently, the Fund expects that any transfers of such rights will be tracked by DTC. To the extent that a stockholder’s Shares are not held by a DTC participant as of the Effective Time, it could be more difficult for such stockholder to transfer such stockholder’s rights to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions.

After our Shares are delisted from Nasdaq, brokers may make a market for interests in the Shares representing the right to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions, in the“over-the-counter” market. There is no assurance that such market will arise or, if one does arise, for how long it will be maintained or how actively such interests in the Shares will trade. Both trading prices and volumes in any such“over-the-counter” market could be volatile and erratic.

Authority of Directors and Officers (page 59)

The Board may continue to employ some or all of the Fund’s existing officers, appoint new officers, hire employees and retain independent contractors, agents and advisors in connection with thewinding-up process, and would be authorized to pay compensation to the Fund’s directors, officers, employees, independent contractors, agents and advisors, which, in the case of directors, officers and employees, may be above their regular compensation in recognition of the extraordinary efforts they may be required to undertake in connection with the successful implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and for retention purposes during the implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (page 59)

In considering the recommendation of our Board, you should be aware that some of our directors and executive officers may have interests in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. These potential interests include the payment of incentive awards under the Fund’s Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), the payment of severance compensation to the Fund’s executive officers and/or the Fund’s continuing indemnification obligations to its directors and officers. Our Board was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in approving the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the transactions contemplated thereby.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Liquidation and Dissolution (page 63)

In general, any distributions to our stockholders pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution, will be taxable to stockholders who are U.S. Holders (as defined in the “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Liquidation and Dissolution”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and such stockholders will recognize taxable gain or loss as a result of such distributions. All stockholders should review the discussion in “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Liquidation and Dissolution” for a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences to them of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution in light of each stockholder’s particular circumstances.

Risk Factors (page 22)

The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution involves a number of risks, including:

The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution.

The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution following entry of the Court Order.

The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of any additional post-dissolution liquidating distributions to stockholders under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.


Liquidating distributions to stockholders could be substantially reduced and/or delayed due to uncertainty regarding the resolution of certain potential tax claims, litigation matters and other unresolved contingent liabilities of the Fund.

The application of, and any changes in, applicable tax laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles and interpretations may adversely affect the Fund’s assets and the amount and timing of any liquidating distributions to stockholders.

The Fund may not be able to resolve promptly, or at all, certain potential PRC tax claims on the Alibaba Share Transfers on terms favorable to the Fund, which may significantly delay or reduce any liquidating distributions to stockholders.

The Fund will continue to incur expenses that will reduce the amount available for distribution, including expenses of complying with reporting requirements under the 1940 Act following the Effective Time and paying its service providers, including the external investment advisers managing its Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio.

The amount of proceeds that might be realized from the sale of the Fund’s primary asset, the Alibaba Shares, is subject to fluctuation in the market prices of such Alibaba Shares and the Fund’s ability to monetize such Alibaba Shares on favorable terms.

The Fund’s ability to sell or otherwise dispose of the Alibaba Shares is subject to contractual restrictions in certain circumstances.

The Fund’s ability to monetize the Alibaba Shares on favorable terms may be materially and adversely affected by economic conditions in the PRC as well as globally.

If the Fund fails to retain sufficient funds to pay the expenses and liabilities actually owed to the Fund’s creditors, each stockholder receiving liquidating distributions could be held liable for payment to the Fund’s creditors of his, her or its pro rata share of any shortfall, up to the amount actually distributed to each stockholder in connection with the liquidation and dissolution.

Amounts held in the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio which had an aggregatewill be subject to market, value of approximately $9.2 billion as of June 30, 2017, tocredit and interest rate risk.

The Shares will be externally managed. As described below, the Board is seeking approval fordelisted from Nasdaq, and the Fund will close its stock transfer books at the Effective Time. Accordingly, the Shares held by the Fund’s stockholders after the Effective Time will not be transferable, and there is no assurance that a market for interests in the Shares will arise.

Interests of stockholders in any liquidating trust that the Fund may establish pursuant to enter into investment advisory agreementsthe Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution generally will not be transferable.

Stockholders will generally not be able to recognize a loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes until they receive a final distribution from us.

Further stockholder approval will not be required in connection with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (“BlackRock”) and with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (“MSSB”). As of June 30, 2017, $8.2 billionthe implementation of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio was externally managed, withPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including the remainder invested by management directly in money market funds for liquidity purposes.

Why is a stockholder meeting being held?

The Sharessale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Fund are listed on NASDAQ Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”)Fund’s assets as contemplated in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

After the rules of Nasdaq requireEffective Time, the Fund towould not hold an annual meetingmeetings of stockholders to elect Directors each fiscal year.

Additionally, the Board seeks approval to enter into investment advisory agreements with BlackRock and with MSSB, each to manage approximately half of the Fund’s Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. On June 16, 2017, the Board approved BlackRock and MSSB (each, an “Adviser,” and together, the “Advisers”) as interim investment advisers and approved an interim advisory agreement with BlackRock (the “Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement”) and an interim advisory agreement with MSSB (the “Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement”) to allow BlackRock and MSSB to serve as interim investment advisers for the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio until an in-person meetingmembers of the Board, couldand consequently the Fund’s stockholders would no longer be able to influence management of the Fund through the election of directors.

The Board may abandon, modify or delay implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, even after stockholder approval.

The Board and our officers may have interests in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution that are different from or in addition to, the interests of stockholders generally.

The tax treatment of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution and any other liquidating distributions may vary from stockholder to stockholder, and stockholders should consult their own tax advisors.

In addition, if stockholders vote against the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Fund may pursue other alternatives, but there can be no assurance that any of these alternatives would result in greater stockholder value than the proposed liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, and any alternative we select may entail additional risks.


Questions and Answers

The following questions and answers are for your convenience only, and briefly address some commonly asked questions about the Special Meeting and the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. You should read this Proxy Statement carefully in its entirety, including the attached Appendix.

The Special Meeting

Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

You are receiving these proxy materials from us because you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on May 16, 2019, the record date of the Special Meeting (the “Record Date”). As a stockholder of record, you are invited to attend the Special Meeting and are entitled to and requested to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement. However, you do not need to attend the Special Meeting to vote your Shares. Instead, you may simply complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided or vote via telephone or the Internet pursuant to the instructions on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form.

When and where is the Special Meeting?

The Special Meeting will be held and a new investment advisory agreement with BlackRock (the “New BlackRock Advisory Agreement”) and a new investment advisory agreement with MSSB (the “New MSSB Advisory Agreement’) couldon Thursday, June 27, 2019, at 11:30 a.m. (Eastern time) at 50 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017.

What will I be submitted to stockholders for approval, in accordance with Rule 15a-4 of the 1940 Act.

The Board seeks ratification by the stockholders of PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) as the Fund’s independent public registered accounting firm for this fiscal year.

Lastly, the Board seeks approval by the stockholders of a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan for the Fund’s management and Directors.

What Proposals has the Board proposed that stockholders votevoting on at the AnnualSpecial Meeting?

At the Special Meeting, you will be voting on (i) the Dissolution Proposal and (ii) the Adjournment Proposal.

(1)

To elect the Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement (Tor R. Braham, Eric K. Brandt, Catherine J. Friedman, Richard L. Kauffman and Thomas J. McInerney) to serve until their respective successors shall have been elected and qualified.

(2)

To approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Fund and BlackRock Advisors, LLC.

(3)

To approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Fund and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC.

(4)

To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

(5)

To approve a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan for the Fund’s management and Directors.

Will my vote make a difference?

Yes! Your vote is very important and could make a difference in the governancefuture of the Fund, no matter how many Shares you own. We cannot proceed with the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution unless the Dissolution Proposal is approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to vote thereon.

Who is asking for my vote?

The enclosed proxy card is solicited by the Board for use at the AnnualSpecial Meeting to be held on Tuesday, October 24, 2017,Thursday, June 27, 2019, and any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof, for the purposes stated in the Notice of AnnualSpecial Meeting.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS


How does the Board recommend that stockholdersI vote on the proposal to elect nominees of the Board?

proposals?

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR” each of the nominees of the Board.

The Board has reviewed the qualifications and backgrounds of the Board’s nominees and believes that they are experienced in overseeing public companies and are familiar with the Fund, its investment strategies and operations and the investment advisers of the Fund. The Board has approved the nominees named in this Proxy Statement and believes their election is in your best interests as stockholders.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote on the proposal to approve a new investment advisory agreement with BlackRock?

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR“FOR” the approval of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement.Dissolution Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote on the proposal to approve a new investment advisory agreement with MSSB?

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote on the proposal to ratify the independent registered public accounting firm?

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of PwC as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote on the proposal to approve a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan for the Fund’s management and Directors?

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan for the Fund’s management and Directors.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote on the stockholder proposal regarding stockholder action by written consent?

The Fund has received notice of a stockholder’s intention to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting to request that the Fund allow stockholders of the Fund to take action by written consent in lieu of a meeting of stockholders. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal regarding stockholder action by written consent.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote on the stockholder proposal regarding the Yahoo Human Rights Fund?

The Fund has received notice of a stockholder’s intention to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting to request that the Fund prepare a report regarding Yahoo’s human rights policy and practice, particularly with respect to the Yahoo Human Rights Fund, which was established by Yahoo in connection with its internet business in China. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal regarding the Yahoo Human Rights Fund.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS


Who is eligible to vote?

Stockholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on September 6, 2017 (the “Record Date”),the Record Date are entitled to be present and to vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting or any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof. Each Share is entitled to one vote on the Proposalseach Proposal and a fractional vote with respect to any fractional Shares, with no cumulative voting.voting rights. Shares represented by duly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with your instructions.


How do I vote my Shares?

Whether or not you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting, we urge you to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided or vote via telephone or the Internet so your Shares will be represented at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. Instructions regarding how to vote via telephone or the Internet are included on the enclosed proxy card or on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.voting instruction form. The required control number for Internet and telephone voting is printed on the enclosed proxy card or on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.voting instruction form. The control number is used to match proxies with stockholders’ respective accounts and to ensure that, if multiple proxies are executed, Shares are voted in accordance with the proxy bearing the latest date.

If you wish to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting and vote in person, you will be able to do so. If you intend to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting in person and you are a record holder of the Fund’s Shares, in order to gain admission you must show photographic identification, such as your driver’s license. If you intend to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting in person and you hold your Shares through a bank, broker or other custodian, in order to gain admission you must show photographic identification, such as your driver’s license, and satisfactory proof of ownership of Shares, of the Fund, such as your voting instruction form (or a copy thereof) or broker’s statement indicating ownership as of a recent date. If you hold your Shares in a brokerage account or through a bank or other nominee, you will not be able to vote in person at the AnnualSpecial Meeting unless you have previously requested and obtained a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it at the Annual Meeting. You may contact Abernathy MacGregor at (212) 371-5999 to obtain directions to the site of the AnnualSpecial Meeting.

All Shares represented by properly executed proxies received prior to the AnnualSpecial Meeting will be voted at the AnnualSpecial Meeting in accordance with the instructions marked thereon or otherwise as provided therein.Ifyou sign the proxy card, but don’t fill in a vote, your Shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendation. If any other business is brought before the AnnualSpecial Meeting, your Shares will be voted at the proxies’ discretion.

Stockholders who execute proxy cards or record their voting instructions via telephone or the Internet may revoke them at any time before they are voted by filing with the Secretary of the Fund a written notice of revocation, by delivering (including via telephone or the Internet) a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting and voting in person. Merely attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting, however, will not revoke any previously submitted proxy.

Broker-dealer firms holding Shares of the Fund in “street name” for the benefit of their customers and clients will request the instructions of such customers and clients on how to vote their Shares on the Proposals before the Annual Meeting. The Fund understands that, under the rules of the NYSE, such broker-dealer firms may for certain “routine” matters, without instructions from their customers and clients, grant discretionary authority to the proxies designated by the Board to vote if no instructions have been received prior to the date specified in the broker-dealer firm’s request for voting instructions. The Proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm is deemed a “routine” matter and stockholders who do not provide proxy instructions or who do not return a proxy card may have their Shares voted by broker-dealer firms in favor of such Proposal. The other Proposals are not deemed “routine” matters under the rules of the NYSE. A properly executed proxy card or other authorization by a stockholder that does not specify how the stockholder’s Shares should be voted on the Proposal may be deemed an instruction to vote such Shares in favor of the Proposal. Broker-dealers who are not members of the NYSE may be subject to other rules, which may or may not permit them to vote your Shares without instruction. We urge you to provide instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee so that your votes may be counted.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS


What vote is required to elect a Director nominee?

The affirmative vote of a “majority of votes cast” on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to elect a Director nominee, unless the election is contested, in which case a plurality of votes cast on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary. A “majority of votes cast” means that the number of shares voted “for” a Director nominee exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that Director nominee.

What vote is required to approve the investment advisory agreements?matters to be voted upon at the Special Meeting?

Pursuant to Delaware law and the Fund’s bylaws:

 

To become effective, the investment advisory agreements must be approved byDissolution Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” as defined under the 1940 Act (such a majority referred to herein as a “1940 Act Majority”) of the Fund. A 1940 Act Majority means the lesser of the vote of (i) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon present at the Annual Meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of such outstanding shares are present in person or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of such outstanding shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon.

What vote is required to ratify the independent registered public accounting firm?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the Shares present in person or represented by proxyoutstanding and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to ratify the independent registered public accounting firm.thereon; and

What vote is required to approve a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan for the Fund’s management and Directors?

 

Thethe Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Shares that are represented at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

What are the effects of not voting, abstaining or broker non-votes?

If you do not vote by virtue of not being present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the AnnualSpecial Meeting, at which a quorum is present is necessary to approve a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan forit will have the Fund’s management and Directors.

What vote is required to approve the stockholder proposals?

The affirmative voteeffect of a majority of Shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on“AGAINST” the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to approve each proposal submitted by stockholders.

How many shares of the Fund were outstanding as of the Record Date?

At the close of business on September 6, 2017, the Fund had 886,874,459 Shares outstanding.



Dissolution Proposal One: Election of Directors

Introduction

The rules of Nasdaq require the Fund to hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect Directors each fiscal year. Stockholders of the Fund are being asked to elect the Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement (Tor R. Braham, Eric K. Brandt, Catherine J. Friedman, Richard L. Kauffman, and Thomas J. McInerney) to serve until their respective successors shall have been elected and qualified.

Composition of the Board of Directors

The size of the Fund’s Board is five directors. If all five nominees are approved, the Fund’s Board will include the five individuals listed below, four of whom will not be “interested persons,” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, of the Fund and who satisfy the requirements contained in the definition of “independent” as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards (the “Independent Directors”), and one of whom will be an “interested person” of the Fund (the “Interested Director”).

Independent DirectorsInterested Director

Tor R. Braham

Thomas J. McInerney

Eric K. Brandt

Catherine J. Friedman

Richard L. Kauffman

Election of Directors

Each Director nominee, if elected at the Annual Meeting, will hold office until his or her respective successor shall have been elected and qualified or until he or she resigns or is otherwise removed.

Unless authority is withheld or other instructions are provided, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy card to vote “FOR” the Director nominees named above. Each Director nominee has consented to serve as a Director of the Fund if elected at the Annual Meeting. If a designated Director nominee declines or otherwise becomes unavailable for election, however, the proxy confers discretionary power on the persons named therein to vote in favor of a substitute Director nominee or nominees.


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Directors

Certain information concerning the Directors of the Fund is set forth in the table below.

Name, Address(1) and Age

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

Term of
Office(2)
and
Length of
Time
Served
Principal Occupation
During The Past Five Years
Other Directorships
Held by Director
During the
Past Five Years

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS:

Tor R. Braham

Year of Birth: 1957

Director

Director
Since June
2017


Managing Director and Global Head of Technology Mergers and Acquisitions of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. from 2004 until November 2012.Yahoo! Inc. from April 2016 to June 2017; Viavi Solutions Inc.; Sigma Designs, Inc. from June 2014 to August 2016; NetApp, Inc. from September 2013 to March 2016.

Eric K. Brandt

Year of Birth: 1962




Chairman
of the
Board;
Director





Director
Since June
2017


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Broadcom Corporation from February 2010 until February 2016.Yahoo! Inc. from March 2016 to June 2017; Lam Research Corporation; and Dentsply Sirona Inc.

Catherine J. Friedman

Year of Birth: 1960

Director

Director
Since June
2017


Independent financial consultant (life sciences industry) since 2006; and Managing Director of Morgan Stanley from 1997 to 2006.Yahoo! Inc. from March 2016 to June 2017; Innoviva, Inc. (formerly Theravance, Inc.); Radius Health, Inc.; GSV Capital Corp. from March 2013 to March 2017; XenoPort, Inc. from September 2007 to July 2016; and EnteroMedics Inc. from May 2007 to May 2016.

Richard L. Kauffman

Year of Birth: 1955

Director

Director
Since
August 2017


Chairman of Energy & Finance for New York State since February 2013; and senior advisor to Secretary Steven Chu at the U.S. Department of Energy from September 2011 through February 2013.New York State Energy Research and Development Agency Board; Levi Strauss & Co. from December 2009 to August 2011; The Wallace Foundation.

INTERESTED DIRECTOR:

Thomas J. McInerney

Year of Birth: 1964(3)




Chief
Executive
Officer;
Director





Director
Since
June 2017


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IAC/InterActiveCorp from January 2005 to March 2012.Yahoo! Inc. from April 2012 to June 2017; HSN, Inc.; Interval Leisure Group, Inc.; and Match Group, Inc.

(1)

The business address of each Director is 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017.

(2)

Time served as a Director of the Fund. If elected, each Director will serve until his or her respective successor is elected and qualified.

(3)

Thomas J. McInerney is an “interested person” as defined by the 1940 Act, because he is an officer of the Fund.

Director Qualifications

Set forth below is a brief biographical description of each person that is a Director nominee. The primary experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each Director are also described in the following paragraphs.


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Independent Directors

Tor R. Braham has served as a member of the Fund’s Board of Directors since the closing of the Sale Transaction in June 2017. He served as a member of Yahoo’s Board of Directors from April 2016 to the closing of the Sale Transaction. Mr. Braham served as Managing Director and Global Head of Technology Mergers and Acquisitions for Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., an investment bank, from 2004 until November 2012. From 2000 to 2004, he served as Managing Director and Co-Head of West Coast U.S. Technology, Mergers and Acquisitions for Credit Suisse First Boston, an investment bank. Prior to that role, Mr. Braham served as an investment banker with Warburg Dillon Read LLC, and as an attorney at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. Mr. Braham currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Viavi Solutions Inc., a network and service enablement and optical coatings company. He previously served on the boards of directors of NetApp, Inc., a computer storage and data management company, from September 2013 to March 2016 and Sigma Designs, Inc., an integrated circuit provider for the home entertainment market, from June 2014 to August 2016. The Fund will benefit from his mergers and acquisitions experience and knowledge of the technology industry gained through his experience as an investment banker and legal advisor to technology companies.

Eric K. Brandt has served as a member of the Fund’s Board of Directors since the closing of the Sale Transaction in June 2017. He served as a member of Yahoo’s Board of Directors from March 2016 to the closing of the Sale Transaction and was elected Chairman of Yahoo’s Board of Directors in January 2017. Mr. Brandt served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”), a global supplier of semiconductor devices, from February 2010 until February 2016, and he served as Broadcom’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2007 until February 2010. From September 2005 until March 2007, Mr. Brandt served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Beginning in 1999, he held various positions at Allergan, Inc., a global specialty pharmaceutical company, including Executive Vice President of Finance and Technical Operations and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Allergan, Mr. Brandt spent ten years with The Boston Consulting Group, a privately held global business consulting firm, most recently serving as Vice President and Partner. Mr. Brandt is a director of Lam Research Corporation, a wafer fabrication equipment company, and Dentsply Sirona Inc., a dental products company. The Fund will benefit from his financial expertise, including as a chief financial officer of a public company, his mergers and acquisitions experience, and his public company board experience.

Catherine J. Friedman served as a member of the Fund’s Board of Directors since the closing of the Sale Transaction in June 2017. She served as a member of Yahoo’s Board of Directors from March 2016 to the closing of the Sale Transaction. Ms. Friedman has been an independent financial consultant serving public and private companies in the life sciences industry since 2006. Prior to that, Ms. Friedman held numerous positions over a 23-year investment banking career with Morgan Stanley, including Managing Director from 1997 to 2006 and Head of West Coast Healthcare and Co-Head of the Biotechnology Practice from 1993 to 2006. Ms. Friedman is a member of the boards of directors of Innoviva, Inc. (formerly Theravance, Inc.), a royalty management company specializing in respiratory assets, and Radius Health, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. She previously served as a member of the boards of directors of EnteroMedics Inc., a medical device company, from May 2007 to May 2016, XenoPort, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from September 2007 to July 2016, and GSV Capital Corp., a publicly traded business development company, from March 2013 to March 2017. The Fund will benefit from her financial and transactional experience, her leadership experience, and her public company board experience.

Richard L. Kauffman has served as a member of the Fund’s Board of Directors since August 2017. Since February 2013, Mr. Kauffman has been the Chairman of Energy & Finance for New York State, overseeing and managing New York State’s entire energy portfolio, and since June 2013 he has also served as Chair of the New York State Energy Research and Development Agency Board. Prior to joining the state administration, Mr. Kauffman worked in energy and finance at some of the nation’s highest levels, most recently serving as senior advisor to Secretary Steven Chu at the U.S. Department of Energy from September 2011 through February 2013. Prior to his public service career, from September 2006 through August 2010, he was chief executive officer of Good Energies, Inc., a leading investor in clean energy technologies. From July 2004 through September 2006, Mr. Kauffman was a partner of Goldman Sachs where he chaired the Global Financing Group; and from May 1993 to July 2004, he worked at Morgan Stanley, most recently as vice chairman of Morgan Stanley’s Institutional Securities Business and co-head of its Global Banking Department. Mr. Kauffman has served as chairman of the board of Levi Strauss & Co., where he was also chair of the finance committee. He has also served on the boards of several nonprofit organizations,


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


including the Brookings Institution and the Wildlife Conservation Society, and is currently a member of the board of The Wallace Foundation. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. The Fund will benefit from his corporate and government leadership experience, his expertise in finance, and his public company board experience.

Interested Director

Thomas J. McInerney served as a member of the Fund’s Board of Directors since the closing of the Sale Transaction in June 2017. He served as a member of Yahoo’s Board of Directors from April 2012 to the closing of the Sale Transaction. Mr. McInerney served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IAC/InterActiveCorp (“IAC”), an Internet company, from January 2005 to March 2012. From January 2003 through December 2005, he also served as Chief Executive Officer of the retailing division of IAC (which included HSN, Inc. and Cornerstone Brands). From May 1999 to January 2003, Mr. McInerney served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ticketmaster, formerly Ticketmaster Online-CitySearch, Inc., a live entertainment ticketing and marketing company. From 1986 to 1988 and from 1990 to 1999, Mr. McInerney worked at Morgan Stanley, a global financial services firm, most recently as a Principal. Mr. McInerney serves on the boards of directors of HSN, Inc., a television and online retailer, Interval Leisure Group, Inc., a provider of membership and leisure services to the vacation industry, and Match Group, Inc., an online dating resource. The Fund will benefit from his corporate leadership experience, his expertise in finance, restructuring, mergers and acquisitions and operations and his public company board and committee experience.

The Board’s Leadership Structure

Eric K. Brandt, an Independent Director, is currently the Chairman of the Board. The Board has determined that having an Independent Director serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board is in the best interests of stockholders of the Fund because it allows the Chairman to focus on the effectiveness and independence of the Board while the Chief Executive Officer focuses on executing the Fund’s strategy and managing the Fund’s operations and performance.

Audit Committee

Tor R. Braham, Eric K. Brandt, and Richard L. Kauffman, who are Independent Directors, serve on the Audit Committee of the Fund (the “Audit Committee”). Mr. Brandt serves as chair of the Fund’s Audit Committee. The overall purpose of the Fund’s Audit Committee is to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Fund and the audits of the Fund’s financial statements.

The Fund’s Audit Committee generally is responsible for reviewing and evaluating issues related to the accounting and financial reporting policies and internal controls of the Fund, overseeing the audit of the Fund’s financial statements, and acting as a liaison between the Board and the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board has determined that each of Mr. Brandt and Mr. Kauffman qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC rules and satisfies the financial sophistication requirements of the Nasdaq listing standards.

Compensation Committee

Ms. Friedman and Mr. Brandt, who are Independent Directors, serve on the Compensation Committee of the Fund (the “Compensation Committee”). Ms. Friedman serves as the chair of the Fund’s Compensation Committee. The primary purpose of the Fund’s Compensation Committee is to oversee the Fund’s compensation and employee benefit plans and practices. The Fund’s Compensation Committee is generally responsible for reviewing the Fund’s compensation and benefits plans, reviewing and approving the compensation levels of executive officers, reviewing and approving employment, severance or termination arrangements, establishing stock ownership guidelines and reviewing and recommending to the Board any changes in the compensation paid to the Fund’s non-employee directors.


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Nominating Committee

Ms. Friedman and Mr. Brandt, who are Independent Directors, serve on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Fund (the “Nominating Committee”). Mr. Brandt serves as the chair of the Fund’s Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee is generally responsible for identifying and recommending individuals qualified to serve as directors of the Fund, advising on matters related to board composition, procedures and committees, assessing the appropriateness of a Director nominee who does not receive a “majority of votes cast” in an uncontested election, assessing the appropriateness of a Director who retires or experiences a change in his or her principal occupation, employer, or principal business affiliation, and overseeing the annual self-assessment of each individual Director’s performance and the annual evaluation of the Board and its committees.

Consideration of Director Candidates

The Fund’s Nominating Committee considers Director candidates recommended by stockholders. In considering Director candidates, whether submitted by management, members of the Board, stockholders, or other persons, the Fund’s Nominating Committee will consider the qualifications and suitability of the candidate, and with regard to a candidate submitted by a stockholder, may also consider the number of shares of the Fund’s common stock held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that such shares have been held.

To have a candidate considered by the Fund’s Nominating Committee, a stockholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must include the following information:

the name of the stockholder and evidence of the stockholder’s ownership of the Fund’s common stock, including the number of shares of the Fund’s common stock owned and the length of time of ownership; and

the name of the candidate, the candidate’s resume or a listing of his or her qualifications to be a Director of the Fund and the candidate’s consent to be named as a Director if selected by the Nominating Committee and nominated by the Board.

The Fund’s Nominating Committee may require additional information as it deems reasonably required to determine the eligibility of the Director candidate to serve as a member of the Board.

The stockholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to the chair of the Nominating Committee in care of the Fund’s Secretary at 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017. Please see “Deadline for Stockholder Proposals” below for information regarding nominations of candidates to be considered by the Fund’s Nominating Committee for nomination to the Board at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.

Pursuant to its charter, the Fund’s Nominating Committee’s criteria for evaluating potential candidates will be consistent with the Board’s criteria for selecting new Directors. Such criteria will include the possession of such knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, integrity, diversity, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, and understanding of the Fund’s business environment as may enhance the Board’s ability to manage and direct the affairs and business of the Fund and, when applicable, the ability of Board committees to fulfill their duties, considered in the context of the Nominating Committee’s assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that time. The Fund’s Nominating Committee may also take into account, as applicable, the satisfaction of any independence requirements imposed by any applicable laws, regulations or rules and the Corporate Governance Guidelines.

While the Fund’s Nominating Committee will not have formal objective criteria for determining the diversity desired or represented on the Board, the committee will also consider and assess the effect that potential candidates may have on Board diversity (which may include, among other things, an assessment of gender, age, race, national origin, education, professional experience, and differences in viewpoints and skills) when evaluating the Board’s composition and recommending candidates for nomination.


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


In connection with the Fund’s Nominating Committee’s consideration of a potential Director candidate, the committee may also collect and review publicly available information regarding the person to assess the suitability of the candidate and determine whether the person should be considered further. If the Fund’s Nominating Committee determines that the candidate warrants further consideration, the chair or another member of the Fund’s Nominating Committee may contact the candidate. Generally, if the candidate expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on the Board, the Fund’s Nominating Committee may request information from the candidate, review his or her accomplishments and qualifications and conduct one or more interviews with the candidate and members of the committee or other members of the Board. The Fund’s Nominating Committee may consider all this information in light of information regarding other candidates that the Fund’s Nominating Committee is evaluating for membership on the Board. In certain instances, members of the Fund’s Nominating Committee or Board may contact one or more references provided by the candidate or may contact other members of the business community or other persons that may have first-hand knowledge of the candidate’s accomplishments. The Fund’s Nominating Committee’s evaluation process will not vary based on the source of a recommendation of a candidate, although, as stated above, in the case of a candidate recommended by a stockholder, the Board may take into consideration the number of shares of the Fund’s common stock held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that such shares have been held.

Board and Committee Meetings

Information regarding the number of meetings of the Board, Audit Committee, Nominating Committee, and Compensation Committee of the Fund since the closing of the Sale Transaction and the Board was reconstituted as the Board of the Fund is set forth in the table below:

Board Meetings

 Audit Committee Meetings Nominating Committee
Meetings
 Compensation Committee
Meetings
2 2 2 2

Each Director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board (and any committee thereof on which he or she serves) held since the closing of the Sale Transaction and the Board was reconstituted as the Board of the Fund. It is the Fund’s policy to encourage Directors to attend annual stockholders’ meetings.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board, as a whole and through its committees, serves an active role in overseeing management of the Fund’s risks. The Fund’s officers are responsible for day-to-day risk management activities. The Fund’s full Board monitors risks through regular reports from each of the committee chairs, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Compliance Officer, and is apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters. The Board and each committee thereof oversees risks associated with their respective areas of responsibility, as summarized below. The Independent Directors of the Fund meet in regularly scheduled sessions without management. The Chair of the Board chairs the executive sessions of the Board.

The Audit Committee reviews risks and exposures associated with financial matters, particularly financial reporting, tax, accounting, disclosures, internal control over financial reporting, and credit and liquidity matters, programs and policies relating to legal compliance and strategy, and the Fund’s operational infrastructure, particularly reliability, business continuity and capacity. The Fund’s Audit Committee meets with key management personnel and representatives of outside advisers as required. The Audit Committee’s Charter is available on the Fund’s website at www.altaba.com.

The Compensation Committee discusses and reviews compensation arrangements for the Fund’s executive officers and other compensation programs to avoid incentives that would promote excessive risk-taking that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Fund. The Compensation Committee’s Charter is available on the Fund’s website at www.altaba.com.


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


The Nominating Committee oversees risks associated with operations of the Board and its governance structure. The Nominating Committee’s Charter is available on the Fund’s website at www.altaba.com.

The Board believes that the processes it has established for overseeing risk would be effective under a variety of leadership frameworks with respect to the Fund and therefore do not materially affect its choice of leadership structure as described under “The Board’s Leadership Structure” above.

Director Communications

Stockholders and other interested parties may contact the Board or any Director by mail. To communicate with the Board or any Director, correspondence should be addressed to the Board or the Board members with whom you wish to communicate by either name or title. All such correspondence should be sent c/o the Secretary of the Fund at 145 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017.

Director Beneficial Ownership of Securities

The table below indicates the dollar range of equity securities of the Fund owned by the Directors as of June 15, 2017:

Dollar Range of Equity

Securities in the Fund

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS:

Tor R. Braham

Over $100,000

Eric K. Brandt

Over $100,000

Catherine J. Friedman

None

Richard L. Kauffman

None

INTERESTED DIRECTOR:

Thomas J. McInerney

Over $100,000

The table below indicates the number of Shares of the Fund owned by the Directors as of June 15, 2017. As of June 15, 2017, each Director, and the Directors as a group, owned less than 1% of the outstanding Shares of the Fund.

Shares of the

Fund Owned

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS:

Tor R. Braham

19,434

Eric K. Brandt

8,545

Catherine J. Friedman

0

Richard L. Kauffman

0

INTERESTED DIRECTOR:

Thomas J. McInerney

45,862

Director Compensation

As compensation for serving on the Board, each Independent Director receives an annual retainer of $350,000 and the chair of the Board receives an additional retainer of $80,000 for his or her additional services in this capacity. Each Independent


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Director receives reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such attendance. In addition, the chair of the Fund’s Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $40,000 and each Audit Committee member receives an annual retainer of $20,000 for their additional services in these capacities. The chair of any other committee receives an annual retainer of $25,000 and each member of any other committee receives an annual retainer of $10,000 for their additional services in these capacities. All amounts are paid quarterly, subject to any deferred retainer amounts (described below), and amounts will be pro-rated for partial periods of service.

Subject to the approval of the Fund’s Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan (defined and described under “Proposal Five”), each Independent Director eligible to participate in the Plan will defer at least 50% (and up to 100%) of his or her annual retainer fees earned during the period following his or her deferral election and up to the third anniversary of the Fund’s 2017 annual stockholder meeting. The amounts deferred will be subject to increase in accordance with the same performance goals as apply to the incentive awards granted to executive officers and will become payable in accordance with the terms of the Plan (each as described below). If the Plan is approved by the Fund’s stockholders, the compensation deferred by each Independent Director eligible to participate in the Plan may increase by as much as four times the amount originally deferred by the respective Independent Director provided that the discount at which the Fund’s common stock trades is reduced to at least 14.7% from the Plan’s baseline discount of 27.2%, which could result in the creation of in excess of $14 billion of value for the Fund’s stockholders based on the market price as of September 7, 2017 of the Fund’s common stock (although the actual value created may vary from this estimate). As of August 18, 2017, Mr. Kauffman is not eligible to participate in the Plan but may defer a portion of his compensation at such time as he becomes eligible to make deferrals at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the applicable deferral election form.

In addition, the Fund maintains directors’ and officers’ liability insurance on behalf of its directors and officers. Interested Directors receive no additional compensation for serving on the Board.

The following table provides information regarding the estimated compensation that is contemplated to be paid to each Director, assuming a full fiscal year of operations of the Fund as an investment company. The Fund is not part of a “fund complex” and therefore only aggregate estimated compensation from the Fund is shown.

Director

Aggregate Estimated Compensation from
the Fund(1)

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS:(2)

Tor R. Braham

370,000

Eric K. Brandt

505,000

Catherine J. Friedman

405,000

Richard L. Kauffman(3)

370,000

INTERESTED DIRECTOR:

Thomas J. McInerney(4)

0

(1)

For the Independent Directors, amounts shown include estimated retainers and committee fees, as described below. The Fund does not accrue or pay retirement or pension benefits or provide health benefits to Independent Directors as of the date hereof.

(2)

Each Independent Director except Mr. Kauffman also served as an independent director of Yahoo. The Independent Directors received cash compensation in the following amounts for their service as directors of Yahoo during 2016: Tor R. Braham: $47,692; Eric K. Brandt: $124,176; and Catherine J. Friedman: $65,989. During Yahoo’s last calendar year, the Independent Directors received grants of equity awards valued at the following amounts for their service as directors of Yahoo: Tor R. Braham: $278,751; Eric K. Brandt: $310,968; and Catherine J. Friedman: $310,968 (with grants of equity awards included at their grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718).

(3)

Mr. Kauffman has determined to donate his director compensation to charity.


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


(4)

See table below under “Officer Compensation” for compensation paid to Mr. McInerney as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. McInerney receives no additional compensation for serving on the Board of the Fund. Mr. McInerney served as a director of Yahoo. Mr. McInerney received the following amounts for his service as an independent director of Yahoo during 2016: $170,000 in cash compensation and grants of equity awards in 2016 valued at $239,971 (with grants of equity awards included at their grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718).

Executive Officers

The following information relates to the executive officers of the Fund who are not listed above under Directors.

Name, Address(1) and Age

TitleTerm of
Office
and
Length
of Time
Served(2)
Principal Occupation During the Past Five Years

Arthur Chong

Year of Birth: 1953

General
Counsel
and
Secretary
Since
June 2017
General Counsel and Secretary of Yahoo from March 2017 through the closing of the Sale Transaction; Outside Legal Advisor to Yahoo from October 2016 to March 2017; Special Advisor to Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP from June 2016 to October 2016; Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Broadcom Corporation from October 2008 to February 2016.

Alexi A. Wellman

Year of Birth: 1970

Chief
Financial
and
Accounting
Officer
Since
June 2017
Vice President, Global Controller of Yahoo from October 2015 through the closing of the Sale Transaction; Vice President, Finance of Yahoo from November 2013 to October 2015; Chief Financial Officer of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. from December 2011 to June 2013.

DeAnn Fairfield Work

Year of Birth: 1969

Chief

Compliance
Officer

Since
June 2017
Outside Legal Advisor to Yahoo from December 2016 through the closing of the Sale Transaction; Senior Vice President, Senior Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of Broadcom Corporation from December 2012 to February 2016; Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Broadcom Corporation from April 2009 to November 2012.

(1)

The business address of each officer of the Fund is 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017.

(2)

Time served as an officer of the Fund. Each officer serves at the pleasure of the Fund’s Board.

Officer Compensation

The following table provides information regarding the estimated aggregate compensation that is contemplated to be paid under existing agreements or arrangements to each of the Fund’s three highest paid officers who received compensation from the Fund in excess of $60,000, assuming a full fiscal year of operations of the Fund as an investment company. The Fund is not part of a “fund complex” and therefore only aggregate estimated compensation from the Fund is shown.

OfficerAggregate Estimated Compensation from the Fund(1)

Thomas J. McInerney, Chief Executive Officer and Director(2)

4,024,000

Arthur Chong, General Counsel and Secretary(3)

2,024,000

Alexi A. Wellman, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer(4)

891,000

(1)

Amounts shown represent estimated direct salaries and estimated targeted annual incentive awards to be paid by the Fund as well as certain other benefits, including any amounts deferred under the Fund’s 401(k) plan, as described below under “Officer Compensation” assuming the Fund had a full fiscal year of operations. The amounts shown in the Compensation Table also include the Fund’s matching contributions made to each officer’s account under the Fund’s 401(k) plan equal to $24,000, $24,000 and $16,000 for Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong and Ms. Wellman respectively. The Fund does not accrue


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


pension benefits to officers as of the date hereof. The amounts shown in the table above do not include the initial value of the deferred compensation incentive awards granted to each of the officers under the Plan, which are further described below.

(2)

Reflects compensation payable to Mr. McInerney in consideration of his services provided to the Fund as its Chief Executive Officer.

(3)

Mr. Chong served as General Counsel and Secretary of Yahoo from March 10, 2017 until the closing of the Sale Transaction. Mr. Chong served as an outside legal advisor to Yahoo from October 31, 2016 to March 9, 2017, pursuant to an engagement letter with Yahoo. Pursuant to this engagement, Yahoo compensated Mr. Chong in the amount of $100,000 per month, and also provided reimbursement for reasonable out of pocket expenses (including a car service).

(4)

Prior to the Sale Transaction, Ms. Wellman served as Vice President and Global Controller of Yahoo. Ms. Wellman received from Yahoo $556,250 in cash compensation for service during 2016 and grants of equity awards in 2016 with a value of $549,948 (with grants of equity awards included at their grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718).

Each of the officers listed in the table above has entered into an offer letter setting forth the terms and conditions of his or her employment with the Fund, which offer letter became effective on the date of the closing of the Sale Transaction, other than Mr. Chong whose offer letter became effective on March 10, 2017. The letters have no specified term, and each officer’s employment with the Fund is on an at-will basis.

Base Salary and Target Bonus. The letters set forth the following annual base salary for each executive officer: Mr. McInerney – $2 million, Mr. Chong – $1 million, and Ms. Wellman – $500,000. Each such officer will be eligible for a cash annual incentive award targeted at the following percentages of the executive officer’s annual base salary (each percentage, a “Target Bonus”): Mr. McInerney – 100%, Mr. Chong – 100%, and Ms. Wellman – 75%. Mr. Chong’s annual incentive award for his first year after closing of the Sale Transaction will be increased pro rata to reflect his services to Yahoo as an outside legal advisor from October 31, 2016 to March 9, 2017 and thereafter as General Counsel and Secretary through the closing of the Sale Transaction.

Long-Term Deferred Incentive Compensation. Each officer disclosed in the table above is eligible for grants of deferred compensation incentive awards governed by the terms of the Plan, which is subject to stockholder approval as further described in Proposal Five below. The deferred amounts payable to each officer under the Plan will be based on attainment of performance targets pre-established by the Compensation Committee. The Plan will provide for the value of payments that each officer may receive based on attainment of the pre-established performance targets, as set forth in the award agreement, and subject to the terms of the Plan. In August 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the grants of initial deferred compensation incentive awards to certain officers and key employees of the fund, including the officers listed in the table above, subject to stockholder approval of the Plan. Mr. McInerney’s deferred compensation incentive award will have an initial value of $6 million, which may result in payments of between $0 and $24 million; Mr. Chong’s deferred compensation incentive award will have an initial value of $3 million, which may result in payments of between $0 and $12 million; and Ms. Wellman’s deferred compensation incentive award will have an initial value of $1.5 million, which may result in payments of between $0 and $6 million. Each deferred compensation incentive award is subject to a three year vesting schedule, commencing on June 13, 2017, which may accelerate upon an involuntary termination or change in control. The terms of the Plan are further described in Proposal Five below.

Severance Benefits.In the event an officer’s employment terminates without “cause” or as a result of a resignation for “good reason” (each, as defined in the offer letters), the officer will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the execution of an effective release of claims against the Fund: (i) a lump sum payment equal to 12 months (or, for Mr. McInerney, 18 months) of base salary; (ii) a pro rata portion of the officer’s annual incentive award based on actual performance, payable at the time such award would otherwise have been paid, (iii) any portion of the deferred compensation to which the officer is entitled pursuant to the terms of the Plan and (iv) subject to the officer’s timely and proper election for continued coverage under Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”), reimbursement by the Fund for COBRA premiums paid by the officer for a period of 12 months (or, for Mr. McInerney, 18 months) following the officer’s termination of employment. In addition, in the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the letters), each officer will


PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


automatically receive the above payments and benefits, subject to the officer’s execution of an effective release of claims against the Fund; provided, that, in lieu of the pro rata annual incentive award described in clause (ii) above, the officer will be entitled to an amount equal to his or her Target Bonus, payable in lump sum within 10 business days following the effective date of the release of claims.

401(k) and Other Benefits. Each officer in the table above is also eligible to participate in the benefit programs generally available to other officers and employees of the Fund and to accrue paid time off days in accordance with the Fund’s post-closing vacation or paid time off policy and will also be eligible to participate in the Fund’s 401(k) plan and health and welfare benefit programs which will be made available to the Fund’s employees generally. The Fund’s 401(k) plan allows employees to contribute up to 100% of their compensation (within the limits prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code). The Fund matches such employee contributions at a rate of 6%, up to an annual limit of $18,000 (subject to increase in the event that the employee makes eligible catch-up contributions). Employee and Fund contributions vest immediately. Participants in the Fund’s 401(k) plan may receive distributions from their respective accounts upon the occurrence of certain events, including a termination of employment and reaching normal retirement age (59 12 years old), subject to the terms and conditions of the Fund’s 401(k) plan.

There are no arrangements or understandings between any of Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong or Ms. Wellman and any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an executive officer of the Fund, and there are no family relationships between any of Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong, or Ms. Wellman and any of the Fund’s other directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by the Fund to become a director or executive officer. None of Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong or Ms. Wellman has any direct or indirect material interest in any transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, except in connection with his or her previous employment with Yahoo as set forth in this section.

Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of a “majority of votes cast” on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to elect a Director nominee, unless the election is contested, in which case a plurality of votes cast on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary. A “majority of votes cast” means that the number of shares voted “for” a director exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes (i.e., Shares held by brokers or nominees as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the stockholder or the persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter), if any, will have no effect on the outcomeAdjournment Proposal. If you are present at the Special Meeting in person or by proxy but abstain from voting, it will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” both the Dissolution Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Dissolution Proposal.

Broker non-votes occur when nominees, such as brokers and banks, holding shares on behalf of “street name” owners do not receive voting instructions from those owners regarding a matter and do not have discretionary authority to vote on the matter under Nasdaq rules. With respect to matters such as the Dissolution Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal, nominees cannot vote unless they receive instructions from the “street name” owner. The failure to receive such instructions as to such a Director nominee. The holders of the Shares will have equal voting rights (i.e. one vote per Share).

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the nominees of the Board.



Board Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements

Introduction

Management recommends retaining two investment advisors to mange the bulk of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. The 1940 Act requires any agreement pursuant to which an investment adviser provides the Fund advice withmatter results in a broker non-vote. With respect to the Fund’s securities to be approved by the Fund’s board of directors, including a majority of the Fund’s Independent Directors, and by the Fund’s stockholders. As a result, each of the New BlackRock Investment Advisory Agreement and the New MSSB Investment Advisory Agreement may be entered into only if it is approved by (i) the registered investment company’s board of directors or a majority of the outstanding voting securities (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the registered investment company, and, in either event, (ii) the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval. After an initial two year period, each agreement is required to be approved annually by the Fund’s board of directors, including a majority of its Independent Directors.

Description of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio

The Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio consists of cash, cash equivalents, and high-quality, short-term debt securities. The Fund’s objectives in managing the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio are preservation of capital, maintenance of liquidity and achieving optimum yields in relation to the applicable guidelines. The Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio is not traded for short-term speculative purposes. The guidelines governing the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio limit the weighted average effective duration of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio to two years.

Permitted investments under the guidelines for the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio include U.S. government and U.S. government-sponsored agency securities (excluding mortgage-backed securities), repurchase agreements with maturities not in excess of seven days collateralized by U.S. government securities and permitted U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, debt securities of corporations and commercial banks, non-U.S. sovereign debt rated Aaa/AAA by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch (denominated in U.S. dollars and traded in the U.S.), direct obligations of supranational organizations rated Aaa/AAA by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch (denominated in U.S. dollars and traded in the U.S.), foreign agency securities guaranteed by foreign governments rated Aaa/AAA by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch (denominated in U.S. dollars and traded in the U.S.), tax exempt securities and money market funds. Ineligible investments include mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities (other than those rated Aaa/AAA by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch), auction rate securities, variable rate demand obligations, extendable debt securities, subordinated corporate debt securities, taxable securities with maturities in excess of 3 years + 2 weeks, tax-exempt securities with maturities in excess of 2 years +2 weeks, securities with short-term ratings below P-1/A-1/F-1 by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch, securities with maturities less than or equal to 2 years with ratings below A3/A- by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch, securities with maturities greater than 2 years and less than 3 years with ratings below A2/A by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch and investments in non-U.S. sovereign debt, direct obligations of supranational organizations and foreign agency securities guaranteed by foreign governments in each case rated below Aaa/AAA by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch or which are not denominated in U.S. dollars or not traded in the U.S.

The guidelines require all debt securities to be rated by at least two of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, and that split-rated securities will be deemed to have the lower rating. The Fund expects that ratings will be monitored on a continuous basis and the Advisers will be required to notify the Fund in the event of any downgrades. With respect to tax-exempt securities, the guidelines apply the minimum ratings requirements described in the forgoing to the underlying assets of the municipal security and disregard any ratings enhancement obtained through insurance provided by monoline insurance companies. Additionally, the guidelines require that any investment included in the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio be denominated in U.S. dollars and any corporate debt have a minimum issue size of $200 million. The guidelines apply at all times; exceptions to the guidelines require written approval by the Fund’s Chief Financial and Accounting Officer.


BOARD CONSIDERATION OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS


A portion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio may be invested by management in one or more money market funds for near term liquidity needs. As of June 30, 2017, $8.2 billion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio was externally managed, with the remainder invested by management directly in a money market fund.

Board Process

On May 4, 2017, Yahoo’s Strategic Review Committee, which included the Yahoo directors that currently serve as Directors on the Board of the Fund, met in-person to discuss the process for selecting external investment advisers for the Fund’s Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio and to review the requirements of Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act governing such selection process. The Directors reviewed information with respect to several potential investment advisers provided by officers and employees of Yahoo and identified BlackRock and MSSB as potential external investment advisers to oversee the management of Fund’s Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. The Directors noted that BlackRock and MSSB submitted the two lowest initial fee proposals of the potential investment advisers being considered by the Directors.

At a telephonic meeting of the Directors held on June 12, 2017, the Yahoo directors who now serve as Directors of the Fund considered their duties in connection with approving an investment advisory agreement for the Fund. The Directors heard presentations by representatives from BlackRock and MSSB and considered information with respect to the capabilities of each of BlackRock and MSSB to serve as an investment adviser for approximately half of the Fund’s Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. The Directors reviewed: (a) information confirming the financial condition of each Adviser and anticipated profitability derived from each Adviser’s relationship with the Fund; (b) fees proposed to be paid to each Adviser by the Fund for services; (c) the resources devoted to, risk oversight of, and implementation of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio’s investment policies and restrictions; (d) each Adviser’s internal controls and risk and compliance oversight mechanisms; (e) execution of portfolio transactions; and (f) each Adviser’s capabilities and experience with managing portfolios similar to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio.

On June 16, 2017, the Board approved the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement and the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement by written consent to allow each of BlackRock and MSSB to serve as investment adviser for its portion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio until an in-person meeting of the Board could be held and the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement and New MSSB Advisory Agreement could be submitted to the stockholders for approval, in accordance with Rule 15a-4 of the 1940 Act. Descriptions of the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement and Interim MSSM Advisory Agreement are included in the Fund’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 and the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement and Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement are filed as an exhibits thereto.

On July 26, 2017, the Board met in person to consider the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement and the New MSSB Advisory Agreement (collectively, the “Advisory Agreements”). At the in-person meeting, legal counsel to the Fund reviewed for the Directors their duties under the 1940 Act requirements applicable to their consideration of the Advisory Agreements for approval. Management recalled for the Board the materials previously reviewed by the Directors and the prior deliberations of the Directors in connection with the selection of each of BlackRock and MSSB and the approval of the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement and Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement. The Directors met by telephone with representatives of BlackRock and MSSB to ask further questions with respect to each Adviser’s capabilities and to ask additional questions with respect to the materials previously considered by the Directors. The Board also received reports from BlackRock and MSSB with respect to their management to date of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio and their views of the current state of the market for the types of securities held in the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio.

The Directors, including the Independent Directors, discussed the Advisory Agreements in light of applicable regulatory requirements and criteria and assessed information concerning the capabilities of each Adviser and the Fund’s proposed advisory fees under the Advisory Agreements. The Directors also considered the unique features of the Fund as compared to more traditional registered closed-end funds for which BlackRock and/or MSSB serve as investment adviser.


BOARD CONSIDERATION OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS


Following an analysis and discussion of the factors identified in this Proxy Statement under “Proposal Two – Board Consideration of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement” and “Proposal Three – Board Consideration of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement” and in the exercise of their business judgment, the Directors concluded that it was in the best interests of the Fund to approve the Advisory Agreements for an initial term of two years. The Board, including a majority of the members of the Board who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or the Advisers, unanimously approved the Advisory Agreements on behalf of the Fund and unanimously recommend approval of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement and the New MSSB Advisory Agreement by stockholders.



Dissolution Proposal, Two: Approval of New Investment Advisory Agreement With BlackRock

Introduction

On June 16, 2017, the Fund entered into the Interim BlockRock Advisory Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the 1940 Act. The terms of the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement are substantially identical to those of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement, except for the term and escrow provisions described below. The Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement will continue in effect until the earlier of November 10, 2017 (150 days following the closing of the Sale Transaction) or when stockholders of the Fund approve the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement. In accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the 1940 Act, compensation earned by BlackRock under the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement will be held in an interest-bearing escrow account. If stockholders of the Fund approve the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement prior to November 10, 2017, the amount held in the escrow account under the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement will be paid to BlackRock. If stockholders of the Fund do not approve the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement prior to November 10, 2017, BlackRock will be paid the lesser of its costs incurred in performing its services under the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement or the total amount in the escrow account, plus interest earned. If stockholders do not approve the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement, BlackRock will no longer be able to act as the Fund’s adviser to a portion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio after November 10, 2017 and the Board will take such action as it deems to be in the best interest of the Fund.

Description of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement

If approved by stockholders of the Fund, the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement will expire on the second anniversary of such stockholder approval, unless continued in effect from year to year thereafter, if such continuance is approved at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act. Below is a comparison of certain terms of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement to the terms of the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement.

Investment Advisory Services. The investment management services to be provided by BlackRock to the Fund under the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement will be identical to those services currently provided by BlackRock to the Fund under the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement. In addition, the investment advisory services are expected to be provided by the same BlackRock personnel under the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement as under the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement. Subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the investment guidelines applicable to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio, BlackRock will (i) act as investment adviser for and supervise and manage the investment and reinvestment of the Fund’s assets allocated to BlackRock (the “BlackRock Assets”) and in connection therewith have complete discretion in purchasing and selling securities and other assets for the BlackRock Assets and in voting, exercising consents and exercising all other rights appertaining to such securities and other assets on behalf of the BlackRock Assets; (ii) supervise continuously the investment program of the BlackRock Assets and the composition of its investment portfolio; (iii) arrange for the purchase and sale of securities and other assets held in the BlackRock Assets; (iv) provide investment research to the Fund; and (v) provide reasonable assistance to the Fund and the Fund’s custodian or its affiliates in assessing the fair value of securities held in the BlackRock Assets for which market quotations are not readily available. BlackRock’s services are not exclusive and BlackRock or any officer, employee or other affiliate thereof may act as investment adviser for any other person, firm or corporation.


PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF NEW INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT WITH BLACKROCK


Fees. The Fund’s fee schedule under the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement is identical to the fee schedule under the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement. The Fund pays BlackRock a monthly fee at an annual rate based upon the average daily net assets (as determined by BlackRock) of the portion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio advised by BlackRock pursuant to the following fee schedule:

up to $250 million

0.08%

between $250 million and $500 million

0.06%

between $500 million and $750 million

0.04%

over $750 million

0.02%

As of June 30, 2017, BlackRock managed approximately $3.8 billion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. Assuming the value of the assets managed by BlackRock remained at such level for the Fund’s first year of operations, the annual investment advisory fee rate payable to BlackRock would be approximately 0.028% of such assets, which would result in an annual fee of approximately $4 million on assets of $3.8 billion. For purposes of calculating BlackRock’s compensation under the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement, the portion of the Fund’s assets invested in money market funds affiliated with BlackRock is excluded from the BlackRock Assets; however, the Fund, as an investor in such money market funds, would bear its pro rata share of such money market fund’s expenses, include any management fee paid to BlackRock or an affiliate of BlackRock.

Adviser Expenses. During the term of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement, BlackRock will bear all costs and expenses of its employees and any overhead incurred in connection with its duties hereunder, except as otherwise expressly provided in the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement. The Fund will bear all of its own expenses including, but not limited to, taxes, interest, brokerage fees and commissions, if any, salaries and fees of the Directors, administration and custody charges, transfer and dividend disbursing agent’s fees, insurance, audit fees, legal expenses and printing expenses.

Limitation of Liability and Indemnification. Both the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement and the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement provide that BlackRock will not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by BlackRock or by the Fund in connection with the performance of the agreement, except a loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation for services or a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on its part in the performance of its duties or from reckless disregard by it of its duties under the agreement. The New BlackRock Advisory Agreement and the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement also provide for indemnification by the Fund of BlackRock, its directors, officers, employees, agents, associates and controlling persons, and the directors, partners, members, officers, employees and agents thereof (including any individual who serves at BlackRock’s request as trustee, officer, partner, member, trustee or the like of another entity) (each such person being an “BlackRock Indemnitee”), for liabilities incurred by them in connection with their services to the Fund, subject to certain limitations and conditions. In particular, no BlackRock Indemnitee will be indemnified under the agreement against any liability to the Fund or the Fund’s stockholders or any expense of such BlackRock Indemnitee arising by reason of (i) willful misfeasance, (ii) bad faith, (iii) gross negligence or (iv) reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such BlackRock Indemnitee’s position.

Term and Termination of Agreement.The Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement was in effect for an initial term of the earlier of (i) the date 150 days from the effective date of the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement and (ii) the date on which stockholders of the Fund approve the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement. If the stockholders of the Fund approve the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement, the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement will expire on the second anniversary of such approval, unless continued. The New BlackRock Advisory Agreement may be continued for successive one-year periods if approved at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act.

The Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement provides that the agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by the vote of the Board or the vote of holders of a majority of the Fund’s outstanding voting securities on ten (10) days’ written notice and by BlackRock on sixty (60) days’ written notice, as required by Rule 15a-4 for an interim agreement. The New BlackRock Advisory Agreement provides that the agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by either party upon sixty (60) days’ written notice.


PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF NEW INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT WITH BLACKROCK


This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement, which is attached hereto as Annex A.

Information about BlackRock

BlackRock Advisors, LLC has a principal place of business located at 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, Delaware 19809. BlackRock is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC and is a wholly owned subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc., a publicly traded company. BlackRock is one of the world’s largest publicly-traded investment management firms and is a leader in investment management, risk management and advisory services for institutional and retail clients worldwide. As of March 31, 2017, BlackRock’s assets under management were approximately $5.42 trillion.

Board Consideration of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement

The New BlackRock Advisory Agreement was approved by the Board at an in-person meeting on July 26, 2017 after consideration of all factors considered by the Directors at meetings on May 4, 2017, June 16, 2017 and July 26, 2017 that the Board determined to be relevant to its deliberations, including those set out below.

Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services Provided by BlackRock. The Board reviewed the nature, extent and quality of services proposed to be provided to the Fund. The Board met telephonically with BlackRock’s personnel responsible for investment activities, including the investment officers, and reviewed the materials provided by the portfolio management team. The Board considered the number, education and experience of investment personnel generally and the portfolio management team for the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio, BlackRock’s research capabilities, portfolio trading capabilities, use of technology, commitment to compliance, credit analysis capabilities, risk analysis and oversight capabilities, and the proposed approach to managing its portion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio, among other factors. The Board noted that BlackRock’s Cash Management Group is comprised of a team of 27 portfolio managers specializing in prime, government, municipal and international investment strategies with an average investment experience of 16 years per portfolio manager as of March 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s compensation structure with respect to its portfolio management team for the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio and to its ability to attract and retain high-quality talent and create performance incentives. The Board also reviewed the capabilities of BlackRock’s compliance departments and considered its policies and procedures for assuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

The Investment Performance of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. The Board discussed with BlackRock the most appropriate performance benchmarks and metrics by which the Board should measure the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio’s performance in the future. The Board received and reviewed information regarding the total amount of assets under management with a similar mandate to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio by BlackRock over the past five years. The Board noted that BlackRock had total assets under management with a similar mandate of $388.9 billion as of March 31, 2017.

Consideration of the Advisory/Management Fees and the Cost of the Services and Profits to be Realized by BlackRock from its Relationship with the Fund. The Board reviewed statements relating to BlackRock’s financial condition and profitability methodology, noting the inherent limitations in allocating costs among various advisory products. The Board considered that profitability may be affected by numerous factors including, among other things, the types of portfolios managed, precision of expense allocations and business mix, and determined that calculating and comparing profitability at the individual portfolio level is difficult.

In addition, the Board considered information regarding BlackRock’s expected profits relating to the management of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio as well as the costs of providing services to the Fund. The Board also considered whether BlackRock has the financial resources necessary to attract and retain high quality investment management personnel to perform its obligations under the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement and to provide the high quality of services that is expected by the Board. The Board noted that the principal components of BlackRock’s compensation of portfolio managers include a base salary, a performance-based discretionary bonus and participation in various benefits programs, as well as one or more of the incentive compensation programs established by BlackRock, which promote the retention of top investment management personnel.

Economies of Scale. The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale might be realized if the assets of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio increase, whether the Fund would benefit from such economies of scale, and whether there


PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF NEW INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT WITH BLACKROCK


should be changes in the advisory fee rate or breakpoint structure applicable to the Interim BlackRock Advisory Agreement in order to enable the Fund to more fully participate in such economies of scale. The Board noted that BlackRock’s use of advisory fee breakpoints, as opposed to asset class, portfolio management team level or complex-wide breakpoints, is the most transparent to comprehend and operationally efficient. The Board also considered the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio’s anticipated asset levels and whether the current fees were appropriate.

Other Factors Deemed Relevant by the Board Members. The Board also took into account other ancillary or “fall-out” benefits that BlackRock may derive from its relationship with the Fund, both tangible and intangible, such as its ability to leverage its investment professionals who manage other portfolios and risk management personnel and an increase in BlackRock’s profile in the investment advisory and broker-dealer communities, which may result in enhanced sales of other BlackRock-advised funds. The Board also considered BlackRock’s overall operations and its efforts to expand the scale of, and improve the quality of, its operations. The Board also reviewed information regarding BlackRock’s brokerage practices.

Overall Conclusions. Based on the foregoing, the Directors determined that the investment advisory fee proposed by BlackRock is fair and reasonable in light of the extent and quality of the services to be provided under the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement and other benefits to be received and that the approval of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In reaching this conclusion, no single factor or group of factors was determinative or conclusive and each Director, in the exercise of his or her business judgment, may have attributed different weights to the various factors considered.

Voting Standard

To become effective, the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement requires the affirmative vote of a 1940 Act Majority. For purposes of determining the approval of the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as shares voted againstvotes “AGAINST” the Proposal.

Board RecommendationDissolution Proposal for purposes of determining whether or not the requisite vote was received. With respect to the Adjournment Proposal, broker non-votes, if any, will be counted to determine a quorum, but will not be counted as votes

 


for or against any proposal and therefore have the practical effect of reducing the number of affirmative votes required to achieve a majority by reducing the total number of shares from which the majority is calculated. If you hold your shares of the Fund’s common stock through a broker and wish to vote on the Proposals, you must instruct your broker how to vote your shares. IF YOU FAIL TO INSTRUCT YOUR BROKER HOW TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE DISSOLUTION PROPOSAL, THE RESULTING BROKER NON-VOTE ON SUCH PROPOSALS WILL HAVE THE EFFECT OF A VOTE “AGAINST” SUCH PROPOSAL.

How many Shares were outstanding as of the Record Date?

At the close of business on May 16, 2019, the Fund had 519,511,366 Shares outstanding.

How can I find out the results of the voting?

We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Special Meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC promptly following the Special Meeting.

Proposal No. 1: The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

What does the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution entail?

The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution provides for the voluntary liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Fund.

Why is the Board recommending approval of the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution?

After carefully considering the risks, timing, viability and potential impact on our stockholders of the alternatives potentially available to the Fund, as well as the recommendation of management, and in consultation with the Fund’s legal, financial and tax advisors, the Board determined that the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Background of the Proposed Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution” and “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Reasons for the Liquidation and Dissolution.”

What will happen if stockholders approve the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution?

If stockholders approve the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Fund intends to make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof) to stockholders following such approval. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation andDissolution—Pre-Dissolution Liquidating Distribution” below for a description of the proposed distribution, including the potential amount and timing of such distribution.The Fund currently expects the Certificate of Dissolution to be filed during the third or fourth quarter of 2019 promptly following the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution, although such filing may be delayed by the Board in its sole discretion. The Fund will issue a press release not less than five days before filing the Certificate of Dissolution to announce (i) that the Board has determined to proceed with the dissolution and (ii) the anticipated filing date of the Certificate of Dissolution. Following the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL, the Board will proceed to wind up the Fund’s affairs. The Fund intends to rely on the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL to, among other things, obtain the Court Order establishing the amount and form of security for contested known, contingent and potential future claims that are likely to arise or become known within five years of the Effective Time (or such longer period of time as the Court may determine not to exceed ten years after the Effective Time). The Fund will pay or make reasonable provision for the Fund’s uncontested known claims and expenses and establish reserves for other claims as required by the Court Order. The remaining assets or cash of the Fund will be used to make liquidating distributions to stockholders. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process” below for a description of the liquidating distributions that may be made to stockholders, including the potential amount and timing of any such distributions.

 


Can the Board abandon or modify the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution after stockholder approval prior to the Effective Time?

Yes. If our Board subsequently determines that the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is no longer in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders, our Board may direct that the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution be abandoned, either before or after stockholder approval, or may amend or modify the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to the extent permitted by Delaware law without the necessity of further stockholder approval.

What are the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL and why does the Board elect to follow such procedures?

For a description of the procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process.”

The Board unanimously recommendshas elected to follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL because following such procedures affords greater protection to our directors and stockholders than the “default” provisions of Section 281(b) of the DGCL. The provisions of Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL would protect the Fund’s directors from liability to claimants for failing to make adequate provision for the Fund’s actual and potential liabilities by providing for a judicial determination of the amount and form of reserves to be set aside for pending, contingent or potential future claims and by providing that, stockholdersin the absence of fraud, the judgment of the directors of the Fund vote “FOR” approvalis conclusive as to the provision made for payment of all other claims that are mature, known and uncontested or that have been finally determined to be owing by the New BlackRock Advisory Agreement.



Proposal Three: ApprovalFund. With respect to stockholders, while the liability of New Investment Advisory Agreement With MSSB

Introduction

On June 16, 2017, the Fund entered into the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the 1940 Act. The terms of the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement are substantially identical to those of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement, except for the term and escrow provisions described below. The Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement will continue in effect until the earlier of November 10, 2017 (150 days following the closing of the Sale Transaction) or when stockholdersa stockholder of the Fund approvefor any claim against the New MSSB Advisory Agreement. In accordance with Rule 15a-4Fund is generally limited to such stockholder’s pro rata share of such claim or the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution, whichever is less, and is limited in the aggregate to the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution, the procedures under the 1940 Act, compensation earned by MSSB under the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement will be held in an interest-bearing escrow account. If stockholdersSections 280 and 281(a) of the Fund approveDGCL further limit stockholder liability by providing that stockholders have no liability for any claim commenced after the New MSSB Advisory Agreement prior to November 10, 2017, the amount held in the escrow account under the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement will be paid to MSSB. If stockholdersexpiration of the Fund dowinding-up period.

What will happen if the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is not approve the New MSSB Advisory Agreement prior to November 10, 2017, MSSB will be paid the lesser of its costs incurred in performing its services under the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement or the total amount in the escrow account, plus interest earned. approved?

If stockholders do not approve the New MSSB Advisoryliquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Fund will continue its corporate existence and the Board will continue to explore alternatives for returning capital to stockholders in a manner intended to maximize value. Such alternatives may include, among other things, (i) resubmitting the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to stockholders for reconsideration in the future, (ii) selling all or substantially all of the Fund’s Alibaba Shares for cash and returning the proceeds from such sales to the Fund’s stockholders by way of share repurchase programs or a tender offer, or (iii) making an exchange offer of the Fund’s Alibaba Shares for Shares, together with cash, and selling Alibaba Shares to fund the cash portion of such exchange offer, and taxes that would be incurred in such transaction.

Do I have appraisal rights?

No. Under Delaware law, stockholders will not have appraisal rights in connection with either of the Proposals.

Will I receive any distributions before the Certificate of Dissolution is filed?

The Fund intends to make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof) contingent on and as soon as reasonably practicable following stockholder approval of the Dissolution Proposal and before the filing of a Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State. The Fund currently estimates that the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be between $52.12 and $59.63 per Share in cash and/or Alibaba Shares. The Fund currently expects to make suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution during the third or fourth quarter of 2019, although the Board reserves the right to extend such timing. However, there is no assurance regarding whether or when suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be made.


The amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution would be dependent on the Fund’s surplus and net assets before and after making such distribution, in accordance with Delaware law. Thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution would also be conditioned on the prior sale by the Fund for cash of not less than a sufficient number of Alibaba Shares to ensure that the Fund has sufficient liquid assets to cover thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount and to fund the cash portion of such distribution.

In addition, in light of the fact that the Board has adopted the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and anticipates entering into a dissolution andwinding-up process, in determining the amount of the Fund’s assets that would be available for apre-dissolution liquidating distribution, the Fund intends to hold back thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount before making suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution. See “—What is thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount?” below.

The assumptions underlying the Fund’s estimate of the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution are described in the “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation andDissolution—Pre-Dissolution Liquidating Distribution” section of this Proxy Statement.

The actual amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution could be higher or lower than the Fund’s current estimated range of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution depending on, among other things, how much of the Fund’s assets, at such time, are in the form of Alibaba Shares, the actual market prices of the Alibaba Shares on and prior to the payment date of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution (which may be higher or lower than the assumed Alibaba Share price), the Fund’s anticipated ability to monetize such remaining Alibaba Shares on favorable terms, and the extent that existing and potential liabilities are resolved, new liabilities arise or facts and circumstances otherwise change or develop. It is not possible to predict with certainty what thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount or the amount available for thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution ultimately will be. The amount set forth above should be considered strictly as an estimate subject to the specified assumptions and qualifications. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution.”

What is thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount?

The“Pre-Dissolution Holdback Amount” is an amount of assets that the Fund will hold back before making thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution contemplated by the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. The amount will be determined by the Board based on the Board’s estimate of the amount of assets that might be required by the Court to satisfy the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, which amount, due to the uncertainties described under “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters,” will include the maximum amount of potential PRC taxes on all of the Alibaba Share Transfers without any offset or reduction for any foreign tax credits allowable under U.S. tax law.

Given the uncertainties with respect to certain of the Fund’s contingent and future liabilities, including potential liabilities for taxes payable to taxing authorities in the PRC, in order to provide the maximum protection for our stockholders and directors under these “safe harbor” dissolution provisions of the DGCL, the Board has determined that it would be prudent to wait until the issuance of the Court Order before distributing any portion of thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount.

Do any reserve amounts in connection with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution affect the Fund’s reserves for liabilities under U.S. GAAP?

None of the current estimates of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount, the amount of the reserves for disputed, contingent and potential future claims set forth in the Fund’s petition to the Court or the amounts required to be reserved by the Fund in the Court Order will be calculated in accordance with, or by reference to, U.S. GAAP and such amounts do not, and will not, reflect any change in the Fund’s position with respect to its liabilities and reserves from an accounting perspective. Rather, each of such amounts is, or will be, calculated solely to ensure that the Fund has sufficient assets to comply with its obligations to provide adequate security under the dissolution procedures under the DGCL, which is generally a more conservative standard than the determination required by U.S. GAAP.


What is the total amount of liquidating distributions that stockholders can expect to receive?

The Fund currently estimates that, assuming an Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, an Alibaba Share value at the time of distribution of $177.00 (the actual closing prices of the Alibaba Shares on the NYSE ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and May 15, 2019), it could make aggregate liquidating distributions to stockholders, including thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, ranging between approximately $39.9 billion and $41.2 billion (approximately $76.76 and $79.35 per Share, respectively), based on the number of Shares outstanding following completion of the September 2018 Repurchase Program. Such estimates assume that the funds held back for certain of our potential tax liabilities (including potential PRC tax liabilities) eventually would be released and available for distribution, based on the assumednon-taxability of the Alibaba Share Transfers under Bulletin 7 or, if the Alibaba Share Transfers were taxable under Bulletin 7, the assumed utilization of related foreign tax credits for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The aggregate amount that would be distributed to stockholders could be higher or lower than the Fund’s current estimated range of the aggregate liquidating distributions depending on, among other things, the resolution of outstanding Known Claims, the incurrence of unexpected or greater-than-expected losses with respect to Litigation Claims and the assertion of Uncertain Claims (as such terms are defined in “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process”) (including potential PRC tax claims and other tax claims), the ability to receive reasonable value when disposing of ournon-cash assets and costs incurred to wind up our business. Further, if additional amounts ultimately are determined to be necessary to satisfy or make provision for any of these obligations, stockholders may receive substantially less than the current estimates. Accordingly, you will not know the exact amount of any liquidating distributions you may receive as a result of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution when you vote on the Dissolution Proposal. You may receive substantially less than the amount that we currently estimate or that you otherwise expect to receive. It is possible that the aggregate liquidating distributions that would be paid to a stockholder under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution would not exceed the amount that the stockholder could have received upon sales of its Shares in the open market.

When will stockholders receive liquidating distributions after the Certificate of Dissolution is filed?

We plan to make an initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution to our stockholders on our transfer books as of the Effective Time as soon as practicable following entry of the Court Order. Under Section 281(a) of the DGCL, the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution may not be made before the expiration of a period of 150 days from the date of the last notice of rejection given by the Fund with respect to Known Claims. We currently expect the Court Order to be issued within one year following the Effective Time, although there can be no assurances regarding the timing of the Court Order.

We are unable to predict the timing of any additional liquidating distributions following the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution. The timing of any such additional liquidating distributions will depend upon the timing of the resolution of actual and potential claims for which we have established reserves, the amount to be paid in satisfaction of such claims, and whether a need has arisen to establish additional reserves. To the extent that claims for which the Fund has set aside reserves are resolved or satisfied at amounts less than such reserves, and assuming no need has arisen to establish additional reserves, the Fund would make additional distributions to stockholders of any portion of the reserves established pursuant to the Court Order that the Board determines is no longer required because the relevant claim has been resolved or satisfied. The Board would evaluate the Fund’s reserves and available cash on a quarterly or, as appropriate, other periodic basis and make additional liquidating distributions as it deems reasonable and appropriate. For more detail on the various factors that could affect the timing of any additional liquidating distributions, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of any additional post-dissolution liquidating distributions to stockholders under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

When do you expect the dissolution andwinding-up process to be completed?

Assuming the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is approved by our stockholders, we intend to file a Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State promptly following the


making of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution. The Fund currently expects the Certificate of Dissolution to be filed during the third or fourth quarter of 2019, although such filing may be delayed by the Board in its sole discretion.

Pursuant to Delaware law, our corporate existence will continue for a period of at least three years following the Effective Time for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, winding up the Fund and making distributions to stockholders, but not for the purpose of continuing to engage in any business. The three-year statutorywinding-up period can be extended by the Court and is automatically extended for any proceeding commenced but not completed prior to the end of this three-year period. As a result, thewinding-up process could extend beyond three years after dissolution, and it is difficult to estimate when it will be completed.

What are the major liabilities of the Fund?

Among other liabilities, the Fund’s major known, contingent and potential future liabilities include (i) potential U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax claims (including potential PRC tax claims), which constitute a significant majority of the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, (ii) potential liabilities arising out of the Data Breaches and certain other legal contingencies, and (iii) continuing obligations to indemnify former Yahoo executives. For a detailed description of such liabilities, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves.”

Does the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution present any liability to our stockholders?

If stockholders approve the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, we will file a Certificate of Dissolution and initiate the dissolution process under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL. Under the DGCL, stockholders of a dissolved corporation which has complied with the procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL have no liability for any claim commenced after the expiration of thewinding-up period. However, stockholders may still be liable for claims that are commenced before the expiration of thewinding-up period. Claimants of such claims may proceed against the Fund’s stockholders to recoup amounts distributed by the Fund, if the remaining assets of the Fund after the distribution are insufficient to satisfy such claims. Under the “safe harbor” dissolution provisions of the DGCL, a stockholder could be held liable for any such claim in the amount of the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim and the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution from the Fund and from any liquidating trust or trusts. The aggregate liability of any stockholder of the Fund for claims against the Fund will not exceed the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution. Accordingly, in such event, a stockholder could be required to return part or all of the liquidating distributions previously made to such stockholder, and could receive nothing from us under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

In addition, if a stockholder has paid taxes on amounts previously received pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, a repayment of all or a portion of such amount could result in a situation in which a stockholder may incur a net tax cost if the repayment of the amount previously distributed does not cause a reduction in taxes payable in an amount equal to the amount of the taxes paid on amounts previously distributed.

How will the Fund’s sale of the Yahoo operating business to Verizon affect the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution?

When the Fund sold the Yahoo operating business to Verizon in 2017, the Fund retained limited categories of liabilities, including liabilities relating to its investments in Alibaba and Yahoo Japan Corporation (“Yahoo Japan”), liabilities under the Fund’s then-outstanding convertible notes and related hedge and warrant transactions, liabilities relating to securityholder litigation, liabilities relating to the Fund’s status as a publicly traded company, certain director and officer indemnification obligations, and 50% of certain liabilities relating to certain historical data breaches (“User Security Liabilities”). All other liabilities resulting from or relating to the Yahoo operating business were transferred to Verizon and will not need to be paid or provided for by the Fund. However, the Fund is required to make provisions reasonably acceptable to Verizon for the satisfaction of the Fund’s obligations with respect to the User Security Liabilities and the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution contains a provision complying with such requirement.


Are there any other risks and uncertainties associated with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution?

Yes. You should carefully read the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Risk Factors.”

Do directors and executive officers have interests in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution that differ from mine?

In considering the Board’s recommendation to approve the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, you should be aware that some of our directors and executive officers may have interests in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. These potential interests include the payment of incentive awards under the LTIP, the payment of severance compensation to the Fund’s executive officers and/or the Fund’s continuing indemnification obligations to its directors and officers. Our Board was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in approving the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the transactions contemplated thereby. For additional information about the interests of the Fund’s directors and officers in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Interests of Directors and Officers in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

Do any of the directors of the Fund intend to resign upon the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution?

No. No changes to the size or composition of the Board are contemplated upon the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution.

Can I sell my Shares once the Certificate of Dissolution is filed?

We anticipate that, upon the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution, trading in our Shares will be suspended on Nasdaq, and our Shares will thereafter be delisted. In addition, we will close our stock transfer books and discontinue recording transfers of the Shares at the Effective Time. Thereafter, certificates representing the Shares will not be assignable or transferable on our books, except by will, intestate succession or operation of law. The Fund will, however, request that, following the Effective Time, DTC, as a record holder of Shares through its Cede & Co. nominee, maintain records representing the right to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including any transfers of such rights. Consequently, the Fund expects that any transfers of such rights will be tracked by DTC. To the extent that a stockholder’s Shares are not held by a DTC participant as of the Effective Time, it could be more difficult for such stockholder to transfer such stockholder’s rights to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions.

After the Effective Time, brokers may make a market for interests in the Shares in the“over-the-counter” market. There is no assurance that such market will arise or, if one does arise, for how long it will be maintained or how actively interests in the Shares will trade. Both trading prices and volumes in any such“over-the-counter” market could be volatile and erratic.

What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the liquidation and dissolution?

In general, any distributions to our stockholders pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution, will be taxable to stockholders who are U.S. Holders (as defined in the “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Liquidation and Dissolution”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Amounts received by a stockholder pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution will first be applied against and reduce the stockholder’s tax basis in the Shares. Gain will be recognized as a result of a liquidating distribution to the extent that the aggregate value of such liquidating distribution and any prior liquidating distributions received by a stockholder with respect to a Share exceeds such stockholder’s tax basis in the Share. Any loss will generally be recognized only when a stockholder receives the final distribution from us and then only if the aggregate value of all liquidating distributions with respect to a Share is less than the stockholder’s tax basis in the Share. Gain or loss recognized by a stockholder will be capital gain or loss provided the Shares are held as capital assets, and will generally be long-term capital gain or loss if the Shares have been held for more than one year.


All stockholders should review the discussion in “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Liquidation and Dissolution” for a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. The tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution may vary depending upon the particular circumstances of each stockholder. Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences to them of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution in light of each stockholder’s particular circumstances.

Proposal No. 2: Adjournment

What is the effect of voting to approve the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies?

If you vote in favor of the Adjournment Proposal, you will be voting to permit the Special Meeting to be adjourned, even if a quorum is present, in order to solicit additional votes in favor of the Dissolution Proposal. In the event that the Dissolution Proposal has not received the requisite stockholder approval, it is likely that our Board would seek to adjourn the Special Meeting to solicit additional proxies in favor of that Proposal. The receipt of sufficient votes in favor of the Adjournment Proposal would allow our Board to take such action.


Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Proxy Statement, including the Appendix, contains forward-looking statements concerning the proposed liquidation and dissolution pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. Without limiting the foregoing, words or phrases such as “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend” or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not statements of historical facts and do not reflect historical information. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those statements. Such risks and uncertainties relate to, among other things: the availability, timing and amount of liquidating distributions, including prior to the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution; the amounts that will need to be set aside by the Fund; the adequacy of such reserves to satisfy the Fund’s obligations; the ability of the Fund to favorably resolve certain potential tax claims, litigation matters and other unresolved contingent liabilities of the Fund; the amount of proceeds that might be realized from the sale or other disposition of the Fund’s primary asset, its Alibaba Shares; the application of, and any changes in, applicable tax laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles and interpretations; the incurrence by the Fund of expenses relating to the liquidation and dissolution; and the ability of the Board to abandon, modify or delay implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, even after stockholder approval. Further information regarding the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ from the results in these forward-looking statements are discussed under the section “Risk Factors” in this Proxy Statement. Please carefully consider these factors, as well as other information contained herein and in our periodic reports and documents filed with the SEC. The forward-looking statements included in this Proxy Statement are made only as of the date of this Proxy Statement. We do not undertake any obligation to update or supplement such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, except as required by law. Because the Fund is an investment company, the forward-looking statements in this Proxy Statement are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).


Risk Factors

There are many factors that the Fund’s stockholders should consider when deciding whether to vote in favor of the Dissolution Proposal, including the risk factors set forth below. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all the other information included in this Proxy Statement and the documents delivered with this Proxy Statement before making a decision about voting on the Proposals.

Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution.

The Fund intends to make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof) contingent on, and as soon as reasonably practicable following stockholder approval of the Dissolution Proposal and before the filing of a Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State. The Fund currently estimates that the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be between $52.12 and $59.63 per Share in cash and/or Alibaba Shares. However, this estimate is subject to a number of assumptions and qualifications that could vary, as described in greater detail below. The Fund currently expects to make suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution during the third or fourth quarter of 2019, although such timing may be extended by the Board in its sole discretion. However, there is no assurance regarding whether or when suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be made.

Under Delaware law, the Fund may not make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution except (i) out of “surplus,” which is defined as the amount by which the Fund’s “net assets” (i.e., the amount by which the Fund’s total assets exceed the Fund’s total liabilities) exceed its “capital” (i.e., the sum of the aggregate par value of all of the Fund’s issued Shares), or (ii) in the case in which there is insufficient “surplus,” out of the Fund’s “net profits” for the fiscal year in which such distribution is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Moreover, the Fund may not make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution if doing so would render the Fund insolvent (i.e., if its liabilities exceed its assets, or if it is unable to pay its debts as they come due) or if such distribution constitutes a fraudulent transfer. Accordingly, the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution would be dependent on the Fund’s surplus and net assets before and after making such distribution.

In addition, in light of the fact that the Board has adopted the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and anticipates entering into a dissolution andwinding-up process, in determining the amount of the Fund’s assets that would be available for apre-dissolution liquidating distribution, the Fund, before making apre-dissolution liquidating distribution, intends to hold back thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount,i.e., an amount of assets that the Board estimates will be sufficient to cover the maximum potential reserves that might be required by the Court to satisfy the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, which amount, due to the uncertainties described under “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters,” will include the maximum amount, including the maximum amount of potential PRC taxes on all of the Alibaba Share Transfers without any offset or reduction for any foreign tax credits allowable under U.S. tax law. For additional information on the Fund’s current estimates of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution and thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation andDissolution—Pre-Dissolution Liquidating Distribution.”

Factors that could impact thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount, and consequently the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, include the following:

whether any existing or potential liabilities are resolved prior to the payment of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution;

whether, in light of new facts and circumstances, any potential claims that were previously taken into account by the Board in determining thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount would no longer result in any actual liabilities; and

whether new liabilities that were not expected by the Board arise, which would require an increase in thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount.

Given these uncertainties, it is not possible to predict with certainty the amount that will be ultimately available for thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution.


The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution following entry of the Court Order.

We plan to make an initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution to our stockholders on our transfer books as of the Effective Time as soon as practicable following entry of the Court Order. Under Section 281(a) of the DGCL, the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution may not be made before the expiration of a period of 150 days from the date of the last notice of rejection given by the Fund with respect to Known Claims. We currently expect the Court Order to be issued within one year following the Effective Time, although there can be no assurances regarding the timing of the Court Order.

In the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution, we intend to distribute all of the Fund’s remaining assets in excess of the amount to be used by the Fund to pay claims and fund the reserves required by the Court Order and pay the Fund’s operating expenses through the completion of the dissolution andwinding-up process. The Court Order will reflect the Court’s own determination as to the amount and form of security reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for all known, contingent and potential future claims against the Fund. There can be no assurances that the Court will not require the Fund to withhold from the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution amounts in excess of the amounts that we believe are sufficient to satisfy the Fund’s potential claims and liabilities. Accordingly, stockholders may not receive distributions of these additional amounts for a substantial period of time.

The amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution would depend on, among other things, the amount that was paid in thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution and the actual amount of the reserves that we are required to establish pursuant to the Court Order. Factors that could impact the amount of the reserves to be determined by the Court Order, and consequently the amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution, include the following:

whether any claim is resolved or barred pursuant to Section 280 of the DGCL;

whether claimants of rejected Known Claims commence proceedings against the Fund, or any other litigation is brought against the Fund or its directors and officers;

whether the Fund is able to obtain clarity from taxing authorities with respect to the amount of taxes, if any, owed to them;

whether unforeseen claims are asserted against the Fund, in which case the Fund would have to defend or resolve such claims and/or be required to establish additional reserves to provide for such claims; and

whether any of the expenses incurred in thewinding-up process, including expenses of required personnel and other operating expenses (including legal, accounting and other professional fees) necessary to dissolve and liquidate the Fund, are more or less than the Fund’s estimates.

With respect to the Fund’s potential PRC tax liabilities, based on our current views as to the applicability of PRC tax to the Alibaba Share Transfers (as described under “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters”), we currently expect to request in our petition to the Court that the Fund not be required in the Court Order to hold back any reserves in respect of PRC tax liabilities with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, and we believe that, if we receive confirmation (which would likely be oral and not written) from the PRC taxing authorities that they have closed their review of an Alibaba Share Transfer and that PRC taxes will not be assessed on that transaction, the Court would likely grant our request. However, the Court will then make its own determination as to the amount and form of security reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for contingent PRC tax liabilities. There can be no assurances that the Court will not require the Fund to reserve an amount for some or all of our potential PRC tax liabilities. If the Court requires us to reserve an amount for some or all of our potential PRC tax liabilities (which are subject to aten-year statute of limitations period), stockholders may not receive distributions of any excess reserve amounts for a substantial period of time. If such a reserve were required for potential PRC taxes with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, then we would seek to include a provision in the Court Order that would permit the Fund to return to the Court to petition for a reduction in the Fund’s reserves if we receive oral confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities after the issuance of the Court Order, or otherwise believe there is a reasonable basis for concluding, that the PRC taxing authorities do not intend to assess PRC tax with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers. There is no assurance, however, that the Court would agree to consider such a request or, if it does, that it would modify the Court Order in such a scenario. For more information regarding the Fund’s


potential PRC tax liabilities, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters.”

The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of any additional post-dissolution liquidating distributions to stockholders under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

To the extent that claims for which the Fund has set aside reserves are resolved or satisfied at amounts less than such reserves, and assuming no need has arisen to establish additional reserves, the Fund would make additional distributions to stockholders of any portion of the reserves established pursuant to the Court Order that the Board determines is no longer required because the relevant claim has been resolved or satisfied. However, there may be less funds available than currently anticipated for additional liquidating distributions to the Fund’s stockholders. The precise amount and timing of any additional liquidating distributions to the Fund’s stockholders will depend on and could be delayed or diminished due to many factors, including:

whether a claim is resolved for more than the amount of reserve established for such claim pursuant to the Court Order;

whether the Fund is unable to resolve claims with creditors or other third parties, including the PRC taxing authorities, or if such resolutions take longer than expected;

whether a creditor or other third party seeks an injunction against the making of additional distributions to stockholders on the basis that the amounts to be distributed are needed to satisfy the Fund’s liabilities or other obligations to the extent not previously reserved for;

whether due to new facts and developments, a new claim, as the Board reasonably determines, requires additional funds to be reserved for its satisfaction; and

whether the expenses the Fund incurs in thewinding-up process, including expenses of personnel required and other operating expenses (including legal, accounting and other professional fees), necessary to dissolve and liquidate the Fund are more than anticipated.

Due to these and other factors, the amounts of any additional post-dissolution liquidating distributions may be substantially less than the amounts currently estimated by the Fund.

Liquidating distributions to stockholders could be substantially reduced and/or delayed due to uncertainty regarding the resolution of certain potential tax claims, litigation matters and other unresolved contingent liabilities of the Fund.

Among other liabilities, the Fund’s major known, contingent and potential future liabilities include (i) potential U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax claims (including potential PRC tax claims), which constitute a significant majority of the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, (ii) potential liabilities arising out of the Data Breaches and certain other legal contingencies, and (iii) continuing obligations to indemnify former Yahoo executives. For a detailed description of such liabilities, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves.”

We intend to follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL to obtain the Court Order establishing the amount and form of security for contested known, contingent and potential future claims that are likely to arise or become known within five years of the Effective Time (or such longer period of time as the Court may determine not to exceed ten years after the Effective Time), and pay or make reasonable provision for the Fund’s uncontested known claims and expenses and establish reserves for other claims as required by the Court Order.

Whether any additional liquidating distributions can be made to stockholders would depend on whether claims for which the Fund has set aside reserves are resolved or satisfied at amounts less than such reserves and whether a need has arisen to establish additional reserves. The Fund cannot assure stockholders that the Fund’s liabilities can be settled for less than the amounts the Fund has reserved, or that unknown liabilities that have not been accounted for will not arise. As a result, the Fund may continue to hold back funds and delay additional liquidating distributions to stockholders. It is important for the Fund to


retain sufficient funds to pay the expenses and liabilities actually owed to the Fund’s creditors, because under Delaware law, if the Fund fails to do so, each stockholder could be held liable for the repayment to creditors, out of the amounts previously received by such stockholder from us or from any liquidating trust or trusts, of such stockholder’s pro rata share of such excess (up to the full amount actually received by such stockholder).

The application of, and any changes in, applicable tax laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles and interpretations may adversely affect the Fund’s assets and the amount and timing of any liquidating distributions to stockholders.

The Fund may be directly or indirectly affected by tax legislation, regulations and administrative practices or the modification of existing tax laws by U.S. ornon-U.S. taxing authorities or other governmental bodies. The application of complex tax laws involves numerous uncertainties, and U.S. andnon-U.S. taxing authorities may review and challenge tax positions adopted by the Fund. These challenges may result in adjustments to, or impact the timing or amount of, the Fund’s taxable income, deductions, credits or other tax items, which may adversely affect our effective tax rate and tax liability.

Even if the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is approved and the Fund files a Certificate of Dissolution, the Fund will continue to be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income and taxable gains until the liquidation is complete (i.e., until all of its remaining assets have been distributed to the stockholders or transferred to a liquidating trust or trusts). Accordingly, the sale or other disposition of the Fund’s remainingnon-cash assets, including the remaining Alibaba Shares, will generally be taxable to the Fund for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund’s prior dispositions of Alibaba Shares and shares of common stock of Yahoo Japan (“Yahoo Japan Shares”) were generally taxable to the Fund for U.S. federal income tax purposes (such dispositions, together with any future dispositions of the Fund’s remaining Alibaba Shares, “Share Dispositions”), resulting in significant tax liabilities to the Fund.

The Fund also expects to incur certain state and local income tax liabilities on the disposition of the Fund’s remaining Alibaba Shares, and it incurred such tax liabilities on prior Share Dispositions. Depending on a number of factors, including the apportionment methodologies that are applied to source the gains from Share Dispositions for state and local tax purposes, the amount of such taxes could be greater or less than the corresponding amount recorded by the Fund for financial accounting purposes and reflected within the liabilities section of the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities filed with the SEC on FormN-CSR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The appropriate apportionment methodology for Share Dispositions is uncertain in each of the state and local jurisdictions in which the Fund expects to pay tax, and could vary materially depending on the manner in which Share Dispositions are effected (e.g., as a sale, exchange, distribution or other disposition). There can be no assurance that we will be able to resolve these matters favorably with the applicable taxing authorities.

On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), which significantly changed existing U.S. tax law. Among other changes impacting the Fund, the TCJA imposed aone-time deemed repatriation tax on certain accumulated earnings ofnon-U.S. corporations owned by 10% U.S. shareholders, expanded the constructive ownership rules that are applied for purposes of determining whether anon-U.S. corporation is a “controlled foreign corporation” (“CFC”), and made other significant changes to the CFC rules. These rules are complex and subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. In addition, the application of these rules and their consequences to the Fund depend on a number of facts specific to Alibaba, Yahoo Japan, and their respective subsidiaries that are beyond our current knowledge and control. These and other uncertainties resulting from the TCJA could materially affect the Fund’s U.S. tax liabilities.

Furthermore, the treatment of the Fund and its assets, and any transactions involving such assets (including liquidating distributions by the Fund), may raise novel and complex issues under other U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax laws. Accordingly, the application of the relevant tax laws to the Fund’s assets and any related past or future transactions, including in connection with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, may be uncertain in many respects. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s treatment of such assets and transactions will not be challenged by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or other U.S. ornon-U.S. taxing authorities, and any such challenge could adversely affect the Fund’s effective tax rate and tax liability, as well as the amount and timing of any liquidating distributions to stockholders.


The Fund may not be able to resolve promptly, or at all, certain potential PRC tax claims on the Alibaba Share Transfers on terms favorable to the Fund, which may significantly delay or reduce any liquidating distributions to stockholders.

Because Alibaba, which is a Cayman Islands company, holds PRC taxable property, each of the Alibaba Share Transfers would be an indirect transfer of such property and potentially subject to PRC tax under Bulletin 7, which is the current regulation governing taxation of indirect transfers in the PRC (other than the 2012 Alibaba Share Transfer, which is covered by the predecessor PRC tax regulation with respect to indirect share transfers). If an Alibaba Share Transfer were subject to PRC tax under Bulletin 7, the tax would be 10% of the gain that the PRC taxing authorities deemed the Fund or its applicable subsidiary to have derived from such transfer. The statute of limitations period applicable to Bulletin 7 cases is ten years. The PRC taxing authorities, in particular the STA, have wide discretion to interpret Bulletin 7 and to apply the indirect transfer rules to specific circumstances.

As described in more detail under “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters,” based on the advice of the Fund’s tax counsel and advisors and other relevant information, we believe it is more likely than not that the Alibaba Share Transfers are not, and in the case of the 2019 Alibaba Share Transfers will not be, subject to PRC tax. There can be no assurance that the PRC taxing authorities will agree with such positions. Even if the PRC taxing authorities have confirmed (which would likely be orally and not in writing) that their review of any Alibaba Share Transfer is closed and that such transaction is not taxable, the PRC taxing authorities are not foreclosed from subsequentlyre-examining and potentially assessing PRC tax on such transactions at any time prior to the expiration of theten-year statute of limitations period; however, we believe based on the advice of our PRC tax advisors that it is highly unlikely they will do so where they have given oral confirmation that a transaction will not be taxed.

Based on advice of the Fund’s counsel, although not free from doubt, we believe that if the Fund or any of its subsidiaries were required to pay tax on the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers or the 2019 Alibaba Share Transfers pursuant to Bulletin 7, the Fund will be entitled to claim the amount of tax paid as a foreign tax credit against its U.S. federal income tax liability on such transfers. If Bulletin 7 tax were assessed on the 2012 Alibaba Share Transfer or the 2014 Alibaba Share Transfer, we would expect to be entitled to claim the amount of tax paid as a foreign tax credit against the Fund’s U.S. federal income tax liability on such transfers.

In order to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to any tax imposed on an Alibaba Share Transfer pursuant to Bulletin 7, the Fund would need to pay the tax assessed by the PRC taxing authorities and pursue all effective and practical remedies to contest the tax under PRC law and the tax treaty between the United States and the PRC, including invoking the assistance of the U.S. competent authority. The Fund expects that it would have to claim the benefit of such credit in the form of a refund of previously paid U.S. federal income taxes. As a result of the U.S. refund procedures and foreign tax credit requirements, including the need to ensure that the Fund has sufficient assets and liquidity to pay and contest any PRC tax imposed on any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, the Fund may need to delay the return of such assets to stockholders until resolution of the potential PRC tax liabilities and any related foreign tax credit claims, which could take a significant period of time. The rules relating to the foreign tax credit are complex and their application to a PRC tax imposed on an Alibaba Share Transfer is not entirely clear. Notwithstanding the advice of the Fund’s counsel and the Fund’s views referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court would agree that the Fund is entitled to claim a credit for such tax.

For a more detailed description of Bulletin 7 and the U.S. refund procedures and foreign tax credit requirements, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters.”

Given the uncertainties described above, when determining the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, we expect to hold back assets sufficient to pay the maximum amount of PRC tax that may be imposed on all of the Alibaba Share Transfers without any offset or reduction in the Fund’s reserves for U.S. tax liabilities. Further, in respect of any post-dissolution liquidating distributions, unless the Fund is able to represent to the Court that we have received reasonably satisfactory confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities (which may include an oral confirmation to the Fund’s representatives) that they have determined not to tax the Alibaba Share Transfers, or otherwise establish to the satisfaction of the Court, that such tax will not be assessed, the Fund expects that the Court Order would require us to


reserve an amount of assets sufficient to cover all or a portion of the maximum potential PRC tax liabilities of the Fund. Based on theten-year statute of limitations period applicable to the potential PRC tax liabilities, such amount of assets may be held back for a substantial number of years.

The Fund will continue to incur expenses that will reduce the amount available for distribution, including expenses of complying with reporting requirements under the 1940 Act following the Effective Time and paying its service providers, including the external investment advisers managing its Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio.

As the Fund continues to wind up, we will continue to incur expenses from operations, including severance costs, compensation to employees who would implement the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, compensation to our independent directors, directors’ and officers’ insurance and other insurance premiums, income, payroll and other taxes (including any taxes that may be imposed on the sale, distribution or other disposition of our remainingnon-cash assets), legal, accounting, financial advisory and consulting fees and general and administrative expenses (including the fees of the external investment advisers for our Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio). We currently estimate that we will reserve between $300 million to $400 million (approximately $0.58 to $0.77 per Share) to pay such expenses. The actual amount of such expenses could be much higher than currently anticipated and will reduce the amount of assets available for ultimate distribution to stockholders.

Following the Effective Time, the Fund will continue to be registered as an investment company under the 1940 Act. The Fund currently expects to deregister as an investment company under the 1940 Act following the issuance of the Court Order, and after the Fund has reduced its remaining assets to cash and distributed substantially all of its assets. Accordingly, the Fund will continue complying with the applicable reporting requirements of the 1940 Act even though compliance with such reporting requirements will cause the Fund to incur related expenses. If the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is approved and the Board effects the liquidation and dissolution, in order to eliminate these expenses, we may seek relief from the SEC from the reporting requirements under the 1940 Act, but no assurances can be given as to when or if such relief will be obtained. If the Fund does not obtain such relief and, in any event, until such time as it obtains such relief, the Fund will continue to incur costs in complying with its reporting requirements as a registered investment company under the 1940 Act.

The amount of proceeds that might be realized from the sale of the Fund’s primary asset, the Alibaba Shares, is subject to fluctuation in the market prices of such Alibaba Shares and the Fund’s ability to monetize such Alibaba Shares on favorable terms.

As of May 15, 2019, the Fund’s Alibaba Shares represented approximately 96.0% of the Fund’s total assets. The trading price of Alibaba Shares has been and is likely to continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to the Fund and affect the Fund’s ability to monetize such Alibaba Shares on favorable terms. For example, the high and low sale prices of Alibaba ADSs between December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were $210.86 and $131.89, respectively. In addition, the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with business operations located mainly in the PRC that have listed their securities in the United States may affect the volatility in the price of and trading volumes for Alibaba Shares. Some of these companies have experienced significant volatility, including significant price declines after their initial public offerings. The trading performances of these PRC companies’ securities at the time of or after their offerings may affect the overall investor sentiment towards other PRC companies listed in the United States and consequently may impact the trading performance of Alibaba Shares.

The market price of Alibaba Shares is affected by Alibaba’s business, management, results of operations and financial condition. Alibaba files with the SEC reports containing financial and other material information about its business and risks relating to its business. You are encouraged to review the information set forth in Alibaba’s registration statements on FormF-1 and FormF-4 and annual reports on Form20-F for additional information about Alibaba’s business, management, results of operations, financial condition and risks. You should also review Alibaba’s press releases and reports filed with the SEC on Form6-K. This information may be obtained at the SEC’s website at:https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001577552&owner=exclude&count=40.

Stockholders should review information filed by Alibaba with the SEC because the Fund’s ability to monetize such Alibaba Shares on favorable terms will depend heavily upon and be influenced by the value of the Alibaba Shares. Information relating to Alibaba in this Proxy Statement is derived from Alibaba’s public filings with the SEC. Such


information is provided for informational purposes only and the Fund makes no representation and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information.

The Fund’s ability to sell or otherwise dispose of the Alibaba Shares is subject to contractual restrictions in certain circumstances.

The Fund’s ability to sell its Alibaba Shares is subject to certain restrictions under the Registration Rights Agreement. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, MSSBamong other things, the Fund generally can sell or otherwise dispose of its “Registrable Securities” (as such term is defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) without limitation or restriction provided the sale or disposition is effected through one or more private sales not executed or recorded on a public exchange or quotation service(“Off-Exchange Sales”).

Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Fund can sell an unlimited amount of Registrable Securities in one or more transactions executed or recorded on a public exchange or quotation service within any90-day period. However, if the Fund sells or otherwise disposes of Registrable Securities in one or more transactions executed or recorded on a public exchange or quotation service resulting in aggregate proceeds greater than $1 billion over any90-day period (a “Large Resale”), then it can sell only up to $1 billion of Registrable Securities (excludingOff-Exchange Sales) in each of the next two90-day periods. The Fund also is restricted in its ability to sell Alibaba Shares (as such term is defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) in public block trades (other than Off-Exchange Sales) in excess of certain threshold amounts or, unless it obtains permission from Alibaba, at a price less than 92% of the most recent prior closing price per Alibaba Share on the NYSE. If the Fund executes a Large Resale or a public block trade or requests Alibaba’s assistance in marketing the sale of Registrable Securities owned by the Fund in accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, then the Fund cannot execute another Large Resale or public block trade or request Alibaba’s assistance in marketing another sale of Alibaba Shares during the180-day period following such transaction, subject to a limited exception for sales pursuant to Rule10b5-1 plans.

Additionally, if Alibaba initiates an underwritten offering and if Alibaba or the underwriters participating in such offering request that the Fund enter into alock-up agreement to not dispose of any Registrable Securities for a period of up to 180 days, then the Registration Rights Agreement requires the Fund to enter into such alock-up agreement to the extent that Alibaba and certain members of Alibaba management are similarly bound.

Accordingly, the Fund may not be able to sell or dispose of its Alibaba Shares to generate new cash in a timely manner, which could delay the liquidating distributions to stockholders.

The Fund’s ability to monetize the Alibaba Shares on favorable terms may be materially and adversely affected by economic conditions in the PRC as well as globally.

Alibaba has significant operations in the PRC. As a result, the Fund’s ability to monetize the Alibaba Shares on favorable terms is impacted to a significant extent by economic, political and legal developments in the PRC. Chinese equities and many American Depositary Shares issued by companies that primarily operate in the PRC, including Alibaba, have experienced increased volatility over the past few years. Although the PRC government has taken steps to seek to stabilize the PRC equity markets, it is uncertain what effect such measures will have, if any, on the PRC equity markets or on the price of American Depositary Shares issued by companies that primarily operate in the PRC. Continued price drops in the PRC equity markets and any related price drops of American Depositary Shares issued by companies that primarily operate in the PRC may adversely affect the Fund’s ability to monetize the Alibaba Shares on favorable terms in connection with the liquidation and dissolution process.

The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the extent of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. Although the PRC government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in the PRC is still owned by the PRC government. In addition, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The PRC government also exercises significant control over the PRC’s economic growth by allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-


denominated obligations, setting monetary policy, regulating financial services and institutions and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth in the past three decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall PRC economy, but may also have a negative effect on the Fund. The Fund’s ability to monetize the Alibaba Shares on favorable terms may be materially and adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable to Alibaba.

In addition, the PRC government has implemented in the past certain measures, including interest rate increases, to control the pace of economic growth. These measures may cause decreased economic activity. Any prolonged slowdown in the Chinese economy could lead to a reduction in demand for Alibaba’s services and consequently have a material adverse effect on Alibaba’s businesses, financial condition and results of operations.

The U.S. administration under President Donald Trump has advocated greater restrictions on trade generally and significant increases on tariffs on certain goods imported into the United States, particularly from the PRC, and has recently taken steps toward restricting trade in certain goods. The PRC and other countries have retaliated in response to new trade policies, treaties and tariffs implemented by the United States. Such policy retaliations could ultimately result in further trade policy responses by the United States and other countries, and result in an escalation leading to a trade war, which would have an adverse effect on manufacturing levels, trade levels and industries, including logistics, retail sales and other businesses and services that rely on trade, commerce and manufacturing. Any such escalation in trade tensions or a trade war, or news and rumors of the escalation of a potential trade war, could affect activity levels within Alibaba’s ecosystem and have a material and adverse effect on its business, results of operations and the trading price of the Alibaba Shares.

If the Fund fails to retain sufficient funds to pay the liabilities actually owed to the Fund’s creditors, each stockholder receiving liquidating distributions could be liable for payment to the Fund’s creditors of his, her or its pro rata share of any shortfall, up to the amount actually distributed to each stockholder in connection with the liquidation and dissolution.

Under Delaware law, in the event the Fund fails to retain sufficient funds to pay the expenses and liabilities actually owed to the Fund’s creditors, each stockholder could be held liable for the repayment to those creditors who file claims before the end of thewinding-up period, out of the amounts previously received by such stockholder from us or from any liquidating trust or trusts, of such stockholder’s pro rata share of such excess liability (up to the full amount actually received by such stockholder).

Moreover, in the event a stockholder has paid taxes on amounts previously received pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, a repayment of all or a portion of such amount could result in a stockholder incurring a net tax cost if the stockholder’s repayment of an amount previously distributed does not cause a reduction in taxes payable. There can be no guarantee that the reserves established by the Fund will be adequate to cover all such expenses and liabilities.

Amounts held in the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio will be subject to market, credit and interest rate risk.

A substantial portion of the Fund’s investment assets (other than the Alibaba Shares) may be held in the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio throughout the liquidation and dissolution process. The proceeds of the Fund’s disposition of its Alibaba Shares, to the extent not used to fund the cash portion of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution to stockholders, may be added to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio and will be invested in accordance with the applicable investment policies and guidelines. Pursuant to such guidelines, the Fund generally invests excess cash in money market funds, time deposits, and liquid debt instruments of the U.S. and foreign governments and their agencies, and high credit quality corporate issuers which are classified as marketable debt securities and cash equivalents.

Investments in fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Such securities also are subject to the risk that the issuer of the security will be unable to pay interest or repay principal on the security when due. Due in part to these factors, the amounts expected to be


realized by the Fund in monetizing the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or the Fund may suffer losses in principal if it sells securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates or changes in credit quality.

The Shares will be delisted from Nasdaq, and the Fund will close its stock transfer books at the Effective Time. Accordingly, the Shares held by the Fund’s stockholders after the Effective Time will not be transferable, and there is no assurance that a market for interests in the Shares will arise.

We anticipate that, upon the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution, trading in our Shares will be suspended on Nasdaq, and our Shares will thereafter be delisted. However, under the Nasdaq rules, Nasdaq has discretionary authority to suspend or terminate the listing of a company that has announced that liquidation has been authorized by its board of directors and that it is committed to proceed, even if the Shares otherwise meet all enumerated criteria for continued listing on Nasdaq. Shortly before filing the Certificate of Dissolution, the Fund will issue a press release to announce the anticipated filing date of the Certificate of Dissolution.

In addition, we will close our stock transfer books and discontinue recording transfers at the Effective Time. Thereafter, record holders of the Shares generally will be prohibited from transferring record ownership of their Shares following the Effective Time (except by will, intestate succession or operation of law). The Fund will, however, request that, following the Effective Time, DTC, as a record holder of Shares through its Cede & Co. nominee, maintain records representing the right to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including any transfers of such rights. Consequently, the Fund expects that any transfers of such rights will be tracked by DTC. There is no assurance that a market for interests in the Shares representing the right to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions will arise or, if one does arise, for how long it will be maintained or how actively such interests in the Shares will trade. Both trading prices and volumes in any such “over-the-counter” market could be volatile and erratic. To the extent that a stockholder’s Shares are not held by a DTC participant as of the Effective Time, it could be more difficult for such stockholder to transfer such stockholder’s rights to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions.

Interests of stockholders in any liquidating trust that the Fund may establish pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution generally will not be transferable.

If the Fund establishes a liquidating trust, the interests of the Fund’s stockholders in such trust generally will not be transferable, which could adversely affect stockholders’ ability to realize the value of such interests. Even if transferable, the interests are not expected to be listed on a national securities exchange, and the extent of any trading market therein cannot be predicted. In addition, the interests may not be accepted by commercial lenders as security for loans as readily as more conventional securities with established trading markets. Furthermore, given that the Fund’s stockholders will be deemed to have received a liquidating distribution equal to their pro rata share of the value of the net assets distributed to any entity which is treated as a liquidating trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the distribution ofnon-transferable interests would result in tax liability to the stockholders without their being readily able to realize the value of such interest to pay such taxes or otherwise.

Stockholders will generally not be able to recognize a loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes until they receive a final distribution from us.

As a result of the Fund’s liquidation and dissolution, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Fund’s stockholders who are U.S. Holders will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the amount of cash and the fair market value (at the time of the distribution) of any other property distributed, less any known liabilities assumed by the stockholder or to which the distributed property is subject, and (ii) such stockholder’s tax basis in the Shares. Liquidating distributions pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution may occur at various times and in more than one tax year. Any loss will generally be recognized only when a stockholder receives the final distribution from us and then only if the aggregate value of all liquidating distributions with respect to a Share is less than the stockholder’s tax basis in the Share. For a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Liquidation and Dissolution.”


Further stockholder approval will not be required in connection with the implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Fund’s assets as contemplated in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

The approval of the Dissolution Proposal by the requisite vote of the stockholders will grant full and complete authority to our Board and officers, without further stockholder action, to proceed with the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution in accordance with any applicable provision of Delaware law. Accordingly, the Fund may sell, distribute or otherwise dispose of its remainingnon-cash assets without further stockholder approval. As a result, the Board may, in order to maximize value for the Fund’s stockholders and creditors, authorize actions in implementing the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including the specific terms and prices for the sales and dispositions of its remaining assets, with which stockholders may not agree.

After the Effective Time, the Fund would not hold annual meetings of stockholders to elect members of the Board, and consequently the Fund’s stockholders would no longer be able to act asinfluence management of the Fund through the election of directors.

Under Delaware law, dissolution of the Fund would become effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State, which the Fund expects to file during the third or fourth quarter of 2019 promptly following the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution. Although the Fund’s adviserexistence would continue for a period of three years from the Effective Time for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, winding up the Fund and making distributions to stockholders, the Fund would not be permitted to continue to engage in business. As a portionresult, the Fund would not convene annual meetings of stockholders during thewinding-up period. Since the Fund would not hold annual meetings of stockholders to elect members of the Marketable Debt Securities PortfolioBoard after November 10, 2017the Effective Time, the Fund’s stockholders would not be able to influence management of the Fund through the election of directors. Because the Fund expects to file the Certificate of Dissolution before the date when the Fund is required to convene its 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, the Fund does not expect to convene its 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. However, if the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution is materially delayed, we expect to hold an annual meeting of its stockholders in 2019.

As noted above, the approval of the Dissolution Proposal by the requisite vote of the stockholders will grant full and complete authority to our Board and officers, without further stockholder action, to proceed with the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution in accordance with any applicable provision of Delaware law. See “—Further stockholder approval will not be required in connection with the implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Fund’s assets as contemplated in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

The Board may abandon, modify or delay implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, even after stockholder approval.

Even if the Fund’s stockholders approve the Dissolution Proposal, the Board will takehas reserved the right, at its discretion, to the extent permitted by Delaware law, to abandon or delay implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (including determining not to file or to delay filing the Certificate of Dissolution) if such action as it deemsis determined to be in the Fund’s best interestinterests and in the best interests of its stockholders, in order, for example, to permit the Fund to pursue new business opportunities or strategic transactions that are subsequently presented to the Board. Any such decision by the Board to abandon or delay implementation of the Fund.

DescriptionPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution prior to the New MSSB Advisory Agreement

If approved by stockholdersEffective Time (including determining not to file or to delay filing the Certificate of Dissolution) may result in the Fund incurring additional operating costs and liabilities, which could reduce the New MSSB Advisory Agreement will expire on the second anniversary of such stockholder approval, unless continuedamount available in effect from year to year thereafter, if such continuance is approved at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act. Below is a comparison of certain terms of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement to the terms of the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement.

Investment Advisory Services. The investment management services to be provided by MSSB to the Fund under the New MSSB Advisory Agreement will be identical to those services currently provided by MSSB to the Fund under the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement. In addition, the investment advisory services are expected to be provided by the same MSSB personnel under the New MSSB Advisory Agreement as under the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement. MSSB has agreed to manage the Fund’s assets allocated to it (the “MSSB Assets”) in accordance with the advisory services it provides through its Institutional Cash Advisory Program. MSSB will convert the Fund’s investment objective and strategies for the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio into a rule matrix for internal use by MSSB. The Fund has agreed to promptly notify MSSB of any changespotential future distribution to the Fund’s investment strategy forstockholders.

The Board also may modify or amend the MSSB AssetsPlan of Liquidation and will not make any material changes to the Fund’s investment strategy for the MSSB Assets without prior consultation with MSSB. MSSB will have complete and unlimited discretionary investment and trading authorization to invest and trade the MSSB Assets consistent with the Fund’s investment strategy for the MSSB Assets.

Without limiting the generalityDissolution, notwithstanding stockholder approval of the foregoing, MSSB has agreed, during the term of the agreement and subject to the Fund’s investment strategy for the MSSB Assets, the other provisions of the agreement and the supervision ofDissolution Proposal, if the Board to, among other things: (i) determine the composition and investment allocationdetermines that, in light of the MSSB Assets, the nature and timing of thenew proposals presented or changes therein and the manner of implementingin circumstances, such changes, including the purchase, retention or sale of specific securities and other assets; (ii) place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment (including executing and delivering all documents relating to the MSSB Assets’ investments); (iii) provide reasonable assistance to the Fund and the Fund’s custodian or its affiliates in assessing the fair value of securities held in the MSSB Assets for which market quotations are not readily available; and (iv) act upon reasonable instructions from the Board with respect to the management of the MSSB Assets which, in the reasonable determination of MSSB, are not inconsistent with MSSB’s fiduciary duties. MSSB will vote any proxies received from the Fund’s custodian (including without limitation giving or determining to withhold consent to any request to amend a debt


PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF NEW INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT WITH MSSB


security or to waive or not waive a breach of covenant or default with respect to a debt security) with respect to any securities held in the MSSB Assets in a manner MSSB reasonably believes toaction would be in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders. The Board will reporthave authority under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to make any such votesmodification or amendment to the Board on a quarterly basis. MSSB’s services are not exclusivePlan of Liquidation and MSSBDissolution without further stockholder approval, although it may determine, in its sole discretion, to submit any modification or any member, manager, officer, employee or other affiliate thereof may act as investment adviser for any other person, firm or corporation. MSSB or any member, manager, officer, employee or other affiliate thereof may allocate their time between advising the MSSB Assets and managing other investment activities and business activities in which they may be involved.

Fees. The Fund’s fee schedule under the New MSSB Advisory Agreement is identicalamendment to the fee schedule under the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement. The Fund’s annual fee, payable quarterly, is based upon the average daily value of the MSSB Assets (on a gross basis) during the most recently completed calendar quarter pursuant to the following fee schedule:

under $750 million

.0700%

between $750 million and $1 billion

.0650%

between $1 billion and $1.5 billion

.0575%

between $1.5 billion and $2 billion

.0500%

between $2 billion and $2.5 billion

.0450%

between $2.5 billion and $3 billion

.0425%

between $3 billion and $3.5 billion

.0400%

between $3.5 billion and $4 billion

.0375%

over $4 billion

.0350%

As of June 30, 2017, MSSB managed approximately $4.4 billion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. Assuming the value of the assets managed by MSSB remained at such levelstockholders for the Fund’s first year of operations, the applicable annual investment advisory fee rate payable to MSSB on all of the MSSB Assets would be 0.0350% of such assets, which would result in an annual fee of approximately $1.5 million on assets of $4.4 billion. MSSB will voluntarily waive its fees by the amount of advisory fees that the Fund pays to MSSB or its affiliates indirectly through its investment of MSSB Assets in money market funds managed by MSSB or its affiliates.

Adviser Expenses. During the term of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement, MSSB will pay all expenses incurred by it in connection with the activities it undertakes to meet its obligations hereunder. MSSB will, at its sole expense, employ or associate itself with such persons as it reasonably believes will assist it in the execution of its duties under the agreement, including, without limitation, persons employed or otherwise retained by MSSB or made available to MSSB by its members or affiliates. The Fund will reimburse MSSB for documented expenses reasonably incurred by MSSB at the written request of or on behalf of the Fund. All other costs and expenses in connection with the operations of the MSSB Assets and transactions effected with respect to the MSSB Assets will be borne by the Fund.

Limitation of Liability and Indemnification. Both the New MSSB Advisory Agreement and the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement provide that MSSB will not be liable for any loss arising out of the MSSB’s activities under the agreement, except a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of MSSB in the performance of its duties, or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the agreement, except as may otherwise be provided under provisions of applicable law which cannot be waived or modified. For purposes of the foregoing, the term “MSSB” includes, without limitation, MSSB’s affiliates and MSSB’s and its affiliates’ respective partners, shareholders, directors, members, principals, officers, employees and other agents of MSSB. Under no circumstances will MSSB be liable for any loss involving Fund assets other than the MSSB Assets.

The New MSSB Advisory Agreement and the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement also provide for indemnification by the Fund of MSSB (and its officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with MSSB) (collectively, the “MSSB Indemnified Parties”) for liabilities incurred by them in connection with their services to the Fund, subject to certain limitationsapproval.

 


PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF NEW INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT WITH MSSB


The Board and conditions. In particular, no MSSB Indemnified Party will be indemnified under the agreement for any liability or expenses thatour officers may be sustained as a result of MSSB’s willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligencehave interests in the performancePlan of MSSB’s dutiesLiquidation and Dissolution that are different from or by reasonin addition to, the interests of the reckless disregardstockholders generally.

Some of MSSB’s dutiesour directors and obligations under the agreement.

Term and Termination of Agreement. The Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement was in effect for an initial term of the earlier of (i) the date 150 days from the effective date of the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement and (ii) the date on which stockholders of the Fund approve the New MSSB Advisory Agreement. If the stockholders of the Fund approve the New MSSB Advisory Agreement, the New MSSB Advisory Agreement will expire on the second anniversary of such approval, unless continued. The New MSSB Advisory Agreementexecutive officers may be continued for successive one-year periods if approved at least annuallyhave interests in the manner required byPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution that are different from, or in addition to, the 1940 Act.

The Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement provides that the agreement may be terminated at any time, withoutinterests of our stockholders generally. These potential interests include the payment of any penalty, byincentive awards under the vote of the Board or the vote of holders of a majority of the Fund’s outstanding voting securities on ten (10) days’ written notice and by MSSB on sixty (60) days’ written notice, as required by Rule 15a-4 for an interim agreement. The New MSSB Advisory Agreement provides that the agreement may be terminated at any time, withoutLTIP, the payment of any penalty, by either party upon sixty (60) days’ written notice.

This summary does not purportseverance compensation to be completethe Fund’s executive officers and/or the Fund’s continuing indemnification obligations to its directors and is qualifiedofficers. Our Board was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in its entirety byapproving the full textPlan of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement, which is attached hereto as Annex B.

Information about MSSB

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC is a registered investment adviser, a registered broker-dealer,Liquidation and a member of the New York Stock Exchange. Its principal place of business is located at 200 Westchester Avenue, Purchase, New York 10577. Morgan Stanley is one of the largest financial services firms in the United States with branch offices in all 50 statesDissolution and the District of Columbia.

Board Consideration of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement

The New MSSB Advisory Agreement was approved by the Board at an in-person meeting on July 26, 2017 after consideration of all factors considered by the Directors at meetings on May 4, 2017, June 16, 2017 and July 26, 2017 that the Board determined to be relevant to its deliberations, including those set out below.

Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services Provided by MSSB. The Board reviewed the nature, extent and quality of services proposed to be provided to the Fund. The Board met telephonically with MSSB’s personnel responsible for investment activities, including the investment officers, and reviewed the materials provided by the portfolio management team. The Board considered the number, education and experience of investment personnel generally and the portfolio management team for the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio, MSSB’s research capabilities, portfolio trading capabilities, use of technology, commitment to compliance, credit analysis capabilities, risk analysis and oversight capabilities, and the proposed approach to managing its portion of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio, among other factors. The Board noted that the MSSB portfolio manager assigned to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio has over 25 years of experience in structuring and managing high-grade fixed income portfolios and his team has worked for over 16 years implementing strategies similar to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio mandate. The Board reviewed MSSB’s compensation structure with respect to its portfolio management team for the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio and with respect to its ability to attract and retain high-quality talent and create performance incentives. The Board also reviewed the capabilities of MSSB’s compliance departments and considered its policies and procedures for assuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

The Investment Performance of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. The Board discussed with MSSB the most appropriate performance benchmarks and metrics by which the Board should measure the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio’s


PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF NEW INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT WITH MSSB


performance in the future, noting that MSSB had previously provided similar advisory services to Yahoo using a custom blended index to measure performance. The Board received and reviewed information regarding the total amount of assets under management with a similar mandate to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio by MSSB over the past five years. The Board noted that MSSB had total assets under management with a similar mandate of $33 billion as of March 31, 2017.

Consideration of the Advisory/Management Fees and the Cost of the Services and Profits to be Realized by MSSB from its Relationship with the Fund. The Board reviewed statements relating to MSSB’s financial condition and profitability methodology, noting the inherent limitations in allocating costs among various advisory products. The Board considered that profitability may be affected by numerous factors including, among other things, the types of portfolios managed, precision of expense allocations and business mix, and determined that calculating and comparing profitability at the individual portfolio level is difficult.transactions contemplated thereby.

In addition, the Board considered information regarding MSSB’s expected profits relatingmay continue to employ some or all of the Fund’s existing officers, appoint new officers, hire employees and retain independent contractors, agents and advisors in connection with thewinding-up process, and would be authorized to pay compensation to the managementFund’s directors, officers, employees, independent contractors, agents and advisors, which, in the case of directors, officers and employees, may be above their regular compensation in recognition of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio as well asextraordinary efforts they may be required to undertake in connection with the costssuccessful implementation of providing servicesthe Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and for retention purposes during the implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

The tax treatment of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution and any other liquidating distributions may vary from stockholder to stockholder, and stockholders should consult their own tax advisors.

The Fund has not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to the Fund. The Board also considered whether MSSB has the financial resources necessary to attract and retain high quality investment management personnel to perform its obligations under the New MSSB Advisory Agreement and to provide the high quality of services that is expected by the Board. The Board noted that MSSB portfolio managers’ compensation is a percentage of fees generated from client accounts, which promotes the retention of top investment management personnel.

Economies of Scale. The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale might be realized if the assetsanticipated U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio increase, whetherPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution. We intend to accomplish the liquidation and dissolution in a manner that will qualify as a “complete liquidation” of the Fund wouldwithin the meaning of Section 346(a) of the Code, but there can be no assurance that our efforts to do so will be successful. If any of the anticipated tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution described in this Proxy Statement proves to be incorrect, the result could be increased taxation at the corporate and/or stockholder level, thus reducing the benefit to the Fund’s stockholders and the Fund from such economies of scale,the liquidation and whether there should be changes in the advisory fee rate or breakpoint structuredissolution. Tax considerations applicable to stockholders may vary with and be contingent upon the Interim MSSB Advisory Agreement in orderparticular circumstances of each stockholder. Stockholders are urged to enableconsult their own tax advisors as to the Fundspecific tax consequences to more fully participate in such economiesthem of scale. The Board noted that MSSB’s fee schedules reflects the economiesPlan of scales as the basis point fee decreases as portfolio assets increase. The Board also considered the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio’s anticipated asset levelsLiquidation and whether the current fees were appropriate.

Other Factors Deemed Relevant by the Board Members. The Board also took into account other ancillary or “fall-out” benefits that MSSB may derive from its relationship with the Fund, both tangible and intangible, such as its ability to leverage its investment professionals who manage other portfolios and risk management personnel and an increase in MSSB’s profile in the investment advisory community. The Board also considered MSSB’s overall operations and its efforts to expand the scale of, and improve the quality of, its operations. The Board also reviewed information regarding MSSB’s brokerage practices.

Overall Conclusions. Based on the foregoing, the Directors determined that the investment advisory fee proposed by MSSB is fair and reasonableDissolution in light of the extent and quality of the services to be provided under the New MSSB Advisory Agreement and other benefits to be received and that the approval of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In reaching this conclusion, no single factor or group of factors was determinative or conclusive and each Director, in the exercise of his or her business judgment, may have attributed different weightsstockholder’s particular circumstances.

Risks Related to the various factors considered.Fund’s Continuing Business if the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is Not Approved by Stockholders

Voting Standard

To become effective, the New MSSB Advisory Agreement requires the affirmativeIf stockholders vote of a 1940 Act Majority. For purposes of determining the approval of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as shares voted against the Proposal.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommendsPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Fund may pursue other alternatives, but there can be no assurance that stockholdersany of these alternatives would result in greater stockholder value than the proposed liquidation and dissolution of the Fund, vote “FORand any alternative we select may entail additional risks.” approval

If stockholders do not approve the Dissolution Proposal, the Fund will continue its corporate existence and the Board will continue to explore what, if any, alternatives are available to return capital to stockholders in a manner intended to maximize value. There can be no assurance that any of these alternatives would result in greater stockholder value than the proposed liquidation and dissolution of the New MSSB Advisory Agreement.Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. Moreover, any alternative we select may entail additional risks.

In addition to the risks described above, you should carefully consider the risks described in our FormN-CSR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC and other documents we file with or furnish to the SEC.

 



 

Proposal Four: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmThe Special Meeting

The Independent Directors have unanimously selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”)Date, Time and Place

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to our stockholders as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books and recordspart of the Fundsolicitation of proxies by our Board for use at the Special Meeting to be held on Thursday, June 27, 2019, starting at 11:30 a.m. (Eastern time) at 50 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017, or any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof.

Proposals

At the Special Meeting, holders of Shares as of the Record Date will consider and vote upon (i) the Dissolution Proposal and (ii) the Adjournment Proposal.

Required Vote

Pursuant to Delaware law and the Fund’s current fiscal year. The selection of bylaws:

the independent registered public accounting firm of the Fund is being submitted to the stockholders for ratification, whichDissolution Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of the Fund presentShares outstanding and entitled to vote on the matter. PwC also served as the independent registered public accounting firm for Yahoo.

A representative of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting to make a statement, if such representative so desires,thereon; and to respond to stockholders’ questions. PwC has informed the Fund that it has no direct or indirect material financial interest in the Fund.

Audit and Other Fees

Audit Fees.The aggregate fees billed to Yahoo by PwC for professional services rendered for the audit of Yahoo’s financial statements for the two most recently completed fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows: $6.9 million and $5.7 million, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees.The aggregate fees billed by PwC and approved by the Audit Committee of Yahoo for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit of Yahoo’s financial statements (such fees relate to services rendered, and out of pocket expenses incurred, in connection with Yahoo’s registration statements, comfort letters and consents) for the two most recently completed fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows: $0 million and $0.6 million, respectively. PwC did not perform any other assurance and related services that were required to be approved by Yahoo’s Audit Committees.

Tax Fees.The aggregate fees billed by PwC and approved by the Audit Committee of Yahoo for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning (such fees relate to tax services provided by PwC in connection with Yahoo’s mergers and acquisitions) for the two most recently completed fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows: $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively. PwC did not perform any other tax compliance or tax planning services or render any tax advice that were required to be approved by Yahoo’s Audit Committee.

All Other Fees.There were no other fees billed for products and services provided by PwC, other than the services reported above in Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, and Tax Fees, for the two most recently completed fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Aggregate Non-Audit Fees.There were no other aggregate non-audit fees billed for products and services provided by PwC, other than the services reported above in Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, and Tax Fees, for the two most recently completed fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Statement of Principles

The Audit Committee of the Board is required to pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit engagements and relationships between the Fund and its independent auditors to provide any non-prohibited services to the Fund, including the fees and other compensation to be paid to the independent auditors (unless an exception is available underRule 2-01 of RegulationS-X). The Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Non-Audit Services (the “Policies”) are intended to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditors’ independence. Unless a type of service to


PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 

be provided by the independent auditor is pre-approved in accordance withAdjournment Proposal requires the terms of the Policies, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval authority has been delegated.

The Policies describe the audit, audit-related, tax and other services that have been pre-approved. The term of any such pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The Audit Committee may, from time to time, modify the nature of the services pre-approved, the aggregate level of fees pre-approved or both. The Audit Committee directed that the Policies, a list of the pre-approved services, and all pre-approval documents be maintained with the books and records of the Fund.

Audit Services

The terms and fees of the annual audit services engagement for the Fund are subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. In addition to the annual audit services engagement specifically approved by the Audit Committee, examples of such services are annual financial statement audits and SEC and regulatory filings and consents. The Audit Committee will approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions or fees resulting from changes in audit scope, Fund structure or other matters. Other audit services for the Fund must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Audit-Related Services

Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are not required for the audit, but are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements of the Fund or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. Examples of such services are accounting consultations, other accounting related matters, agreed upon procedures reports and attestation reports, and other internal control reports. Other audit-related services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Tax Services

The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide tax services such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence. Other tax services include tax compliance services related to Federal, state and local income tax compliance, regulated investment company qualification reviews, tax distribution analysis and planning, tax authority examination services, tax appeals support services, accounting methods studies and tax compliance, planning and advice services and related projects. However, the Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the sole business purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and related regulations. Other tax services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

All Other Services

All other services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

General Pre-Approval Limits

Additionally, the Audit Committee has pre-approved those services, which fall into one of the categories of services listed above and for which the estimated fees are less than $25,000. For services with estimated fees of $25,000 or more, but less than $50,000, the Chair of the Audit Committee is authorized to pre-approve such services on behalf of the Audit Committee. Services with estimated fees of $50,000 or more require pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

Procedures

Requests or applications to provide the services listed above that require approval by the Audit Committee must be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the independent auditor and the chief financial officer of the Fund, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, (a) the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence and (b) the requested service is or is not a non-audit service prohibited by the SEC.


PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The independent auditor or the chief financial officer of the Fund shall report to the Audit Committee at each of its regular meetings all audit, audit-related, tax and other services initiated since the last such report. The report shall include a general description of the services and projected fees, and the means by which such services were approved by the Audit Committee (including the particular category listed above under which pre-approval was obtained).

Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Shares present in person orthat are represented by proxyat the Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to ratify PwC as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. For purposes of determining the approval of PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Fund, abstentions will have the same effect as shares voted against the Proposal and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.thereon.

Board Recommendation

Record Date

The Board has fixed the close of business on May 16, 2019, as the Fund unanimously recommends thatRecord Date for the determination of stockholders of the Fund entitled to notice of, and to vote FOR” ratification ofat, the selection of PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm.



Proposal Five: Approval of Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan

On August 9, 2017, the Board approved the Altaba Inc. Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), subject to stockholder approval, pursuant to which certain awards granted thereunder are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 162(m)”).

The Board believes that the adoption of the Plan is in the best interestsSpecial Meeting. Stockholders of the Fund and its stockholders, and is designed to (i) assist the Fund in attracting and retaining directors, executive officers and key employees of the Fund by providing them with incentives and financial rewards that are valued based on the narrowing of the discount at which the Fund’s common stock is traded relative to the pre-tax value of the Fund’s net assets, (ii) align the interests of the Fund’s management and directors with those of the Fund’s stockholders, and (iii) provide incentives and rewards that are commensurate with performance and competitive market practices.

As previously disclosed, the Company informally submitted a draft no-action letter request to the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Staff has informed the Fund that it will not be providing formal guidance in the form of a no-action letter, without approving or dis-approving of the Plan. Accordingly, the Company has structured the Plan with the advice of legal counsel in a manner intended to comply with the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

The Fund’s stockholders are being asked to approve the Plan so that certain awards granted under the Plan may qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m). Stockholder approval of the Plan will enable the Fund to be in a position to grant deferred compensation incentive awards under the Plan while preserving the tax deductibility of those awards.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) generally limits the deductibility for tax purposes of compensation in excess of $1 million per year paid by a publicly traded company to its principal executive officer and its three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than its principal financial officer), each of whom are deemed to be “covered employees” under the Internal Revenue Code. However, compensation that qualifies under Section 162(m) as “performance-based” compensation is exempt from the $1 million deductibility limitation if the following criteria are satisfied: (i) the performance goals are objective, pre-established and determined by a compensation committee of the board of directors, which compensation committee is comprised solely of two or more outside directors; (ii) the material terms of the performance goals under which the compensation is to be paid are disclosed to the stockholders and approved by a majority stockholder vote; and (iii) the compensation committee certifies that the performance goals and other material terms were in fact satisfied before the compensation is paid. The deductibility of payments made under the Plan resulting in total covered compensation in excess of $1 million for the Fund’s covered employees will depend on whether the payment is “performance-based” within the meaning of Section 162(m).

The Plan is intended to enable the Fund to grant deferred compensation incentive awards to covered employees that satisfy the requirements of “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m). However, in order for compensation granted pursuant to the Plan to qualify for the performance-based exemption from the applicability of Section 162(m), the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid must be disclosed to and approved by stockholders in a separate vote prior to payment. Accordingly, the Fund is asking its stockholders to approve the Plan.

Summary of the Material Terms of the Plan

The following is a summary of the material provisions of the Plan. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Plan, which is attached hereto as Annex C.


PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN


Purposes

The Plan is intended to attract, retain and appropriately incentivize the Fund’s executive officers and other key employees by providing them with grants of incentive cash awards and the non-employee members of the Board (each, an “independent director”) by providing them with the opportunity to defer director fees into a deferral account under the Plan. The value of these deferred compensation incentive awards and deferral accounts under the Plan will be determined based on measurement of the change in the Fund’s trading discount relative to the pre-tax value of the Fund’s net assets, as adjusted to eliminate any impact from share price movements of ordinary shares of Alibaba Group Holding Limited (the “Alibaba Shares”) and shares of common stock of Yahoo Japan Corporation (“Yahoo Japan Shares”) (referred to herein as the “trading discount”), against a baseline level with resulting payout multipliers to be established by the Fund’s Compensation Committee.

By way of background, the Fund’s common stock is principally valued on the basis of a trading discount relative to the pre-tax value of the Fund’s net assets. Because a significant portion of the Fund’s assets consist of the Alibaba Shares and the Yahoo Japan Shares, it is expected that the market price of the Fund’s common stock will be significantly affected by the market price of the Alibaba Shares and the Yahoo Japan Shares. The Board does not believe that the Plan should reward or penalize participants simply based on the market price of the Fund’s common stock because such a result would be largely based on changes in the market price of the Alibaba Shares and the Yahoo Japan Shares, factors over which participants will have no direct influence. Therefore, the Plan is designed to permit participants to defer compensation in the form of grants of deferred compensation incentive awards for employees or deferral accounts for independent directors, the value of which will increase or decrease based on changes in the Fund’s trading discount relative to the pre-tax value of its net assets, as adjusted to eliminate any impact from price movements of the Alibaba Shares and Yahoo Japan Shares. The Board believes that this design will incentivize management to reduce the Fund’s trading discount and therefore align the interests of management and independent directors with those of the Fund’s stockholders.

Effective Date

The effective date of the Plan is August 9, 2017, the date on which the Board approved the Plan, subject to approval by the Fund’s stockholders (the “Effective Date”).

Administration

The Plan may be administered by the Compensation Committee or such other person or persons appointed from time to time by the Compensation Committee. The plan administrator may delegate any of its duties from time to time to such other person as it may designate. However, to the extent that awards granted under the Plan are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m), the Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee and consist of not fewer than two members who are “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m). It is currently contemplated that the Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee, as the plan administrator, has the power to take all action necessary or appropriate in connection with the general administration of the Plan, including, without limitation, interpreting or construing the Plan, determining all facts and resolving any questions relevant to the Plan’s administration; prescribing, amending and rescinding administrative rules and regulations under the Plan; resolving any dispute which may arise under the Plan involving participants or beneficiaries; and making all other administrative determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, including, without limitation, amending or terminating the Plan. Any such actions taken by the Compensation Committee will be conclusive and binding on all persons.


PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN


Eligibility

The Compensation Committee may designate those employees and independent directors of the Fund who are eligible to participate in the Plan. As of August 18, 2017, there were six (6) employees, including the Fund’s officers, and three (3) independent directors eligible to participate in the Plan. As discussed above, Mr. Kauffman is not currently eligible to participate in the Plan.

Deferred Compensation Incentive Awards Granted to Employees

Vesting of Deferred Compensation Incentive Awards. Subject to the terms of the Plan, each participant who is an employee of the Fund may be granted a cash deferred compensation incentive award with an initial value as set forth in the applicable award agreement that will vest based on the extent to which the Fund’s trading discount has been reduced in relation to a baseline level established by the Compensation Committee and measured as of certain vesting dates so long as the participant remains continuously employed with the Fund through such vesting date, subject to fully accelerated vesting upon either (x) a “change in control” of the Fund or (y) a termination of the participant’s employment with the Fund by the Fund without “cause” or by the participant for “good reason” (each as defined in the Plan) or due to the participant’s disability or death (any such termination referred to herein as a “qualifying termination”) pursuant to the Plan. Upon a termination of the participant’s employment with the Fund for any reason, the deferred compensation incentive award, to the extent vested as of the dateclose of termination, will become payable tobusiness on the participant pursuant to the Plan and the participant will forfeit any then-unvested portion of the deferred compensation incentive award.

Measurement of Deferred Compensation Incentive Awards. The amount of a deferred compensation incentive award that may become payable to a participant is subject to the achievement of a reduction in the Fund’s trading discount (if any) as compared to the baseline level established by the Compensation Committee and resulting payout multipliers (as set forth in the award agreement underlying the award) and whichRecord Date will be measuredentitled to one vote on the applicable vesting date, the date of the occurrence ofeach matter to be voted on for each Share held and a change in control or, in the case of a qualifying termination, the greater of the amount measured as of the date of termination or the first anniversary of such date of termination (such applicable date, the “measurement date”). With respect to any deferred compensation incentive award that is intended to qualify for the performance-based exception to Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee will establish the performance goals and payout multipliers in respect of the Fund’s trading discount reduction, applicable to such awards in writing not later than ninety (90) days after the commencement of the applicable performance period; provided, that the outcome is substantially uncertain at the time the Compensation Committee actually establishes such performance goals (or at such earlier time as may be required or such later time as may be permissible under Section 162(m)).

As of the applicable measurement date, the amount of the deferred compensation incentive award payable to the participant will be calculated in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the applicable award agreement based on the initial amount of the deferred compensation incentive award granted to the participant and the applicable payout multiplier determined based on the reduction in the Fund’s trading discount measured as of the measurement date. The Compensation Committee will measure the reduction of the Fund’s trading discount on an objective basis and consistently; provided, that the Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify such methodology in accordance with the terms of the Plan. With respect to any deferred compensation incentive award that is intended to qualify for the performance-based exception to Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee shall not take any action in respect of such award that would constitute an impermissible exercise of discretion within the meaning of Section 162(m), or would otherwise cause such award to not be deductible under Section 162(m).

Certification of Deferred Compensation Incentive Awards. Before any deferred compensation incentive awards intended to qualify for the performance-based exception to Section 162(m) may be paid to participants, the Compensation Committee will certify, in writing, whether and to what extent the performance goals referred to in the Plan have been satisfied for the applicable performance period.

Payment of Deferred Compensation Incentive Awards.Deferred compensation incentive awards, to the extent vested, will generally be paid to the participant within thirty (30) days following the earlier to occur of the first anniversary of each applicable vesting date or a change in control of the Fund, unless otherwise deferred in accordance with the Plan (as described below). If the participant’s employment with the Fund is terminated for any reason, payout of the award, to the extent vested, will


PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN


occur within thirty (30) days following the date of termination; provided, that if the participant’s employment with the Fund is terminated due to a qualifying termination and the Fund’s trading discount reduction measured as of the first anniversary of the date of termination exceeds the Fund’s trading discount reduction measured as of the date of termination, then the participant will receive an additional payment in an amount equal to the difference between (x) the value of the award calculated based on the payout multiplier as in effect on the first anniversary of the date of termination and (y) the value of the award calculated based on the payout multiplier as in effect on the date of termination, payable within thirty (30) days following such first anniversary of the date of termination.

Subject to the terms of the Plan, participants may elect to further defer payments of deferred compensation incentive awards, to the extent vested, to the occurrence of the participant’s separation from service with the Fund in lieu of receiving payment on the first anniversary of each vesting date.

Any deferred compensation incentive award, to the extent vested, that is paid to the participant more than thirty (30) days after the applicable vesting date will be credited with a rate of interest, based on the prime rate of interest as reported in the Wall Street Journal for the applicable vesting date (or most recent rate of interest available immediately prior to the vesting date), compounded monthly from the applicable vesting date through the date of payment, pursuant to the terms of the Plan.

In addition, the Plan provides for a “catch-up” payment in respect of a deferred compensation incentive award that may become payable to a participant in an amount equal to the difference in the value of the then-current payout of the deferred compensation incentive award and the payout of any previously vested amounts under the following circumstances:

If a change in control occurs and either (x) the participant remains in continuous service with the Fund through such change in control or (y) the participant incurs a qualifying termination within twelve (12) months prior to such change in control, such catch-up amount will be determined based on the difference in the payout multiplier calculated based on the trading discount reduction measured as of such change in control and the payout multiplier that applied to such previously vested or paid out portion of the award, or

In the absence of a change in control, on the date of the fourth anniversary of the Effective Date and each six (6)-month anniversary thereafter (each such date, an “applicable date”); provided, that either (x) the participant remains in continuous service with the Fund through the applicable date or (y) the participant incurs a qualifying termination within the twelve (12)-month period prior to such applicable date, but only if the trading discount reduction as measured on such applicable date results in a payout multiplier of at least three (3.0), such catch-up amount will be determined based on the difference in the applicable payout multiplier based on the trading discount reduction measured as of such applicable date, and the payout multiplier that applied to such previously vested or paid out portion of the award.

Any catch-up payments will be paid in cash to the participant on or within thirty (30) days following (i) the occurrence of a change in control or the respective catch-up payment date, as applicable, or (ii) if the participant has elected to defer payments pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the date of the participant’s separation from service.

Maximum Deferred Compensation Incentive Award Amounts. The aggregate maximum amount that may become payable with respect to all deferred compensation incentive awards granted to participants under the Plan from time to time, assuming the maximum level of performance and payout multiplier applicable to such deferred compensation incentive awards, is $60,000,000, and the maximum amount that may become payable to any individual participant in any fiscal year of the Fundfractional vote with respect to any deferred compensation incentive award granted under the Plan is $24,000,000 provided that the discount at which the Fund’s common stock trades is reduced to at least 14.7% from the Plan’s baseline discount of 27.2%, which could result in the creation of in excess of $14 billion of value for the Fund’s stockholders based on the market price as of September 7, 2017 of the Fund’s common stock (although the actual value created may vary from this estimate).

Impact of Federal Tax Reform.Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any award agreement to the contrary, if (i) Federal tax reform is enacted at any time prior to the first applicable vesting date and (ii) the participant has vested in any portion of the deferred compensation incentive award on or prior to the first applicable vesting date, then the amount payable with respect to any such portion of the deferred compensation incentive award that has so vested on or prior to the first applicable vesting date may, in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, be reduced based on an assessment by the Compensation Committee in good-faith of the impact that such tax reform had on the trading discount reduction that resulted in such portion of the deferred compensation incentive award becoming so vested, subject to a maximum reduction of fifty percent of the payout multiplier applicable to such deferred compensation incentive award.


PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN


Director Deferrals

Deferral of Director Fees. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, each participant who is an independent director shall be required to defer a portion of not less than fifty percent and up to one hundred percent of his or her director fees payable in cash for services rendered by such director during the period commencing as of the date of deferral and ending on the date of the third anniversary of the first regularly scheduled annual meeting of the Fund’s stockholders. The amount of director fees so deferred will be credited to the participant’s deferral account under the Plan as of the regularly scheduled payment date of such fees. The participant will be fully vested in his or her deferral account.

Measurement of Deferral Account. The value of the participant’s deferral account will be subject to increase or decrease based on the achievement of a reduction (if any) in the Fund’s trading discount compared to a pre-established baseline level and resulting payout multipliers as set forth in the deferral agreement entered into between the director and the Fund and which will be measured on the applicable payment date (as described below).

Payment of Deferral Account. Distribution of the participant’s deferral account, as adjusted pursuant to the terms of the Plan, will be made to the participant in a single lump sum cash payment upon the earlier to occur of (i) the participant’s separation from service for any reason or (ii) a change in control of the Fund (each, a “payment date”).

Other Provisions of the Plan

Equitable Adjustments. In the event of a reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend or stock split, or combination or other change in the Fund’s common stock, the Compensation Committee shall, in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of rights in respect of a deferred compensation incentive award granted to a participant or a participant’s deferral account, make such adjustments to the deferred compensation incentive award or the deferral account, respectively, as the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion may determine.

Unfunded Status of Plan.The obligations of the Fund under the Plan will be unfunded and unsecured. The interest of any participant or any other person under the Plan will be limited to the right to receive the benefits under the Plan and any such right to receive benefits under the Plan will be no greater than the rights of an unsecured general creditor of the Fund.

No Right to Employment or Service. Neither the action of the Fund in establishing the Plan, nor any action taken by the Fund, the Board or any member of the Compensation Committee, nor any provision of the Plan will give any participant any right to be retained as an employee or director.

No Transfer or Assignment.The rights of the participant or any other person to the payment of deferred compensation or other benefits under the Plan shall not be assigned, transferred, pledged or encumbered, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or as otherwise provided under the Plan.

Tax Withholding.The Fund will deduct from the amount of any payment made pursuant to the Plan or from any other amounts payable by the Fund to or with respect to a participant any income, employment or other taxes required to be paid or withheld by the federal government or any state or local government by virtue of participation in the Plan. In addition, a participant may be required to tender the amount of any such taxes to the Fund prior to payment of amounts due under the Plan. In no event will the Fund be liable for any of a participant’s income tax obligations.

Amendment and Termination of the Plan

The Plan may be amended, suspended, discontinued or terminated at any time, in whole or in part, by the Compensation Committee; provided, that no such action shall reduce or in any manner adversely affect the rights of any participant with respect to payments which have accrued under the Plan prior to the date of such action, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion.


PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN


Federal Income Tax Consequences

This section discusses certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of deferred compensation incentive awards and deferred compensation payable under the Plan based on current U.S. federal laws and regulations and does not purport to be a complete discussion. Moreover, as mentioned above, existing law is subject to change by new legislation, new regulations, administrative pronouncements and court decisions or new or clarified interpretations or applications of existing laws, regulations, administrative pronouncements and court decisions. Any such change may affect the U.S. federal tax income consequences described herein.

Generally, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of the award received under the Plan in the year of receipt. That income will be subject to applicable income and employment tax withholding by the Fund. If and to the extent that the Plan payments satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) and otherwise satisfy the requirements for deductibility under federal income tax law, the Fund may deduct the amounts paid to participants who are “covered employees” (within the meaning of Section 162(m)) under the Plan.

New Plan Benefits

On August 9, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of deferred compensation incentive awards to certain executive officers and other key employees designated as participants under the Plan, subject to stockholder approval of the Plan. The amount of the deferred compensation incentive awards that may be earned by participants under the Plan for fiscal year 2017 cannot be determined at this time because the value is subject to change based on the payout multiplier that applies after measuring the reduction in the Fund’s trading discount at the applicable measurement date against the baseline level established by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the Plan and the underlying award agreement. Similarly, the amounts that directors may elect to defer under the Plan and the value of any corresponding deferral account that may be paid to such directors cannot be determined at this time because the value is subject to change based on the payout multiplier that applies after measuring the reduction in the Fund’s trading discount at the applicable payment date against the baseline level established by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the Plan and the underlying deferral agreement. In particular, the amounts payable to recipients of initial deferred compensation incentive awards and directors who elect to defer their payments under the Plan will be calculated by reference to the table below:

    Current
Trading
Discount^
  

Change
from
Trading
Discount
a/o

8/11/17

  Trading Discount
Reduction from
Baseline (27.2%)
  Payout
Multiplier*

Trading Discount as of August 11, 2017

  30.3%    -3.1%  
  28.0%    2.3% ��-0.8%  

Baseline

  27.2%    3.1%    0.0%  

Threshold

  25.6%    4.7%    1.6%  0.50
  23.4%    6.9%    3.8%  1.00
  21.2%    9.1%    6.0%  1.50
  19.0%  11.3%    8.2%  2.00
  16.4%  13.9%  10.8%  3.00
  14.5%  15.8%  12.7%  3.50

Maximum

  12.5%  17.8%  14.7%  4.00

^

As defined in the Plan.


PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN


*

The payout multiplier is applied towards the vested portion of the initial award value or the value of the participant’s deferral account, as applicable. The payout multiplier is capped at 4.0 if the trading discount reduction from baseline level is at least 14.7%. If the trading discount reduction is less than 1.6% from baseline level, the payout multiplier will be equal to zero. If the trading discount reduction falls between any two scheduled levels, the payout multiplier will be calculated using straight line interpolation between such levels.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the initial value of deferred compensation incentive awards granted to participants under the Plan as of August 18, 2017, all of which are subject to stockholder approval of the Plan.

Altaba Inc. Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan

Name and Position(1)

Dollar Value ($)(2)

Thomas J. McInerney, Chief Executive Officer and Director

   6,000,000

Arthur Chong, General Counsel and Secretary

   3,000,000

Alexi A. Wellman, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

   1,500,000

All Current Executive Officers as a Group

 10,500,000

Tor R. Braham, Director

Eric K. Brandt, Director

Catherine J. Friedman, Director

All Current Directors Who Are Not Executive Officers as a Group

All Employees, Including All Current Officers Who Are Not Executive Officers, as a Group

$1,450,000

(1)

Following the sale on June 16, 2017 of Yahoo’s operating businesses, Yahoo changed its name to Altaba Inc. and registered with the SEC as an investment company. The disclosures in this table relate to current directors and certain executive officers of the Fund based on SEC rules applicable to investment companies.

(2)

The dollar values set forth above reflect the initial value of the deferred compensation incentive awards granted to the executive officers under the Plan, which may be increased by a payout multiplier (with a maximum payout multiplier of four (4.0)). The dollar values of amounts that directors will elect to defer under the Plan is not determinable at this time and therefore no deferred amounts for independent directors are included in this table.

Future participation under the Plan is in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Moreover, future deferred compensation incentive awards granted to employees and deferrals by directors under the Plan are subject to the baseline level trading discount and payout multipliers that apply to the amount of reduction in the Fund’s trading discount as established by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the applicable award agreement or deferral agreement. Accordingly, it is not possible to determine the actual amounts that will be paid to particular participants in the future under the Plan.

Certain Interests of Directors

In considering the recommendation of the Board with respect to the approval of the Plan, stockholders should be aware that members of the Board have certain interests, which may present them with conflicts of interest in connection with this Proposal Five. As discussed above, certain members of the Board are eligible to participate in the Plan. In addition, members of the Board serving on the Compensation Committee (namely, Mr. Brandt and Ms. Friedman) have the discretion to determine the performance metrics to which both the deferred compensation incentive awards and director deferral accounts are subject. The Board also has the authority to cause the Fund to engage in transactions which could impact the payout of deferred compensation incentive awards and director deferral accounts under the Plan. The Board recognizes that approval of the Plan under this Proposal Five may benefit the Fund’s directors and their successors.


PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN


Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of thefractional Shares, present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to approve the Altaba Inc. Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan. For purposes of determining the approval of the Altaba Inc. Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan, abstentions will have the same effect as shares voted against the Proposal and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Board Recommendation

The Board of the Fund unanimously recommends that stockholders of the Fund vote “FOR” the approval of the Altaba Inc. Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan.



Proposal Six: Stockholder Proposal

Mr. John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, has represented that he owns no fewer than 260 Shares and has given notice of his intention to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. The Proposal appears below in italics.

The Board opposes adoption of the Proposal and asks stockholders to review the Board’s response, which follows the proponent’s Proposal.

Stockholder Proposal – Right To Act By Written Consent

Resolved, Shareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent.

Taking action by written consent in lieu of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle. A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are 2 complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. Taking action by written consent saves the expense of holding a special shareholder meeting.

Also our company requires 25% of shares to aggregate their holdings to call a special meeting—a much higher hill to climb than the 10% of shares permitted by Delaware law. Dozens of Fortune 500 companies provide for both shareholder rights—to act by written consent and to call a special meeting. Our high 25% threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting is one more reason that we should have the right to act by written consent.

Our lack of confidential voting is another incentive to vote for this proposal. Our management can now monitor incoming votes and then use shareholder money to blast shareholders back with costly solicitations on matters where they have a direct self-interest such as such as the ratification of lucrative stock options and to obtain artificially high votes for their lucrative executive pay.

Our management can now do an end run on the effectiveness of say-on-pay votes. Instead of improving executive pay practices in response to disapproving shareholder votes, our management can easily manipulate the say-on-pay vote to a higher percentage—funded by shareholders without their consent. Without confidential voting our management can simply blast shareholders by using multiple professional proxy solicitor firms at shareholder expense (no timely disclosure of the complete cost) with one-way communication by mail and electronic mail (right up to the deadline) to artificially boost the vote for their self-interest executive pay ballot items.

Returning to the core topic of this proposal, Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Board Statement Opposing Stockholder Proposal

The Board has carefully considered the proposed right for stockholders to act by written consent without a meeting and, for the reasons outlined below, the Board believes that it is not in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders.


PROPOSAL SIX: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL


The Board believes that stockholders of the Fund are better served by holding stockholder meetings for which all stockholders receive notice, and at which all stockholders have an opportunity to consider and discuss the proposed actions and vote Shares held by such stockholders. Consistent with this view, the Fund’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) give stockholders owning at least 25% of the Fund’s outstanding common stock the right to call a special meeting. With this special meeting right, stockholders of the Fund already have the opportunity to raise important matters both on an annual basis at the Fund’s annual meeting of stockholders as well as at special meetings held outside the annual meeting process.

Additionally, stockholder meetings offer important protections and advantages that are absent from the written consent process, including the following:

in connection with stockholder meetings, complete information about the proposed action is distributed in advance to all stockholders in a proxy statement, which enables a well-informed evaluation of the merits of the proposed action;

stockholder meetings include consideration of proposals submitted by stockholders in accordance with the Fund’s Bylaws and Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act;

stockholder meetings take place on specified dates that are publicly announced in advance, giving all stockholders a chance to express their views and cast their votes;

stockholder meetings provide stockholders with a forum for open discussion and consideration of the proposed stockholder action; and

prior to stockholder meetings, the Board has an opportunity to analyze each proposed action and provide a recommendation with respect to each proposed action.

In contrast to stockholder meetings, the written consent process, as proposed, undermines the important deliberative process in which the informed views of all stockholders, management and the Board are considered. Stockholder action by written consent would make it possible for the holders of a bare majority of the Fund’s outstanding common shares to take significant corporate action without any prior notice to the Fund or other stockholders, and without giving all stockholders an ample opportunity to consider, discuss and vote on stockholder actions that may have important ramifications for both the Fund and its stockholders. Further, because stockholder action by written consent can be effected without soliciting the consents of all stockholders, this approach could be used to disenfranchise selected and smaller stockholders by denying them the opportunity to participate in the written consent. The Board believes that these possible outcomes are contrary to principles of stockholder democracy and good corporate governance.

The written consent process also has the potential to create confusion since multiple groups of stockholders would be able to solicit written consents at any time and as frequently as they choose on a range of issues, some of which may be duplicative or conflicting. Addressing such actions could impose significant administrative and financial burdens on the Fund with no corresponding benefit to stockholders. Additionally, stockholder action by written consent could be used by a group of stockholders – no matter how small of an ownership position they represent – to pursue personal agendas or significant corporate actions that are not in the best interests of all stockholders.cumulative voting rights.

Quorum

The Board believes the Fund’s existing strong corporate governance practices make adoption of this Proposal unnecessary. In addition to the right of stockholders to call special meetings at a 25% threshold as mentioned above, the following Fund corporate governance provisions empower stockholders to express their views or take action and promote Board accountability:

a majority voting standard in uncontested director elections;

annual election of all directors;

a mechanism for stockholders to communicate directly with the Board;

no stockholder rights plan;


PROPOSAL SIX: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL


no supermajority voting provisions; and

independent Board leadership, including a majority of independent directors and an independent Chairman of the Board.

The Board notes that the Proposal contains assertions regarding the Fund’s executive compensation and related party transactions that the Board believes are incorrect and are not relevant in evaluating the Proposal’s advisability.

For the reasons outlined above, the Board believes the adoption of this Proposal is not in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders.

Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to approve this Proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as shares voted against the Proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Board Recommendation

The Board of the Fund unanimously recommends that stockholders of the Fund vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.


Proposal Seven: Stockholder Proposal

Dr. Jing Zhao, 1745 Copperleaf Court, Concord, California 94519, has represented that he owns 100 Shares and has given notice of his intention to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. The Proposal appears below in italics.

The Board opposes adoption of the Proposal and asks stockholders to review the Board’s response, which follows the proponent’s Proposal.

Stockholder Proposal – Yahoo Human Rights Fund’s Transparency

Resolved: shareholders request that our company prepare a report of our company’s human rights policy and practice, especially related to the Yahoo Human Rights Fund (YHRF), to disclose: 1. The claimed purpose and advertisement of the YHRF, including those were reported to the Congress, the SEC, shareholders and the general public. 2. Why and how the YHRF was handed to one person Harry Wu without any accountability? 3. How much of the YHRF has been used for the claimed purpose? How much of the YHRF was abused against the Chinese human rights community? 4. How many complaints, including law suits, have been submitted against the YHRF and Harry Wu in related to the abuse of the YHRF? 5. Recommendations to the board of directors to take necessary actions to remedy victims of our company and the YHRF to improve our company’s human rights policy and practices.

Supporting Statement

“Whoever wants to hold back relevant material information should show cause why it should not be revealed.” (Irving S. Shapiro, former Chairman of E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company) As shareholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in the use of our corporate fund, especially since the YHRF has long been abused enormously. For example, 1) “the Statement by Seven Former Chinese Political Prisoners Regarding the Death of Harry Wu and the Abuses of the Yahoo Human Rights Fund” (April 28, 2016 https://chinachange.org/2016/04/28/statement-by-seven-former-chinese-political-prisoners-regarding-the-death-of-harry-wu-and-the-abuses-of-the-vahoo-human-rights-fund/) stated that “of the approximately $14-15 million of the YHRF that has been spent from 2008 to 2015, only about $700,000 was used to provide humanitarian aid to Chinese dissidents.” 2) New York Times article “Champion of Human Rights in China Leaves a Tarnished Legacy” (August 13, 2016 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/us/champion-of-human-rights-in-china-leaves-a-tarnished-legacy.html ) reported Harry Wu “spending more than $13 million of the Yahoo money to operate his own foundation”; “In some years, financial disclosure forms show that the foundation spent less than 2 percent of annual disbursements on direct assistance to Chinese dissidents or their families; in recent years, such grants all but dried up.” 3) More information of the YHRF abuses since 2007, including my proposal “HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS OF YAHOO BUSINESS” at 2011 shareholders meeting requesting that “Yahoo will review, report to shareholders and improve all policies and actions (including supervising the abused Yahoo Human Rights Fund) that might affect human rights observance in countries where it does business”, can be found from the links at “Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance Accountability Review” (http://cpri.tripod.com/cpr2017/csrgar6.pdf) which rated our company the lowest rating “F”.

Board Statement Opposing Stockholder Proposal

The Board has carefully considered the Proposal and has determined that the Fund is not the proper addressee of the Proposal because the Yahoo Human Rights Fund in question is now being administered by Verizon as a result of the Sale Transaction. Accordingly, the Fund does not have any control or influence over the administration of the Yahoo Human Rights Fund nor is it in a position to provide the requested information regarding the historic administration of the Yahoo Human Rights Fund. Further, even if the Fund were in a position to access such information, the Board believes it would be an inappropriate use of Fund resources to prepare the report requested by the Proposal. The Board additionally notes that stockholders of the Fund overwhelmingly rejected, by more than 95% of the votes cast, a human rights-related proposal at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders of Yahoo.


PROPOSAL SEVEN: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL


Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to approve this Proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as shares voted against the Proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Board Recommendation

The Board of the Fund unanimously recommends that stockholders of the Fund vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.


Additional Information

Further Information About Voting and the Annual Meeting

Quorum.With respect to the Fund, the holders of a majority of the Shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on any matter at a meetingthe Special Meeting, present in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at such meeting of the stockholdersSpecial Meeting for purposes of conducting business on such matter. Votes withheld, abstentions and brokernon-votes (i.e. (i.e., Shares held by brokers or nominees as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the stockholder or the persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter) will be counted as Shares present at the AnnualSpecial Meeting for quorum purposes.

Record Date.The Board has fixedVoting Your Shares

Your vote is very important, regardless of the closenumber of business on September 6, 2017, asShares you own. We cannot proceed with the Record Date for the determination of stockholdersliquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution unless the Dissolution Proposal is approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of the Fund as of the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on by the Fund for each Share held and a fractional vote with respect to fractional Shares with no cumulative voting rights.

How to Vote Your Shares.thereon.Whether or not you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting, we urge you to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided or vote via telephone or the Internet so your Shares will be represented at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. Instructions regarding how to vote via telephone or the Internet are included on the enclosed proxy card or on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.voting instruction form. The required control number for Internet and telephone voting is printed on the enclosed proxy card or on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.voting instruction form. The control number is used to match proxies with stockholders’ respective accounts and to ensure that, if multiple proxies are executed, Shares are voted in accordance with the proxy bearing the latest date.

All Shares represented by properly executed proxies received prior to the AnnualSpecial Meeting will be voted at the AnnualSpecial Meeting in accordance with the instructions marked thereon or otherwise as provided therein.If you sign the proxy card, butdon’t fill in a vote, your Shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendation.recommendation. If any other business is brought before the AnnualSpecial Meeting, your Shares will be voted at the proxies’ discretion.


Stockholders who execute proxy cards or record voting instructions via telephone or the Internet may revoke them at any time before they are voted by filing with the Secretary of the Fund a written notice of revocation, by delivering (including via telephone or the Internet) a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting and voting in person. Merely attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting, however, will not revoke any previously submitted proxy.

Attending the Annual Meeting.Special Meeting

If you wish to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting and vote in person, you will be able to do so. If you intend to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting in person and you are a record holder of the Fund’s Shares, in order to gain admission you must show photographic identification, such as your driver’s license. If you intend to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting in person and you hold your Shares through a bank, broker or other custodian, in order to gain admission you must show photographic identification, such as your driver’s license, and satisfactory proof of ownership of Shares, of the Fund, such as your voting instruction form (or a copy thereof) or broker’s statement indicating ownership as of a recent date. If you hold your Shares in a brokerage account or through a bank or other nominee, you will not be able to vote in person at the AnnualSpecial Meeting unless you have previously requested and obtained a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. You may contact Abernathy MacGregor at (212) 371-5999 to obtain directions to the site of the Annual Meeting.

Additional Information Regarding Voting.Broker-dealer firms holding Shares of the Fund in “street name” for the benefit of their customers and clients will request the instructions of such customers and clients on how to vote their shares on the Proposal before the Annual Meeting. The Fund understands that, under the rules of the NYSE, such broker-dealer firms may for certain “routine” matters, without instructions from their customers and clients, grant discretionary authority to the proxies designated by the Board to vote if no instructions have been received prior to the date specified in the broker-dealer firm’s request for voting instructions. The Proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm is deemed a “routine” matter and stockholders who do not provide proxy instructions or who do not return a proxy card may have their Shares voted by broker-dealer firms in favor of the Proposal. The other Proposals are not


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


deemed “routine” matters under the rules of the NYSE. A properly executed proxy card or other authorization by a stockholder that does not specify how the stockholder’s Shares should be voted on the Proposal may be deemed an instruction to vote such Shares in favor of the Proposal. Broker-dealers who are not members of the NYSE may be subject to other rules, which may or may not permit them to vote your Shares without instruction. We urge you to provide instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee so that your votes may be counted.

The Fund will update certain data regarding the Fund, including performance data, on a monthly basis on its website at www.altaba.com. Investors and others are advised to periodically check the website for updated performance information and the release of other material information about the Fund.

Administrator

U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, serves as the Fund’s administrator pursuant to an administration agreement. U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is located at 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.

Principal Stockholders

As of the Record Date, to the knowledge of the Fund, no person beneficially owned more than 5% of the voting securities of any class of securities of the Fund, except as set forth below:

Stockholder Name

and Address*

  Class of Shares  Share
Holdings
  Percentage
Owned

TCI Fund Management Limited

Christopher Hohn

7 Clifford Street

London, W1S 2FT, United Kingdom

    Common Stock    86,224,273    9.01%

David Filo

David Filo 1998 Revocable Trust U/A DTD 06/12/1998

701 First Avenue

Sunnyvale, California 94089

    Common Stock    70,666,390    7.4%

The Vanguard Group

Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company

Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd.

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

    Common Stock    55,924,468    5.86%

*

The information contained in this table is based on the Fund’s review of Schedule 13D, Schedule 13G and other regulatory filings made on or before September 6, 2017.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Section 30(h) of the 1940 Act require the Fund’s officers and Directors, certain officers of the Fund’s investment advisers, affiliated persons of the investment adviser, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of the Fund’s shares to file certain reports of ownership (“Section 16 filings”) with the SEC and Nasdaq. Based upon the Fund’s review of the copies of such forms effecting the Section 16 filings received by it, the Fund believes that for its most recently completed fiscal year, all filings applicable to such persons were completed and filed in a timely manner.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


Privacy Principles of the Fund

The Fund is committed to maintaining the privacy of stockholders and to safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information the Fund collects, how the Fund protects that information and why, in certain cases, the Fund may share information with select other parties.

Generally, the Fund does not receive any non-public personal information relating to its stockholders, although certain non-public personal information may become available to the Funds. The Fund does not disclose any non-public personal information about its stockholders or former stockholders to anyone, except as permitted by law or as is necessary in order to service stockholder accounts (for example, to a transfer agent or third party administrator).

The Fund restricts access to non-public personal information about its stockholders to only those employees with a legitimate business need for the information. The Fund maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the non-public personal information of its stockholders.

Deadline for Stockholder Proposals

The Fund’s Bylaws require compliance with certain procedures for a stockholder to properly make a nomination for election as a Director or to propose other business for the Fund. If a stockholder who is entitled to do so under the Fund’s Bylaws wishes to nominate a person or persons for election as a Director or propose other business for the Fund, that stockholder must provide a written notice to the Secretary of the Fund at the Fund’s principal executive offices. Such notice must include certain information about the proponent and the proposal, or in the case of a nomination, the nominee. A copy of the Fund’s Bylaws, which include the provisions regarding the requirements for stockholder nominations and proposals, may be obtained by writing to the Secretary of the Fund at 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017. Any stockholder considering making a nomination or other proposal should carefully review and comply with those provisions of the Fund’s Bylaws.

Expenses of Proxy Solicitation

The cost of the AnnualSpecial Meeting, including the costs of preparing and mailing the notice,Notice of Special Meeting, this Proxy Statement and the proxy statement and proxy,card, and the solicitation of proxies, including reimbursement to broker-dealers and others who forwarded proxy materials to their clients, will be borne by the Fund. Certain officers of the Fund or its respective affiliates (none of whom will receive additional compensation therefore) may solicit proxies by telephone, mail,e-mail and/or personal interviews. Brokerage houses, banks and other fiduciaries may be requested to forward proxy solicitation materials to their principals to obtain authorization for the execution of proxies, and will be reimbursed by the Fund for suchout-of-pocket expenses. The Fund has retained Georgeson LLC, a professional proxy solicitation firm, to assist in additional proxy solicitation. The estimated cost of solicitation by Georgeson LLC is approximately $12,500.

Other Matters$15,000.

 


 

Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

General

At the Special Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to approve the Dissolution Proposal. The managementPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution was unanimously approved by our Board, subject to stockholder approval, on April 2, 2019. A copy of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is attached as Appendix Ato this Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference. Certain material features of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution are summarized below. Stockholders are urged to carefully read the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution in its entirety.

If stockholders approve the Dissolution Proposal, the Fund intends to make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof) to stockholders following such approval. See“—Pre-Dissolution Liquidating Distribution” below for a description of the proposed distribution, including the potential amount and timing of such distribution.The Fund currently expects the Certificate of Dissolution to be filed promptly following the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution during the third or fourth quarter of 2019, although such filing may be delayed by the Board in its sole discretion. The Fund will issue a press release not less than five days before filing the Certificate of Dissolution to announce (i) that the Board has determined to proceed with the dissolution and (ii) the anticipated filing date of the Certificate of Dissolution. Following the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL, the Board will proceed to wind up the Fund’s affairs. The Fund intends to rely on the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL to, among other things, obtain the Court Order establishing the amount and form of security for contested known, contingent and potential future claims that are likely to arise or become known within five years of the Effective Time (or such longer period of time as the Court may determine not to exceed ten years after the Effective Time). The Fund will pay or make reasonable provision for the Fund’s uncontested known claims and expenses and establish reserves for other claims as required by the Court Order. The remaining assets or cash of the Fund knowswill be used to make liquidating distributions to stockholders.

If stockholders do not approve the Dissolution Proposal, the Fund will continue its corporate existence and the Board will continue to explore alternatives for returning capital to stockholders in a manner intended to maximize value. Such alternatives may include, among other things, (i) resubmitting the Plan of no other matters which areLiquidation and Dissolution to be brought beforestockholders for reconsideration in the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters not now known properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intentionfuture, (ii) selling all or substantially all of the personsFund’s Alibaba Shares for cash and returning the proceeds from such sales to the Fund’s stockholders by way of share repurchase programs or a tender offer or (iii) making an exchange offer of the Fund’s Alibaba Shares for Shares, together with cash, and selling Alibaba Shares to fund the cash portion of such exchange offer and taxes that would be incurred in such transaction.

Background of the Proposed Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

Prior to June 16, 2017, the Fund was an operating company named “Yahoo! Inc.” Yahoo sold its operating business to Verizon on June 13, 2017 in the enclosedSale Transaction pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. On June 16, 2017, Yahoo changed its name to “Altaba Inc.” and registered as an investment company under the 1940 Act, with its consolidated investment assets consisting of Alibaba Shares, Yahoo Japan Shares, a Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio, other minority investments and all of the equity interests in Excalibur. The Fund completed a repurchase of approximately 64.5 million Shares for approximately $3.4 billion in cash pursuant to a modified “Dutch auction” self-tender offer in June 2017, for the purpose of providing liquidity to stockholders that were forced to sell their Shares at or prior to the closing of the Sale Transaction due to restrictions on holding shares of an investment company or securities that are not included in the S&P 500 index.

As disclosed in the Fund’s public filings with the SEC, the Fund’s investment objective is to increase the price per Share at which it trades relative to the then-current value of the Fund’s principal underlying assets. The Fund seeks to do this by reducing the discountat which it trades relative to the underlying value of its net assets (before giving effect to deferred taxes on unrealized appreciation) while simplifying its net asset base and returning capital to its stockholders in ways that are accretive and increase stockholder value.

In seeking to achieve its investment objective, since the date that the Fund was converted into an investment company, the Board has evaluated, in consultation with the Fund’s management and its legal, financial and tax advisors, various strategic alternatives and has authorized a number of transactions, each of which is discussed further below, with the goal of returning capital to stockholders and reducing the discount at which the Shares trade relative to their net asset value.


On July 26, 2017, the Board authorized a share purchase program in the amount of $5 billion (the “July 2017 Repurchase Program”). Pursuant to the July 2017 Repurchase Program, the Fund repurchased approximately 73.9 million Shares valued at $5 billion on the open market between July 2017 and December 2017.

On February 20, 2018, the Board authorized another repurchase program for up to $5 billion of the Fund’s Shares (the “February 2018 Repurchase Program”). Between February 20, 2018 and June 30, 2018, the Fund repurchased approximately 24.4 million Shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $1.8 billion pursuant to the February 2018 Repurchase Program.

At a meeting held on March 13, 2018, the Board explored strategies to reduce the discount at which the Shares trade relative to their net asset value and return capital to stockholders. The Board discussed, among other things, the possibility of paying a pro rata dividend in the form of proxyAlibaba Shares, making an exchange offer of Alibaba Shares to votestockholders, undertaking certain transactions that could allow the Fund to convert to a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and continuing with the status quo. At the same meeting, the Board received a presentation on the dissolution process under Delaware law by the Fund’s outside counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (“Skadden”). At that meeting, the Board also discussed potential transactions involving the sale of the Fund’s Yahoo Japan Shares.

On April 16, 2018, Thomas J. McInerney, Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, held anin-person meeting with Joseph Tsai, Vice Chairman of Alibaba, during which Mr. Tsai expressed no interest in pursuing a strategic transaction between Alibaba and the Fund.

At a meeting held on April 23, 2018, the Board continued to evaluate strategic alternatives, including an exchange offer of the Alibaba Shares held in the Fund’s investment portfolio for the Fund’s Shares, additional repurchases of the Fund’s Shares in the open market, conversion of the Fund to anopen-end investment company that could qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund. At that meeting, Mr. McInerney reported to the Board on his conversation with Mr. Tsai on April 16, 2018.

On May 21, 2018 and May 22, 2018, the Board met and discussed with the Fund’s management and its financial and legal advisors proposed terms of an exchange offer and considerations with respect to other alternatives. At the meeting, representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Board its fiduciary duties relating to the matters under consideration. The Board decided to reconvene in two weeks to discuss whether an exchange offer was, at that time, the best available alternative, when compared with other options, for returning capital to stockholders and enhancing stockholder value.

On June 4, 2018, after further consideration, the Board determined that an exchange offer of the Fund’s Alibaba Shares and cash for Shares was in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders and authorized management to proceed with an exchange offer on the terms and subject to the conditions discussed in detail during the Board’s deliberation (the “2018 Exchange Offer”).

On June 7, 2018, the Fund commenced the 2018 Exchange Offer to purchase up to 195,000,000 (approximately 24%) of the Fund’s Shares. In exchange for each Share accepted in the 2018 Exchange Offer, the Fund’s stockholders received a fractional amount of Alibaba ADSs held by the Fund in its investment portfolio and an amount in cash based on Alibaba’s volume-weighted average price.

Contemporaneously with the 2018 Exchange Offer, the Fund sold approximately 32,000,000 Alibaba ADSs for a value of approximately $5.7 billion (the “Alibaba Resale”) in order to pay certain taxes related to the 2018 Exchange Offer and the Alibaba Resale and to fund part of the cash portion of the 2018 Exchange Offer consideration. Pursuant to the 2018 Exchange Offer, which closed in August 2018, the Fund purchased 195,000,000 Shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $13.8 billion.

On July 9, 2018, during the pendency of the 2018 Exchange Offer, the Fund entered into an agreement with SoftBank Corp., a then wholly-owned subsidiary of SoftBank Group Corp., to sell up to 613,888,888 Yahoo Japan Shares it held to SoftBank Corp. for ¥360 (approximately $3.26) per Yahoo Japan Share in cash. In order to comply with Japanese legal requirements, the transaction was structured as a tender offer by SoftBank Corp (the “Yahoo Japan Tender Offer”). The Fund sold 613,750,500 of its Yahoo Japan Shares to SoftBank Corp. for approximately $2 billion in the Yahoo Japan Tender Offer,


which expired on August 11, 2018. Following the Yahoo Japan Tender Offer, the Fund continued to hold approximately 26.8% of the outstanding Yahoo Japan Shares. On July 9, 2018, concurrently with the Yahoo Japan Tender Offer, SoftBank Group Corp., certain of its affiliates and the Fund agreed to terminate that certain Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1996, as amended, by and among such proxyparties, which had previously governed the shareholding and other governance arrangements relating to Yahoo Japan.

At a meeting held on September 6, 2018, the Board approved the sale of the remaining portion of the Yahoo Japan Shares held by the Fund in a transaction structured as an “accelerated bookbuild offering” (the “Yahoo Japan Offering”). Pursuant to the Yahoo Japan Offering, the Fund agreed to sell the Yahoo Japan Shares to certain managers which then offered and resold the Yahoo Japan Shares to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and outside the United States and Japan in accordance with their judgmentRegulation S under the Securities Act. The Board also continued to discuss potential strategic alternatives, including maintaining the status quo, staged dispositions of Alibaba ADSs and other assets, a liquidation and dissolution, seeking to convert to a RIC for tax purposes, and potential transactions involving Alibaba. The Board analyzed the benefits and detriments of these strategic alternatives, including uncertainties, timing, risks, alignment with and impact on such matters.

Failure of a quorum to be present at the Annual Meeting may result in an adjournment. The chairresolution of the Annual Meeting mayFund’s current and potential liabilities, and which alternatives were feasible and within the Fund’s control.

At the September 6, 2018 meeting, the Board also moveauthorized the September 2018 Repurchase Program to repurchase up to $5.75 billion of the Fund’s Shares, inclusive of the portion of the February 2018 Repurchase Program that was unused, in order to return to stockholders the estimated amount of the Fund’s excess net cash after giving effect to the aforementioned sales of Yahoo Japan Shares. Between September 6, 2018 and May 13, 2019, the date on which the September 2018 Repurchase Program was completed, the Fund repurchased approximately 86 million Shares on the open market for an adjournmentaggregate cost of $5.75 billion pursuant to permit further solicitationthe September 2018 Repurchase Program.

Following the September 6, 2018 meeting of proxiesthe Board, the Board retained Sidley Austin LLP (“Sidley”) and Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP (“Young Conaway”) as separate legal counsel to advise the Board with respect to its fiduciary duties in connection with the Board’s consideration of strategic alternatives, including a Proposal if hepotential liquidation and dissolution of the Fund.

On September 10, 2018, the Fund publicly announced the terms of the Yahoo Japan Offering for its remaining stake in Yahoo Japan, which consisted of 1,363,531,700 Yahoo Japan Shares. One week later, on September 17, 2018, the Fund announced the successful completion of the Yahoo Japan Offering, which generated roughly $4.3 billion in proceeds for the Fund.

At a meeting held on November 28, 2018, the Board discussed the Fund’s ongoing efforts to obtain confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities as to the inapplicability of Bulletin 7 to the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers, as well as the status of various efforts to clarify certain actual and contingent U.S. federal and state tax liabilities. Representatives from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan”) reviewed with the Board the Fund’s potential strategic alternatives, including, among others, maintaining the status quo, another exchange offer, a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund, and potential transactions involving Alibaba. Given the time and effort that would be required to prepare for Board approval of any of the Fund’s viable strategic alternatives, the Board directed management to proceed in parallel with preparing for a potential liquidation and dissolution of the Fund and continuing to evaluate the feasibility of other potential strategic alternatives. The Board also reviewed and discussed with management and legal counsel the process of liquidation and dissolution and received advice from Skadden, Sidley and Young Conaway regarding the Fund’s obligations in connection with a liquidation and dissolution under Delaware law.

At a meeting held on January 23, 2019, the Board continued to review with management and the Fund’s advisors the process of liquidation and dissolution. The Board discussed, among other things, a potential timeline for a dissolution of the Fund, the impact of the Fund’s dissolution on the liquidity of the Shares, and the Fund’s other potential strategic alternatives, including an additional exchange offer of Alibaba Shares for Shares. The Board also discussed the Fund’s attempts to obtain confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities as to the inapplicability of Bulletin 7 to the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers, as well as the status of various efforts to clarify certain actual and contingent U.S. federal and state tax liabilities. The Board directed management and its legal advisors to continue discussions with the STA and U.S. federal and state tax officials with respect to


the Fund’s contingent tax liabilities. Furthermore, the Board directed management to engage one or she determinesmore financial advisors to assist the Board in its consideration of the Fund’s viable strategic alternatives and the potential shareholder returns associated with each such viable strategic alternative, including a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund. The Board directed management and its legal and financial advisors to continue proceeding in parallel with preparing for a potential liquidation and dissolution of the Fund and continuing to evaluate the feasibility of the Fund’s other potential strategic alternatives.

At the March 1, 2019 meeting of the Board, the Board further considered whether to approve a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to a plan of liquidation and dissolution. At the meeting, management, representatives of J.P. Morgan and representatives of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (“Goldman Sachs”) (which, together with J.P. Morgan had been retained by the Fund in connection with the Board’s consideration of strategic alternatives) discussed with the Board their assessment of the benefits and issues associated with certain of the strategic alternatives available to the Fund to reduce the discount at which the Shares trade, including, among others, an exchange offer involving the Fund’s Alibaba Shares, various transactions involving Alibaba, the concept of a transaction involving a third party with significant available tax attributes such as net operating losses or foreign tax credit carryforwards, as well as monetization alternatives for the Fund’s Alibaba Shares. It was noted that adjournmentAlibaba indicated that it was not interested in pursuing a strategic transaction with the Fund. Representatives of Skadden, Sidley and Young Conaway reviewed the fiduciary duties of the Board in connection with a plan of liquidation and dissolution. The Board reviewed the financial aspects of a liquidation analysis prepared by management and its advisors reflecting estimates of the Fund’s assets and potential liabilities, including (i) the estimated range of net assets available for distribution to stockholders pursuant to a plan of liquidation and dissolution after the reserve of amounts reasonably necessary to pay or provide for all known, contingent and potential future claims, and (ii) the potential returns available to stockholders under the proposed plan of liquidation and dissolution and other transactions. The Board received an update from management and the Fund’s tax advisors with respect to discussions with U.S. federal and state and PRC taxing authorities, including the Fund’s efforts to obtain confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities as to the inapplicability of Bulletin 7 to the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers.

At the March 14, 2019 meeting of the Board, the Board further considered whether to approve a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to a plan of liquidation and dissolution. At the meeting, management, representatives of J.P. Morgan and representatives of Goldman Sachs noted for the Board that their assessment of the benefits and issues associated with certain of the strategic alternatives available to the Fund to reduce the discount at which the Shares trade, including, among others, the concept of a transaction involving a third party with significant available tax attributes such as net operating losses or foreign tax credit carryforwards, has not changed since the previous Board meeting held on March 1, 2019. Representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Board the proposed plan of liquidation and dissolution, the draft resolutions to approve the proposed plan of liquidation and dissolution and related matters, and the draft proxy statement to be submitted to stockholders in connection with the solicitation of stockholder approval of the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to a plan of liquidation and dissolution. The Board reviewed the financial aspects of a liquidation analysis prepared by management and its advisors reflecting estimates of the Fund’s assets and potential liabilities, which had been updated since the previous Board meeting held on March 1, 2019. The Board received a further update from management and the Fund’s tax advisors with respect to discussions with U.S. federal and state and PRC taxing authorities, including the Fund’s efforts to obtain confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities as to the inapplicability of Bulletin 7 to the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers.

On April 2, 2019, the Board met to consider whether to approve a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. At the meeting, management updated the Board on its assessment of the strategic alternatives available to the Fund to reduce the discount at which the Shares trade relative to their net asset value. Representatives of Skadden, Sidley and Young Conaway reviewed the actions taken by the Board in exercising its fiduciary duties. At the meeting, representatives of J.P. Morgan and representatives of Goldman Sachs discussed with the Board updated information about the discount at which the Shares traded relative to their net asset value and considered the consequences to stockholders of maintaining the Fund’s “status quo” operations. The Board once again reviewed the financial aspects of a liquidation analysis prepared by management reflecting estimates of the Fund’s assets and potential liabilities, including the estimated range of net assets available for distribution to stockholders pursuant to a plan of liquidation and dissolution after the reserve of amounts reasonably necessary to pay or provide for all known, contingent and potential future claims. The Board considered both the risks and benefits of a decision to liquidate and dissolve the Fund. As a result of these considerations and other factors, which are reasonablediscussed more thoroughly below under the caption “ —Reasons for the Liquidation and Dissolution,” the Board concluded that, under the circumstances, it is advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders to liquidate and dissolve the


Fund, unanimously approved and adopted the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and recommended approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to our stockholders. In addition, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”), the Board adopted an amendment to the LTIP in recognition of the fact that, under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Shares would be delisted from Nasdaq and, therefore, it would not be possible to measure any reduction in the Fund’s trading discount by reference to the prices of the Shares on Nasdaq as is currently contemplated under the LTIP. The purpose of the amendment, which would become effective upon the date that the Shares are delisted from Nasdaq, is to preserve the benefits to participants under the LTIP by providing a mechanism for measuring current value by reference to the per share net asset value of the Fund, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This change is not intended to increase the magnitude of amounts potentially payable under the LTIP, but (in the context of the Shares being delisting after the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution) to provide an alternative mechanism for measuring current value that aligns management and stockholder interests. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Interests of Directors and Officers in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Payment of Incentive Awards under the Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan.”

Reasons for the Liquidation and Dissolution

The decision of the Board to seek your approval for the Dissolution Proposal followed a lengthy process during which the Board consulted with management and financial, accounting and legal advisors and carefully considered the risks, timing, viability and potential impact on our stockholders of the alternatives potentially available to the Fund. Based on such consideration and analysis, the Board determined that a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders.

As discussed in the above section entitled “—Background of the Proposed Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution,” although the Fund has pursued a number of strategies with the goal of reducing the discount to net asset value at which the Shares trade, including repurchases of the Shares, both in the open market and through the 2018 Exchange Offer, the Yahoo Japan Tender Offer and the Yahoo Japan Offering (which concentrated the Fund’s assets in Alibaba Shares) and through other means, the Shares have continued to trade at a substantial discount to net asset value.

In addition to the considerations above, the Board also considered the following factors in favor of a liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution:

since the Fund was converted to an investment company following the Sale Transaction, the Board, in consultation with management and the Fund’s legal, financial and tax advisors, considered various potential strategies and transactions for achieving the Fund’s investment objectives, including maintaining the status quo, staged dispositions of Alibaba Shares and other assets, a liquidation and dissolution, becoming a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, seeking Alibaba’s agreement for Alibaba to effectuate a reorganization related to the current CFC rules, and a sale of the Fund to Alibaba, among others, and determined that each of such alternatives either was not viable or entailed materially greater risk and/or time to return capital to stockholders;

commencing the dissolution process under the DGCL, including the mailing of notices to claimants and the requirement that claimants respond by a specified date or their claims will be barred, may facilitate an earlier resolution of certain claims against the Fund;

under Section 281(c) of the DGCL, by following the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, directors of a dissolved corporation would be protected from personal liability to claimants of the dissolved corporation for failing to make adequate provision for such corporation’s actual and potential liabilities, and each stockholder’s potential liability would be limited in the aggregate to the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution and further limited to claims filed before the expiration of thewinding-up period;

the terms and conditions of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution permit the Board to abandon or delay implementation of the dissolution prior to the Effective Time if it determines that, in light of new proposals presented or changes in circumstances, a liquidation and dissolution is no longer advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders;

the Dissolution Proposal is subject to approval by our stockholders and allows stockholders to have a direct vote on whether they concur with such Proposal as a favorable outcome for the Fund and our stockholders;


there are potential U.S. federal income tax benefits of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to our stockholders, including that distributions received by U.S. Holders pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution will generally be treated first as atax-free return of the tax basis in the stockholder’s Shares, with any excess treated as capital gain, and that any such distributions received bynon-U.S. Holders will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax;

as a result of the TCJA, the rate of corporate-level U.S. federal income tax imposed on sales and other taxable transfers of Alibaba Shares after December 31, 2017 was reduced from 35% to 21%; and

the information provided by the Fund’s financial advisors, J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs to the Board about strategic alternatives considered by the Board to reduce the discount to net asset value at which the Shares trade, including maintaining the Fund’s “status quo” operations, with the proposed liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, as well as the information they provided about monetization alternatives for the Fund’s Alibaba Shares.

The Board also considered unfavorable factors in arriving at its conclusion that liquidating and dissolving the Fund is advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders, including, among others:

there are uncertainties as to the timing, nature and amount of any liquidating distributions to stockholders, and the amounts we would ultimately distribute to our stockholders pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution may be substantially less than the amounts we currently estimate if the amounts of our liabilities, other obligations and expenses and claims against us are higher than we currently anticipate or the price or value at which we sell or distribute our Alibaba Shares is lower than we currently anticipate;

it is possible that the aggregate liquidating distributions that would be paid to a stockholder under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution would not exceed the amount that the stockholder could have received upon sales of its Shares in the open market;

the disposition of the Fund’s remainingnon-cash assets, including the remaining Alibaba Shares, will be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal, state and local tax, and, in the case of the Alibaba Shares, may potentially be subject to PRC taxation;

uncertainties exist as to the resolution of potential Bulletin 7 tax liability, and the Court Order may require the Fund to reserve amounts for some or all of such potential liability;

given the amount that the Fund is expected to hold back and the length of time it may hold such amount back, the trading prices of the Shares may be adversely affected, resulting, at least in the short term, in an increase in the discount to net asset value;

by selling all or substantially all of our Alibaba Shares, and in any event, by filing a Certificate of Dissolution, the Fund will eliminate the possibility of a significant transaction between the Fund and Alibaba and the Fund’s ability to benefit from any increase in the value of its Alibaba Shares;

the Board and our officers may have interests in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of stockholders generally;

in the event we fail to create adequate reserves for payment of the amounts ultimately payable in respect of expenses and liabilities, our stockholders may be required to return to certain creditors some or all of the liquidating distributions; and

if the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is approved by our stockholders, holders of the Shares would generally not be permitted to transfer the Shares after the Effective Time, and such lack of liquidity and the delisting of the Shares from Nasdaq may adversely affect the trading prices of the Shares prior to the Effective Time.

Our Board also considered the other factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” of this Proxy Statement and under the caption “Principal Risks” in our FormN-CSR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC and other documents we file with or furnish to the SEC, in deciding to approve, and recommend that our stockholders approve, the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.


The preceding discussion is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the information and factors considered by our Board, but addresses the material information and factors considered. In view of the variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, our Board did not find it practical and did not quantify or otherwise attempt to assign relative weight to the specific factors considered in reaching its conclusions. In addition, our Board did not undertake to make any specific determination as to whether any particular factor, or any aspect of any particular factor, was favorable or unfavorable to its ultimate determination, but rather conducted an overall analysis of the factors described above. In considering the factors described above, individual members of our Board may have given different weight to different factors.

At this time, our Board has considered all of the strategic alternatives the Board has to date considered feasible and has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders to dissolve the Fund and return to our stockholders the Fund’s assets and/or cash that are not necessary to provide for the Fund’s liabilities. The Board, however, retains the right to consider additional alternatives that may develop and abandon or delay implementation of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution should a superior alternative arise before the filing of a Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State.

Pre-Dissolution Liquidating Distribution

The Fund intends to make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof) contingent on, and as soon as reasonably practicable following, stockholder approval of the Dissolution Proposal and before the filing of a Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State. The Fund currently estimates that the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be between $52.12 and $59.63 per Share in cash and/or Alibaba Shares. However, this estimate is subject to a number of assumptions and qualifications that could vary, as described in greater detail below. The Fund currently expects to make suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution during the third or fourth quarter of 2019, although such timing may be extended by the Board in its sole discretion. However, there is no assurance regarding whether or when suchpre-dissolution liquidating distribution will be made.

The Fund’s estimate of the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution is based on:

the assumption that the Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, the Alibaba Share value at the time of distribution is $177.00 per Alibaba Share (the actual closing prices of the Alibaba Shares on the NYSE ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and May 15, 2019);

the assumption that the Fund’s written warrant transactions would be settled in cash with each of the Fund’s bank counterparties prior to the payment of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution; and

the Board’s estimate of thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount, based on, among other things, the foregoing assumptions.

Under Delaware law, the Fund may not make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution except (i) out of “surplus,” which is defined as the amount by which the Fund’s “net assets” (i.e., the amount by which the Fund’s total assets exceed the Fund’s total liabilities) exceed its “capital” (i.e., the sum of the aggregate par value of all of the Fund’s issued Shares), or (ii) in the case in which there is insufficient “surplus,” out of the Fund’s “net profits” for the fiscal year in which such distribution is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Moreover, the Fund may not make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution if doing so would render the Fund insolvent (i.e., if its liabilities exceed its assets, or if it is unable to pay its debts as they come due) or if such distribution constitutes a fraudulent transfer. Accordingly, the amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution would be dependent on the Fund’s surplus and net assets before and after making such distribution. Thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution would also be conditioned on the prior sale by the Fund for cash of not less than a sufficient number of Alibaba Shares to ensure that the Fund has sufficient liquid assets to cover thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount and to fund the cash portion of such distribution. The Fund is not eligible to be treated as a RIC under the Code, as a result of the Fund’s concentrated ownership of Alibaba Shares. Instead, the Fund is treated as a regular corporation, or a “C” corporation, for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as a result, will be subject to corporate income tax to the extent the Fund recognizes taxable income and taxable gains. Accordingly, the sale or other disposition of the Fund’s remaining non-cash assets, including the remaining Alibaba Shares, will generally be taxable to the Fund for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Fund will also generally recognize gain or loss upon any liquidating distribution (including the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution) of Alibaba Shares or other non-cash property to stockholders or to a liquidating trust as if such property were sold at its fair market value at the time of the distribution.


In addition, in light of the fact that the Board has adopted the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and anticipates entering into a dissolution andwinding-up process, in determining the amount of the Fund’s assets that would be available for apre-dissolution liquidating distribution, the Board intends to retain sufficient assets to ensure the Fund’s ability to satisfy or make adequate provision for all of its liabilities, including the expansive array of potential, contingent and future liabilities the Fund would be required to provide for in the context of a dissolution and winding up in accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL (see “—Dissolution Generally Under Delaware Law”). Given the uncertainties with respect to certain of the Fund’s contingent and future liabilities, including potential liabilities for taxes payable to taxing authorities in the PRC, in order to provide the maximum protection for our stockholders and directors under these “safe harbor” dissolution provisions, the Board has determined that it would be prudent to wait until the issuance of the Court Order before distributing assets that the Court might determine are needed to cover such contingent and future liabilities.Accordingly, before making apre-dissolution liquidating distribution, the Fund intends to hold back thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount,i.e., an amount of assets that the Board estimates will be sufficient to cover the maximum potential reserves that might be required by the Court to satisfy the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, which amount, due to the uncertainties described under “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters,” will include the maximum amount of potential PRC taxes on all of the Alibaba Share Transfers without any offset or reduction for any foreign tax credits allowable under U.S. tax law.

The actual amount of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution could be higher or lower than the Fund’s current estimated range of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution depending on, among other things, how much of the Fund’s assets, at such time, are in the form of Alibaba Shares, the actual market prices of the Alibaba Shares on and prior to the payment date of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution (which may be higher or lower than the assumed Alibaba Share price provided above), the Fund’s anticipated ability to monetize such remaining Alibaba Shares on favorable terms, and the extent that existing and potential liabilities are resolved, new liabilities arise or facts and circumstances otherwise change or develop. It is not possible to predict with certainty what thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount or the amount available for thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution ultimately will be. The amount set forth above should be considered strictly as an estimate subject to the specified assumptions and qualifications. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution.”

None of the current estimates of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount, the amount of the reserves for disputed, contingent and potential future claims set forth in the Fund’s petition to the Court or the amounts required to be reserved by the Fund in the Court Order will be calculated in accordance with, or by reference to, U.S. GAAP and such amounts do not, and will not, reflect any change in the Fund’s position with respect to its liabilities and reserves from an accounting perspective. Rather, each of such amounts is, or will be, calculated solely to ensure that the Fund has sufficient assets to comply with its obligations to provide adequate security under the dissolution procedures under the DGCL, which is a generally more conservative standard than the determination required by U.S. GAAP.

Dissolution Generally Under Delaware Law

Delaware law requires that the dissolution of a corporation be authorized upon (i) the determination by its Board that such dissolution is advisable and in the best interests of the corporation and its stockholders and (ii) the subsequent approval of the dissolution by a majority of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon. Once so authorized, the corporation is dissolved upon filing a certificate of dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State.

Dissolution ends a corporation’s legal existence. It does not, however, extinguish pending litigation nor prevent the filing of suits against the dissolved corporation. Rather, a dissolved corporation can sue or be sued for up to three years after dissolution, or a longer period as determined by the Court. In fact, Section 278 of the DGCL mandates the continued legal existence of corporations for three years after dissolution, or longer if ordered by the Court, for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, whether civil, criminal or administrative, by or against them, and of enabling corporations gradually to settle and close their business, to dispose of and convey their property, to discharge their liabilities and to distribute to their stockholders any remaining assets, but not for the purpose of continuing the business for which the corporation was organized. The Court may prolong the period of continued corporate life beyond three years if an application is made before the three-year period expires.


The time period is also automatically extended by statute for any proceeding commenced prior to dissolution or prior to the end of the three-year period but not completed within the allotted period. As a result, dissolution does not function as a statute of limitations, and actions commenced against a corporation prior to dissolution or during the three-year statutorywinding-up period do not abate by reason of dissolution or on the expiration of thewinding-up period.

To fulfill the purpose of winding up a dissolved corporation’s affairs, the DGCL offers two alternative pathways: (i) the elective, court-supervised “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL; or (ii) the unsupervised, “default” procedures under Section 281(b) of the DGCL. The Board has determined that it will follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a). For a description of those procedures, see below “—Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-UpProcess—Winding-Up Process.”

Under Section 281(c) of the DGCL, directors of a dissolved corporation which has complied with either the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL or the “default” procedures under Section 281(b) of the DGCL are not personally liable to the claimants of the dissolved corporation. However, whether directors have “complied” with the relevant procedures may be more open to challenge for corporations wound up under the “default” procedures without the oversight of the Court. To the extent the directors are found not to have complied with the relevant procedures, they would not be afforded the benefit of Section 281(c) of the DGCL.

Regarding stockholders, Section 282 of the DGCL provides a monetary limitation on the liability of stockholders as well as a time limit on such liability. If a corporation complies with the distribution procedures of either Section 281(a) or Section 281(b) of the DGCL, stockholder liability is limited to a pro rata share of corporate liability or the amount distributed, whichever is less. In addition, a stockholder will not be liable to creditors of a dissolved corporation in an aggregate amount exceeding the amount of assets distributed to such stockholder. The procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL further limit stockholder liability by providing that stockholders have no liability for any claim commenced after the expiration of thewinding-up period, and thus, stockholders are fully released of all claims not filed prior to that time.

At any time prior to the expiration of the three-year statutorywinding-up period following the dissolution of a corporation, the corporation may revoke the dissolution if (i) its board of directors adopts a resolution recommending that the dissolution be revoked, (ii) the holders of a majority of the stock of the corporation which was outstanding and entitled to vote upon a dissolution at the time of the corporation’s dissolution vote for the resolution to revoke the dissolution, and (iii) the corporation files a Certificate of Revocation with the Delaware Secretary of State and takes certain other actions specified by the DGCL.

Description of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Dissolution andWinding-Up Process

Below is a description of the material aspects of the proposed Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. While we believe that the description covers the material terms of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, it may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should carefully read this entire Proxy Statement, including the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement, for a more complete understanding of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

To become effective, the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to vote thereon. The approval of the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution by the requisite vote of the holders of the Shares will grant full and complete authority to our Board and officers, without further stockholder action, to proceed with the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution in accordance with any applicable provision of Delaware law.

As discussed above, the Fund intends to make apre-dissolution liquidating distribution (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof) to stockholders following stockholder approval and before the filing of a Certificate of Dissolution.


Effective Time of Dissolution

The Fund currently expects the Certificate of Dissolution to be filed during the third or fourth quarter of 2019 promptly following the pre-dissolution liquidating distribution, although such filing may be delayed by the Board in its sole discretion. For example, the Board may determine that dissolving the Fund by filing a Certificate of Dissolution may impair the Fund’s attempts to voluntarily resolve certain potential claims. The date of the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution is the Effective Time unless the Certificate of Dissolution specifies otherwise. The Fund will issue a press release not less than five days before filing the Certificate of Dissolution to announce (i) that the Board has determined to proceed with the dissolution and (ii) the anticipated filing date of the Certificate of Dissolution.

We will close our stock transfer books and discontinue recording transfers of Shares at the Effective Time. Thereafter, record holders of Shares would not be able to assign or otherwise transfer their Shares, except for assignments by will, intestate succession or operation of law. All liquidating distributions from us or a liquidating trust on or after the Effective Time would be made to stockholders of record according to their holdings of Shares on the Fund’s stock ledger. The record holders and number of Shares held by such holders reflected on the Fund’s stock ledger would be the holders and number of Shares as of the Effective Time, subject to any transfers subsequently reflected on our stock ledger by reason of assignments by will, intestate succession or operation of law. See also “—Delisting and Lack of Market for Trading of the Shares and Interests in a Liquidating Trust.”

Winding-Up Process

After the Effective Time, the Fund would exist solely for purposes of prosecuting and defending suits and winding up its affairs. The Fund expects to follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL because following such procedures would afford greater protection to our directors and stockholders than the “default” provisions of Section 281(b) of the DGCL. The provisions of Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL would protect the Fund’s directors from liability to claimants for failing to make adequate provision for the Fund’s actual and potential liabilities by providing for judicial determination of the amount and form of reserves to be set aside for pending, contingent or potential future claims and by providing that, in the absence of fraud, the judgment of the directors of the Fund is conclusive as to the provision made for payment of all other claims that are mature, known and uncontested or that have been finally determined to be owing by the Fund.

Under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, following the filing of a Certificate of Dissolution, the Fund would provide a notice of the Fund’s dissolution containing the information required by Section 280(a) of the DGCL by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to:

Known Claims;

all persons with claims asserted against the Fund in a pending action, suit or proceeding to which the Fund is a party (such claims,“Pre-existing Litigation Claims”); and

all persons with contractual claims contingent upon the occurrence or nonoccurrence of future events or otherwise conditional or unmatured (such claims, “Contingent Contractual Claims”).

The Fund would also publish such notice at least once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the office of the Fund’s last registered agent in Delaware is located and in the Fund’s principal place of business and at least once in all editions of a daily newspaper with a national circulation, declaring that all claims must be received by a certain date not earlier than 60 days from the date of notice (the “Bar Date”). In addition, the Fund may give notice to significant claimants whose claims would be the subject of the Fund’s petition to be subsequently filed with the Court (see below for a description of the petitioning process).

Any Known Claim (other thanPre-existing Litigation Claims) or Contingent Contractual Claim required to be presented is barred if the relevant claimant received actual notice and does not present such claim by the Bar Date referred to in the notice.

Within 90 days following receipt of any Known Claim made pursuant to the above notice (and at least 150 days before the end of the three-year statutorywinding-up period), the Fund may reject any such Known Claim (other thanPre-existing Litigation


Claims), in whole or in part. Any such Known Claim is barred if the claimant whose claim is rejected by the Fund does not commence an action, suit or proceeding with respect to the claim within 120 days after the mailing of the Fund’s rejection notice.

Within 90 days following receipt of any Contingent Contractual Claim made pursuant to the above notice (and at least 150 days before the end of the three-year statutorywinding-up period), the Fund must offer the relevant claimant such security as the Fund determines would be sufficient to provide compensation to the claimant if the claim matures. Any security offered with respect to a Contingent Contractual Claim is deemed accepted if the relevant claimant does not reject the security within 120 days after the receipt of such offer of security.

The Fund then would petition the Court to determine the amount and form of reserves that:

will be reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation forPre-existing Litigation Claims, and rejected Known Claims as to which the claimant commenced an action suit or proceeding within 120 days after the Fund’s mailing of the rejection notice (such claims, together with thePre-existing Litigation Claims, “Litigation Claims”);

will be sufficient to provide compensation for Contingent Contractual Claims for which offered security is rejected by the applicable claimants; and

will be reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for claims that have not been made known to the Fund or that have not arisen but that, based on facts known to the Fund, are likely to arise or to become known to the Fund within five years after the Effective Time or such longer period of time, as the Court may determine, not to exceed ten years after the Effective Time (“Uncertain Claims” and, together with the Litigation Claims and the Contingent Contractual Claims for which offered security is rejected by the applicable claimants, the “Petitioned Claims”).

The Fund’s petition would include the amount and form of reserves the Board believes in good faith is reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for the claims against the Fund. All of the claimants whose claims are the subject of the Fund’s petition would have an opportunity to appear before the Court and present their positions with respect to such claims.

Upon completion of the adjudication process, the Court would enter the Court Order determining the amount and form of reserves the Fund is required to establish with respect to the Petitioned Claims. The Fund intends to proceed expeditiously after the Certificate of Dissolution is filed to wind up its affairs, settle its liabilities and obtain the Court Order, after which it intends to distribute any available assets to stockholders. The Fund expects the Court Order to be issued within one year following the Effective Time, although there can be no assurance regarding the timing of the Court Order. In order to ensure the maximum protection of the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, the Fund does not intend to make any liquidating distributions between the Effective Time and the date when the Court Order is issued, although the Fund reserves the right to do so. There can be no assurance as to the amount that the Court will ultimately determine is required to be held back by the Fund. In its petition to the Court, the Fund will provide its view as to the amount of claims and liabilities that is reasonably likely to be payable by the Fund with respect to the Petitioned Claims. The Court will then make its own determination as to the amount and form of security reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for the Petitioned Claims. As a result, the Fund may be required to withhold up the maximum potential amount of each potential claim and liability. Such reserves may exceed the amounts ultimately payable with respect to such contingent liabilities and stockholders may not receive distributions of these excess amounts for a substantial period of time.

After receiving the Court Order, the Fund would:

pay Known Claims that are not rejected by the Fund;

post the security offered for Contingent Contractual Claims and not rejected by the claimants;

post any security ordered by the Court for other Petitioned Claims; and

pay or make provision for all other claims that are mature, known and uncontested or that have been finally determined to be owing by the Fund (such claims, “Additional Uncontested Claims”). Under the DGCL, in the absence of actual fraud, the judgment of the directors of the Fund as to the provision made for payment of Additional Uncontested Claims would be conclusive.


As discussed below, to the extent that the Fund’s actual liabilities and expenses are less than the amounts required to be held as security pursuant to the Court Order, the excess will be available to be distributed to the Fund’s stockholders in one or more post-dissolution liquidating distributions. Subject to the Fund’s compliance with the Court Order, all determinations as to the timing, amount and kind of distributions will be made by the Board in its absolute discretion and in accordance with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. However, no assurances can be given either as to the ultimate amounts available for distribution to our stockholders or as to the timing of any distributions.

Any adjourned meetingamounts proposed or meetingsdetermined to be set aside as security for the claims in the Fund’s petition or in the Court Order or actually held back by the Fund will not be calculated in accordance with, or by reference to, U.S. GAAP and will not reflect any change in the Fund’s position with respect to its liabilities and reserves from an accounting perspective. Rather, such amounts will be calculated solely to ensure that the Fund has sufficient assets to comply with its obligations to provide adequate security under the dissolution procedures under the DGCL, which is generally a more conservative standard than the determination required by U.S. GAAP.

Sale or Other Disposition of Our Remaining Assets

The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution gives the Board the power to sell, distribute or otherwise dispose of our remainingnon-cash assets in order to maximize value for the Fund’s stockholders and creditors. The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution does not specify the manner or timing in which we may sell, distribute or otherwise dispose of ournon-cash assets and any such sales or dispositions will be made on such terms and at such times as the Fund may determine in its discretion. Approval of the Dissolution Proposal at the Special Meeting will constitute stockholder approval of any such sales or dispositions. We will not be required to obtain any further stockholder approval with respect to specific terms of any particular sales or dispositions of assets approved by the Board. We do not anticipate amending or supplementing this Proxy Statement to reflect any such terms, unless required by law.

Prior to making anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution, we plan to sell not less than a sufficient number of Alibaba Shares to ensure that the Fund has sufficient liquid assets to cover thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount and fund the cash portion of such distribution. We intend to sell no more than approximately 50% of the Alibaba Shares we held at the time the Board approved the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution prior to receiving stockholder approval of the Dissolution Proposal and to sell our remaining Alibaba Shares after stockholder approval, except that any Alibaba Shares we do not need to sell to cover thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount may instead be distributed in kind. The Fund, which continues to be a party to the Registration Rights Agreement, which provides certain limitations and restrictions on the Fund’s share sale activities, intends to sell our Alibaba Shares through open market transactions and/or through private dispositions not executed or recorded on a public exchange or quotation service. Regardless of the method we choose, we currently intend to provide additional information upfront regarding the manner and timing that we expect to use to sell our Alibaba Shares. On May 15, 2019, we announced that, in connection with the Plan, we intend to commence selling our Alibaba Shares on May 20, 2019, and that we currently intend to update stockholders weekly on the actual amount of Alibaba Shares sold on the Fund’s website at https://www.altaba.com, in the section titled “Holdings”. The actual commencement of selling, the timing and method of sales, and other related transaction considerations will be determined at the Fund’s discretion, and the plans are subject to change based on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The Fund intends to sell its Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio when the Board determines that doing so is in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders. The Fund also intends to sell Excalibur, sell certain of the Excalibur IP Assets or license the Excalibur IP Assets when the Board determines that doing so is in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders.

The Fund’s disposition of its Alibaba Shares may cause the Fund to no longer invest 25% or more of its total assets in securities issued by companies in the online services ande-commerce industry. After the Fund’s investments in securities of companies in the online services ande-commerce industry drops below 25% of the Fund’s total assets, the Fund will no longer maintain a policy to concentrate its investment in such securities.

As of the close of business on May 15, 2019, the Fund’s cash and Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio had an aggregate market value of approximately $1.8 billion and represented approximately 3.3% of the Fund’s total assets.

The proceeds of the Fund’s disposition of its Alibaba Shares, to the extent not used to fund the cash portion of anypre-dissolution liquidating distribution to stockholders, may be added to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio and will be


invested in accordance with the applicable investment policies and guidelines. A substantial portion of the Fund’s investment assets (other than the Alibaba Shares) may be held in the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio throughout the liquidation and dissolution process. Following stockholder approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Fund intends to continue to manage the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio in accordance with the current policies and guidelines applicable to the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio. The Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio is managed by BlackRock Advisors, LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC as external investment advisers, who, in doing so, apply the investment guidelines set by the Fund. In general, the Fund will seek to match the maturity of an applicable portion of its Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio to the expected maturity date of its liabilities. The monetization of the Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio following the Effective Time will be made from time to time under the supervision of the Board.

Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves

Among other liabilities, the Fund’s major known, contingent and potential future liabilities include (i) potential U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax claims (including potential PRC tax claims), which constitute a significant majority of the Fund’s known, contingent and potential future liabilities, (ii) potential liabilities arising out of the Data Breaches and certain other legal contingencies, and (iii) continuing obligations to indemnify former Yahoo executives.

Potential Tax Claims

U.S. Federal, State, and Local Income Tax Matters

Even if the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is approved and the Fund files a Certificate of Dissolution, the Fund will continue to be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income and taxable gains until the liquidation is complete (i.e., until all of its remaining assets have been distributed to the stockholders or transferred to a liquidating trust or trusts). Accordingly, the sale or other disposition of the Fund’s remainingnon-cash assets, including the remaining Alibaba Shares, will generally be taxable to the Fund for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Fund’s prior dispositions of Alibaba Shares and Yahoo Japan Shares were generally taxable to the Fund for U.S. federal income tax purposes, resulting in significant tax liabilities to the Fund.

With respect to the 2018 Exchange Offer, the Fund recognized taxable gain equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the Alibaba Shares exchanged in the 2018 Exchange Offer on the date of the exchange over (ii) the Fund’s tax basis in such Alibaba Shares. For these purposes, the valuation of the Alibaba Shares exchanged in the 2018 Exchange Offer is uncertain. In general, the trading price of publicly traded stock is normally presumed to be its fair market value for tax purposes. However, courts and the IRS have recognized that it may be appropriate to apply a “blockage discount” in valuing a large block of stock that cannot be sold in a reasonable time without depressing the necessitymarket. Due to the large number of another notice.Alibaba Shares exchanged in the 2018 Exchange Offer, the 2018 Exchange Offer could support a position that such Alibaba Shares should be valued after the application of a blockage discount that takes into account the size and illiquidity of the block. There is no assurance that the IRS or a court would agree with this position.

The Fund will generally recognize gain or loss upon any liquidating distribution of Alibaba Shares or othernon-cash property to stockholders or to a liquidating trust as if such property were sold at its fair market value at the time of the distribution. There is no assurance that the IRS will not challenge our valuation of any property so distributed, including any potential blockage or other discount claimed in respect of a liquidating distribution of Alibaba Shares.

The Fund also expects to incur certain state and local income tax liabilities on the disposition of the Fund’s remaining Alibaba Shares, and it incurred such tax liabilities on prior Share Dispositions. Depending on a number of factors, including the apportionment methodologies that are applied to source the gains from Share Dispositions for state and local tax purposes, the amount of such taxes could be greater or less than the corresponding amount recorded by the Fund for financial accounting purposes and reflected within the liabilities section of the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities filed with the SEC on FormN-CSR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The appropriate apportionment methodology for Share Dispositions is uncertain in each of the state and local jurisdictions in which the Fund expects to pay tax, and could vary materially depending on the manner in which Share Dispositions are effected (e.g., as a sale, exchange, distribution or other disposition). There can be no assurance that we will be able to resolve these matters favorably with the applicable taxing authorities.

 


ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONIn early May 2019, the Fund reached agreements with the California Franchise Tax Board regarding certain matters in connection with determining its 2012, 2014 and 2018 California state income tax liability. With respect to 2012 and 2014, it has been agreed that the capital gains from the sale of Alibaba Shares in those periods will be treated as apportionable business income. With respect to 2018, the apportionment methodology to be applied to the capital gains arising from the disposition of Yahoo Japan and Alibaba Shares in that period has been agreed. The Fund will release certain balance sheet reserves as a result of the 2012 and 2014 agreement. The agreement on 2018 was generally consistent with the Fund’s previous assumptions in estimating its California tax liability from transactions in that period.

On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the TCJA, which significantly changed existing U.S. tax law. Among other changes impacting the Fund, the TCJA imposed aone-time deemed repatriation tax on certain accumulated earnings ofnon-U.S. corporations owned by 10% U.S. shareholders, expanded the constructive ownership rules that are applied for purposes of determining whether anon-U.S. corporation is a CFC, and made other significant changes to the CFC rules. These rules are complex and subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. In addition, the application of these rules and their consequences to the Fund depend on a number of facts specific to Alibaba, Yahoo Japan, and their respective subsidiaries that are beyond our current knowledge and control. These and other uncertainties resulting from the TCJA could materially affect the Fund’s U.S. tax liabilities.


PRC Tax Matters

The Fund potentially could be liable for PRC tax with respect to the following dispositions of Alibaba Shares:

 

Please vote promptlythe 2012 Alibaba Share Transfer, which was the repurchase from the Fund by completing, signing, dating,Alibaba of 523,000,000 Alibaba Shares for approximately $7.1 billion on September 18, 2012;

The 2014 Alibaba Share Transfer, which was the sale by Altaba Hong Kong of 140,000,000 Alibaba Shares in Alibaba’s initial public offering for approximately $9.4 billion (net of underwriting discounts, commissions and returning fees) on September 24, 2014;

the enclosed proxy card2018 Alibaba Share Transfers, which were the transfers of Alibaba Shares in the postage-paid envelope provided or via telephone or2018 Exchange Offer and the Internet pursuant to the instructions on the enclosed proxy card or on the NoticeAlibaba Resale, including internal transfers of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials so you will be represented at the Annual Meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be Held on October 24, 2017

This Proxy Statement is available on the Internet at www.envisionreports.com/AABA.


ANNEX A

FORM OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN ALTABA INC. AND BLACKROCK ADVISORS, LLC

This Investment Management Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated [    ], 2017, is by and betweenAlibaba Shares from Altaba Inc. (the “Fund”), a Delaware corporation, and BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the “Advisor”), a Delaware limited liability company.

WHEREAS, the Fund is registered as aclosed-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”);

WHEREAS, the Advisor is registered as an investment advisor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), and has agreed to furnish investment advisory servicesHong Kong to the Fund; and

WHEREAS,

the 2019 Alibaba Share Transfers, which would be the disposition or other transfer of the Fund’s remaining Alibaba Shares described in this Agreement has been approvedProxy Statement, which are expected to be completed in 2019.

PRC taxation of indirect transfers of PRC taxable property is currently governed by Bulletin 7. Under Bulletin 7, an “indirect transfer” of PRC taxable property, which occurs when a foreign company that is not resident in the PRC transfers shares in another foreign company that is not resident in the PRC, and the company whose shares are transferred directly or indirectly holds PRC taxable property, including equity interests in PRC resident enterprises, may be recharacterized and treated as a direct transfer of PRC taxable property and subject to PRC tax, if such arrangement does not have a reasonable commercial purpose. An arrangement is deemed to lack a reasonable commercial purpose if the primary purpose of the arrangement is to avoid tax. The PRC taxing authorities, in particular the STA, which is the highest level taxing authority in the PRC, have wide discretion to interpret Bulletin 7 and to apply the indirect transfer rules to specific circumstances.

Because Alibaba, which is a Cayman Islands company, holds PRC taxable property, each of the Alibaba Share Transfers would be indirect transfers under Bulletin 7 (or, in the case of the 2012 Alibaba Share Transfer, the predecessor PRC tax regulation with respect to indirect share transfers). If an Alibaba Share Transfer were subject to PRC tax under Bulletin 7, the tax would be 10% of the gain that the PRC taxing authorities deemed the Fund or its applicable subsidiary to have derived from such transfer. While the rules for determining gain for purposes of Bulletin 7 are complex, the Fund believes that the tax basis that would be applied would be fairly low, resulting in a substantial gain to which the Bulletin 7 tax would apply. In addition, if the PRC tax is deemed applicable and is not timely paid, interest accrues until the tax is paid or settled by the Directorstransferor. Further, a transferee who has paid consideration for the transferred shares is a withholding agent and can be subject to a penalty for failure to withhold the PRC tax payable by the transferor in an amount up to three times the amount of the tax. The statute of limitations period applicable to Bulletin 7 cases is ten years.

Based on the advice of the Fund’s PRC tax counsel and advisors and other relevant information, including the discussions referred to in the following paragraph, we believe it is more likely than not that the Alibaba Share Transfers are not,


and in the case of the 2019 Alibaba Share Transfers will not be, subject to PRC tax. There can be no assurance that the PRC taxing authorities will agree with such positions.

The transferee and transferor can each voluntarily report an indirect transfer of PRC taxable property to the PRC taxing authorities. Voluntary reporting may entitle the transferor to a lower rate of interest on the PRC tax payable and gives the transferee a possible exemption or reduction of the penalty for failure to withhold. When an indirect transfer is voluntarily reported, the PRC taxing authorities will in the first instance review the case to determine whether the indirect transfer is potentially taxable and, if so, whether to open a formal investigation. If the PRC taxing authorities conclude at this stage that an indirect transfer is not taxable under Bulletin 7 and therefore decide not to open a formal investigation, they will close their review of the case in accordance with their internal procedures and will communicate that conclusion orally to the parties. We voluntarily reported the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers to the PRC taxing authorities. As part of the voluntary reporting process, we and our advisors have engaged the STA and other PRC taxing authorities and are seeking confirmation that such Alibaba Share Transfers are not taxable under Bulletin 7. We currently intend to follow a similar process with respect to the 2019 Alibaba Share Transfers. Even if the PRC taxing authorities have confirmed (which would likely be orally and not in writing) that an Alibaba Share Transfer is not subject to PRC tax, the PRC taxing authorities are not foreclosed from subsequentlyre-examining and potentially assessing Bulletin 7 tax on such transaction at any time prior to the expiration of theten-year statute of limitations period, although we believe based on the advice of our PRC tax advisors that it is highly unlikely they will do so where they have given oral confirmation that a transaction will not be taxed.

Based on advice of the Fund’s counsel, although not free from doubt, we believe that if the Fund or any of its subsidiaries were required to pay tax on the 2018 Alibaba Share Transfers or the 2019 Alibaba Share Transfers pursuant to Bulletin 7, the Fund will be entitled to claim the amount of tax paid as a credit against its U.S. federal income tax liability on such transfer. If Bulletin 7 tax were assessed on the 2012 Alibaba Share Transfer or the 2014 Alibaba Share Transfer, we would expect to be entitled to claim the amount of tax paid as a foreign tax credit against the Fund’s U.S. federal income tax liability on such transfers. Among other requirements for claiming a foreign tax credit, a taxpayer must exhaust all effective and practical remedies, including invocation of competent authority procedures available under applicable tax treaties, to reduce, over time, the taxpayer’s liability for foreign tax (including liability pursuant to an audit adjustment). Where a taxpayer pays an assessed foreign tax to stop interest and penalties from accruing, or because the foreign country requires payment of the tax before the taxpayer may further contest its tax liability, the taxpayer generally becomes entitled to claim a foreign tax credit upon payment of the tax (subject to adjustment if the tax is later refunded or additional tax is determined to be due).

Under PRC law, a taxpayer is generally required to pay a tax assessed under Bulletin 7 in order to contest the tax through an administrative review process and/or administrative litigation in the PRC courts. The STA may also be unlikely to enter into a competent authority proceeding pursuant to a PRC tax treaty unless the taxpayer has already paid the tax. Accordingly, in order to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to any tax imposed on any of the Alibaba Share Transfers pursuant to Bulletin 7, the Fund would need to pay the tax assessed by the PRC taxing authorities and pursue all effective and practical remedies to contest the tax under PRC law and the tax treaty between the United States and the PRC, including invoking the assistance of the U.S. competent authority. The Fund expects that it would have to claim the benefit of such credit in the form of a refund of previously paid U.S. federal income taxes. To obtain such a refund, the Fund would need to file a claim for refund (which could take the form of a protective refund claim) within ten years of the due date for the Fund’s U.S. federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the Alibaba Share Transfer occurred. Any such refund claim would be subject to review and approval by both the IRS and the Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan committee of Congress responsible for reviewing refund claims in excess of certain thresholds. As a result of the U.S. refund procedures and foreign tax credit requirements, including the need to ensure that the Fund has sufficient assets and liquidity to pay and contest any PRC tax imposed on any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, the Fund may need to delay the return of such assets to stockholders until resolution of the potential PRC tax liabilities and any related foreign tax credit claims, which could take a significant period of time. The rules relating to the foreign tax credit are complex and their application to a PRC tax imposed on an Alibaba Share Transfer is not entirely clear. Notwithstanding the advice of the Fund’s counsel and the Fund’s views referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court would agree that the Fund is entitled to claim a credit for such tax.

Given the uncertainties described above, we expect to hold back assets sufficient to pay the maximum amount of PRC tax that may be imposed on the all of the Alibaba Share Transfers, without any offset or reduction in the Fund’s reserves for U.S. tax liabilities, when determining the amounts of thePre-Dissolution Holdback Amount and, consequently, thepre-dissolution


liquidating distribution. Further, in respect of any liquidating distributions following issuance of the Court Order, unless the Fund is able to represent to the Court that we have received reasonably satisfactory confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities (which may include an oral confirmation to the Fund’s representatives) that they have determined not to tax the Alibaba Share Transfers, or we are otherwise able to establish to the satisfaction of the Court that such tax will not be assessed, the Fund expects that the Court Order would require us to reserve an amount of assets sufficient to cover all or a portion of the maximum potential PRC tax liabilities of the Fund. Based on theten-year statute of limitations period applicable to the potential PRC tax liabilities, such amount of assets may be held back for a substantial number of years. In that event, then we would seek to include a provision in the Court Order that would permit the Fund to return to the Court to petition for a reduction in the Fund’s reserves if we receive oral confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities after the issuance of the Court Order, or otherwise believe there is a reasonable basis for concluding, that the PRC taxing authorities do not intend to assess PRC tax with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers. There is no assurance, however, that the Court would agree to consider such a request or, if it does, that it would modify the Court Order in such a scenario.

Legal Contingencies

General

As described below, the Fund is involved in claims, suits, government investigations and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of the Fund’s previously owned Yahoo business, and for which the Fund continues to bear potential liability, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims, privacy, consumer protection, information security, data protection or law enforcement matters, commercial claims, stockholder derivative actions, purported class action lawsuits and other matters.

Data Breach Litigation

On September 22, 2016, the Fund disclosed that a copy of certain user account information for approximately 500 million user accounts was stolen from the Fund’s network in late 2014 (the “2014 Data Breach”). On December 14, 2016, the Fund disclosed that, based on its outside forensic expert’s analysis of data files provided to the Fund in November 2016 by law enforcement, the Fund believed an unauthorized third party stole data associated with more than one billion user accounts in August 2013 (the “2013 Data Breach”). Verizon subsequently disclosed that the 2013 Data Breach involved over three billion user accounts. In November and December 2016, the Fund disclosed that, based on an investigation by its outside forensic experts, it believed an unauthorized third party accessed the Fund’s proprietary code to learn how to forge certain cookies. The outside forensic experts have identified approximately 32 million user accounts for which they believe forged cookies were used or taken in 2015 and 2016 (the “Cookie Forging Activity”). The 2013 Data Breach, the 2014 Data Breach and the Cookie Forging Activity collectively constitute the Data Breaches. The total amount accrued related to the Data Breaches was $152 million.

Numerous putative consumer class action lawsuits were filed against the Fund in U.S. federal and state courts, and in foreign courts, relating to the Data Breaches, including the following: (1) In Re: Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Case No.5:16-md-02752-LHK (the “Federal Consumer Class Action”); (2) Yahoo! Inc. Private Information Disclosure Cases, Superior Court of California, County of Orange Case No. JCCP 4895 (the “California Consumer Class Action”); (3) Demers v. Yahoo! Inc., et al., Province of Quebec, District of Montreal Superior Court Case Nos.500-06-000841-177 and500-06-000842-175; (4) Gill v. Yahoo! Canada Co., et al., Supreme Court of British Columbia, Vancouver Registry Case No.S-168873; (5) Karasik v. Yahoo! Inc., et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice Case No.CV-16-566248-00CP; (6) Larocque v. Yahoo! Inc., et al., Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan Case No. QBG 1242 of 2017; (7) Sidhu v. Yahoo Canada Co., et al., Court of Queen’s Bench for Alberta Case No. 1603-22837; (8) Lahav v. Yahoo! Inc., Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court CaseNo. 61020-09-16 (“Lahav”); and (9) Reinzilber v. Yahoo! Inc., Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court CaseNo. 7406-08-17 (“Reinzilber”). Plaintiffs, who purport to represent various classes of users, generally claim to have been harmed by the Fund’s alleged actions and/or omissions in connection with the Data Breaches and assert a variety of common law and statutory claims seeking monetary damages or other related relief.

In October 2018, the Fund announced that it has reached an agreement with plaintiffs’ counsel to resolve all pending claims in the Federal Consumer Class Action and the California Consumer Class Action. The agreement is subject to certain conditions, including court approval and therefore may not result in a final settlement. On December 3, 2018, the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court granted plaintiffs’ counsel petition to dismiss the Lahav and Reinzilber actions, in view of the proposed settlement of the federal consumer class action.


On January 28, 2019, the court in the Federal Consumer Class Action denied the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of the proposed settlement. The Court instructed the parties to file a joint status report indicating whether they intend to negotiate a revised settlement agreement and renewed motion for preliminary approval or to resume litigation. The parties subsequently filed a revised settlement agreement and renewed motion for preliminary approval on April 9, 2019. The Court has scheduled a June 27, 2019 hearing for the motion for preliminary approval.

In addition, as described below, putative stockholder class actions were filed against the Fund and certain current officers of the Fund including a majorityon behalf of Directorspersons who are not “interested persons” (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) ofpurchased or otherwise acquired the 1940 Act)Fund’s stock between April 30, 2013 and December 14, 2016; an additional putative class action was filed against certain former directors and officers of the Fund (the “Independent Directors”) in a manner that correspondson behalf of stockholders of the Fund; and six stockholder derivative actions have been filed purportedly on behalf of the Fund against its former directors and officers, each asserting claims related to the requirementsData Breaches.

Additional lawsuits and claims related to the Data Breaches may be asserted by or on behalf of users, partners, shareholders or others seeking damages or other related relief.

In addition, the Fund is cooperating with federal, state and foreign governmental officials and agencies seeking information and/or documents about the Data Breaches and related matters, including, the SEC, a number of state attorneys general and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

On April 24, 2018, the SEC announced the settlement of its investigation of Yahoo related to the Data Breaches, which the Fund disclosed on September 22, 2016 and in the 2016 Form10-K filed on March 1, 2016. The Fund agreed to settle with the SEC, without admitting or denying the allegations described in the SEC’s settlement order. The SEC’s settlement order requires the Fund to cease and desist from any further violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act and Section 15(c)13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules12b-20,13a-1,13a-11,13a-13, and13a-15 promulgated thereunder.

Under the Reorganization Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2016, entered into by Yahoo and Yahoo Holdings, Inc. (an entity formed for purposes of the Sale Transaction) in connection with the Sale Transaction (the “Reorganization Agreement”), the Fund continues to be responsible for 50% of the User Security Liabilities and bears all of any liability under the SEC action against the Fund.

Other Legal Contingencies

On January 27, 2016, a stockholder action captioned UCFW Local 1500 Pension Fund v. Marissa Mayer, et al., 3:16-cv-00478-RS, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Fund, and certain then-current and former officers and directors of the Fund. On April 29, 2016, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint asserted derivative claims, purportedly on behalf of the Fund, for violations of the 1940 Act, and the Advisor is willing to furnish such services upon the terms and conditions herein set forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, in considerationbreach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, violations of Section 124 of the mutual premisesDGCL and covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration,violations of California Business & Professions Code Section 17200. The amended complaint sought to rescind the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed by and betweenFund’s employment contracts with the parties heretoindividual defendants because those defendants allegedly caused the Fund to illegally operate as follows:

1.

Appointment. (a) The Fund appoints the Advisor as investment adviser to provide investment advisory services (“Advisory Services”) with respect to those assets designated by the Fund in writing to the Advisor as subject to the Advisor’s management hereunder (“Allocated Assets”), together with all income, proceeds and profits derived therefrom as set out in this Agreement. The Advisor accepts such appointment as investment manager. The Advisor shall, for all purposes herein provided, be deemed to be an independent contractor and, except as expressly provided or authorized herein, shall have no authority to act for or represent the Fund in any way or otherwise be deemed an agent of the Fund.

(b)an unregistered investment company. The Advisor may from time to time,plaintiff sought disgorgement in its sole discretion to the extent permitted by applicable law, appoint one or more subadvisers who are affiliatesfavor of the Advisor, to perform investment advisory services with respect toFund, rescission and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. In addition, the Allocated Assets; provided, however, that the compensation of such subadvisers shall be paid by the Advisor and that Advisor shall be fully responsible toamended complaint asserted a direct claim against the Fund for alleged violation of Section 124(1) of the acts and omissionsDGCL, based on the allegation that the Fund had illegally operated as an unregistered investment company. Pursuant to this claim, the plaintiff sought injunctive relief preventing the Fund from entering into any such subadviserfuture contracts, including any contracts to sell its assets. On October 19, 2016, the court dismissed the amended complaint, with leave to amend. On November 18, 2016, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint seeking substantially the same relief as it did in the amended complaint. On February 10, 2017, the court dismissed the second amended complaint with prejudice. On March 10, 2017, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, which was docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit asCase No. 17-15435. On July 12, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision affirming the court’s dismissal. This case is now resolved.

In January 2017, a stockholder action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Fund and certain of its own acts and omission. The Advisor may terminate any and all subadvisersformer officers,In re Yahoo! Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No.5:17-cv-00373-LHK (the “Federal Securities Class Action”). In March 2017, a similar stockholder action captionedTalukder v. Yahoo! Inc., et al., was filed in its sole discretion at any time to the extent permitted by applicable law.U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. In April 2017, the court consolidated the two cases. In June, the

 

2.

Duties and Obligations of the Advisor with Respect to Investment of Assets of the Fund. Subject to the direction of the Fund’s Board of Directors, the Advisor shall

(i) act as investment advisor for

plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint purporting to represent a class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired the Fund’s stock between April 30, 2013 and superviseDecember 14, 2016. The complaint asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and manage the investment and reinvestment20(a) of the Allocated AssetsExchange Act and Rule10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaint alleged that the Fund’s public disclosures about its business, operations and compliance policies were materially misleading in connection therewith have complete discretionlight of the Data Breaches. The complaint sought class certification, damages, interest and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. On September 7, 2018, the court granted final approval to a class action settlement reached by the parties. This case is now resolved.

In February 2017, stockholder derivative actions were filed in purchasing and selling securities and other assetsthe U.S. District Court for the Allocated Assets in voting, exercising consents and exercising all other rights appertaining to such securities and other assetsNorthern District of California purportedly on behalf of the Allocated Assets; (ii) supervise continuouslyFund against certain of its then-current and former directors and officers,In re: Yahoo!Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, Case No.5:17-cv-00787-LHK (the “Federal Shareholder Derivative Litigation”). The complaints allege that defendants failed to disclose the investment programData Breaches and caused or allowed the Fund to issue materially false and misleading statements in its public filings and other public statements. The complaints assert derivative claims, purportedly on behalf of the Allocated AssetsFund, for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaints seek unspecified damages, disgorgement of profits and compensation obtained by the defendants, an award of attorneys’ fees and costs, and other related injunctive and equitable forms of relief. In May 2017, the court consolidated the two cases, and on July 6, 2017, plaintiffs filed a consolidated stockholder derivative complaint asserting the same claims, as well as claims of insider trading, purportedly on behalf of Yahoo, against certain defendants under California Corporations Code sections 25402 and 25403. In September 2017, the court granted a joint motion to stay the Federal Shareholder Derivative Litigation pending resolution of the Federal Securities Class Action and the compositionFederal Consumer Class Action.

In March 2017, a stockholder derivative and class action,Spain v. Marissa Mayer, et al., Case No. 17CV207054, was filed in the Superior Court of its investment portfolio; (iii) arrangeCalifornia for the purchaseCounty of Santa Clara. In May 2017, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, purportedly on behalf of the Fund, against certain of the Fund’s then-current and sale of securitiesformer directors and officers. The complaint alleges that defendants failed to prevent and disclose the Data Breaches and caused or allowed the Fund to issue materially false and misleading statements in its public filings and other assets heldpublic statements. The complaint also asserts claims of insider trading, purportedly on behalf of the Fund, against certain defendants under California Corporations Code sections 25402 and 25403. The complaint also asserts direct claims, purportedly on behalf of the then-current Fund stockholders, against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty relating to disclosures in the Allocated Assets; (iv) provide investment researchproxy statement relating to the Fund;Sale Transaction concerning the negotiation and (v) provide reasonable assistanceapproval of the Stock Purchase Agreement and against Verizon for aiding and abetting the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duty. The complaint seeks class certification, unspecified damages, an award of attorneys’ fees and costs and other related injunctive and equitable forms of relief. Multiple shareholder plaintiffs have filed stockholder derivative actions making similar claims, including:The LR Trust, et al. v. Marissa Mayer, et al., Case No. 17CV306525 (Cal. Sup. Ct.);Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Marissa Mayer, et al., Case No. 17CV310992 (Cal. Sup. Ct.) andOklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Eric Brandt, et al., Case No. 2017 0133 SG (Del. Ch. Ct.) (the “Delaware Shareholder Derivative Litigation”).

In July 2018, the parties to the Delaware Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Federal Shareholder Derivative Litigation reached an agreement in principle to resolve such cases, subject to court approval. On January 9, 2019, final court approval of the settlement was granted. Following final approval of the settlement, each of the Federal Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Delaware Shareholder Derivative Litigation was also dismissed with prejudice.

Under the Reorganization Agreement, the Fund retained all liabilities arising from securityholder claims. The ultimate outcome of legal proceedings involves judgments, estimates and inherent uncertainties, and cannot be predicted with certainty. Furthermore, in the case of the Data Breaches described herein, alleged damages have not been specified, there is uncertainty as to the likelihood of a class or classes being certified or the ultimate size of any class if certified, and there are significant factual and legal issues to be resolved. The Fund will continue to evaluate information as it becomes known.

In the event of a determination adverse to the Fund, its subsidiary, directors or officers in these matters, the Fund may incur substantial monetary liability and be required to change its business practices. The Fund may also incur substantial legal fees in defending against these claims.

From time to time, the Fund may enter into confidential discussions regarding the potential settlement of pending proceedings, claims or litigation. There are a variety of factors that influence our decisions to settle and the custodianamount (if any) we


may choose to pay, including the strength of our case, developments in the litigation, the behavior of other interested parties, the demand on management time and the possible distraction of our employees associated with the case and/or the possibility that we may be subject to an injunction or other equitable remedy. In light of the numerous factors that go into a settlement decision, it is difficult to predict whether any particular settlement is possible, the appropriate terms of a settlement or the opportune time to settle a matter. The settlement of any pending litigation or other proceedings could require us to make substantial settlement payments and result in us incurring substantial costs.

Continuing Obligations to Indemnify Yahoo Executives

Pursuant to the Reorganization Agreement, the Fund retains liability for indemnification obligations with respect to directors and officers of Yahoo and certain subsidiaries of Yahoo (i) arising from acts and omissions relating to the “Excluded Assets” or “Retained Liabilities”, as such terms are defined in the Reorganization Agreement, or (ii) in their respective capacities as directors and/or officers of Yahoo.

Written Warrant Transactions

The Fund is a party to written warrant transactions with bank counterparties, which give each of the counterparties the right to purchase Shares from the Fund. However, the written warrant transactions began to expire on March 1, 2019 and are expected to expire and be settled in cash prior to the payment date of thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution.

Expenses

The Fund would incur operating expenses through completion of the dissolution andwinding-up process, including severance costs, compensation to employees who would implement the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, compensation to our independent directors, directors’ and officers’ insurance and other insurance premiums, income, payroll and other taxes (including any taxes that may be imposed on the sale, distribution or other disposition of our remainingnon-cash assets), legal, accounting, financial advisory and consulting fees, and general and administrative expenses.

Reserves

We intend to follow the “safe harbor” procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL to obtain the Court Order establishing the amount and form of security for contested known, contingent and potential future claims that are likely to arise or become known within five years of the Effective Time (or such longer period of time as the Court may determine not to exceed ten years after the Effective Time), and pay or make reasonable provision for the Fund’s uncontested known claims and expenses and establish reserves as required by the Court Order.

As discussed above, any amounts of reserves for the Fund’s liabilities and expenses set forth in the Fund’s petition or in the Court Order or actually held back by the Fund will not be calculated in accordance with, or by reference to, U.S. GAAP and will not reflect any change in the Fund’s position with respect to its liabilities and reserves from an accounting perspective. Rather, such amounts will be calculated solely to ensure that the Fund has sufficient assets to comply with its obligations to provide adequate security under the dissolution procedures under the DGCL, which is generally a more conservative standard than the determination required by U.S. GAAP.

Liquidating Distributions; Amount; Timing

The Fund currently estimates that, assuming an Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, an Alibaba Share value at the time of distribution of $177.00 (the Custodian”)actual closing prices of the Alibaba Shares on the NYSE ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and May 15, 2019), it could make aggregate liquidating distributions to stockholders, including thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, ranging between approximately $39.9 billion and $41.2 billion (approximately $76.76 and $79.35 per Share, respectively), based on the number of Shares outstanding following completion of the September 2018 Repurchase Program. Such estimates assume that the funds held back for certain of our potential tax liabilities (including potential PRC tax liabilities) eventually would be released and available for distribution, based on the assumednon-taxability of the Alibaba Share Transfers under Bulletin 7 or, its affiliates in assessingif the fairAlibaba Share Transfers were taxable under Bulletin 7, the assumed utilization of related foreign tax credits for U.S. federal income tax purposes.


The aggregate amount of liquidating distributions would depend on a number of factors, including the amount of proceeds received from the sales of our Alibaba Shares and/or the value of securities heldany Alibaba Shares distributed to our stockholders, the amount of proceeds received from the sales or other dispositions of our othernon-cash assets, the potential tax consequences of such sales and/or distributions of our Alibaba Shares, the resolution of outstanding Known Claims, the incurrence of unexpected or greater-than-expected liabilities and expenses with respect to Litigation Claims and the assertion of Uncertain Claims (as such terms are defined in“—Winding-Up Process”) (including potential U.S. federal, state and local tax claims and potential foreign tax claims, such as potential PRC tax claims), and costs incurred to wind up our business.

We plan to make an initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution to our stockholders on our transfer books as of the Effective Time as soon as practicable following entry of the Court Order. Under Section 281(a) of the DGCL, the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution may not be made before the expiration of a period of 150 days from the date of the last notice of rejection given by the Fund with respect to Known Claims. We currently expect the Court Order to be issued within one year following the Effective Time, although there can be no assurance regarding the timing of the Court Order.

In the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution, we intend to distribute all of the Fund’s remaining assets in excess of the amount to be used by the Fund to pay claims and fund the reserves required by the Court Order and pay the Fund’s operating expenses through the completion of the dissolution andwinding-up process. The amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution would depend on, among other things, the amount that was paid in the Allocated Assetspre-dissolution liquidating distribution and the actual amount of the reserves that we are required to establish pursuant to the Court Order. The Court Order will reflect the Court’s own determination as to the amount and form of security reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for all known, contingent and potential future claims against the Fund. There can be no assurances that the Court will not require the Fund to withhold from the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution amounts in excess of the amounts that we believe are sufficient to satisfy the Fund’s potential claims and liabilities. For example, based on our current views as to the applicability of PRC tax to the Alibaba Share Transfers (as described in —Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters), we currently expect to request in our petition to the Court that the Fund not be required in the Court Order to hold back any reserves in respect of potential PRC tax liabilities with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, and we believe that, if we receive confirmation (which would likely be oral and not written) from the PRC taxing authorities that they have closed their review of an Alibaba Share Transfer and that PRC taxes will not be assessed on that transaction, the Court would likely grant our request. Nevertheless, the Court may require the Fund to reserve an amount for some or all of such potential PRC tax liabilities. For more information regarding the Fund’s potential PRC tax liabilities, see “—Liabilities; Expenses; Reserves—Potential Tax Claims—PRC Tax Matters.”

To the extent that claims for which market quotationsthe Fund has set aside reserves are resolved or satisfied at amounts less than such reserves, and assuming no need has arisen to establish additional reserves, the Fund would make additional distributions to stockholders of any portion of the reserves established pursuant to the Court Order that the Board determines is no longer required because the relevant claim has been resolved or satisfied. However, if the Court requires us to reserve an amount for some or all of our potential PRC tax liabilities (which are subject to aten-year statute of limitations) or any other potential liabilities that are not readily available.resolved prior to the issuance of the Court Order, stockholders may not receive distributions of any excess reserve amounts for a substantial period of time. If such a reserve were required for potential PRC taxes with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers, then we would seek to include a provision in the Court Order that would permit the Fund to return to the Court to petition for a reduction in the Fund’s reserves if we receive oral confirmation from the PRC taxing authorities after the issuance of the Court Order, or otherwise believe there is a reasonable basis for concluding, that the PRC taxing authorities do not intend to assess PRC tax with respect to any of the Alibaba Share Transfers. There is no assurance, however, that the Court would agree to consider such a request or, if it does, that it would modify the Court Order in such a scenario.

For more detail on the various factors that could affect the amount and timing of liquidating distributions, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of any additional post-dissolution liquidating distributions to stockholders under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

Pursuant to Delaware law, our corporate existence will continue for a period of at least three years following the Effective Time for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, winding up the Fund and making distributions to stockholders, but not for the purpose of continuing to engage in any business. The three-year statutory winding-up period can be extended by


the Court and is automatically extended for any proceeding commenced but not completed prior to the end of this three-year period. As a result, the winding-up process could extend beyond three years after dissolution, and it is difficult to estimate when it will be completed.

The following table sets forth the calculations giving rise to our estimates of the aggregate liquidating distributions, including thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution. The following table is based upon, among other things, the assumptions set forth above and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement and estimates of certain liabilities.

Estimated Liquidating Distribution to Stockholders

(in millions, except for per share amounts)

   Range of Estimates 
    Low  High 

Cash and cash equivalents as of May 15, 2019(1)

  

$

1,763

 

 

$

1,763   

 

Proceeds from sales of Alibaba Shares(2)

  

 

50,147

 

 

 

50,147   

 

Estimated interest income and cash from sale of other assets

  

 

250

 

 

 

500   

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total cash for distribution

  

 

52,160

 

 

 

52,410   

 

Estimated operating expense through Dissolution Period

  

 

(400

 

 

(300)  

 

Reserves for potential tax liabilities(3)

  

 

(11,684

 

 

(10,836)  

 

Reserves for other and contingent liabilities, net

  

 

(200

 

 

(50)  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Estimated cash to distribute to stockholders

  

$

39,876

 

 

$

41,224   

 

Assumed Shares outstanding(4)

  

 

519,511,366

 

 

 

519,511,366   

 

Estimated liquidating distribution per share

  

$

76.76

 

 

$

79.35   

 

 

3.(1)

Representations, WarrantiesEstimated range of cash and Covenantscash equivalents, assuming the settlement in cash of the Advisor. The Advisor hereby represents and warrants to, and covenantsFund’s written warrant transactions with the Fund as follows:Fund’s bank counterparties.

 

 (a)(2)

the Advisor is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act asAssumes all of the effective dateAlibaba Shares owned by the Fund will be sold for cash prior to filing a Certificate of this AgreementDissolution, at a price of $177.00 (the actual closing prices of the Alibaba Shares on the NYSE ranged from a low of $130.60 to a high of $210.86 during the period between May 1, 2018 and shall maintain such registration so long as this Agreement remainsMay 15, 2019), with total consideration of $50.0 billion. Note that fluctuation in effect;the average sale price of the Alibaba Shares affects the ranges of reserves for certain liabilities, particularly potential tax liabilities. See the sensitivity analysis that follows these notes.

 

 (b)(3)

Both the Advisor is a limited liability company duly organizedlow end and validly existing under the lawshigh end of the Stateestimated range of Delaware withliquidating distribution reserves assume that no tax under Bulletin 7 or any predecessor statute is assessed on any of the power to own and possess its assets and carry on its business as it is now being conducted;Alibaba Share Transfers or that any payments of such assessments would be fully offset by foreign tax credits under U.S. federal income tax law.

 

 (c)(4)

the execution, delivery and performance by the AdvisorBased on Shares outstanding as of this Agreement are within the Advisor’s powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary action, and no action by or in respect of, or filing with, any governmental body,May 15, 2019.

 


Set forth below is a sensitivity analysis showing the aggregate liquidating distributions to stockholders, including thepre-dissolution liquidating distribution, assuming 10% to 20% variations in the Alibaba Share price at the time of distribution and/or realized on sale. Such variations in the Alibaba Share price would directly impact the amount of cash proceeds the Fund would generate from sales of Alibaba Shares and the total amount of taxes that would be payable on those Alibaba Share sales, which would in turn affect the aggregate liquidating distributions that the Fund’s stockholders may ultimately receive.

 

(in millions, except for per share amounts)
      Low Distribution  High Distribution
    Alibaba Share Price  Total Amount  Per Share  Total Amount  Per Share

Assumed + 20%

   

 

$212.40

 

   

$

47,603

   

$

91.63

   

$

48,994

   

$

94.31

Assumed + 10%

   

 

194.70

   

 

43,739

   

 

84.19

   

 

45,109

   

 

86.83

Assumed

   

 

177.00

   

 

39,876

   

 

76.76

   

 

41,224

   

 

79.35

Assumed - 10%

   

 

159.30

   

 

36,012

   

 

69.32

   

 

37,339

   

 

71.87

Assumed - 20%

   

 

141.60

   

 

32,149

   

 

61.88

   

 

33,454

   

 

64.40

Annex A-1


agency or official is required on the part of the Advisor for the execution, delivery and performance by the Advisor of this Agreement, and the execution, delivery and performance by the Advisor of this Agreement do not contravene or constitute a default under (i) any provision of applicable law, rule or regulation, (ii) the Advisor’s governing instruments, or (iii) any agreement, judgment, injunction, order, decree or other instrument binding upon the Advisor;

(d)

the Advisor has provided the Board of Directors of the Fund with a complete copy of its Form ADV, including Part 2A thereof, and will make available electronically to the Board any updated or amended version of its Form ADV promptly upon making any material changes to the Form ADV;

(e)

the Advisor will maintain a written code of ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that complies with the requirements of Rule17j-1 under the 1940 Act (“Rule17j-1”), a copy of which will be provided to the Fund, and will institute procedures reasonably necessary to prevent any Access Person (as defined in Rule17j-1) from violating its Code of Ethics. The Advisor will follow such Code of Ethics in performing its services under this Agreement. Upon written request, the Advisor also will certify quarterly to the Fund that it and its “Advisory Persons” (as defined in Rule17j-1) have complied materially with the requirements of Rule17j-1 during the previous quarter or, if not, explain what the Advisor has done to seek to ensure such compliance in the future. Annually, the Advisor will furnish a written report, which complies with the requirements of Rule17j-1, concerning the Code of Ethics to the Fund. The Advisor shall notify the Fund promptly of any material violation of the Code of Ethics involving the Fund. The Advisor will provide such additional information regarding violations of the Code of Ethics affecting the Fund as the Chief Compliance Officer of the Fund may reasonably request in order to assess the functioning of the Code of Ethics or any harm caused to the Fund from such a violation of the Code of Ethics. Further, the Advisor represents that it has policies and procedures regarding the detection and prevention of the misuse of material, nonpublic information by the Advisor and its employees;

(f)

the Advisor, upon written request, will provide the Fund with such information as necessary to ensure solely with respect to information relating to the Advisor: (i) the Fund’s registration statement on FormN-2, to be filed with the SEC, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, and (ii) the Fund’s prospectus, if applicable, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;

(g)

in the performance of its duties under this Agreement, the Advisor shall at all times materially conform to, and act in accordance with, any requirements imposed by: (i) the provisions of the 1940 Act, the Advisers Act, and all applicable Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); (ii) any other applicable provision of law; (iii) the provisions of this Agreement and the Fund’s Certificate of Incorporation, as such documents are amended from time to time and provided in writing to the Advisor; (iv) the then current investment objectives and policies of the Fund as set forth in its Registration Statement on FormN-2; and (v) any other policies and determinations of the Board of Directors of the Fund provided in writing to the Advisor;

(h)

the Advisor has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer under Rule206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act and has adopted written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Advisers Act. Upon written request, the Advisor will timely provide to the Fund an annual certification from the Advisor’s Chief Compliance Officer with respect to the design and operation of the Advisor’s compliance program, in a format reasonably requested by the Fund. The Advisor shall cooperate with the Fund in any regulatory investigation, examination, or inspection of the Fund or of the Advisor with respect to the Fund or relating to the provision of services to the Fund under this Agreement;

(i)

the Advisor shall maintain business continuity, disaster recovery and backup capabilities and facilities intended to allow the Advisor to perform its obligations hereunder with minimal disruption or delays;

(j)

the Advisor shall place orders either directly with the issuer or with any broker or dealer. Subject to the other provisions of this paragraph, in placing orders with brokers and dealers, the Advisor will attempt to obtain the best price and the most favorable execution of its orders. In placing orders, the Advisor will consider the experience and skill of the firm’s securities traders as well as the firm’s financial responsibility and administrative efficiency. Consistent with this obligation and to the extent permitted by Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Advisor may select brokers on the basis of the research, statistical and pricing services they provide to


Annex A-2


the Allocated Assets and other clients of the Advisor. Information and research received from such brokers will be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the services required to be performed by the Advisor hereunder. A commission paid to such brokers may be higher than that which another qualified broker would have charged for effecting the same transaction, provided that the Advisor determines in good faith that such commission is reasonable in terms either of the transaction or the overall responsibility of the Advisor to the Allocated Assets and its other clients and that the total commissions paid by the Allocated Assets will be reasonable in relation to the benefits to the Fund over the long-term. In no instance, however, will the Allocated Assets be purchased from or sold to or through any first- or second-tier affiliate of the Fund, except to the extent permitted by Section 17(a) and Section 17(e) of the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder or otherwise permitted by the SEC or by applicable law;

(k)

in connection with any purchase or sale of securities for the Allocated Assets, the Advisor will arrange for the transmission to the Custodian on a daily basis such confirmations, trade tickets, and other documents and information, including without limitation CUSIP, Sedol, or other numbers that identify the securities to be purchased or sold on behalf of the Fund, as may be reasonably necessary for the Custodian and its affiliates to perform their custodial, administrative and recordkeeping responsibilities with respect to the Fund. With respect to securities to be settled through the Custodian, the Advisor will arrange for the prompt transmission of the confirmation of such trades to the Custodian. The parties acknowledge that the Advisor is not the custodian of the Allocated Assets and will not take possession or custody of such assets; and

(l)

the Advisor shall maintain a policy and practice of conducting its investment advisory services hereunder independently of the commercial banking operations of its affiliates. When the Advisor makes investment recommendations for the Allocated Assets, its investment advisory personnel will not inquire or take into consideration whether the issuer of securities proposed for purchase or sale for the Allocated Assets are customers of the commercial department of its affiliates.

4.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Fund.

The foregoing estimates, which are qualified by the assumptions set forth above, are subject to numerous uncertainties. The estimates may not reflect the total range of possible outcomes, and actual amounts may differ materially from such estimates. We have attempted to make reasonable estimates and assumptions, but if any of such estimates or assumptions are inaccurate, the actual amount we distribute to our stockholders may be lower or higher than the estimated range. It is possible that the aggregate liquidating distributions that would be paid to a stockholder under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution would not exceed the amount that the stockholder could have received upon sales of its Shares in the open market. It is not possible to predict with certainty what the amount of aggregate liquidating distributions ultimately will be. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution—The Fund representscannot assure stockholders of the timing or amount of the initial post-dissolution liquidating distribution following entry of the Court Order” and warrants“Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation and covenants with,Dissolution—The Fund cannot assure stockholders of the Advisor as follows:timing or amount of any additional post-dissolution liquidating distributions to stockholders under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

(a)

the execution, delivery and performance by the Fund of this Agreement are within the Fund’s powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary action, and no action by or in respect of, or filing with, any governmental body, agency or official is required on the part of the Fund for the execution, delivery and performance by the Fund of this Agreement, and the execution, delivery and performance by the Fund of this Agreement do not contravene or constitute a default under (i) any provision of applicable law, rule or regulation, (ii) its Certificate of Incorporation, or (iii) any agreement, judgment, injunction, order, decree or other instrument binding upon the Fund;

(b)

the Fund shall conduct its activities under this Agreement in accordance with any applicable laws and regulations of any governmental authority pertaining to its investment activities. The Fund shall notify the Advisor of a change in control of the Fund within a reasonable time prior to such change;

(c)

the Fund shall cooperate with the Advisor in any regulatory investigation, examination, or inspection of the Fund or the Advisor relating to this Agreement or services provided by the Advisor hereunder;

(d)

the Fund represents and warrants that the Allocated Assets are free from any security interests, liens, or encumbrances exercisable by any third party against such assets that limit the ability of the Advisor to trade the Allocated Assets as contemplated in this Agreement and the Fund shall not grant such a security interest, lien, or encumbrance on any such assets for the benefit of any third party, except after providing prior written notice to the Advisor. The Fund agrees to notify the Advisor immediately if it learns that any such security interest, lien, or encumbrance is created against any assets managed by the Advisor and the Fund agrees to indemnify and hold the Advisor harmless from any and all expenses, damages, costs, and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, incurred by the Advisor as a result of any security interest, lien, or encumbrance being created on such assets;

(e)

the Fund represents and warrants that, for the purposes of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection act (the “Volcker Rule”), the Fund is a “registered investment company” and is therefore excluded from the definition of “covered fund” for purposes of Section 10 of the Volcker Rule implementing rules and, accordingly, the limitations on a banking entity’s ability to acquire or retain ownership interests set forth in such Section 10 do not apply to the Fund; and


Under Delaware law, in the event the Fund fails to retain sufficient funds to pay the expenses and liabilities actually owed to the Fund’s creditors, each stockholder could be held liable for the repayment to those creditors who file claims before the end of thewinding-up period, out of the amounts previously received by such stockholder from us or from any liquidating trust or trusts, of such stockholder’s pro rata share of such excess liability (up to the full amount actually received by such stockholder). However, under the “safe harbor” provisions of Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL, the liability of a stockholder of the Fund for any claim against the Fund is generally limited to such stockholder’s pro rata share of such claim or the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution, whichever is less, and is limited in the aggregate to the amount distributed to such stockholder in the dissolution. The procedures under Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL further limit stockholder liability by providing that stockholders have no liability for any claim commenced after the expiration of thewinding-up period.

Annex A-3


(f)

the Fund shall from time to time provide the Advisor with a written list of persons known to be affiliates of the Fund and affiliates of such affiliates to the extent reasonably necessary to ensure compliance with the limitations on affiliated transactions set forth in Section 17 of the 1940 Act.

5.

Survival of Representations and Warranties; Duty to Update Information.

(a)

All representations and warranties made by the Advisor and the Fund pursuant to Sections 3 and 4 of this Agreement, respectively, shall survive for the duration of this Agreement and the parties hereto shall promptly notify each other in writing upon becoming aware that any of the foregoing representations and warranties are no longer true.

(b)

The Advisor shall promptly notify the Board in writing:

(i)

to the extent permitted by law or relevant regulator, of any investigation in connection with the services provided by the Advisor or its affiliates to the Allocated Assets, not including any routine examination of the Advisor or its affiliates, investigations into specific securities traded by the Advisor or a proceeding in the ordinary course of business;

(ii)

if Rich Mejzak (or any subsequent replacement) is no longer head of the portfolio management team in the Americas or if Frank Gianatasio (or any subsequent replacement) is no longer a portfolio manager of the Advisor who provides services to the Fund hereunder;

(iii)

of any prospective material change in approach to the Advisor’s management of and recommendations with respect to the Allocated Assets;

(iv)

of any other change in the Advisor’s business activities or circumstances that in the Advisor’s reasonable opinion could reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the Advisor’s ability to discharge its obligations under this Agreement, including without limitation the occurrence of any event that would disqualify the Advisor from serving as an investment adviser to the Fund pursuant to Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act; and

(v)

of any actual, anticipated, or contemplated change in ownership of the Advisor or its affiliates constituting, or that would reasonably be expected to constitute, an “assignment” of this Agreement for purposes of the 1940 Act.

6.

Services Not Exclusive. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the Advisor or any officer, employee or other affiliate thereof from acting as investment advisor for any other person, firm or corporation, or from engaging in any other lawful activity, and shall not in any way limit or restrict the Advisor or any of its officers, employees or agents from buying, selling or trading any securities for its or their own accounts or for the accounts of others for whom it or they may be acting; provided, however, that the AdvisorAny liquidating distributions from us will undertake no activities which, in its judgment, will adversely affect the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.

7.

Books and Records. In compliance with the requirements of Rule31a-3 under the 1940 Act, the Advisor hereby agrees that all records which it maintains for the Fund are the property of the Fund, and further agrees to surrender promptly to the Fund any such records upon the Fund’s written request. The Advisor further agrees to preserve for the periods prescribed by Rule31a-2 under the 1940 Act the records required to be maintained by Rule31a-1 under the 1940 Act. The Advisor shall make such records available for inspection by the Fund’s Board of Directors, the Fund’s officers and employees and the Fund’s authorized agents upon reasonable notice.

8.

Expenses. During the term of this Agreement, the Advisor will bear all costs and expenses of its employees and any overhead incurred in connection with its duties hereunder, except as otherwise expressly provided herein. Other expenses to be incurred by the Fund are expenses of the Fund, including but not limited to taxes, interest, brokerage fees and commission, if any, salaries and fees of directors, administration and custody charges, transfer and dividend disbursing agent’s fees, insurance, audit fees, legal expenses and printing expenses.

9.

Compensation of the Advisor. Subject to Section 9(b) of this Agreement, the Fund agrees to pay to the Advisor and the Advisor agrees to accept as full compensation for all services rendered by the Advisor pursuant to this Agreement, a monthly fee in arrears at an annual rate equal to 0.08% of the average daily net assets (as determined by the Advisor) of the


Annex A-4


first $250 million assets of the Allocated Assets; 0.06% of the next $250 million; 0.04% of the next $250 million; and 0.02% of any assets above $750 million. For purposes of calculating the Advisor’s compensation under this Agreement, the portion of the Fund’s assets invested in affiliated money market funds should be excluded from the Allocated Assets. Such exclusion shall not preclude the payment of fees by an affiliated money market fund to any investment adviser orsub-adviser that is an affiliate of the Advisor. For the Fund’s assets in affiliated money market funds, Fund shall pay the fees set forth in the corresponding prospectus of such affiliated funds. For any period less than a month during which this Agreement is in effect, the fee shall be prorated according to the proportion which such period bears to a full month of 28, 29, 30 or 31 days, as the case may be. Payment is due to the Advisor within thirty days of the applicable invoice date.

10.

Indemnity.

(a)

The Fund shall, subject to the prior consent of the Board of Directors of the Fund, including a majority of the Independent Directors, indemnify the Advisor, and each of the Advisor’s trustees, officers, employees, agents, associates and controlling persons and the trustees, partners, members, officers, employees and agents thereof (including any individual who serves at the Advisor’s request as trustee, officer, partner, member, trustee or the like of another entity) (each such person being an “Indemnitee”) against any liabilities and expenses, including amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments, in compromise or as fines and penalties, and counsel fees (all as provided in accordance with applicable state law) reasonably incurred by such Indemnitee in connection with the defense or disposition of any action, suit or other proceeding, whether civil or criminal, before any court or administrative or investigative body in which such Indemnitee may be or may have been involved as a party or otherwise or with which such Indemnitee may be or may have been threatened, while acting in any capacity set forth herein or thereafter by reason of such Indemnitee having acted in any such capacity, except with respect to any matter as to which such Indemnitee shall have been adjudicated not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that such Indemnitee’s action was in the best interest of the Fund and furthermore, in the case of any criminal proceeding, so long as such Indemnitee had no reasonable cause to believe that the conduct was unlawful; provided, however, that (1) no Indemnitee shall be indemnified hereunder against any liability to the Fund or the Trust’s shareholders or any expense of such Indemnitee arising by reason of (i) willful misfeasance, (ii) bad faith, (iii) gross negligence or (iv) reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Indemnitee’s position (the conduct referred to in such clauses (i) through (iv) being sometimes referred to herein as “disabling conduct”), (2) as to any matter disposed of by settlement or a compromise payment by such Indemnitee, pursuant to a consent decree or otherwise, no indemnification either for said payment or for any other expenses shall be provided unless there has been a determination that such settlement or compromise is in the best interests of the Fund and that such Indemnitee appears to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that such Indemnitee’s action was in the best interest of the Fund and did not involve disabling conduct by such Indemnitee and (3) with respect to any action, suit or other proceeding voluntarily prosecuted by any Indemnitee as plaintiff, indemnification shall be mandatory only if the prosecution of such action, suit or other proceeding by such Indemnitee was authorized by a majority of the full Board of Directors of the Fund, including a majority of the Directors of the Fund who are not “interested persons” of the Fund (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act).

(b)

The Fund may make advance payments in connection with the expenses of defending any action with respect to which indemnification might be sought hereunder if the Fund receives a written affirmation of the Indemnitee’s good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification has been met and a written undertaking to reimburse the Fund unless it is subsequently determined that such Indemnitee is entitled to such indemnification and if the Directors of the Fund determine that the facts then known to them would not preclude indemnification. In addition, at least one of the following conditions must be met: (A) the Indemnitee shall provide security for such Indemnitee undertaking, (B) the Fund shall be insured against losses arising by reason of any unlawful advance, or (C) a majority of a quorum consisting of Directors of the Fund who are neither “interested persons” of the Fund (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) nor parties to the proceeding (“DisinterestedNon-Party Directors”) or an independent legal counsel in a written opinion, shall determine, based on a review of readily available facts (as opposed to a full trial-type inquiry), that there is reason to believe that the Indemnitee ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification.

(c)

All determinations with respect to the standards for indemnification of the Advisor hereunder shall be made (1) by a final decision on the merits by a court or other body before whom the proceeding was brought that such Indemnitee is not liable or is not liable by reason of disabling conduct, or (2) in the absence of such a decision, by (i) a majority vote


Annex A-5


of a quorum of the DisinterestedNon-Party Directors of the Fund, or (ii) if such a quorum is not obtainable or, even if obtainable, if a majority vote of such quorum so directs, independent legal counsel in a written opinion. All determinations that advance payments in connection with the expense of defending any proceeding shall be authorized and shall be made in accordance with the immediately preceding clause (2) above.

(d)

The Advisor shall indemnify the Fund, and its affiliates and controlling persons, (including its directors, officers and employees) each of whom shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary hereof, for any damage, liability, cost and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, which the Fund or its affiliates and controlling persons may sustain as a result of the Advisor’s willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of its duties hereunder. All determinations with respect to the standard for indemnification of the Fund hereunder shall be made by a final decision on the merits of a court or other body before whom the proceeding was brought such that the Advisor has engaged in disabling conduct.

The rights accruing to any Indemnitee under these provisions shall not exclude any other rightstockholders of record according to which such Indemnitee may be lawfully entitled.

11.

Limitationtheir holdings of Shares on Liability. The Advisor will not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by the Advisor or by the Fund in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except a loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation for services or a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on its part in the performance of its duties or from reckless disregard by it of its duties under this Agreement.

12.

Confidentiality.

(a)

Subject to Section 13 of this Agreement, the Advisor and the Fund each acknowledges and agrees that, pursuant to this Agreement, either party may have access to the other party’s confidential and proprietary information and materials concerning or pertaining to the other’s business. Each party will receive and hold such information in the strictest confidence, and acknowledge, represent, and warrant that it will use its best efforts to protect the confidentiality of this information. Each party agrees that, without the prior written consent of the other party, it will not use, copy, or divulge to third parties or otherwise use, except in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, any information obtained from or through the other party in connection with this Agreement other than as reasonably necessary in the course of their business; provided that such recipients must agree to protect the confidentiality of such information and use such information only for the purposes of performing their obligations under this Agreement; provided, further, however, this covenant shall not apply to information (i) which is in the public domain now or when it becomes in the public domain in the future, other than by reason of a breach of this Agreement, (ii) which has come to either party from a lawful source not known by the other party to be bound to maintain the confidentiality of such information, other than from the other party or an affiliate or representative of that party, (iii) information provided by the Advisor to broker-dealers or third parties bound by an agreement of confidentiality for the purposes of bona fide due diligence, or (iv) disclosures which are required by law, regulatory authority, regulation or legal process or made at the request of a banking, financial, securities or similar supervisory or self-regulatory or governmental authority exercising its supervisory, examination or audit functions over the Advisor or any of its affiliates.

(b)

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, each party to this Agreement (and each employee, representative, or other agent of such party) may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation of any kind, the tax treatment and tax structure of (i) the Fund and (ii) any of its transactions, and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided to such party relating to such tax treatment and tax structure.

(c)

The representations and warranties made by the Advisor and the Fund pursuant to this Section 12 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for so long as the Advisor is required by the Advisers Act to maintain books and records with respect to the Allocated Assets.

13.

Use of Names and Track Record.

(a)

Fund’s Use of Advisor’s Name. Other than as expressly stated herein, the Fund shall have no right to use the name “BlackRock Advisors LLC” or “BlackRock” (or any combination or derivation thereof) without the prior written


Annex A-6


consent of the Advisor. For so long as the Advisor is serving as an adviser to the Fund, the Fund may use the name of the Advisor, including any short-form of such name, or any combination or derivation thereof, for the purpose of identifying the Advisor as an adviser to the Fund with respect to the Allocated Assets, including without limitation in regulatory filings, on the Fund’s website and in any reports and other information provided to the Fund’s stockholders. The Fund shall cease to use the name of the Advisor in any newly printed materials (except as may, in the sole discretion of the Fund, be reasonably necessary to comply with applicable law) promptly upon termination of this Agreement. The use of the Advisor’s name or combination or derivation thereof by the Fund hereunder shall be in a manner that is not intended to reflect negatively on the reputation or goodwill of the Advisor or such names or any combination or derivation thereof.

(b)

Restrictions on Use of Fund Name. The Advisor shall not use the name of the Fund or Yahoo! Inc. (or any combination or derivation thereof) in any material relating to the Advisor in any manner not approved prior thereto in writing by the Fund, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, other than inclusions of such entities in lists of the Advisor’s clients. The use of the Fund’s name or combination or derivation thereof by the Advisor hereunder shall be in a manner that is not intended to reflect negatively on the reputation or goodwill of the Fund or Yahoo! Inc., or such names or any combination or derivation thereof.

(c)

Advisor’s Use of Track-Record. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Advisor may use performance data it generates in connection with the Allocated Assets for its track record and use the name of the Fund solely to identify such performance.

14.

Duration and Termination.

(a)

This Agreement shall become effective on the date hereof and shall continue in effect for two years from its effective date, and thereafter shall continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act) of the Fund and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Fund’s directors who are not parties to this Agreement or “interested persons” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of any such party, in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act.

(b)

Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be terminated by the Fund at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon giving the Advisor 60 days’ notice (which notice may be waived by the Advisor), provided that such termination by the Fund shall be directed or approved by the vote of a majority of the Directors of the Fund in office at the time or by the vote of the holders of a majority of the voting securities of the Fund at the time outstanding and entitled to vote, or by the Advisor on 60 days’ written notice (which notice may be waived by the Fund). This Agreement will also immediately terminate in the event of its assignment. (As used in this Agreement, the terms “majority of the outstanding voting securities,” “interested person” and “assignment” shall have the same meanings of such terms in the 1940 Act.)

15.

Notices. Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing to the other party at such address as the other party may designate from time to time for the receipt of such notice and shall be deemed to be received on the earlier of the date actually received or on the fourth day after the postmark if such notice is mailed first class postage prepaid.

16.

Amendment of this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement may be changed, waived, discharged or terminated orally, but only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against which enforcement of the change, waiver, discharge or termination is sought. Any amendment of this Agreement shall be subject to the 1940 Act.

17.

Information. The Fund shall provide such information and documentation as the Advisor may reasonably request in connection with the services provided by the Advisor to the Fund under this Agreement.

18.

Systems. The Advisor shall retain title to and ownership of any and all of its own databases, computer programs, inventions, discoveries, patentable or copyrightable matters, concept, expertise, patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and other related legal rights utilized by the Advisor in connection with the services provided by the Advisor to the Fund under this Agreement.


Annex A-7


19.

Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York for contracts to be performed entirely therein without reference to choice of law principles thereof and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the 1940 Act.

20.

Miscellaneous. The captions in this Agreement are included for convenience of reference only and in no way define or delimit any of the provisions hereof or otherwise affect their construction or effect. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held or made invalid by a court decision, statute, rule or otherwise, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors.

21.

Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the parties hereto, each of which shall constitute an original counterpart, and all of which, together, shall constitute one Agreement.

[Signature Page Follows]


Annex A-8


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the foregoing instrument to be executed by their duly authorized officers, allFund’s stock ledger as of the day and the year first above written.

ALTABA INC.
By:

Name:

Title:

BLACKROCK ADVISORS, LLC
By:

Name:

Title: Managing Director

Signature Page to the Investment Advisory Agreement



ANNEX B

FORM OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

BETWEEN ALTABA INC. AND MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC

This Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made this [        ] day of [        ] 2017, by and between Altaba Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Fund”), and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Adviser”).

WHEREAS, the Fund is anon-diversified,closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”);

WHEREAS, the Adviser is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”); and

WHEREAS, the Fund desires to retain the Adviser to furnish investment advisory services to a portion of the Fund’s assets on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and the Adviser wishesEffective Time, which we expect to be retainedthe date on which we close our stock transfer books, subject to provide such services to the allocated portionany transfers subsequently reflected on our stock ledger by reason of the Fund’s assets.assignments by will, intestate succession or operation of law.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree as follows:Liquidating Trust

1.

Duties of the Adviser.

(a)Retention of Adviser. The Fund hereby appoints the Adviser to act as the investment adviser to, and manage the investment and reinvestment of, a portion of the Fund’s assets as determinedIf deemed necessary, appropriate or desirable by the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) and allocated to the Adviser, as further described herein (the “Allocated Assets”), for the period and upon the terms herein set forth in accordance with:

(i)

the investment objectives, policies and restrictions of the Allocated Assets in effect from time to time and communicated to the Adviser in writing;

(ii)

such policies, directives, regulatory restrictions and compliance policies as the Boardany reason, we may, from time to time establish or issue and communicate to the Adviser in writing; and

(iii)

applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and the Fund’s Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate”) and bylaws (the “Bylaws”), in each case as may be amended from time to time.

The Fund shall promptly notify the Adviser in writing of any changes to (i) or (ii) above. In no event shall the Adviser be held responsible for failing to comply with changes to any of (i) or (ii) unless it had previously received the written notification in the foregoing sentence.

(b)Responsibilities of Adviser. The Adviser will manage the Allocated Assets in accordance with the advisory services it provides through its Institutional Cash Advisory Program. The Fund, in consultation with the Adviser, will set forth –in the Fund’s registration statement and/or in separate written documentation provided to the Adviser – the investment objective and principal investment strategies of the Allocated Assets, including any investment limitations or investment restrictions (the “Investment Strategy”). The Adviser shall convert the Investment Strategy into a rule matrix for internal use by the Adviser. Should any assets held in the Allocated Assets fall outside the Investment Strategy, the Adviser may liquidate such assets in an orderly manner within a commercially reasonable amount of time. The Fund may provide the Adviser with a written waiver of adherence to the Investment Strategy at the discretion of the Board. The Fund will promptly notify the Adviser of any changes to the Investment Strategy and will not make any material changes to the Investment Strategy without prior consultation with the Adviser. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Adviser shall, during the term and subject to the Investment Strategy, the other provisions of this Agreement and the supervision of the Board:

(i)

determine the composition and investment allocation of the Allocated Assets, the nature and timing of the changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes, including the purchase, retention or sale of specific securities and other assets;


Annex B-1


(ii)

place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment (including executing and delivering all documents relating to the Allocated Assets’ investments);

(iii)

identify and evaluate investments made for the Allocated Assets;

(iv)

execute, monitor and service the Allocated Assets’ investments;

(v)

provide reasonable assistance to the Fund and the custodian (the “Custodian”) or its affiliates in assessing the fair value of securities held in the Allocated Assets for which market quotations are not readily available;

(vi)

provide such information to the Board as the Board deems necessary for the Fund to maintain a current and/or effective private placement memorandum, prospectus and/or registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the 1940 Act that complies with the requirements of the Securities Act, the 1940 Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules and regulations promulgated under each;

(vii)

report to the Board and provide such information, and make appropriate persons available for the purpose of reviewing with representatives of the Board on a regular basis at reasonable times its activities hereunder, including without limitation, review of the general investment strategies of the Allocated Assets, the performance of the Allocated Assets in relation to standard industry indices, stock market and interest rate considerations and general conditions affecting the marketplace, and the placement and execution of portfolio transactions and provide various other reports and information from time to time as reasonably requested by the Board; and

(viii)

act upon reasonable instructions from the Board with respect to the management of the Allocated Assets which, in the reasonable determination of the Adviser, are not inconsistent with the Adviser’s fiduciary duties under this Agreement.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Adviser shall have no responsibility with respect to any assets of the Fund other than the Allocated Assets. The Fund has no obligation to share any information, and does not expect to share any information, with the Adviser about any assets of the Fund other than the Allocated Assets. The Adviser will have no influence, rights, or control whatsoever, and shall not provide investment advice, with respect to the Fund’s assets other than the Allocated Assets.

(c)Power and Authority. To facilitate the Adviser’s performance of these undertakings, but subject to the restrictions contained herein, the Fund hereby delegates to the Adviser, and the Adviser hereby accepts, the power and authority on behalf of the Fund to effectuate its investment decisions for the Allocated Assets, including the execution and delivery of all documents relating to the Allocated Assets’ investments and the placing of orders for other purchase or sale transactions on behalf of the Allocated Assets. The Adviser shall have complete and unlimited discretionary investment and trading authorization to invest and trade the Allocated Assets consistent with the Investment Strategy and is hereby appointed as agent andattorney-in-fact with respect to the same. Pursuant to such authorization, the Adviser may, in its sole discretion and at the risk of the Allocated Assets, but subject to the Investment Strategy, purchase, sell, exchange, convert and otherwise trade the Allocated Assets and arrange for delivery and payment in connection with the above and act on behalf of Allocated Assets in all other matters necessary or incidental to the handling of the Allocated Assets. This power of attorney and trading authorization shall be valid until the termination of this Agreement or until it is earlier terminated by the Fund or the Adviser in writing. The termination of this authorization will constitute a termination of this Agreement.

(d)Acceptance of Engagement. The Adviser hereby accepts such engagement and agrees during the term hereof to render the services described herein for the compensation provided herein, subject to the limitations contained herein.

(e)Independent Contractor Status. The Adviser shall, for all purposes herein provided, be deemed to be an independent contractor and, except as expressly provided or authorized herein, shall have no authority to act for or represent the Fund in any way or otherwise be deemed an agent of the Fund.

(f)Record Retention. Subject to review by, and the overall control of, the Board, the Adviser shall keep and preserve for the period required by the 1940 Act any books and records relevant to the provision of its investment advisory services to the Allocated Assets and shall specifically maintain, or cause to be maintained, all books and records with respect to the Allocated


Annex B-2


Assets’ transactions and shall deliver to the Board such periodic and special reports as the Board may reasonably request or as may be required under applicable federal and state law, including without limitation Rule31a-1 and Rule31a-2 under the 1940 Act, and shall make such records available for inspection by the Board, the Fund’s officers and employees and the Fund’s authorized agents, at any time and from time to time, during normal business hours. The Adviser agrees that all recordstransfer any of our unsold assets and any portion of our reserves to one or more liquidating trusts established for the benefit of our stockholders, which property would thereafter be sold or distributed on terms approved by its trustee(s). Our Board may determine to transfer assets to a liquidating trust in circumstances where the nature of an asset is not susceptible to distribution (for example, interests in intangibles) or where our Board determines that it maintains forwould not be in the Allocated Assets are the propertybest interests of the Fund, our creditors and shall surrender promptlyour


stockholders for such assets to be distributed directly to the stockholders at such time. If all of our assets are not sold or distributed prior to the third anniversary of the effectiveness of the dissolution, we would expect either to seek an extension of the three-yearwinding-up period from the Court or to transfer in final distribution such remaining assets to a liquidating trust. Our Board may also elect in its discretion, as applicable, to transfer the reserves, if any, or any portion thereof, to such a liquidating trust. The Fund does not intend to transfer any of its assets to a liquidating trust prior to the issuance of the Court Order and until after the Fund has reduced its remaining assets to cash and distributed substantially all of its assets.

The purpose of a liquidating trust would be to distribute such records uponproperty, or to sell such property on terms satisfactory to the Board’s requestliquidating trustee(s) and upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 9, provided thatdistribute the Adviser may retain a copyproceeds of such records.

(g)Trade Confirmations. In connection withsale, after paying our liabilities, if any, purchase or saleassumed by the trust, to our stockholders, based on their proportionate ownership interest in the trust. Any liquidating trust acquiring all of securities forour unsold assets will assume all of our liabilities and obligations and will be obligated to pay any of our expenses and liabilities that remain unsatisfied. If the Allocated Assets, the Adviser will arrange for the transmissionreserves transferred to the Fund’s custodian (the “Custodian”) on a daily basisliquidating trust are exhausted, such confirmations, trade tickets,expenses and liabilities will be satisfied out of the liquidating trust’s other documentsunsold assets.

The Plan of Liquidation and information, including without limitation CUSIP, Sedol,Dissolution authorizes our Board to appoint one or other numbers that identify the securities to be purchasedmore individuals, who may include persons who are also officers or sold on behalfdirectors of the Fund, or entities to act as trustee or trustees of the liquidating trust or trusts and to cause us to enter into a liquidating trust agreement or agreements with such trustee or trustees on such terms and conditions as may be reasonably necessaryapproved by our Board. It is anticipated that our Board would select such trustee or trustees on the basis of the experience of such individual or entity in administering and disposing of assets and discharging liabilities of the kind to be held by the liquidating trust or trusts and the ability of such individual or entity to serve the best interests of our creditors and our stockholders.

The trust would be evidenced by a trust agreement between the Fund and the trustees. Pursuant to the trust agreement, the trust property would be transferred to the trustees immediately prior to the distribution of interests in the trust to our stockholders, to be held in trust for the Custodian and its affiliates to perform their custodial, administrative and recordkeeping responsibilities with respectbenefit of the stockholder beneficiaries subject to the Fund. With respectterms of the trust agreement. It is anticipated that the interests would be evidenced only by the records of the trust, there would be no certificates or other tangible evidence of such interests and no holder of our Shares would be required to securitiespay any cash or other consideration for the interests to be settled throughreceived in the Custodian,distribution or to surrender or exchange Shares in order to receive the Adviser will arrangeinterests.

Amendment, Modification or Revocation of Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

Once the dissolution of the Fund becomes effective, it cannot be revoked without stockholder approval. In general, however, the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, as the blueprint for the prompt transmissionliquidation of the confirmation ofFund following its dissolution, is subject to modification or amendment by the Board without stockholder approval, if the Board determines that such trades to the Custodian. The parties acknowledge that the Adviser is not the custodian of the Allocated Assets and will not take possession or custody of such assets.

(h)Proxies. The Adviser will vote any proxies received from the Custodian (including without limitation giving or determining to withhold consent to any request to amend a debt security or to waive or not waive a breach of covenant or default with respect to a debt security) with respect to any securities held in the Allocated Assets in a manner the Adviser reasonably believes toaction would be in the best interests of the Fund and shall reportour stockholders. Although the Board will have the authority under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to make any such votesmodification or amendment to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution without stockholder approval, the Board may determine, in its sole discretion, to submit any modification or amendment to the stockholders for approval.

If for any reason our Board determines after the Effective Time that revocation of the dissolution would be in the best interests of the Fund and our stockholders, our Board may, in its sole discretion, at any time before the cessation of our corporate existence, adopt a resolution recommending that the dissolution be revoked and directing that the question of the revocation of our dissolution be submitted for approval to the stockholders of record on the date the dissolution becomes effective. If the holders of a quarterly basis.majority of the Shares which was outstanding and entitled to vote upon a dissolution at the time of the Fund’s dissolution approve the revocation of the dissolution, the Fund would, among other things, file a Certificate of Revocation with the Delaware Secretary of State, which would become effective upon the effective time of such filing. The Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution would be void upon the effective time of any such revocation.

Winding Up of the Fund’s Subsidiaries

Pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Board and the management of the Fund will take all action as they determine to be necessary, appropriate or advisable to cause the dissolution, liquidation and winding up of any and all


subsidiaries of the Fund (including Altaba Hong Kong, Altaba HK MC Limited and Excalibur), or the sale or other disposition of the Fund’s ownership interest in any such subsidiaries, whether by merger, sale of equity or otherwise.

Reporting Requirements

As an investment company registered under the 1940 Act, the Fund will be required to continue filing periodic reports required by the 1940 Act until the SEC issues an order declaring that the Fund is no longer an investment company and its registration under the 1940 Act is no longer in effect or the SEC issues an order excepting the Fund from all or a portion of its reporting requirements.

Among other circumstances not relevant here, an investment company is permitted to file a FormN-8F to seek to deregister if it has distributed substantially all of its assets to stockholders, and has completed, or is in the process of, winding up its affairs. We do not expect that the Fund will be able to deregister from the 1940 Act until substantially all of the Fund’s assets (including substantially all of the securities held in our Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio) are reduced to cash. As such, we currently intend to maintain our investment company status under the 1940 Act until the liquidation and dissolution is substantially completed and continue to make the periodic filings required under the 1940 Act.

Delisting and Lack of Market for Trading of the Shares and Interests in a Liquidating Trust

We anticipate that, upon the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution, trading in our Shares will be suspended on Nasdaq, and our Shares will thereafter be delisted. However, under the Nasdaq rules, Nasdaq has discretionary authority to suspend or terminate the listing of a company that has announced that liquidation has been authorized by its board of directors and that it is committed to proceed, even if the Shares otherwise meet all enumerated criteria for continued listing on Nasdaq. The Fund will instructissue a press release not less than five days before filing the CustodianCertificate of Dissolution to sendannounce (i) that the Board has determined to proceed with the Adviser all proxy materialsdissolution and (ii) to announce the anticipated filing date of the Certificate of Dissolution.

In addition, we will close our stock transfer books and discontinue recording transfers at the Effective Time. Thereafter, record holders of the Shares generally will be prohibited from transferring record ownership of their Shares following the Effective Time (except by will, intestate succession or operation of law). The Fund will, however, request that, following the Effective Time, The Depository Trust Company, or DTC, as a record holder of Shares through its Cede & Co. nominee, maintain records representing the right to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions in accordance with respect toSection 4 of the Allocated Assets.

2.

Compensation and Expenses.

(a)Management Fee. Subject to Section 2(b),Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, including any transfers of such rights. Consequently, the Fund agreesexpects that any transfers of such rights will be tracked by DTC. To the extent that a stockholder’s Shares are not held by a DTC participant as of the Effective Time, it could be more difficult for such stockholder to pay,transfer such stockholder’s rights to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions.

After the delisting from Nasdaq, brokers may make a market for interests in the Shares representing the right to receive any post-dissolution liquidating distributions, in the“over-the-counter” market. There is no assurance that such market will arise or, if one does arise, for how long it will be maintained or how actively such interests in the Shares will trade. Both trading prices and volumes in any such“over-the-counter” market could be volatile and erratic.

It is anticipated that the interests in the liquidating trust, if one is created, will not be transferable. Even if transferable, any such interests are not expected to be listed on a national securities exchange or quoted through Nasdaq, and the Adviser agreesextent of any trading market therein cannot be predicted. Moreover, the interests may not be accepted by commercial lenders as security for loans as readily as more conventional securities with established trading markets.

Because stockholders will be deemed to accept, as compensation forhave received a liquidating distribution equal to their pro rata share of the services provided by the Adviser hereunder, a management fee (“Management Fee”) as set forth on Schedule A hereto. The Adviser may agree to waive, in whole or in part, the Management Fee at any time. The Management Fee shall be payable quarterly in arrears, and shall be calculated at an annual rate based on the average daily value of the Allocated Assets (onnet assets distributed to an entity which is treated as a gross basis) duringliquidating trust for tax purposes, the most recently completed calendar quarter. The Management Fee for any partial quarter shall be appropriatelydistribution ofpro-rated.non-transferable The Management Fee includesinterests could result in tax liability to the interest holders without their being readily able to realize the value of such interests to pay such taxes or otherwise.


Authority of Directors and Officers

Our Board may continue to employ some or all fees or charges reasonably incurred by the Adviser (including brokerage commissions resulting from transactions effected through the Adviser or its affiliates) on behalf of the Fundour existing officers, appoint new officers, hire employees and retain independent contractors, agents and advisors in connection with providing services under this Agreement. The Management Fee does not includethewinding-up process, and is authorized to pay compensation to or otherwise compensate our directors, officers, employees, independent contractors, agents and advisors, which, in the following: (a) charges for services provided by the Adviser, its affiliates or third parties which are outside the scopecase of this Agreement (e.g., retirement plan administration fees, trustee fees, etc.); (b) any taxes or fees imposed by exchanges or regulatory bodies;directors, officers and (c) brokerage commissions or other charges resulting from transactions not effected through the Adviser or its affiliates. Each of these additional chargesemployees, may be separately charged to the Allocated Assets or reflectedabove their regular compensation in the price paid or received for a given security. If open- orclosed-end registered funds or exchange-traded funds (collectively, “Portfolio Funds”) are used by the Adviser for investment by the Allocated Assets, any such Portfolio Fund may pay its own separate investment advisory fees and other expenses to its manager or other service provider. In addition, anopen-end mutual fund may charge distribution or servicing fees. In such cases, these fees or expenses will be in addition to the Management Fee.

(b)Adviser Personnel. All personnelrecognition of the Adviser, when andextraordinary efforts they may be required to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services hereunder, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, shall be provided and paid for by the Adviser and not by the Fund.

(c)Expenses. During the term of this Agreement, the Adviser shall pay all expenses incurred by itundertake in connection with the activities it undertakes to meet its obligations hereunder. The Adviser shall, at its sole expense, employ or associate itself with such persons as it reasonably believes will assist it in the execution of its duties under this Agreement, including, without limitation, persons employed or otherwise retained by the Adviser or made available to the Adviser by its members or affiliates. The Fund shall reimburse the Adviser outsuccessful implementation of the Allocated Assets for documented expenses reasonably incurred by the Adviser at the written requestPlan of or on behalfLiquidation and Dissolution. Approval of the Fund. All other costsliquidation and expenses in connection with the operations of the Allocated Assets and transactions effected with respect to the Allocated Assets shall be borne by the Allocated Assets.


Annex B-3


(d)Brokerage Selection and Related Fees and Expenses. The Adviser shall use commercially reasonable efforts to seek to obtain the best execution of all portfolio transactions executed on behalf of the Fund. Any transactions executed with or through first- or second-tier affiliatesdissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution by the requisite vote of our stockholders will comply with Section 17constitute approval by our stockholders of any such compensation.

The approval of the 1940 Act, including without limitation Section 17(a), Section 17(e)liquidation and Rule17e-1 thereunder, and the applicable compliance policiesdissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution by our stockholders also will authorize, without further stockholder action, our Board to do and perform, or to cause our officers to do and perform, any and all acts and to make, execute, deliver or adopt any and all agreements, resolutions, conveyances, certificates and other documents of every kind that our Board deems necessary, appropriate or desirable, in the absolute discretion of the Board, to implement the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the Adviser. In evaluating which brokertransactions contemplated thereby, including all filings or dealer will provide the best execution, the Adviser will consider the full range and quality of a broker’s or dealer’s services including, among other things, the value of research provided as well as execution capability, commission rate, financial responsibility and responsiveness.

In no event will the Adviser or its affiliates be obligated to effectacts required by any transaction for the Allocated Assets which they believe would violate any applicable state or federal law rule or regulation orto wind up its affairs.

Government Approvals

Except for the filing of the rules or regulationsa Certificate of any regulatory or self-regulatory body.

3.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Adviser.

The Adviser represents and warrants to, and covenantsDissolution with the Fund as follows:

(a) The Adviser is registered as an investment adviser underDelaware Secretary of State, the Advisers Act asfiling of the Effective Date and shall maintain such registration so long as this Agreement remains in effect;

(b) The Adviser is a limited liability company duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with the power to own and possess its assets and carry on its business as it is now being conducted;

(c) The execution, delivery and performance by the Adviser of this Agreement are within the Adviser’s powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary action, and no action by or in respect of, or filing with, any governmental body, agency or official is required on the part of the Adviser for the execution, delivery and performance by the Adviser of this Agreement, and the execution, delivery and performance by the Adviser of this Agreement do not contravene or constitute a default under (i) any provision of applicable law, rule or regulation, (ii) the Adviser’s governing instruments, or (iii) any agreement, judgment, injunction, order, decree or other instrument binding upon the Adviser;

(d) The Adviser has provided the Board with a complete copy of its Form ADV, including Part 2A for the Institutional Cash Management Program, and will make available electronically to the Board any updated or amended version of its Form ADV promptly upon making any material changes to the Form ADV (Adviser’s Form ADV Part 2A and 2B are available at www.morganstanley.com/ADV. Adviser’s Form ADV Part 1A is available on the SEC’s website at https://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov/);

(e) The Adviser will maintain a written code of ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that complies with the requirements of Rule17j-1 under the 1940 Act (“Rule17j-1”), a copy of which will be provided to the Fund, and will institute procedures reasonably necessary to prevent any Access Person (as defined in Rule17j-1) from violating its Code of Ethics. The Adviser will follow such Code of Ethics in performing its services under this Agreement. The Adviser also will certify quarterly to the Fund that it and its “Advisory Persons” (as defined in Rule17j-1) have complied materially with the requirements of Rule17j-1 during the previous quarter or, if not, explain what the Adviser has done to seek to ensure such compliance in the future. Annually, the Adviser will furnish a written report, which complies with the requirements of Rule17j-1 and Rule206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act, concerning the Code of Ethics and compliance program, respectively, to the Fund. The Adviser shall notify the Fund promptly of any material violation of the Code of Ethics involving the Fund. The Adviser will provide such additional information regarding violations of the Code of Ethics affecting the Fund as the Chief Compliance Officer of the Fund may reasonably request in order to assess the functioning of the Code of Ethics or any harm caused to the Fund from such a violation of the Code of Ethics. Further, the Adviser represents that it has policies and procedures regarding the detection and prevention of the misuse of material, nonpublic information by the Adviser and its employees;

(f) The Adviser will provide the Fund with such information as necessary to ensure solely with respect to information relating to the Adviser: (A) the Fund’s registration statement on FormN-2,N-8F to be filed with the SEC will not contain any untrue statementand receipt of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading,deregistration order in connection therewith, and (B) the Fund’s prospectus, ifcompliance with applicable will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;

(g) The Adviser shall comply in all material respects with all applicable provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, including the 1940 ActDelaware law and the Advisers Act and other applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Code, no United States federal or state regulatory requirements must be complied with or approvals obtained in connection with the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

Absence of Appraisal Rights

Stockholders are not entitled to assert appraisal rights in connection with dissolution of the Fund under the DGCL.

Interests of Directors and Officers in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

Some of our directors and executive officers may have interests in the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. These potential interests include the payment of incentive awards under the LTIP, the payment of severance compensation to the Fund’s executive officers and/or the Fund’s continuing indemnification obligations to its directors and officers. Our Board was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in approving the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the transactions contemplated thereby.

Stock Ownership

Certain members of our Board and our executive officers own, as of May 15, 2019, an aggregate of 80,484 Shares. In connection with any liquidating distributions, certain of our directors and our executive officers will conductbe entitled to the same pro rata cash distributions as our stockholders based on their ownership of the Shares.

The table below sets forth the number of Shares beneficially owned by each of our directors and executive officers as of May 15, 2019. As of May 15, 2019, the directors and executive officers set forth in the table below, individually and as a group, owned less than 1% of the outstanding Shares:

Name of Director or Executive Officer

Shares
Owned

Tor R. Braham, Director

9,434

Eric K. Brandt, Director

8,545

Thomas J. McInerney, Chief Executive Officer and Director

45,862

Alexi Wellman, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

16,643

 


Annex B-4


its activities under this AgreementCatherine J. Friedman, a member of our Board, currently holds vested cash-settled restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted to her in accordanceconnection with any applicable laws and regulationsher service as a member of any governmental authority pertaining to its investment advisory activities. The Adviser shall notify the Board prior to the sale of the Yahoo business and conversion of the Fund into an investment company, pursuant to which a cash amount having a value equal to 8,545 Shares is scheduled to be distributed to her on September 1, 2020. Because our Shares would be delisted in connection with the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution such that the amount payable to Ms. Friedman under her RSUs will not be readily determinable, the RSUs have been amended to provide that on September 1, 2020, Ms. Friedman will instead receive an amount calculated based on the per Share net asset value of the Fund, as adjusted to eliminate any impact from share price movements of Alibaba Shares.

Payments under Executive Officer Offer Letters

Each of the Fund’s executive officers, including Mr. McInerney, Arthur Chong, General Counsel and Secretary, and Alexi Wellman, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, entered into an offer letter in connection with his or her commencement of employment. Such offer letters set forth the terms of his or her employment with the Fund. Pursuant to each of the offer letters, in the event an executive officer’s employment terminates without “cause” or as a result of a resignation for “good reason” (each, as defined in the offer letters), the executive officer will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the execution of an effective release of claims against the Fund: (i) a lump sum payment equal to 12 months (or, for Mr. McInerney, 18 months) of base salary (the “Base Salary Amount”); (ii) a pro rata portion of the executive officer’s annual incentive award based on actual performance, payable at the time such award would otherwise have been paid, (iii) any portion of the deferred compensation to which the executive officer is entitled pursuant to the terms of the LTIP and (iv) subject to the executive officer’s timely and proper election for continued coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (“COBRA”), reimbursement by the Fund for COBRA premiums paid by the executive officer for a period of 12 months (or, for Mr. McInerney, 18 months) following the executive officer’s involuntary termination; provided that if such termination occurs on or after the date of payment of the first distribution to stockholders following issuance of the Court Order, then the pro rata annual incentive award described in clause (ii) above shall be based on the executive officer’s target bonus and, in addition to the payments and benefits described in clauses (i) through (iii) above, the executive officer will be entitled to an amount equal to his or her full target bonus. The executive officer’s pro rata annual incentive award based on target bonus and full target bonus amount will be payable in a lump sum within ten business days following the effective date of the release of claims. In the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the offer letters), subject to the executive officer’s execution of an effective release of claims against the Fund, each executive officer will automatically receive the payments and benefits described above that would be payable on an involuntary termination (but substituting a change in control for an involuntary termination); provided that, in lieu of the Adviserpro rata annual incentive award described in clause (ii) above, the executive officer will be entitled to an amount equal to his or her full target bonus, payable in lump sum within a reasonable time in advance of such change. The Adviser will also fully cooperate withten business days following the Fund in any regulatory investigation, examination, or inspectioneffective date of the Fund orrelease of claims.

The following table sets forth the Adviser with respect to the Fund or relating to the provisionestimated aggregate dollar value of services to the Fund under this Agreement;

(h) The Adviser will exercise its best judgment, use reasonable(i) any cash severance payments and (ii) health care and act in good faith and act in a manner consistent with applicable federal and state laws and regulations in rendering the services it agrees to provide under the Agreement. The Adviser shall maintain a policy and practice of conducting its investment advisory services hereunder independently of the commercial banking operations of its affiliates. When the Adviser makes investment recommendationswelfare benefits, for the Allocated Assets, its investment advisory personnel will not inquire or take into consideration whetherFund’s three most highly compensated officers (as identified in the issuer of securities proposed for purchase or sale for the Allocated Assets are customers of the commercial department of its affiliates, except as otherwise required by applicable law, rules,Fund’s 2018 proxy statement), Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong and regulations and firm policies;

(i) The Adviser has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer under Rule206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act and has adopted written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Advisers Act The Adviser will timely provide to the FundMs. Wellman, in each case, which may become payable assuming an annual certification from the Adviser’s Chief Compliance Officer with respect to the design and operation of the Adviser’s compliance program, in a format reasonably requested by the Fund;

(j) The Adviser will promptly notify the Fund of the occurrence of any event that would disqualify the Adviser from serving as an investment adviser to the Fund pursuant to Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act; and

(k) The Adviser shall maintain business continuity, disaster recovery and backup capabilities and facilities intended to allow the Adviser to perform its obligations hereunder with minimal disruption or delays.involuntary termination had occurred on May 17, 2019:

 

4.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Fund.

The Fund represents and warrants to, and covenants with, the Adviser as follows:

(a) The execution, delivery and performance by the Fund of this Agreement are within the Fund’s powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary action, and no action by or in respect of, or filing with, any governmental body, agency or official is required on the part of the Fund for the execution, delivery and performance by the Fund of this Agreement, and the execution, delivery and performance by the Fund of this Agreement do not contravene or constitute a default under (i) any provision of applicable law, rule or regulation, (ii) the Certificate, or (iii) any agreement, judgment, injunction, order, decree or other instrument binding upon the Fund;

(b) The Fund shall comply in all material respects with all applicable provisions of Federal Securities Law as defined in Rule38a-1(e)(1) under the 1940 Act and rules and regulations of the SEC with respect to the services provided to the Fund hereunder and the Fund’s activities under this Agreement, and will conduct its activities under this Agreement in accordance with any applicable laws and regulations of any governmental authority pertaining to its investment activities. The Fund shall notify the Adviser of a change in control of the Fund within a reasonable time after such change. The Fund will also fully cooperate in any regulatory investigation, examination, or inspection of the Fund or the Adviser relating to this Agreement or services provided by the Adviser hereunder.

(c) The Fund represents and warrants that the Allocated Assets are free from any security interests, liens, or encumbrances exercisable by any third party against such assets that limit the ability of the Adviser to trade the Allocated Assets as contemplated in this Agreement and the Fund shall not grant such a security interest, lien, or encumbrance on any such assets for the benefit of any third party, except after providing prior written notice to the Adviser. The Fund agrees to notify the Adviser immediately if it learns that any such security interest, lien, or encumbrance is created against any assets managed by the Adviser and the Fund agrees to indemnify and hold the Adviser harmless from any and all expenses, damages, costs, and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, incurred by the Adviser as a result of any security interest, lien, or encumbrance being created on such assets.

(d) The Fund represents and warrants that, for the purposes of the Volcker Rule, the Fund is a “registered investment company” and is therefore excluded from the definition of “covered fund” for purposes of Section 10 of the Volcker Rule implementing rules and, accordingly, the limitations on a banking entity’s ability to acquire or retain ownership interests set forth in Section 10 do not apply to the Fund.


Annex B-5


(e) The Fund shall from time to time provide the Adviser with a written list of persons known to be affiliates of the Fund and affiliates of such affiliates to the extent reasonably necessary to ensure compliance with the limitations on affiliated transactions set forth in Section 17 of the 1940 Act.

5.

Survival of Representations and Warranties; Duty to Update Information.

(a) All representations and warranties made by the Adviser and the Fund pursuant to Sections 3 and 4, respectively, shall survive for the duration of this Agreement and the parties hereto shall promptly notify each other in writing upon becoming aware that any of the foregoing representations and warranties are no longer true.

(b) The Adviser shall promptly notify the Board in writing:

Name

  Type of
Event
   Cash(a)(b)   Continued
Benefits
Coverage(c)
  Total

 

Thomas J. McInerney,

Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

  

 

 

 

 

Involuntary
Termination

 

 

 
 

 

  

 

$

 

3,750,685

 

 

  

 

$58,305

  

 

$3,808,990

 

Arthur Chong,

General Counsel and Secretary

 

  

 

 

 

 

Involuntary
Termination

 

 

 
 

 

  

 

$

 

1,375,342

 

 

  

 

$26,713

  

 

$1,402,055

 

Alexi Wellman,

Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

 

  

 

 

 

 

Involuntary
Termination

 

 

 
 

 

  

 

$

 

640,753

 

 

  

 

$38,870

  

 

$   679,623

 

 (i)(a)

upon receiving notice that a governmental authority, agency or body is investigating or intendsReflects the sum of the Base Salary Amount (as defined above) ($3,000,000 for Mr. McInerney, $1,000,000 for Mr. Chong and $500,000 for Ms. Wellman, respectively)plus the prorated value of each executive officer’s annual incentive award ($2,000,000 for Mr. McInerney, $1,000,000 for Mr. Chong and $375,000 for Ms. Wellman, respectively), in each case, payable within 10 business days of the release’s effective date.


(b)

Annual incentive awards to investigate it or any of its directors, officers or employeesbe paid in connectionaccordance with the services provided toterms and conditions of the Allocated Assets, including any routine examination or proceeding inoffer letters for an involuntary termination, based on achievement of target levels. Amounts paid may vary depending on the ordinary coursedate of business;the involuntary termination and the actual level of performance achieved.

 

 (ii)(c)

Reflects the cost of any change in the portfolio managers18 months of the Adviser who provide services to the Fund hereunder;continued health insurance coverage (medical, dental and vision) for Mr. McInerney and his dependents and 12 months of continued health insurance coverage (medical, dental and vision) for Mr. Chong and Ms. Wellman and each of their dependents, respectively.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

(iii)

of any prospective material change in approach to the Adviser’s management of and recommendations with respect to the Allocated Assets;

(iv)

of any other change in the Adviser’s business activities or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the Adviser’s ability to discharge its obligations under this Agreement; and

(v)

of any actual, anticipated, or contemplated change in ownership of the Adviser or its affiliates constituting, or that would reasonably be expected to constitute, an “assignment” of this Agreement for purposes of the 1940 Act.

6.

Other Activities of the Adviser.

NothingPursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Fund will continue to indemnify and provide for advancement of expenses to its officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives in this Agreement shall preventaccordance with the Adviser orFund’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, its bylaws, any member, manager, officer, employee or other affiliate thereof from acting as investment adviser for any other person, firm or corporation, or from engaging in any other lawful activity,contractual arrangements and shall not in any way limit or restrict the Adviser or any of its members, managers, officers, employees or agents from buying, selling, or trading any securities for its own or their own accounts or for the accounts of others for whom it or they may be acting. For the avoidance of doubt, the Adviser, and any of its affiliates, may enter into one or more agreements pursuant to which the Adviser and/or its affiliates and their personnel may be restricted in their investment management activities. The Adviser or any member, manager, officer, employee or other affiliate thereof may allocate their time between advising the Allocated Assets and managing other investment activities and business activities in which they may be involved.

7.

Indemnification.

(a) The duties of the Adviser shall be confined to those expressly set forth herein. The Adviser shall not be liable for any loss arising out of the Adviser’s activities hereunder, except a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties hereunder, except as may otherwise be provided under provisions of applicable law which cannot be waived(including the 1940 Act), for acts or modified hereby. (As used in this Section 7(a), the term “Adviser” shall include, without limitation, the Adviser’s affiliates and the Adviser’s and its affiliates’ respective partners, shareholders, directors, members, principals, officers, employees and other agentsomissions of the Adviser). Under no circumstances will the Adviser be liable for any loss involving Fund assets other than the Allocated Assets.

(b) The Adviser shall indemnify the Fund, and its affiliates and controllingsuch persons (including its directors, officers and employees) each of whom shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary hereof, for any damage, liability, cost and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, which the Fund or its affiliates and controlling persons may sustain as a result of the Adviser’s willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of its duties hereunder.

(c) The Fund shall indemnify the Adviser (and its officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with the Adviser, each of whom shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary hereof) (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) and hold them harmless


Annex B-6


from and against any damage, liability, cost and expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, howsoever arising from, or in connection with the Adviser’s performanceimplementation of itsthe Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution and the winding up of the affairs of the Fund. The Fund’s obligation to indemnify (or advance expenses to) such persons may also be satisfied out of insurance proceeds or the assets of any trust created pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

The Board or any trustee(s) or agent(s) as may be appointed by the Board under the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, as applicable, is authorized to obtain and maintain insurance as may be necessary, appropriate or desirable to cover the Fund’s obligations under this Agreement, to the extent such damages, liabilities, costsPlan of Liquidation and expenses are not fully reimbursed byDissolution including its existing directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and to the extent that such indemnification would not be inconsistent with the laws of the State of Delaware or the Certificate; provided, however, that the Adviser shall not be indemnified for any liability or expenses that may be sustained as a result of the Adviser’s willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of the Adviser’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of the Adviser’s duties and obligations under this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver by the Fund of any of its legal rights under applicable U.S. federal securities lawspolicy or any other laws.replacement policy.

The Fund may make advance payments to an Indemnified Party in connection withPayment of Incentive Awards under the expenses of defending any action with respect to which indemnification might be sought hereunder if (i) the Fund receives a written affirmation of such Indemnified Party’s (1) good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification has been met and (2) undertaking to reimburse the Fund unless it is subsequently determined that such Indemnified Party is entitled to such indemnification and (ii) the Board determines that the facts then known to the Board would not preclude indemnification. In addition, at least one of the following conditions must be met: (A) the Indemnified Party shall provide security for such Indemnified Party’s undertaking, (B) the Fund shall be insured against losses arising by reason of any unlawful advance, or (C) a majority of a quorum consisting of directors of the Fund who are neither “interested persons” of the Fund (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) nor parties to the proceeding (“DisinterestedNon-Party Directors”) or an independent legal counsel in a written opinion, shall determine, based on a review of readily available facts (as opposed to a full trial-type inquiry), that there is reason to believe that the Indemnified Party ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification. All determinations with respect to the standards for indemnification hereunder shall be made (1) by a final decision on the merits by a court or other body before whom the proceeding was brought that such Indemnified Party is not liable or is not liable by reason of disabling conduct, or (2) in the absence of such a decision, by (i) a majority vote of a quorum of the DisinterestedNon-Party Directors of the Fund, or (ii) if such a quorum is not obtainable or, even if obtainable, if a majority vote of such quorum so directs, independent legal counsel in a written opinion. All determinations that advance payments in connection with the expense of defending any proceeding shall be authorized and shall be made in accordance with the immediately preceding paragraph. The rights accruing to any Indemnified Party under these provisions shall not exclude any other right to which such Indemnified Party may be lawfully entitled.

8.

Confidentiality.

(a) Subject to Section 9 of this Agreement, the Adviser and the Fund each acknowledges and agrees that, pursuant to this Agreement, either party may have access to the other party’s confidential and proprietary information and materials concerning or pertaining to the other’s business. Each party will receive and hold such information in the strictest confidence, and acknowledge, represent, and warrant that it will use its best efforts to protect the confidentiality of this information. Each party agrees that, without the prior written consent of the other party, it will not use, copy, or divulge to third parties or otherwise use, except in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, any information obtained from or through the other party in connection with this Agreement other than as reasonably necessary in the course of their business; provided that such recipients must agree to protect the confidentiality of such information and use such information only for the purposes of performing their obligations under this Agreement; provided, further, however, this covenant shall not apply to information (i) which is in the public domain now or when it becomes in the public domain in the future, other than by reason of a breach of this Agreement, (ii) which has come to either party from a lawful source not bound to maintain the confidentiality of such information, other than from the other party or an affiliate or representative of that party, (iii) information provided by the Adviser to broker-dealers or third parties bound by an agreement of confidentiality for the purposes of bona fide due diligence, or (iv) disclosures which are required by law, regulatory authority, regulation or legal process or made at the request of a banking, financial, securities or similar supervisory or self-regulatory or governmental authority exercising its supervisory, examination or audit functions over the Adviser or any of its affiliates.

(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, each party to this Agreement (and each employee, representative, or other agent of such party) may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation of any kind, the tax treatment and tax structure of (i) the Fund and (ii) any of its transactions, and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided to such party relating to such tax treatment and tax structure.


Annex B-7


(c) The representations and warranties made by the Adviser and the Fund pursuant to this Section 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

9.

Use of Names and Track Record.

(a)Fund’s Use of Adviser’s Name. Other than as expressly stated herein, the Fund shall have no right to use the name “Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC” or “MSSB” (or any combination or derivation thereof) without the prior written consent of the Adviser. For so long as the Adviser is serving as an adviser to the Fund, the Fund may use the name of the Adviser, including any short-form of such name, or any combination or derivation thereof, for the purpose of identifying the Adviser as an adviser to the Fund with respect to the Allocated Assets, including without limitation in regulatory filings, on the Fund’s website and in any reports and other information provided to the Fund’s stockholders. The Fund shall cease to use the name of the Adviser in any newly printed materials (except as may, in the sole discretion of the Fund, be reasonably necessary to comply with applicable law) promptly upon termination of this Agreement. The use of the Adviser’s name or combination or derivation thereof by the Fund hereunder shall be in a manner that is not intended to reflect negatively on the reputation or goodwill of the Adviser or such names or any combination or derivation thereof.

(b)Restrictions on Use of Fund Name. The Adviser shall not use the name of the Fund or Yahoo! Inc. (or any combination or derivation thereof) in any material relating to the Adviser in any manner not approved prior thereto in writing by the Fund, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, other than inclusions of such entities in lists of the Adviser’s clients. The use of the Fund’s name or combination or derivation thereof by the Adviser hereunder shall be in a manner that is not intended to reflect negatively on the reputation or goodwill of the Fund or Yahoo! Inc., or such names or any combination or derivation thereof.

(c)Adviser’s Use of Track-Record. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Adviser may use performance data it generates in connection with the Allocated Assets for its track record and use the name of the Fund solely to identify such performance.

10.

Effectiveness, Term and Termination of Agreement.

(a)Effectiveness and Term. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date first written above. This Agreement shall remain in effect for two years from its effective date, and thereafter shall continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act) of the Fund and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Fund’s directors who are not parties to this Agreement or “interested persons” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of any such party, in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act.

(b)Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice, (i) by the vote of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act) of the Fund, (ii) by the vote of the Board, or (iii) by the Adviser. This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of its “assignment” (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 15(a)(4) of the 1940 Act). The provisions of Sections 7 and 8 of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and the Adviser shall remain entitled to the benefits thereof, notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement. Further, notwithstanding the termination or expiration of this Agreement as aforesaid, the Adviser shall be entitled to any amounts owed to it under Section 2 through the date of termination or expiration and Section 7 shall continue in force and effect and apply to the Adviser and its representatives as and to the extent applicable.

11.

Notices.

Any notice under this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed and delivered or mailed, postage prepaid, to the other party at its principal office.

12.

Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended in writing by mutual consent of the parties hereto, subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act and the Certificate.


Annex B-8


13.

Miscellaneous.

The captions in this Agreement are included for convenience of reference only and in no way define or delimit any of the provisions hereof or otherwise affect their construction or effect. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors.

14.

Severability.

If any provision of this Agreement shall be declared illegal, invalid, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be severable from this Agreement (to the extent permitted by law) and in any event such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remainder hereof, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted to give maximum effect to the intent of the parties manifested thereby.

15.

Entire Agreement; Governing Law; Venue; Waiver of Jury Trial.

This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements with respect to the subject matter hereof. Notwithstanding the place where this Agreement may be executed by any of the parties hereto, this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. This Agreement shall also be construed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the 1940 Act. To the extent the applicable laws of the State of New York, or any of the provisions herein, conflict with the provisions of the 1940 Act, the latter shall control. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the parties hereto, each of which shall constitute an original counterpart, and all of which, together, shall constitute one Agreement. The parties irrevocably submit to the personal jurisdiction and service and venue of any federal or state court within the State of New York having subject matter jurisdiction, for the purpose of any action, suit or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any action taken or omitted hereunder, and waive any claim of forum non conveniens. The parties further waive personal service of any summons, complaint or other process and agree that service thereof may be made by certified or registered mail directed to such party at such party’s address for purposes of notices hereunder. THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY WAIVE ANY AND ALL RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]


Annex B-9


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the date above written.

BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, THE UNDERSIGNED CONSENTS TO ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF ADVISER’S FORM ADV PART 2A AND 2B, EITHER BY EMAIL OR BY REFERRING THE UNDERSIGNED TO A WEBSITE (WHICH MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME BY WRITTEN NOTICE TO ADVISER).

Altaba Inc.

By:

Name:

Title:

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC

By:

Name:

Title:

Signature Page to the Investment Advisory Agreement



SCHEDULE A

TO THE

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

BETWEEN ALTABA INC. AND MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC

Pursuant to Section 2 of the Agreement, the Fund shall pay the Adviser compensation at an annual rate as follows:

Allocated Asset level under $750M

.0700%

Allocated Asset level between $750M and $1B

.0650%

Allocated Asset level between $1B and $1.5B

.0575%

Allocated Asset level between $1.5B and $2B

.0500%

Allocated Asset level between $2B and $2.5B

.0450%

Allocated Asset level between $2.5B and $3B

.0425%

Allocated Asset level between $3B and $3.5B

.0400%

Allocated Asset level between $3.5B and $4B

.0375%

Allocated Asset level over $4B

.0350%

The fee payable by the Fund to the Adviser will be payable quarterly in arrears and will be calculated for all the Allocated Assets at the annual rate applicable to the Allocated Assets level (on a gross basis) set forth in the foregoing table based on the average daily value of the MSSB Assets during the most recently completed calendar quarter.

The Adviser will voluntarily waive its fees by the amount of advisory fees that the Fund pays to the Adviser or its affiliates indirectly through its investment by the Adviser of Allocated Assets in money market funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates.


Annex B-Schedule A


ANNEX C

ALTABA INC.

LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONSAnnex C-1
ARTICLE 2 ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATIONAnnex C-3
ARTICLE 3 INCENTIVE AWARDSAnnex C-4
ARTICLE 4 DIRECTOR DEFERRALSAnnex C-6
ARTICLE 5 ADMINISTRATIONAnnex C-7
ARTICLE 6 AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF PLANAnnex C-7
ARTICLE 7 DETERMINATION OF BENEFITSAnnex C-8
ARTICLE 8 MISCELLANEOUSAnnex C-9


ALTABA INC.

LONG-TERM DEFERRED COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN

Altaba Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”) hereby adopts and establishes this Altaba Inc. Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) in order

The LTIP, adopted by the Fund’s stockholders at its 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, is intended to permitattract, retain and appropriately incentivize the deferral of certain compensation to which eligible directors,Fund’s executive officers and other key employees by providing them with grants of the Company may become entitled, which deferred amounts will be subject to vesting, measurement and payout based on the Company’s achievement of certain performance criteria relating to the change in the trading discount of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.

ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS

1.1General. The following terms used in the Plan shall have the meanings specified below unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary.

1.2“Affiliate” shall mean, at any time, and with respect to any person, any other person that, at such time, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such first person. The term “control” means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person through the ownership of voting securitiesincentive cash awards and the terms “controlled” and “controlling” have meanings correlative thereto.”

1.3 “Alibaba Share” shall mean an ordinary share, par value $0.000025 per share, of Alibaba Group Limited.

1.4 “Award Agreement” shall mean any written notice, agreement or other document evidencing an Award granted under the Plan.

1.5 “Beneficiary” shall mean the person or persons designated by a Participant, on a form provided by the Plan Administrator, to receive payments under the Plan in the event of his or her death. A Participant may change the designation of a Beneficiary at any time by completing a new designation form which shall revoke and supersede all earlier forms.

1.6 “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.

1.7 “Cause” shall have the meaning given to such term in the employment, severance or similar agreement between the Company and the Participant or, if no such agreement exists or if “Cause” is not defined therein, then “Cause” shall mean the occurrence of one or more of the following: (1) the Participant’s willful refusal or material failure to perform the Participant’s job duties and responsibilities (other than by reason of the Participant’s serious physical or mental illness, injury or medical condition), (2) the Participant’s willful failure or refusal to comply in any material respect with material Company policies or lawful directives, (3) the Participant’s material breach of any contract or agreement between the Participant and the Company (including but not limited to any employment agreement or restrictive covenant agreement between the Participant and the Company), or the Participant’s material breach of any statutory duty, fiduciary duty or any other obligation that the Participant owes to the Company, (4) the Participant’s commission of an act of fraud, theft, embezzlement or other unlawful act against the Company or involving its property or assets or the Participant engaging in intentional acts that are materially detrimental to the reputation of the Company and which cause the Company material economic harm, or (5) the Participant’s indictment or conviction ornolo contendre or guilty plea with respect to any felony or crime of moral turpitude. For purposes of this provision, no act or failure to act on the Participant’s part shall be considered “willful” unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by the Participant in bad faith or without reasonable belief that the Participant’s action or omission was in the best interests of the Company. Any act, or failure to act, based upon authority given pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board or upon the advice of counsel for the Company shall be conclusively presumed to be done, or omitted to be done, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company. Except for a failure, breach or refusal which, by its nature, cannot reasonably be expected to be cured, the Participant shall have ten (10) days from the delivery of written notice by the Company within which to cure any acts constituting Cause;provided, that, if the Company reasonably expects irreparable injury from a delay of ten (10) days, the Company may give the Participant notice of such shorter period within which to cure as is reasonable under the circumstances.


Annex C-1


1.8 “Change in Control” shall mean the occurrence of any of the following after the Effective Date:

(a) one person (or more than one person acting in concert as a group), other than the Company, acquires ownership of stock of the Company that, together with the stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than fifty percent (50%) of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company;

(b) a majority of thenon-employee members of the Board are replaced during any twelve (12) month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed byproviding them with the opportunity to defer director fees into a majority of the Board before the date of appointment or election; or

(c) the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets;

(d) a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other entity in which the Company’s voting securities immediately prior to the merger or consolidation do not represent, or are not converted into securities that represent, a majority of the voting power of all voting securities of the surviving entity immediately after the merger or consolidation.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control shall not occur unless such transaction constitutes a change in the ownership of the Company, a change in effective control of the Company, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets under Section 409A of the Code. In the event of an amendment that materially changes Section 409A of the Code’s definition of change in control, the Plan Administrator may amend the definition of “Change in Control”deferral account under the Plan to be consistent with such amendment.

1.9 “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,LTIP, in each case, as amended from time to time.

1.10 “Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other person or persons appointed from time to timedetermined by the Compensation Committee of the Board to administer the Plan.

1.11 “Company” shall mean Altaba Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly known as Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation).

1.12 “Company Common Stock” shall mean the common shares, $0.001 par value per share, of the Company.

1.13 “Deferral Account” shall mean the bookkeeping entry that is utilized solely as a device for the measurement and determination of the amount to be paid to a Participant in respect of the Participant’s Director Fees that are deferred pursuant to Article 4.

1.14 “Deferral Agreement” shall mean a written agreement evidencing a Participant’s election to defer his or her Director Fees under the Plan pursuant to Section 4.1.

1.15 “Director” shall mean a member of the Board.

1.16 “Director Fees” shall mean, with respect to an Independent Director who is a Participant, the fees payable in cash for services rendered as a Director during the period commencing on the Deferral Date and ending on the date of the third anniversary of the first regularly scheduled annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

1.17 “Disability” shall mean, with respect to a Participant, a total and permanent disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.

1.18 “Effective Date” shall mean August 9, 2017, subject to the approval of the Plan by the Company’s stockholders.

1.19 “Employee” shall mean any individual who is a common-law employee of the Company or its Affiliates.

1.20 “ERISA” shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time.

1.21 “Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Annex C-2


1.22 “Good Reason” shall have the meaning given to such term in the employment, severance or similar agreement between the Company and the Participant or, if no such agreement exists or if “Good Reason” is not defined therein, then “Good Reason” shall be deemed to exist only if the Company shall fail to correct within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from the Participant specifying in reasonable detail the reasons the Participant believes one of the following events or conditions has occurred (provided such notice is delivered by the Participant no later than sixty (60) days after the initial existence of the occurrence): (1) a material diminution of the Participant’s then current aggregate base salary and target annual incentive award amount without the Participant’s prior written agreement; (2) a material adverse change in the Participant’s title, authority, duties or responsibilities without the Participant’s prior written agreement; (3) a material change in the geographic location at which the Participant is required to perform services for the Company, without the Participant’s prior written agreement; (4) any material breach of the Participant’s employment or similar agreement with the Company; or (5) a material adverse change in the Participant’s reporting structure;provided, that in all events the termination of the Participant’s service with the Company shall not be treated as a termination for “Good Reason” unless such termination occurs not more than six (6) months following the initial existence of the occurrence of the event or condition claimed to constitute “Good Reason.”

1.23 “Incentive Award” shall mean an award granted to a Participant under the Plan pursuant to Section 3.1.

1.24 “Independent Director” shall mean a member of the Board who is not an Employee.

1.25 “Participant” shall mean an Employee who is designated by the Plan Administrator to participate in the Plan or, unless otherwise determined by the Plan Administrator, an Independent Director who elects to participate in the Plan, in each case, pursuant to Article 2.

1.26 “Payout Multiplier” means the payout multiplier in respect of an Incentive Award granted to a Participant or a Participant’s Deferral Account as specified in the applicable Award Agreement or Deferral Agreement, respectively.

1.27 “Plan” means this Altaba Inc. Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan, as may be amended or restated from time to time.

1.28 “Plan Administrator” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other person or persons appointed from time to time by the Compensation Committee of the Board to administer the Plan. With respect to any payments hereunder intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan Administrator shall be the Compensation Committee of the Board and shall be comprised solely of two or more directors who are “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

1.29 “Qualifying Termination” means a termination of the Participant’s employment with the Company and its Affiliates either by the Company without Cause or by the Participant for Good Reason or as a result of the Participant’s Disability or death.

1.30 “Separation from Service” means a Participant’s separation from service with the Company within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Code and the Department of Treasury final regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder.

1.31 “Yahoo Japan Share” shall mean a common share, no par value, of Yahoo Japan Corporation.

ARTICLE 2

ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION

2.1Employees. The Plan Administrator may, from time to time, designate those Employees who may participate in the Plan and to whom an Incentive Award may be granted pursuant to Section 3.1.

2.2Independent Directors. Each Independent Director may participate in the Plan by making a Deferral Election with respect to such Independent Director’s Director Fees pursuant to Section 4.1.


Annex C-3


ARTICLE 3

INCENTIVE AWARDS

3.1Grant of Incentive Awards. The Plan Administrator may, from time to time, grant an Incentive Award to any Participant who is an Employee, payable in cash, pursuant to the terms of the PlanLTIP.

The value of these incentive awards and which shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement. The terms, conditions and limitationsdeferral accounts under the LTIP are currently determined based on measurement of each Incentive Award shall be set forththe change in the Award Agreement consistentFund’s trading discount relative to thepre-tax value of the Fund’s net assets, as adjusted to eliminate any impact from share price movements of Alibaba Shares and to reflect certain other adjustments, against certain targeted performance levels, with resulting payout multipliers determined by the Compensation Committee. As discussed below under “—Amendments to the LTIP in Connection with the termsPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution,” at the time the Board adopted the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board adopted an amendment to the LTIP to address the suspension of trading in the Shares and their delisting in connection with the filing of the Plan. Notwithstanding anything hereinCertificate of Dissolution which would cause the LTIP to cease to operate as a result of the absence of a public trading price for the Shares on which to calculate the trading discount under the LTIP. The LTIP amendment automatically becomes effective upon the delisting of the Shares from Nasdaq pursuant to the contrary, assumingPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

Incentive Awards

Assuming the maximum level of performance and Payout Multiplierpayout multiplier applicable to such Incentive Awards,incentive awards, the maximum amount that may become payable to any Participanta LTIP participant in any fiscal year of the Company with respect to an Incentive Award shall be $24,000,000Fund is $24 million and the maximum amount that may become payable with respect to all Incentive Awardsawards granted to Participantsparticipants under the Plan from timeLTIP is $52 million (although, the aggregate grant date value of awards granted to time shall be $60,000,000.

3.2Vesting of Incentive Awardsparticipants to date is less than the maximum). SubjectThe LTIP provides for an award granted to the participant and a range of payments that each officer may receive based on attainment of thepre-established performance targets:

Mr. McInerney’s deferred compensation will have an initial incentive award of $6 million, which may result in payments of between $0 and $24 million;

Mr. Chong’s deferred compensation will have an initial incentive award of $3 million, which may result in payments of between $0 and $12 million; and


Ms. Wellman’s deferred compensation will have an initial incentive award of $1.5 million, which may result in payments of between $0 and $6 million.

Each incentive award is subject to a three-year vesting schedule, commencing on June 13, 2017, which may accelerate upon an involuntary termination or change in control. The amount of an incentive award that may become payable to a participant is currently based on the trading discount as measured on the applicable vesting anniversary date. The Fund assesses the trading discount and payout multiplier on a quarterly basis of the vesting period and records the applicable liability.

The terms of the LTIP as originally adopted did not contemplate a dissolution of the Fund and, as discussed below under “—Amendments to the LTIP in Connection with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution,” absent additional amendment the LTIP would cease to operate when the Shares are suspended from trading and delisted in connection with the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution because of the absence of a public trading price for the Shares on which to calculate the trading discount for purposes of the LTIP. Assuming that the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution were not to be approved and the Shares remained listed on Nasdaq through the final vesting date under the LTIP, then under the LTIP’s current terms and conditions set forthassuming the trading discount as of May 15, 2019 remains unchanged through June 13, 2020, then as of June 13, 2020, or if earlier, their involuntary termination of employment, Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong and Ms. Wellman would be entitled to cumulative payments under the LTIP of approximately $9.6 million, $4.8 million and $2.4 million, respectively, and would remain eligible to receive additional distributions (but not in excess of the Award Agreement, a Participant’s Incentive Award shall vest upon the respective vesting dates set forth therein (each, a “Vesting Date”), or (ii) a Change in Control,maximum amounts specified above). For so long as Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong and Ms. Wellman remain employed by the Participant remainsFund, then on the fourth anniversary of the LTIP’s effective date and eachsix-month anniversary thereafter, they are generally eligible to receive additional payments under the LTIP based on the then-applicable payout multiplier if such payout multiplier would have resulted in continuous service withadditional payments under the Company or anyLTIP had it been applicable to the determination of its Affiliates through such Vesting Date or Change in Control, respectively;provided, that the Incentive Award shall vest in full in the event that the Participant experiencestheir LTIP payments as of a Qualifying Termination.

3.3Effect of Termination of Employment.prior vesting date. In the event of thean LTIP participant’s involuntary termination, of a Participant’s employment or service by the Company or its Affiliates for any reason, the Incentive Award, to the extent vested as of such date of termination (after taking into account any full vesting in connection with a Qualifying Termination), shall become payable to the Participant or the Participant’s Beneficiary, as applicable, pursuant to Section 3.5, and the then-unvested portion of the Incentive Award, if any, shall thereupon terminate without any payment therefor, and the Participant shall have no further rights with respect thereto.

3.4Deferral Election. Each Participant may irrevocably elect to defer payment of his or her Incentive Award, to the extent vested, to the occurrence of the Participant’s Separation from Service (in lieu of payment on the first anniversary of each Vesting Date) by completing and executing an Award Agreement that specifies such election and returning such executed Award Agreement to the Plan Administrator within thirty (30) days following the date of the Participant’s receipt of such Award Agreement.

3.5Payment of Incentive Awards.

(a) Except as provided in Sections 3.5(b) and 3.5(c), a Participant’s Incentive Award, to the extent vested, shall be paid to the Participant or the Participant’s Beneficiary, as applicable, on or within thirty (30) days following the earliest to occur of (i) the first anniversary of each Vesting Date, or, if the Participant has made a timely and valid deferral election pursuant to Section 3.4, the date of the Participant’s Separation from Service or (ii) immediately prior to (but subject to the consummation of) a Change in Control.

(b) If a Participant’s employment with the Company or its Affiliates is terminated for any reason other than a Qualifying Termination, then the Participant’s Incentive Award, to the extent vested, shall be paid to the Participant on or within thirty (30) days following the date of such termination.

(c) If a Participant’s employment with the Company or its Affiliates is terminated by reason of a Qualifying Termination, then the Participant’s Incentive Award shall be fully vested as of the date of such Qualifying Termination and shall be paid to the Participant on or within thirty (30) days following the date of such Qualifying Termination;provided, that if the Trading Discount Reduction (asas defined below)in the LTIP measured as of the first anniversary of the date of termination (or a Changechange of Controlcontrol if it occurs earlier than said first anniversary) exceeds the Trading Discount Reduction as defined in the LTIP measured as of the date of termination, then the ParticipantLTIP participant shall be entitled to a payment in an amount equal to the difference between (x) the amount of the Incentive AwardLTIP award calculated based on the Payout Multiplierpayout multiplier as in effect on the first anniversary of the date of termination (or a Changechange of Controlcontrol if it occurs earlier than said first anniversary) and (y) the amount of the Incentive Awardaward calculated based on the Payout Multiplierpayout multiplier as in effect on the date of termination, withtermination.

Deferral Accounts

Each independent director who is designated as a participant by the Compensation Committee under the LTIP is required to defer a portion of not less than 50% and up to 100% of his or her director fees payable in cash for services rendered by such amount paiddirector during the period following his or her deferral election and up to the Participantearliest of such participant’s separation from service for any reason or the Participant’s Beneficiary, as applicable, on or within thirty (30) days following such first anniversarya change in control of the date of termination (or, in the event of a Change of Control if it occurs earlier than said first anniversary, immediately prior to (but subject to the consummation of) a Change in Control.


Annex C-4


3.6Calculation of Payment of Incentive Awards.

(a)Generally.Fund. The amount of an Incentive Awarddirector fees so deferred is credited to the participant’s deferral account under the LTIP as of the regularly scheduled payment date of such fees, and the participant will be fully vested in his or her deferral account. The amounts deferred are subject to increase in accordance with the same performance goals as apply to the incentive awards granted to the Fund’s executive officers and other key employees and will become payable in a single lump sum cash payment upon the earlier to occur of the participant’s separation from service for any reason or a change in control of the Fund.

Amendments to the LTIP in Connection with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution

As described above, the LTIP currently calculates incentive award payouts based on the change in the Fund’s trading discount relative to thepre-tax value of the Fund’s net assets, as adjusted to eliminate any impact from share price movements of Alibaba Shares, against a baseline level with resulting payout multipliers established by the Fund’s Compensation Committee. The amount of the deferred compensation incentive award that may become payable to a Participant shall beparticipant is currently subject to the Trading Discount Reduction achieved and Payout Multipliers as set forthachievement of a reduction in the Award Agreement that applyFund’s trading discount (if any) as compared to the Trading Discount Reduction as determinedbaseline level established by the Compensation Committee. The LTIP currently measures these changes based on the applicable Vesting Date, the datepublicly traded share price of the occurrenceShares. However, as discussed under “—Payment of Incentive Awards under the Long-Term Deferred Compensation Incentive Plan” above, in connection with the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, the Shares will cease to be publicly traded. As a Change in Control or, inresult, the case of a Qualifying Termination,Compensation Committee has recommended and the date of termination orBoard adopted an amendment to the one year anniversaryLTIP that will automatically become effective as of the date of termination if higher, as describedthe Shares cease to be listed on Nasdaq, to determine changes in Section 3.5(c) above (such applicable date, the Measurement Date”).Fund’s trading discount by reference

(b)Methodology.


As

to the per Share net asset value of the applicable Measurement Date, the amount of the Incentive Award payable to the Participant shall be calculatedFund, as determined in accordance with the terms of the Award Agreement based on the initial amount of the Incentive Award grantedU.S. GAAP and as adjusted to the Participant and the applicable Payout Multiplier determined based on the Trading Discount Reduction measured as of such Measurement Date, subject to the vesting terms set forth in the Award Agreement.

For purposes of measuring the Trading Discount Reduction, the following terms shall apply:

Base Trading Discount” shall mean the percentage (rounded to the nearest tenth of a percentile) specified in a Participant’s Award Agreement or Deferral Agreement, as applicable.

Base Adjusted NAV” and “Base Adjusted NAV Per Share” shall mean the initial net asset value adjusted for the exclusion of deferred taxes on unrealized appreciation and other adjustments. These amounts will be specified in a Participant’s Award Agreement or Deferral Agreement and utilized in the calculation of Base Trading Discount.

Revised Adjusted NAV” and“Revised Adjusted NAV Per Share” shall mean the Base Adjusted NAV pereliminate any impact from share revised to reflect the impact of changes in the per share price movements of Alibaba Shares and Yahoo Japan Shares, respectivelyto reflect certain other adjustments (such adjustments being consistent with the LTIP as originally adopted).

Thepre-established performance targets and vesting schedule described above will remain unchanged under the amended LTIP. Likewise, the maximum amounts payable under the LTIP, as well as the individual incentive award opportunities described above will remain unchanged. The LTIP’s terms as applicable to each independent director will also remain unchanged, other than to similarly reflect that increases of deferred amounts will be calculated based on changes to the Base Adjusted NAV. The impact of these share price changes may be direct (e.g.,trading discount by reference to the per Share net asset value of the Company’s holdings are increased or decreased) or indirect (e.g., the company bought back its own shares at a pricefund, and to provide that reflected higher or lower share prices for these holdings than subsequently in effect). For purposes of illustration, Revised Adjusted NAV and Revised Adjusted NAV Per Share shalleach independent director’s deferrals will be determined consistently with the example set forth onAppendix A hereto.

Current Trading Discount” means,measured as of any Measurement Date, an amount (roundedthe first distribution to stockholders following issuance of the nearest tenth of a percentile) equal to one less the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the average closing price per share of Common StockCourt Order based on the Nasdaq Stock Market during the thirty (30) day trading period immediately prior to such measurement date (in each case adding back the per share amount of cumulative dividends paid by the Company fromdiscount at that time, and after the Effective Date, by (y) the “Revised Adjusted NAV Per Share” on such measurement date.

Trading Discount Reduction” means an amount (rounded to the nearest tenth of a percentile) equal to the difference obtained by subtracting (x) the Current Trading Discount from (y) the Base Trading Discount.

The measurement of the Trading Discount Reduction pursuant to this Section 3.6(b) shall be applied on an objective basis and consistently by the Plan Administrator from time to time;provided, that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Plan Administrator reserves the right to modify such methodology in such a manner that does not cause any amounts payable hereunder to cease to qualify as performance based compensation within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and which does not adversely affect the rights of any Participant under his or her Incentive Award.

(c)Deferred Payment Interest Credit. The amount of an Incentive Award that becomes vested on an applicable Vesting Date and which is paid to such Participant more than 30 days after the applicable Vesting Date shallwill subsequently be credited with a rate of interest based on the prime rate of interest until an independent director’s separation from service.

Under the LTIP’s terms as reportedamended as of the date the Shares are delisted and assuming the per Share net asset value of the Fund, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and as adjusted to eliminate any impact from share price movements of Alibaba Shares and to reflect certain other adjustments (such adjustments being consistent with the Wall Street Journal forLTIP currently in effect) as of May 15, 2019 remains unchanged through June 13, 2020, then as of June 13, 2020, or if earlier, their involuntary termination of employment, Mr. McInerney, Mr. Chong and Ms. Wellman would be entitled to cumulative payments under the applicable Vesting Date (or immediately preceding date onLTIP of approximately $21.6 million, $10.8 million and $5.4 million, respectively, and would remain eligible to receive additional distributions (but not in excess of the maximum amounts specified above) in connection with future distributions from the Fund. These payment amounts are identical to that which such rate is reported, if not reported inthese LTIP participants would have received under the Wall Street JournalLTIP prior to its amendment, assuming 100% of the net assets of the Fund were distributed to stockholders and making the same assumptions described above. The net effect of the LTIP amendments, based on the applicable Vesting Date), compounded monthly fromassumptions described above, is not intended to increase the applicable Vesting Datemagnitude of amounts potentially payable under the LTIP, but is intended (in the context of the Shares being delisted after the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution) to provide for an alternative mechanism for measuring current value that aligns management and stockholder interests.

Under the LTIP’s terms as amended, the deferral accounts of independent directors will remain subject to the terms described above; provided that, with respect to independent directors who remain in continuous service on the Board through the first distribution to stockholders following issuance of the Court Order, as of the date of payment (the “Interest Credit”). The amountthe first distribution to stockholders following issuance of the Incentive Award payableCourt Order, their deferral accounts will be credited by reference to thethen-per Share net asset value of the Fund, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and as adjusted to eliminate any Participantimpact from share price movements of Alibaba Shares and to reflect certain other adjustments (such other adjustments being consistent with the LTIP as originally adopted), and will thereafter be credited based on an applicable payment date described in Sections 3.5(a), (b) and (c) shall be increased by an amounta fixed rate of interest equal to the Interest Credit throughprime rate of interest as of the date of paymentthe first distribution to stockholders following issuance of the Court Order until distributed in accordance with the terms of the LTIP as originally adopted. Independent directors who do not remain in continuous service on the Board through the first distribution to stockholders following issuance of the Court Order will receive a prorated distribution determined by reference to per Share net asset value of the Fund (as described herein) on the date of their separation from service, with the proration factor being determined by the number of days the director served after June 12, 2019 divided by 365.

Incentive Award,award amounts under the LTIP which additional Interest Credit amount shall be paidbecome vested prior to the Participantdate the Shares cease to be listed on Nasdaq will be calculated and become payable in accordance with the LTIP’s terms as in effect before such delisting date.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Liquidation and Dissolution

The following is a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution that are applicable to our stockholders. This summary is included for general information purposes only and is not tax advice. This summary is based on the Code, Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, published rulings, administrative pronouncements and judicial decisions, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. We have not sought and do not intend to seek a ruling from the IRS concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. The tax consequences described in the following discussion are not binding on the IRS or the courts, and no assurance can be given that contrary positions will not be successfully asserted by the IRS or adopted by a court.


This summary addresses only stockholders who hold their Shares as capital assets within the meaning of the Code and does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to stockholders in light of their particular circumstances or to certain types of stockholders subject to special treatment under the Code, including pass-through entities (including partnerships and S corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and investors in such entities, certain financial institutions, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, insurance companies, certain accrual method taxpayers subject to special tax accounting rules as a result of their use of financial statements, expatriates, mutual funds, real estate investment trusts, cooperatives,tax-exempt organizations, persons who are subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons who hold their Shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion, constructive sale, synthetic security, integrated investment, or other risk-reduction transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, stockholders that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, and persons who acquired their Shares upon the exercise of stock options or otherwise as compensation. This summary does not address any U.S. federal estate, gift, or othernon-income tax consequences, the effects of the Medicare contribution tax on net investment income, or any state, local, or foreign tax consequences.Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution to them in light of each stockholder’s particular circumstances.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial holder of Shares that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (i) a citizen or individual resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any State or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust if it (A) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (B) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. A“Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial holder of Shares that is neither a U.S. Holder nor a partnership, or other entity treated as a partnership, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner in a partnership holding Shares should consult its tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.

U.S. Federal Income Taxation of the Fund

Even if the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is approved and the Fund files a Certificate of Dissolution, the Fund will continue to be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income and taxable gains until the liquidation is complete (i.e., until all of its remaining assets have been distributed to the stockholders or transferred to a liquidating trust or trusts). Accordingly, the sale or other disposition of the Fund’s remainingnon-cash assets, including the remaining Alibaba Shares, will generally be taxable to the Fund for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The Fund will generally recognize gain or loss upon any liquidating distribution of Alibaba Shares or othernon-cash property to stockholders or to a liquidating trust as if such property were sold at its fair market value at the same time of the distribution. There is no assurance that the IRS will not challenge our valuation of any property so distributed, including any potential blockage or other discount claimed in respect of a liquidating distribution of Alibaba Shares.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Stockholders

We intend to accomplish the liquidation and dissolution in a manner that will qualify as a “complete liquidation” of the Fund within the meaning of Section 346(a) of the Code, but there can be no assurance that our efforts to do so will be successful. The term “complete liquidation” is not defined in the Code, and the approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution does not ensure that any liquidating distributions by the Fund will be treated as distributions in “complete liquidation” by the IRS.

Based on advice of the Fund’s counsel, we believe that if the Fund liquidates and dissolves in the manner contemplated by the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, all distributions by the Fund to its stockholders after a vote of the stockholders approving the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as distributions in complete liquidation of the Fund. The remainder of this summary assumes such treatment. If any such distribution does not so


qualify, it would generally be treated as a dividend to stockholders to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits, and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution would differ materially from the consequences described in this summary. Stockholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of the liquidation and dissolution as a complete liquidation and the potential consequences of a failure to qualify for such treatment.

Consequences to U.S. Holders. Amounts received by stockholders pursuant to the same termsPlan of Liquidation and Dissolution (including amounts treated as the underlying vested Incentive Award to which it relates.


Annex C-5


(d)Catch-Up Payment. If (i)received by stockholders as described below in “—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of a Change in Control occurs while the Participant is in continuous service with the Company or any of its Affiliates or following a Participant’s Qualifying Termination that has occurred within the twelve months prior to such Change in Control and (ii) the Payout Multiplier determined based on the Trading Discount Reduction measuredLiquidating Trust”) will generally be treated as of such Change in Control (the “Liquidity Payout Multiplier”) is greater than the Payout Multiplier that applied to any previously vested or paid out portion of an Incentive Award (such portion, the “Prior Portion”), then the Participant shall be entitled to afull payment in an amountexchange for their Shares. As described below, a U.S. Holder will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the excess,difference between (i) the amount of cash and the fair market value (at the time of the distribution) of any other property distributed, less any known liabilities assumed by the stockholder or to which the distributed property is subject and (ii) such stockholder’s tax basis in the Shares.

Amounts received by a U.S. Holder pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution will first be applied against and reduce the stockholder’s tax basis in the Shares. If a U.S. Holder holds different blocks of Shares (generally as a result of having acquired Shares at different times or at different prices), gain or loss is calculated separately with respect to each such block. In general, a U.S. Holder must allocate a liquidating distribution proportionately to each block of Shares and compare the allocated portion of the liquidating distribution with the stockholder’s tax basis in each such block. Gain will be recognized as a result of a liquidating distribution to the extent that the aggregate value of such liquidating distribution and any prior liquidating distributions received by a stockholder with respect to a Share exceeds such stockholder’s tax basis in the Share. Any loss will generally be recognized only when a stockholder receives the final distribution from us and then only if any,the aggregate value of all liquidating distributions with respect to a Share is less than the stockholder’s tax basis in the Share. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder with respect to a Share will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Share has been held for more than one year. Certain U.S. Holders (including individuals) may be eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long-term capital gains. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

In the event of a distribution of Alibaba Shares or othernon-cash property to a U.S. Holder, the stockholder’s tax basis in such property immediately after the distribution will be the fair market value of such property at the time of the distribution.

After the close of our taxable year, we intend to provide stockholders and the IRS with a statement of the amount of cash distributed to our stockholders (or transferred to a liquidating trust) and our best estimate as to the Prior Portion calculatedfair market value of any property distributed to them (or transferred to a liquidating trust) during that year, at such time and in such manner as ifrequired by the Liquidity Payout Multiplier had applied toTreasury Regulations. There is no assurance that the IRS will not challenge our valuation of any property so distributed or transferred. In the event such Prior Portion on each prior Vesting Date, overa challenge is made successfully, the amount of gain or loss recognized by stockholders could change materially. A distribution that includes Alibaba Shares or othernon-cash property could result in tax liability to a U.S. Holder exceeding the Prior Portion calculated asamount of eachcash received, requiring the stockholder to meet the tax obligations from other sources or by selling all or a portion of the property received.

If a U.S. Holder is required to satisfy any liability of the Fund not fully covered by our reserves, payments by the stockholder in satisfaction of such liability would generally produce a capital loss in the year paid, which, in the hands of an individual U.S. Holder, could not be carried back to prior Vesting Date. Inyears to offset capital gains realized from liquidating distributions in those years.

Consequences toNon-U.S. Holders. ANon-U.S. Holder will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax with respect to any gain realized on a liquidating distribution unless (i) the absencegain is effectively connected with theNon-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a Changetrade or business within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of theNon-U.S. Holder), (ii) in Control,the case of aNon-U.S. Holder that is a nonresident alien individual, theNon-U.S. Holder is present in the United States for 183 or more days in the taxable year of the liquidating distribution and certain other requirements are met or (iii) the Fund is or has been a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of the fourth anniversaryliquidating distribution or the period that theNon-U.S. Holder held the Shares, and theNon-U.S. Holder owns or owned (actually or constructively) more than 5% of the Effective DateShares at any time during the shorter of the two periods mentioned above. Although there can be no assurances in this regard, we believe that the Fund is not, and each six-month anniversary thereafter (eachhas not been during the preceding five years, a United States real property holding corporation.


If gain realized on a liquidating distribution by aNon-U.S. Holder is effectively connected with theNon-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of theNon-U.S. Holder), such date,gain will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a Catch-Up Measurement Date”) so longnet income basis at regular U.S. federal income tax rates in the same manner as if theNon-U.S. Holder were a U.S. Holder. In the Participant remainscase of aNon-U.S. Holder that is a corporation, such gain may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or a lower applicable treaty rate). If aNon-U.S. Holder is an individual that is present in continuous servicethe United States for 183 or more days in the taxable year of the exchange and certain other requirements are met, theNon-U.S. Holder will generally be subject to a flat income tax at a rate of 30% (or a lower applicable treaty rate) on any gain realized on a liquidating distribution, which may be offset by certain U.S. source capital losses.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of a Liquidating Trust

If we transfer assets to a liquidating trust in connection with the Company or anyPlan of its Affiliates on, or has terminated employment withinLiquidation and Dissolution, we intend to structure the prior twelve months by reasonliquidating trust so that it will not be treated as an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes based upon the anticipated activities of the liquidating trust. As a Qualifying Termination priorresult, it is intended that the liquidating trust itself will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Stockholders will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as having received a distribution (at the time of the transfer) of their pro rata share of cash and the fair market value of other property transferred to the applicable Catch-up Measurement Date, ifliquidating trust, reduced by the amount of known liabilities assumed by the Trading Discount Reduction applicableliquidating trust or to which the property transferred is subject, and then having contributed such property to the Incentive Awardliquidating trust. The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution will generally be as measureddescribed above in “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Stockholders.”

As owners of the liquidating trust, stockholders will generally be required to take into account for U.S. federal income tax purposes their pro rata portion of any income, expense, gain or loss recognized by the liquidating trust. The income, expense, gain or loss recognized by the liquidating trust will not affect a stockholder’s basis in the Shares.

As a result of the transfer of property to a liquidating trust and the ongoing activities of the liquidating trust, stockholders should be aware that they may be subject to U.S. federal income tax whether or not they have received any actual liquidating distributions from the liquidating trust or the Fund with which to pay such tax.

We have not obtained any IRS ruling as to the tax status of any liquidating trust, and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with our conclusion that the liquidating trust should be treated as a liquidating trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If, contrary to our expectation, it were determined that the liquidating trust should be classified for U.S. federal income tax purposes as an association taxable as a corporation, income expenses, gains and losses of the liquidating trust would be reflected on each Catch-Up Measurement Dateits own tax return rather than being passed through to stockholders, and the liquidating trust would otherwise resultbe required to pay U.S. federal income taxes at the applicable corporate tax rate. Furthermore, much of the above discussion would no longer be accurate. For instance, all or a portion of any distribution made to the stockholders from the liquidating trust could be treated as a dividend subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates (or, in the case of aNon-U.S. Holder, withholding tax at a rate of 30% (or a lower applicable treaty rate)). Stockholders should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences to them of owning an interest in a Payout Multiplierliquidating trust in light of at least three (3.0) (the “their particular circumstances.

Premium Payout MultiplierInformation Reporting and Backup Withholding forNon-U.S. Holders”), then the Participant shall be entitled

In general, information reporting requirements will apply to a payment in an amount equalliquidating distributions made toNon-U.S. Holders that are not exempt recipients. We must annually report to the excess, if any, ofIRS and to eachNon-U.S. Holder the amount of distributions made on the Prior Portion calculated as ifShares held by the Premium Payout Multiplier had applied to such Prior Portion on each prior Vesting Date, overstockholder and the amount of the Prior Portion calculated as of each prior Vesting Date. Any amounts that become payable pursuant to this Section 3.6(c) in respect of an Incentive Award shall be payable in cash to the Participant or the Participant’s Beneficiary, as applicable, and shall be paid on or within thirty (30) days following (i) the occurrence of a Change in Control or the respective Catch-Up Measurement Date, as applicable, or (ii) if the Participant has made a timely and valid deferral election pursuant to Section 3.4, the date of the Participant’s Separation from Service.

(e)Section 162(m). To the extent required under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan Administrator shall make a certification in writingtax withheld with respect to such distributions, regardless of whether withholding is required. Under the calculationprovisions of an applicable income tax treaty or other agreement, copies of the amount payable under anyinformation returns reporting such distributions and withholding may also be made available to the taxing authorities in the country in which theNon-U.S. Holder resides. In addition, U.S. federal backup withholding may apply to distributions paid to certainNon-U.S. Holders unless the stockholder furnishes to the payer a properly executed IRS FormW-8BEN or other applicable Incentive Awardform certifying the stockholder’s status as anon-U.S. person, or the stockholder otherwise establishes an exemption and the payer does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the stockholder is a U.S. person that is intendednot an exempt recipient.


Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be refunded or credited against a stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability; provided that the required information is timely furnished to qualify as performance-based compensationthe IRS. Certain penalties may be imposed by the IRS on aNon-U.S. Holder that is required to furnish information but does not do so in the proper manner.Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of backup withholding in their particular circumstances and the availability of and procedure for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding under Section 162(m)current Treasury Regulations.

Accounting Treatment

As an investment company registered under the 1940 Act, the Fund would be exempt from applying liquidation accounting and would continue to apply U.S. GAAP. The Fund anticipates remaining registered under the 1940 Act until substantially all of the Code priorFund’s assets (including substantially all of the securities held in our Marketable Debt Securities Portfolio) are reduced to any such paymentcash. Upon deregistration under the 1940 Act, the Fund would change its basis of accounting to the liquidation basis of accounting.

Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their estimated net realizable values, and liabilities are stated at their estimated ultimate settlement amounts. Recorded liabilities will include the estimated expenses associated with carrying out the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. For periodic reporting, we will prepare a statement of net assets in liquidation, which will summarize the assets expected to be received and liabilities expected to be paid as described above, a schedule of investments in liquidation and a statement of changes in net assets in liquidation, which will present the changes during the period in net assets available for distribution to investors and other claimants during the liquidation. Valuations presented in the statement will represent management’s estimates, based on present facts and circumstances, of the net realizable values of assets, satisfaction amounts of liabilities, and expenses associated with carrying out the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution based upon management assumptions.

The valuation of assets and liabilities will necessarily require many estimates and assumptions, and there will be substantial uncertainties in carrying out the provisions of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. Ultimate values realized for our assets and ultimate amounts paid to satisfy our liabilities are expected to differ from estimates recorded in annual or interim financial statements.

Recommendation of Our Board

Our Board has determined that the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders.OUR BOARDUNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFORTHE DISSOLUTION PROPOSAL.


Proposal No. 2: Approval of Adjournment of Special Meeting to Solicit Additional Proxies

General

At the Special Meeting, we may ask our stockholders to vote on the Adjournment Proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting to another date, time or place, if deemed necessary or appropriate in the discretion of the Board, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies to vote in favor of the Dissolution Proposal.

Any adjournment of the Special Meeting may be made without notice, other than by the announcement made at the Special Meeting, if the Adjournment Proposal is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Shares that are represented at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. However, if the adjournment is for more than 30 days from the date set for the original meeting, a new notice of the adjourned meeting will be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the adjourned meeting.

If we adjourn the Special Meeting to a Participant hereunder.

(f)Impactlater date, we will transact the same business and, unless we must fix a new record date, only the stockholders who were eligible to vote at the original meeting will be permitted to vote at the adjourned meeting. Any adjournment of Tax Reform. Notwithstanding anythingthe Special Meeting will allow our stockholders who have already sent in this Plan or any Award Agreementtheir proxies to the contrary, if (i) Federal tax reform is enactedrevoke them at any time prior to their use at the first applicable Vesting Date and (ii) the Participant has vested in any portionSpecial Meeting as adjourned.

Recommendation of the Incentive Award on or prior to the first applicable Vesting Date, then the amount payable with respect to any such portion of the Incentive Award that has so vested on or prior to the first applicable Vesting Date may, in the sole discretion of the Plan Administrator be reduced based on an assessment by the Plan Administrator in good-faith of the impact that such tax reform had on the Trading Discount Reduction that resulted in such portion of the Incentive Award becoming so vested, subject to a maximum reduction of fifty percent (50%) of the Payout Multiplier applicable to such Incentive Award.Our Board

ARTICLE 4

DIRECTOR DEFERRALS

4.1Deferral of Director Fees. Each Participant who is an Independent Director shall irrevocably elect to defer to an amount equal to any whole number percentage of not less than fifty percent (50%) and no more than one hundred percent (100%) of his or her Director Fees by completing and executing a Deferral Agreement and filing it with the Plan Administrator within thirty (30) days after the date the Participant first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan and which shall become effective on the first day following the filing thereof;provided, that the Participant’s Deferral Agreement shall only apply with respect to such Participant’s Director Fees attributable to services not yet performed. The Director Fees paid to such Participant shall be reduced by the amount deferred under this Section 4.1.

4.2Deferral Account.OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A Participant’s Deferral Account shall be credited with an amount equal to the Director Fees deferred by such Participant pursuant to Section 4.1 as of the regularly scheduled date of payment of such Director Fees, which shall be fully vested and subject to measurement prior to payout pursuant to Section 4.3.

4.3Calculation of Payout of Deferral Account.

(a)Generally. The amounts credited to a Participant’s Deferral Account hereunder shall be accumulated in such Deferral Account and subject to the Trading Discount Reduction achieved and payout multiplier as set forth in the Deferral Agreement that apply to the Trading Discount Reduction as determined on the applicable Payment Date (as defined below).VOTE “FOR” THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.

 


Additional Information

Description of Business

The Fund is an independent, publicly traded,non-diversified,closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act. The Fund is organized as a Delaware corporation. The Shares are currently listed on Nasdaq and its ticker symbol is “AABA.” The Fund’s principal executive offices are located at 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017 and its telephone number is646-679-2000.

For a description of our business as historically conducted, our properties and any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or subject, see (i) our Registration Statement on FormN-2, dated June 16, 2017, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement, dated August 28, 2017, Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement, dated February 26, 2018, and Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement, dated July 10, 2018 and (ii) our FormN-CSR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 27, 2019.

Administrator

U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC serves as the Fund’s administrator pursuant to an administration agreement. U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is located at 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.

Market Price of Shares

Our Shares currently trade on Nasdaq under the symbol “AABA.” The following table sets forth, for each of the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing market prices for the Shares on Nasdaq, the net asset value per Share and the premium or discount to net asset value per Share at which the Shares were trading.

 

During Quarter Ended

  

Market Price

per Share

   

Net Asset Value per
Share on Date of
Market Price

High and Low(1)

   

Premium/(Discount)

on Date of Market
Price

High and Low(2)

 
   High   Low   High   Low   High   Low 

March 31, 2019

  

$

76.01

 

  

$

55.53

 

  

$

102.39

 

  

$

71.86

 

  

 

-25.77%

 

  

 

-22.73%

 

December 31, 2018

  

$

67.25

 

  

$

55.65

 

  

$

87.14

 

  

$

72.32

 

  

 

-22.82%

 

  

 

-23.05%

 

September 30, 2018

  

$

77.53

 

  

$

63.80

 

  

$

105.03

 

  

$

85.30

 

  

 

-26.18%

 

  

 

-25.20%

 

June 30, 2018

  

$

82.36

 

  

$

67.55

 

  

$

110.98

 

  

$

92.42

 

  

 

-25.79%

 

  

 

-26.91%

 

March 31, 2018

  

$

80.30

 

  

$

69.15

 

  

$

111.61

 

  

$

96.11

 

  

 

-28.05%

 

  

 

-28.05%

 

December 31, 2017

  

$

72.93

 

  

$

65.40

 

  

$

103.60

 

  

$

93.81

 

  

 

-29.60%

 

  

 

-30.29%

 

September 30, 2017

  

$

67.43

 

  

$

54.45

 

  

$

97.20

 

  

$

79.06

 

  

 

-30.63%

 

  

 

-31.13%

 

June 30, 2017(3)

  

$

55.09

 

  

$

52.58

 

  

$

80.32

 

  

$

76.66

 

  

 

-31.41%

 

  

 

-31.41%

 

Annex C-6

(1)

Based on the Fund’s computations.

(2)

Calculated based on the information presented. Percentages are rounded.

(3)

The Fund commenced investment operations on June 16, 2017. Prior to June 16, 2017, the Shares were listed for trading on Nasdaq under the symbol “YHOO.”



(b)Methodology.Principal Stockholders

As of the applicable PaymentRecord Date, to the amountknowledge of the Deferral Account payableFund, no person beneficially owned more than 5% of the voting securities of any class of securities of the Fund, except as set forth below:

Stockholder Name

and Address*

  Class of Shares   

Share

Holdings

   

Percentage

Owned

 

 

David Filo

380 Hamilton Ave., P.O. Box 1411

Palo Alto, California 94302

 

  

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

  

 

 

 

31,510,285

 

 

  

 

 

 

5.2

 

*

The information contained in this table is based on Mr. Filo’s Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019.

Privacy Principles of the Fund

The Fund is committed to maintaining the privacy of stockholders and to safeguarding theirnon-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information the Fund collects, how the Fund protects that information and why, in certain cases, the Fund may share information with select other parties.

Generally, the Fund does not receive anynon-public personal information relating to its stockholders, although certainnon-public personal information may become available to the ParticipantFund. The Fund does not disclose anynon-public personal information about its stockholders or former stockholders to anyone, except as permitted by law or as is necessary in order to service stockholder accounts (for example, to a transfer agent or third-party administrator).

The Fund restricts access tonon-public personal information about its stockholders to only those employees with a legitimate business need for the Participant’s Beneficiary,information. The Fund maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect thenon-public personal information of its stockholders.

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations

The Fund currently expects to file the Certificate of Dissolution during the third or fourth quarter of 2019. If we file the Certificate of Dissolution in the third or fourth quarter of 2019, we do not currently intend to hold an annual meeting of stockholders in 2019. However, if the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution is materially delayed and we do hold an annual meeting of stockholders in 2019, stockholder proposals intended for inclusion in the Fund’s proxy statement in connection with the Fund’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant toRule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must be received by the Fund’s Secretary at the Fund’s principal executive offices by May 7, 2019.

Stockholders who do not wish to submit a proposal for inclusion in the Fund’s proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2019 annual meeting in accordance withRule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act may submit a proposal for consideration at the Fund’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with the Fund’s bylaws. The Fund’s bylaws require compliance with certain procedures for a stockholder to properly make a nomination for election as applicable,a director or to propose other business for the Fund. If a stockholder who is entitled to do so under the Fund’s bylaws wishes to nominate a person or persons for election as a director or propose other business for the Fund, that stockholder must provide a written notice to the Secretary of the Fund at the Fund’s principal executive offices. Such notice must include certain information about the proponent and the proposal, or in the case of a nomination, the nominee. A copy of the Fund’s bylaws, which include the provisions regarding the requirements for stockholder nominations and proposals, may be obtained by sending a written request to the Fund’s Secretary at 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017. Any stockholder considering making a nomination or other proposal should carefully review and comply with those provisions of the Fund’s bylaws. Notice of any such business must be in writing and received at the Fund’s principal executive office between June 18, 2019 and July 18, 2019.

Householding of Proxy Statement

The rules promulgated by the SEC permit companies, brokers, banks or other intermediaries to deliver a single copy of our proxy materials to households at which two or more stockholders reside (“Householding”). Stockholders sharing an address


who have been previously notified by their broker, bank or other intermediary and have consented to Householding, either affirmatively or implicitly by not objecting to Householding, received only one copy of our proxy materials. A stockholder who wishes to participate in Householding in the future must contact his or her broker, bank or other intermediary directly to make such request. Alternatively, a stockholder who wishes to revoke his or her consent to Householding and receive separate proxy materials for each stockholder sharing the same address must contact his or her broker, bank or other intermediary to revoke such consent. Stockholders may also obtain a separate Proxy Statement or may receive a printed or ane-mail copy of this Proxy Statement without charge by sending a written request to the Fund’s Secretary at 140 East 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10017 or to Georgeson LLC toll free at1-866-219-9786. We will promptly deliver a copy of this Proxy Statement upon request. Householding does not apply to stockholders with Shares registered directly in their name.

Where You Can Find More Information

The Fund files annual, semi-annual and current reports, proxy statements and other documents with the SEC under the Exchange Act. The Fund’s SEC filings made electronically through the SEC’s EDGAR system are available to the public on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov or on the SEC Filings section of the Fund’s website at https://www.altaba.com. You may also read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549-1004. Please call the SEC at(800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room.


Appendix A

Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution of Altaba Inc.

This Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution (this “Plan”) is intended to accomplish the complete liquidation and dissolution of Altaba Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Fund”), in accordance with Sections 280 and 281 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) and Section 331 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

1.Approval of this Plan. The Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) has adopted this Plan in accordance with the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Fund, as amended (the “Charter”), and Section 275 of the DGCL. This Plan shall be equalsubmitted to the product of (x) the amountstockholders of the Deferral AccountFund for approval or disapproval by them in accordance with the resolutions adopted by the Board and shall become effective as of the date that this Plan is approved and adopted by the requisite vote of holders of a majority of the shares of the Fund’s common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.

2.Certificate of Dissolution. Subject to Section 14 hereof, at such Payment Datetime as may be determined by the appropriate officers of the Fund following the approval and (y)adoption of this Plan by the applicable Payout Multiplier determined based onFund’s stockholders, the Trading Discount Reduction measuredFund shall file with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a certificate of dissolution (the “Certificate of Dissolution”) in accordance with Section 275(d) of the DGCL (the time of such filing, or such later effective time as stated therein, the “Effective Time”).

3.Cessation of Business Activities. After the Effective Time, the Fund shall exist solely for purposes of prosecuting and defending suits, whether civil, criminal or administrative, by or against the Fund, and of enabling the Fund gradually to settle and close its business, to dispose of and convey its property, to discharge its liabilities and to distribute to its stockholders any remaining assets, but not for the purpose of continuing the business for which the Fund was organized.

4.Dissolution Process. From and after the Effective Time, the Fund shall proceed to liquidate and wind up its affairs in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 278, 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL. In this respect, the Fund shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL, and in conformity with the requirements of Section 281(a) of the DGCL:

(a)

Shall pay the claims made and not rejected in accordance with Section 280(a) of the DGCL;

(b)

Shall post the security offered and not rejected pursuant to Section 280(b)(2) of the DGCL;

(c)

Shall post any security ordered by the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in any proceeding under Section 280(c) of the DGCL; and

(d)

Shall pay or make provision for all other claims that are mature, known and uncontested or that have been finally determined to be owing by the Fund.

Such claims or obligations shall be paid in full and any such provision for payment shall be made in full, in each case, if there are sufficient assets. If there are insufficient assets, such claims and obligations shall be paid or provided for according to their priority, and, among claims of equal priority, ratably to the extent of assets available therefor. Any remaining assets shall be distributed to the stockholders of the Fund in accordance with the terms of the Charter; provided, however, that no such distribution shall be made before the expiration ofone-hundred and fifty (150) days from the date of the last notice of rejection given pursuant to Section 280(a)(3) of the DGCL. The Fund may make multiple distributions, which shall be in cash and/or assets, in such amounts, and at such time or times, as the Board (or any trustee(s) or agent(s) as may be appointed by the Board under this Plan) may determine, subject in each case to compliance with Sections 280 and 281(a) of the DGCL. For the avoidance of doubt, the Fund shall make adequate provision in satisfaction of the Fund’s obligations with respect to the User Securities Liabilities (as defined in that certain Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of such Payment Date. The measurementJuly 23, 2016, as amended as of February 20, 2017 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), by and between the Fund (f/k/a Yahoo! Inc.) and Verizon Communications, Inc.) pursuant to the Reorganization Agreement (as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement) in accordance with and pursuant to Section 4.21(b) of the Trading Discount Reduction pursuantStock Purchase Agreement. In the absence of actual fraud, the judgment of the Board, or any trustee(s) or agent(s) as may be appointed by the Board under this Plan, as the case may be, as to the provision made for the payment of all obligations under paragraph (d) of this Section 4.3(b)4 shall be applied on an objective basis and consistently by the Plan Administrator from time to time; provided, that notwithstandingconclusive.


Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the Board (or any trustee(s) or agent(s) as may be appointed by the Board under this Plan) may opt to dissolve the Fund in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 281(b) of the DGCL.

5.Liquidating Trust. If deemed necessary, appropriate or desirable by the Board, in its sole and absolute discretion, in furtherance of the liquidation and distribution of the Fund’s assets to the stockholders, as a final liquidating distribution or from time to time, the Fund may transfer to one or more liquidating trustees, for the benefit of the stockholders, under one or more liquidating trusts, all, or a portion, of the assets and liabilities of the Fund. If assets are transferred to a liquidating trust, each stockholder shall receive an interest (each, an “Interest”) in such liquidating trust pro rata based on its proportionate entitlement to any liquidating distribution(s) under the Charter on that date. All distributions from such liquidating trust will be made pro rata in accordance with the Interests. The Interests shall not be transferable except by operation of law or upon death of the recipient. The Board is hereby authorized to appoint one or more individuals, corporations, partnerships or other persons, or any combination thereof, including, without limitation, any one or more officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives of the Fund, to act as the trustee(s) of such liquidating trust for the benefit of the stockholders and to receive any assets of the Fund. Any such conveyance to the trustee(s) shall be in trust for the stockholders of the Fund. The Fund, as authorized by the Board, in its sole and absolute discretion, may enter into a liquidating trust agreement(s) with the trustee(s), on such terms and conditions as the Board may deem necessary, appropriate or desirable. Adoption of this Plan Administrator reservesby the stockholders of the Fund shall constitute the approval of the stockholders of any such appointment and any such liquidating trust agreement as their act and as a part hereof as if herein written.

6.Closing of Stock Transfer Books; Cancellation of Stock. At the Effective Time, the Fund shall close its stock transfer books and discontinue recording transfers of shares of capital stock of the Fund and thereafter certificates representing shares of capital stock of the Fund will not be assignable or transferable on the books of the Fund except by operation of law or upon death of the recipient. From and after the Effective Time, and subject to applicable law, each stockholder of the Fund shall cease to have any rights in respect thereof, except the right to modify such methodology. For the avoidance of doubt,receive distributions, if any, in no event shall a Participant’s Deferral Account be subjectaccordance with Section 4 hereof. With respect to any catch-up payment.

4.4Payment of Deferral Account. Paymentcapital stock of the Participant’s Deferral Account, as adjusted pursuant to Section 4.3, shall be madeFund represented by certificates, the Fund may, but need not, require the surrender of the certificates representing the capital stock of the Fund (or evidence satisfactory to the Participant or the Participant’s Beneficiary, as applicable, in a single lump sum upon the earlier to occurFund of the following: (i)loss, theft or destruction of such certificates, together with such surety bond or other security or indemnity as may be required by and satisfactory to the Participant’s Separation from ServiceFund) as a condition to payment of any liquidating distribution to stockholders. The Fund shall request that, following the Effective Time, The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), as a holder of capital stock through its Cede & Co. nominee, maintain records representing the right to receive distributions, if any, in accordance with Section 4 hereof, including any transfers of such rights.

7.Absence of Appraisal Rights. The Fund’s stockholders shall not be entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law for any reason or (ii) a Change in Control (each, a “Payment Date”).

ARTICLE 5

ADMINISTRATION

5.1Plan Administrator Authority.

(a) The Plan Administrator shall administer the Plan and shall have the power to take all action necessary or appropriatetheir shares of capital stock in connection with the general administrationtransactions contemplated by this Plan.

8.Abandoned Property. If any distribution to a stockholder cannot be made, whether because the stockholder cannot be located, has not surrendered certificates evidencing the capital stock (as and to the extent required hereunder) or for any other reason, the distribution to which such stockholder is entitled shall be transferred, at such time as the final liquidating distribution is made by the Fund, to the official of such state or other jurisdiction authorized by applicable law to receive the proceeds of such distribution. The proceeds of such distribution shall thereafter be held solely for the benefit of and for ultimate distribution to such stockholder as the sole equitable owner thereof and shall be treated as abandoned property and escheat to the applicable state or other jurisdiction in accordance with applicable law. In no event shall the proceeds of any such distribution revert to or become the property of the Fund.

9.Stockholder Consent to Sale of Assets. Approval and adoption of this Plan by the stockholders of the Fund shall constitute the approval of the stockholders of the sale, exchange or other disposition of any and all of the property and assets of the Fund, whether such sale, exchange or other disposition occurs in one transaction or a series of transactions, and shall constitute approval, adoption and ratification of any contracts for sale, exchange or other disposition entered into in contemplation of approval and adoption of this Plan. The Fund shall not be required to obtain appraisals, fairness opinions or other third-party opinions as to the value of its properties and assets in connection with the implementation of this Plan.

10.Expenses of Dissolution. The Board and officers of the Fund shall take all action required to be taken by the Fund, including, without limitation, authorizing and directing the payment of or making provision for the payment of all expenses,


liabilities and obligations of the Fund incurred in connection with the dissolution, liquidation and winding up of the Fund as provided for herein. Without limiting the generalityforegoing, in connection with and for the purposes of implementing and assuring completion of this Plan, the Fund may, in the sole and absolute discretion of the foregoing,Board (or any trustee(s) or agent(s) as may be appointed by the Plan Administrator may (i) interpret or construe the Plan, (ii) determineBoard under this Plan), retain brokers, lawyers, accountants and other advisors and pay any facts or resolve any questions relevantinvestment advisory, brokerage, agency, professional and other fees and expenses of persons rendering services to the Plan’s administration, (iii) prescribe, amendFund in connection with the collection, management, sale, exchange or other disposition of the Fund’s property and rescind administrative rulesassets and regulations under the Plan, (iv) resolve any dispute which may arise underimplementation of this Plan.

11.Authority of Officers and Directors.

(a) After the Plan involving Participants or BeneficiariesEffective Time, the Board and (v) make all other administrative determinations necessary or advisablethe officers of the Fund shall continue in their respective positions for the administrationpurpose of winding up the affairs of the Plan, in all cases subject to all ofFund as contemplated by the provisions of the Plan, including without limitation Article 6 hereof.

(b)DGCL. The Plan AdministratorBoard may delegate any of its duties hereunder to such person or persons from time to time as it may designate.

(c) The Plan Administrator is empowered, on behalf of the Plan, to engage accountants, legal counselappoint officers, hire employees and such other personnelretain independent contractors as it deems necessary or advisabledesirable to assist itsupervise or facilitate the dissolution, and is authorized to pay to the Fund’s officers, directors, employees and independent contractors, or any of them, compensation or additional compensation (including retention and severance payments) above their regular compensation, in the performancemoney or other property, and may provide for indemnification (including advancement of its duties under the Plan. The functions of anyexpenses) to such persons, engaged by the Plan Administrator shall be limited to the specified services and duties for which they are engaged, and such persons shall have no other duties, obligations or responsibilities under the Plan. Such persons shall exercise no discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting the managementin recognition of the Plan. All reasonable expenses thereof shall be borne by the Company.

5.2Indemnification of Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee of the Board, the Boardextraordinary efforts they, or any other person who may actof them, will be required to fulfill the responsibilities of the Plan Administrator shall be indemnified by the Company against any and all liabilities arising by reason of any act,undertake, or failure to act, pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, including expenses reasonably incurredactually undertake, in the defense of any claim relating to the Plan.

ARTICLE 6

AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF PLAN

The Plan may be amended, suspended, discontinued or terminated at any time, in whole or in part, by the Plan Administrator; provided, that no such action shall reduce or in any manner adversely affect the rights of any Participant with respect to payments under any Incentive Award issued under the Plan prior to the date of such action, as determined by the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion. Notice of any amendment, suspension, discontinuation or termination of the Plan shall be given in writing to each Participant.


Annex C-7


ARTICLE 7

DETERMINATION OF BENEFITS

7.1Benefit Claims. If a Participant believes that he or she is being denied a benefit to which he or she is entitled under the Plan (hereinafter referred to as a “Claimant”), he or she, or his or her representative, may file a written request for such benefitconnection with the Company, setting forth his or her claim. The request must be addressed tosuccessful implementation of this Plan. To the Secretary of the Company (the “Secretary”) at its then principal place of business.

7.2Claim Review Process. Upon receipt of a claim, the Plan Administrator shall advise the Claimant that a reply will be forthcoming within ninety (90) days and shall, in fact, deliver such reply within such period. The Plan Administrator may, however, extend the reply period for an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause, provided that notice of the extended reply period is provided to Claimant prior to the expiration of the initial ninety (90) day period with a description of the special circumstances requiring the extended time for review and the expected date of the completion of such review.

If the Claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall adopt a written opinion, using language calculated to be understoodfullest extent permitted by the Claimant, setting forth:

(a) The specific reason or reasons for such denial;

(b) The specific reference to pertinent provisionslaw, adoption of this Plan on which such denial is based;

(c) A description of any additional material or information necessary forby the Claimant to perfect his or her claim and an explanation why such material or such information is necessary;

(d) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to submit the claim for review;

(e) The time limits for requesting a review under Section 7.3 and for review under Section 7.4 hereof; and

(f) A statementstockholders of the Claimant’s right to bring a civil suit under Section 502(a) of ERISA.

7.3Benefit Denial Review. Within sixty (60) days after the receipt by the Claimant of the written opinion described above, the Claimant may request in writing that the Secretary review the Plan Administrator’s determination. Such request must be addressed to the Secretary, at the Company’s then principal place of business. The Claimant or his or her duly authorized representative may, but need not, review the pertinent documents and submit issues and comments in writing, documents, records and other information for consideration by the Secretary. If the Claimant does not request a review of the Plan Administrator’s determination by the Secretary within such sixty (60) day period, he or sheFund shall be barred and estopped from challenging the Plan Administrator’s determination. Claimant shall be provided, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefits under this Plan.

7.4Process of Review. Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Plan Administrator’s determination. After considering all materials presented, whether or not included or reviewed in the initial claim determination, by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision, containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Plan on which the decision is based, containing a statement that Claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and free of change, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefits under this Plan and containing a statement of Claimant’s right to bring an action under Section 502(a) of ERISA, if applicable. If special circumstances require that sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant prior to the expiration of such sixty ( 60) day time period and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.


Annex C-8


ARTICLE 8

MISCELLANEOUS

8.1Unfunded/Unsecured Plan. The Company shall be obligated to make all payments under the Plan. The obligations of the Company under the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as providing for assets to be held in trust or escrow or any other form of segregation of the assets of the Company for the benefit of any Participant or any other person or persons to whom benefits are to be paid pursuant to the terms of the Plan,provided, that the Plan Administrator may, at any time and in its discretion, adopt a grantor trust or escrow for the purpose of providing a source of funds to pay Plan benefits. The interest of any Participant or any other person hereunder shall be limited to the right to receive the benefits as set forth herein. To the extent that a Participant or any other person acquires a right to receive benefits under the Plan, such rights shall be no greater than the rights of an unsecured general creditor of the Company.

8.2No Right to Employment or Service. Neither the action of the Company in establishing the Plan, nor any action taken by the Company, the Board or any individual or member of a committee duly appointed as Plan Administrator under the provisions hereof, nor any provision of the Plan shall give a Participant any right to be retained as an Employee or Director.

8.3No Assignment. Except as provided herein, the right of the Participant or any other person to the payment of deferred compensation or other benefits under this Plan shall not be assigned, transferred, pledged or encumbered, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

8.4Withholding of Taxes. The Company or any of its Affiliates shall deduct from the amount of any payment made pursuant to this Plan or from any other amounts payable by the Company or any of its Affiliates to or with respect to a Participant any income, employment or other taxes required to be paid or withheld by the federal government or any state or local government by virtue of participation in the Plan. In no event shall the Company or its Affiliates be liable for any of a Participant’s income tax obligations.

8.5Adjustments. In the event of a reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend or stock split, or combination or other change in the Common Stock, the Plan Administrator shall, in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of rights in respect of an Incentive Award granted to a Participant or a Participant’s Deferral Account, make such adjustments as the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion may determine.

8.6Waivers. Any waiver of any right granted pursuant to the Plan shall not be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the party waiving such right. Any such waiver shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other rights.

8.7Severability. In the event any one or more provisions of this Plan are held to be invalid or unenforceable, such illegality or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect unaffected by such invalidity or unenforceability.

8.8Captions and Gender. The captions preceding the Sections and subsections of the Plan have been inserted solely as a matter of convenience and in no way define or limit the scope or intent of any provisions of the Plan. Where the context requires, words used in the masculine gender shall be construed to include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.

8.9Choice of Law. The Plan and all rights under this Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its principles of conflicts of law, except to the extent preempted by ERISA.

8.10Section 409A.

(a) The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, and shall in all respects be interpreted and administered in accordance with Section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive guidance issued thereunder (“Section 409A”). Neither the Company nor the Plan Administrator shall be obligated to perform any obligation hereunder in any case where, in the opinion of the Company’s counsel, such performance would result in


Annex C-9


the violation of any law or regulation or failure to comply with Section 409A. Should it be determined that any provision or feature of the Plan is not in compliance with Section 409A, that provision or feature shall be null and void to the extent required to avoid the noncompliance with Section 409A; provided, that in no event shall the Company be liable for all or any portion of any taxes, penalties, interest or other expenses that may be incurred by the Participant on account of noncompliance with Section 409A.

(b) Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, (i) if at the time of a Participant’s termination of employment with the Company or its Affiliates the Participant is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code, and the deferral of the commencement of any payments or benefits otherwise payable hereunder as a result of such termination of employment is necessary in order to prevent any accelerated or additional tax under Section 409A of the Code, then the commencementconstitute approval of the payment of any such paymentscompensation.

(b) The adoption of this Plan by the stockholders of the Fund shall constitute full and complete authority for the Board and the officers of the Fund, without further stockholder action, to do and perform any and all acts and to make, execute and deliver any and all agreements, conveyances, assignments, transfers, certificates and other documents of any kind and character that the Board or benefits hereunder shall be deferred (without any reductionsuch officers deem necessary, appropriate or advisable: (i) to dissolve the Fund in accordance with the DGCL and cause its withdrawal from all jurisdictions in which it is authorized to do business; (ii) to sell, dispose, convey, transfer and deliver the assets of the Fund; (iii) to satisfy or provide for the satisfaction of the Fund’s obligations in accordance with Sections 280 and 281 of the DGCL and the Code; (iv) to dispute, defend, adjudicate or settle claims and to resolve and clarify liabilities with respect to such payments or benefits ultimately paid or providedclaims; and (v) to distribute all of the remaining funds of the Fund to the Participant) untilstockholders of the first business dayFund, in each case, to occur following the date that is six (6) months following the Participant’s “separation from service” (within the meaningfullest extent permitted by law.

12.Indemnification. The Fund shall continue to indemnify and provide for advancement of expenses to its officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives in accordance with its Charter, its bylaws, any contractual arrangements and applicable law, for acts or omissions of such term under Section 409Apersons in connection with the implementation of this Plan and the winding up of the Code) with the Company (or the earliest date as is permitted under Section 409Aaffairs of the Code).Fund. The Fund’s obligation to indemnify (or advance expenses to) such persons may also be satisfied out of insurance proceeds or the assets of any trust created pursuant to this Plan. The Board or any trustee(s) or agent(s) as may be appointed by the Board under this Plan, as applicable, is authorized to obtain and maintain insurance as may be necessary, appropriate or desirable to cover the Fund’s obligations under this Plan including its existing directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy or any replacement policy.

(c) Notwithstanding anything in13.Modification or Abandonment of this Plan. In its sole and absolute discretion, the Board may amend or modify this Plan at any time, notwithstanding stockholder approval of this Plan, and the Board need not submit any such amendment or modification to the contrary, a termination of employment shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of any provisionstockholders of the Fund for approval. In its sole and absolute discretion, the Board may abandon this Plan providing forand all actions contemplated hereby without further action by the paymentstockholders to the extent permitted by the DGCL. Upon the abandonment of amounts or benefits upon or following a termination of employment unless such termination is also a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and, for purposes of any such provision of thethis Plan, references to a “resignation,” “termination,” “termination of employment” or like terms shall mean separation from service.

(d) For purposes of Section 409A of the Code, each payment made under thethis Plan shall be designated as a “separate payment” within the meaningvoid and of the Section 409A of the Code.

[Signature page follows]no further force and effect.

 


14.Concentration of Investments. In connection with the liquidation and distribution of the Fund’s assets to stockholders, the Fund’s disposition of its ordinary shares and American Depositary Shares of Alibaba Group Holding Limited may cause the Fund to no longer invest 25 percent or more of its total assets in securities issued by companies in the online services ande-commerce industry. After the Fund’s investments in securities of companies in the online services ande-commerce industry drops below 25 percent of the Fund’s total assets, the Fund will no longer maintain a policy to concentrate its investment in such securities.

ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF ALTABA INC.

ON APRIL 2, 2019


LOGO

 

Annex C-10


I hereby certify that the foregoing Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Altaba Inc. on August 9, 2017.

I hereby certify that the foregoing Plan was approved by the shareholders of Altaba Inc. on                    , 2017. Executed on this                     day of                     , 2017.

Corporate Secretary


Appendix A

For illustrative purposes, Revised Adjusted NAV Per Share shall be calculated under the Plan as follows:

Base Adjusted NAV

Less

Dollar amount of actual share repurchases by the Company

Less

Dollar amount of actual dividends paid by the Company

Plus

For that portion of the Alibaba Shares and Yahoo Japan Shares held by the Company as of the measurement date, the increase (or decrease) in value from the value utilized in calculating the Base Adjusted NAV, with the values as of the measurement date being determined on a 30 day average trading basis for the respective securities

Plus

For that portion of the Alibaba Shares and Yahoo Japan Shares sold prior to the measurement date, the increase (or decrease) in value as of the date of disposition from the value utilized in calculating the Base Adjusted NAV

Less

The increase in the net liability of the Altaba Convertible Bond (net of the value of the call spread) (i.e., the change in value of [the Convertible Bond less the Call Options plus the Warrants Written]) from the value utilized in calculating the Base Adjusted NAV to the value as of the measurement date; for measurement dates prior to the final settlement of the Convertible Bond and the call spread, an estimate of the fair market value of the combined position will be utilized; for measurement dates after the final settlement, the final settlement values will be utilized

Equals

Revised Adjusted NAV

Divided by

A hypothetical number of shares outstanding* which equals:

Shares utilized in calculation of Base Adjusted NAV per share

Less    Number of shares hypothetically repurchased if the dollar amount of actual repurchases was utilized to buy back shares at a price equal to Base Adjusted NAV per share

Equals

Revised Adjusted NAV per share

*

In addition to the delineated adjustment which follows, appropriate additional adjustments may be necessary for transactions which affect the then outstanding number of Company shares (e.g., stock split, spin-off, split-off or similar transactions).


Annex C-Appendix A


LOGO

0 2 C V Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X 02NZWG 1 U PX031GUK + Annual Meeting Proxy Card . IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A, B, C, AND D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION + A 01—Tor R. Braham 04—Richard L. Kauffman 02—Eric K. Brandt 05—Thomas J. McInerney 03—Catherine J. Friedman 1. Election2. To grant discretionary authority to the Board of Directorsthe Fund to adjourn the special meeting, even if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes at the time of the five director nominees listed belowspecial meeting to serve until their respective successors shall have been electedapprove the liquidation and qualified.dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution. For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Against Abstain The Fund’s Board of Directors recommends aPlease sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote “FOR” each of the nominees listed belowto be counted. — Date and FOR Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5. B For Against Abstain 2. To approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Fund and BlackRock Advisors LLC. 4. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. For Against Abstain 3. To approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Fund and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. 5. To approve a long-term deferred compensation incentive plan for the Fund’s management and Directors. The Fund’s Board of Directors recommends a vote “AGAINST” Proposals 6 and 7. For Against Abstain 6. To vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding stockholder action by written consent. For Against Abstain 7. To vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding the Yahoo Human Rights Fund.Sign Below: qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours2019 Special Meeting Proxy Card For Against Abstain A Proposals — Altaba Inc.’s (“Altaba” or the “Fund”) Board of Directors (the “Board”) recommends a day, 7 daysvote “FOR” each of Proposals 1 and 2: 1. To consider and vote upon a week! Insteadproposal to approve the voluntary liquidation and dissolution of the Fund pursuant to the Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution attached to the proxy statement as Appendix A (such plan, the “Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution”). 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ 1234 5678 9012 345 MMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 4 2 1 2 1 3 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND C 1234567890 J N T C123456789 MMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMM 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext If no electronic voting, delete QR code and control # Ä You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one ofthis card. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/AABA or scan the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. ProxiesQR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/AABA Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Votes submitted by the Internet or telephoneelectronically must be received by 2:00 A.M.a.m., Eastern Time,time, on October 24, 2017. VoteJune 27, 2019. Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!


LOGO

Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by Internet Goconsenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/AABA Or scan the QR code with your smartphone Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone Call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message


LOGO

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ALTABA INC. FOR THE ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held on October 24, 2017June 27, 2019 The undersigned stockholder of Altaba Inc. (the “Fund”), a Delaware corporation, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated September 11, 2017,May 17, 2019, and hereby appoints Thomas J. McInerney and Arthur Chong, and each or either of them, as proxies, with full power of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned to represent the undersigned at the 2017 annuala special meeting of stockholders of the Fund (the “Special Meeting”) to be held on Tuesday, October 24, 2017,June 27, 2019, at 8:0011:30 a.m. (Eastern time), local time, at The Yale Club, located at 50 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote all shares of common stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present, as indicated on the reverse side. YOUR SHARES WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR INSTRUCTIONS. ANY STOCKHOLDER COMPLETING THIS PROXY THAT FAILS TO MARK ONE OF THE BOXES FOR ANY PROPOSAL WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE GIVEN THE PROXY HOLDERS COMPLETE DISCRETION IN VOTING HIS, HER, OR ITS SHARES AT THE SPECIAL MEETING ON SUCH PROPOSAL. IN THAT CASE, THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED, AS APPLICABLE, “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTEDPROPOSALS 1 AND 2. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) Altaba Inc. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4 AND 5 AND “AGAINST” PROPOSALS 6 AND 7. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDETHE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q CNon-Voting Items: Items + + Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the annual meeting.Special Meeting. Change of Address — Please print new address below. D Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below: Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. All holders must sign. When signing in a fiduciary capacity, please indicate full title as such. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized person. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A, B, C, AND D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. RECEIVE FUTURE ALTABA INC. PROXY MATERIALS VIA THE INTERNET! Receive future Altaba Inc. annual reports and proxy materials in electronic form rather than in printed form. Next year when the annual report and proxy materials are available, we will send you an email with instructions which will enable you to review the materials online. To consent to electronic delivery, visitwww-us.computershare.com/Investor, or while voting via the Internet, just click the box to give your consent. + + qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q